Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2023-10
Integrating Critical Thinking Into Instruction,Assignments,and Discussions Improves Students’ Critical Analysis and Evaluation Skills in an Online Course
Critical thinking is an important student learning outcome in all psychology courses and included in the American Psychological Association’s (APA’s) goals for the undergraduate major.
Objective
The purpose of this study was to test the effectiveness of integrating a general model of critical thinking into the instruction, assignments, and discussions in an online course on students’ development of critical analysis and evaluation skills.
Method
Two raters scored 34 students’ written responses on a critical thinking test administered at the beginning and end of the semester that had students analyze psychological studies as reported in media reports and evaluate position statements on a controversial issue. During the term, students completed assignments on identifying the parts of a scientific study and discussions on identifying weaknesses in thinking.
Results
Students showed large gains in critical analysis and critical evaluation scores from pretest to posttest. Specific comparisons revealed that students significantly improved their abilities to identify the theoretical point of view of a study, relevant psychological concepts, assumptions, and implications.
Conclusion
Integrating critical thinking in a direct way into a course can lead to substantial improvements in critical thinking over the span of a single semester.
Teaching Implications
The conceptualization of critical thinking used is broadly applicable to any psychology course at any level of education.
AdamA.MansonT. M. (2014). Using a pseudoscience activity to teach critical thinking. Teaching of Psychology, 41(2), 130-134. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628314530343.
American Psychological Association (2016). Guidelines for the undergraduate psychology major: Version 2.0. American Psychologist, 71(2), 102-111. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037562.
4.
AndersonL. W.KrathwohlD. R.BloomB. S. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. Longman.
5.
CampbellC. G.OswaldB. R. (2018). Promoting critical thinking through service learning: A home-visiting case study. Teaching of Psychology, 45(2), 193-199. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628318762933.
6.
CargasS.WilliamsS.RosenbergM. (2017). An approach to teaching critical thinking across disciplines using performance tasks with a common rubric. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 26, 24-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2017.05.005.
7.
CascioT. V. (2017). Using critical thinking drills to teach and assess proficiency in methodological and statistical thinking. Teaching of Psychology, 44(3), 250-254. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628317712753.
8.
ChiM. T. H. (1997). Quantifying qualitative analyses of verbal data: A practical guide. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 6(3), 271-315. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls0603_1.
9.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Routledge Academic.
DwyerC. P.HoganM. J.StewartI. (2015). The effects of argument mapping-infused critical thinking instruction on reflective judgement performance. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 16, 11-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2014.12.002.
12.
FungD. (2017). The pedagogical impacts on students’ development of critical thinking dispositions: Experience from Hong Kong secondary schools. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 26, 128-139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2017.10.005.
13.
HamaouiK. (2021 July 22). Integrating critical thinking appendices. Retrieved fromosf.io/rnxeg.
14.
KingA. (1995). Inquiring minds really do want to know: Using questioning to teach critical thinking. Teaching of Psychology, 22(1), 13-17. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328023top2201_5.
15.
KuK. Y. L.HoI. T.HauK.-T.LaiE. C. M. (2014). Integrating direct and inquiry-based instruction in the teaching of critical thinking: An intervention study. Instructional Science, 42(2), 251-269. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-013-9279-0.
16.
Lanagan-LeitzelL. K.DillerJ. W. (2018). Teaching psychological critical thinking using popular media. Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology, 4(2), 120-125. https://doi.org/10.1037/stl0000112.
17.
LawsonT. J.Jordan-FlemingM. K.BodleJ. H. (2015). Measuring psychological critical thinking: An update. Teaching of Psychology, 42(3), 248-253. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628315587624.
18.
MuellerJ. F.TaylorH. K.BrakkeK.DrysdaleM.KellyK.LevineG. M.Ronquillo-AdachiJ. (2020). Assessment of scientific inquiry and critical thinking: Measuring APA goal 2 student learning outcomes. Teaching of Psychology, 47(4), 274-284. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628320945114.
19.
NguyenL. T.IkedaM. (2015). The effects of ePortfolio-based learning model on student self-regulated learning. Active Learning in Higher Education, 16(3), 197-209. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787415589532.
20.
PaulR. W. (1990). Critical and reflective thinking: A philosophical perspective. In JonesB. F.IdolL. (Eds.), Dimensions of thinking and cognitive instruction (pp. 445-494). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
21.
PaulR. W.ElderL. (2000). Critical thinking: Basic theory and instructional structures handbook. Foundation for Critical Thinking.
22.
PaulR. W.ElderL. (2016). The miniature guide to critical thinking concepts & tools (7th ed.). Foundation for Critical Thinking.
RichmondA. S.FleckB.HeathT.BroussardK. A.SkardaB. (2015). Can inquiry-based instruction promote higher-level learning?Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology, 1(3), 208-218. https://doi.org/10.1037/stl0000032.
25.
SemerciN. (2006). The effect of problem-based learning on the critical thinking of students in the intellectual and ethical development unit. Social Behavior and Personality, 34(9), 1127-1136. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2006.34.9.1127.
26.
StevensC.WitkowM. R.SmeltB. (2016). Strengthening scientific reasoning skills in introductory psychology: Evidence from community college and liberal arts classrooms. Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology, 2(4), 245-260. https://doi.org/10.1037/stl0000070.
27.
StolkJ.HarariJ. (2014). Student motivations as predictors of high-level cognitions in project-based classrooms. Active Learning in Higher Education, 15(3), 231-247. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787414554873.
28.
ThompsonB. (2007). Effect sizes, confidence intervals, and confidence intervals for effect sizes. Psychology in the Schools, 44, 423-432. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20234.
29.
WentworthD. K.WhitmarshL. (2017). Thinking like a psychologist introductory psychology writing assignments: Encouraging critical thinking and resisting plagiarism. Teaching of Psychology, 44(4), 335-341. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628317727909.
30.
WespR.MontgomeryK. (1998). Developing critical thinking through the study of paranormal phenomena. Teaching of Psychology, 25(4), 275-278. https://doi.org/10.1080/00986289809709714.
