Multiple studies have demonstrated the efficacy of various psychological critical thinking interventions. The current study tests a novel technique for improving introductory psychology students’ ability to identify and evaluate methodological concepts in real-life media by prompting them to analyze secondary source news and blog articles. Participants randomly assigned to the experimental group completed three separate methodological thinking drills (MTDs), whereas control participants completed two reflection activities followed by a single MTD. Evidence for the effectiveness of the MTD intervention was found with respect to the within-group comparisons in the experimental condition and also the between-group comparison, indicating linear improvements in scores over time and across groups. These results suggest that methodological thinking can be taught and assessed simultaneously using a single, internally valid procedure.
ArumR.RoksaJ. (2011). Academically adrift. Limited learning in college classrooms. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
6.
BensleyD. A.CroweD. S.BernhardtP.BucknerC.AllmanA. L. (2010). Teaching and assessing critical thinking skills for argument analysis in psychology. Teaching of Psychology, 37, 91–96. doi:10.1080/00986281003626656
7.
BensleyD. A.MurtaghM. P. (2011). Guidelines for a scientific approach to critical thinking assessment. Teaching of Psychology, 39, 5–16. doi:10.1177/0098628311430642
8.
BlessingS. B.BlessingJ. S. (2010). PsychBusters: A means of fostering critical thinking in the introductory course. Teaching of Psychology, 37, 178–182. doi:10.1080/00986283.2010.488540
9.
BonkC. J.SmithG. S. (1998). Alternative instructional strategies for creative and critical thinking in the accounting curriculum. Journal of Accounting Education, 16, 261–293. doi:10.1016/s0748-5751(98)00012-8
10.
CascioT. V. (2017). Using critical thinking drills to teach and assess proficiency in methodological and statistical thinking. Teaching of Psychology, 44, 250–254. doi:10.1177/0098628317712753
11.
HalonenJ. S. (1995). Demystifying critical thinking. Teaching of Psychology, 22, 75–81. doi:10.1207/s15328023top2201_23
HalpernD. F. (1998). Teaching critical thinking for transfer across domains: Disposition, skills, structure training, and metacognitive monitoring. American Psychologist, 53, 449–455. doi:10.1037/0003-066x.53.4.449
14.
HuberC. R.KuncelN. R. (2016). Does college teach critical thinking? A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 86, 431–468. doi:10.3102/0034654315605917
15.
KennedyM.FisherM. B.EnnisR. H. (1991). Critical thinking: Literature review and needed research. In IdolL.JonesB. F., (Eds.), Educational values and cognitive instruction: Implications for reform (pp. 11-40). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum & Associates.
16.
KuK. Y. L. (2009). Assessing students’ critical thinking performance: Urging for measurements using multi-response format. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 2, 70–76. doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2009.02.001
17.
LawsonT. J. (1999). Assessing psychological critical thinking as a learning outcome for psychology majors. Teaching of Psychology, 26, 207–209. doi:10.1207/S15328023TOP260311
18.
LawsonT. J.Jordan-FlemingM. K.BodleJ. H. (2015). Measuring psychological critical thinking: An update. Teaching of Psychology, 42, 248–253. doi:10.1177/0098628315587624
19.
LehmanD. R.NisbettR. E. (1990). A longitudinal study of the effects of undergraduate training on reasoning. Developmental Psychology, 26, 952–960.
20.
McLeanC. P.MillerN. A. (2010). Changes in critical thinking skills following a course on science and pseudoscience: A quasi-experimental study. Teaching of Psychology, 37, 85–90. doi:10.1080/00986281003626714
21.
MossP. A.KoziolS. M. (1991). Investigating the validity of a locally developed critical thinking test. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 10, 17–22. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3992.1991.tb00199.x
22.
PaulR.NosichR. (1993). A model for the national assessment of higher order thinking. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 353 296)
23.
PenningrothS. L.DespainL. H.GrayM. J. (2007). A course designed to improve psychological critical thinking. Teaching of Psychology, 34, 153–157. doi:10.1080/00986280701498509
24.
PerkinsD. N.AllenR.HafnerJ. (1983). Difficulties in everyday reasoning. In MaxwellW. (Ed.), Thinking: The frontier expands (pp. 177–189). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum & Associates.
25.
SadlerP.GoodE. (2006). The impact of self- and peer-grading on student learning. Educational Assessment, 11, 1–31. doi:10.1207/s15326977ea1101_1
SolonT. (2007). Generic critical thinking infusion and course content learning in introductory psychology. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 34, 95–109.
28.
StarkE. (2012). Enhancing and assessing critical thinking in a psychological research methods course. Teaching of Psychology, 39, 107–112. doi:10.1177/0098628312437725
29.
Van GelderT. V. (2005). Teaching critical thinking: Some lessons from cognitive science. College Teaching, 53, 41–48. doi:10.3200/ctch.53.1.41-48
30.
WespR.MontgomeryK. (1998). Developing critical thinking through the study of paranormal phenomenon. Teaching of Psychology, 25, 275–278. doi:10.1080/00986289809709714
31.
WilliamsR. L.OliverR.AllinJ. L.WinnB.BooherC. S. (2003). Psychological critical thinking as a course predictor and outcome variable. Teaching of Psychology, 30, 220–223. doi:10.1207/S15328023TOP3003_04
