The Teacher Behavior Checklist: The Mediation Role of Teacher Behaviors in the Relationship Between the Students’ Importance of Teacher Behaviors and Students’ Effort

Abstract

Background:

Previous research suggests a relationship between teacher behaviors and students’ effort. However, it is not clear what role the students’ expectations (i.e., importance of teacher behaviors) play in this relationship.

Objective:

Utilizing the teacher behavior checklist, this study sought to investigate whether teacher behaviors mediate the relationship between the importance students set on teacher behaviors and students’ effort. Further, the study explored which specific behaviors influence students’ effort.

Method:

Cross-sectional survey data were analyzed (N = 159) using mediation analysis and stepwise multiple linear regression.

Results:

There was evidence that teacher behaviors mediate the relationship between the importance students set on teacher behaviors and students’ effort. Four of the 28 teacher behaviors had a significant relationship to students’ effort: creative and interesting, enthusiastic about teaching, happy/positive/humorous, and promotes critical thinking.

Conclusion:

Knowing students’ expectations (i.e., the importance of teacher behaviors) is essential to increasing students’ effort.

Teaching Implications:

Happy/positive/humorous had a negative relationship with students’ effort, while creative and interesting, enthusiastic about teaching, and promotes critical thinking showed a positive relationship with students’ effort.

Keywords

teacher behavior checklist excellent teaching student effort

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adediwura

A. A.

Tayo

(2007). Perception of teachers’ knowledge, attitude and teaching skills as predictor of academic performance in Nigerian secondary schools. Educational Research and Review, 2(7), 165–171.

Astin

A. W.

(1993). What matters in college? Four critical years revisited. Jossey-Bass.

Avolio

Bass

. (2004). Multifactor leadership questionnaire manual and sample set (3rd ed.). Mind Garden.

Baron

Kenny

(1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182.

Bauer

K. W.

Liang

(2003). The effect of personality and precollege characteristics on first-year activities and academic performance. Journal of College Student Development, 44(3), 277–290.

Buskist

Sikorski

Buckley

Saville

(2002). Elements of master teaching. In Davis

S. F.

Buskist

&W.

(Eds.), The teaching of psychology: Essays in honor of Wilbert J. McKeachie and Charles L. Brewer (pp. 27–39). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

Campbell

L. C.

Eichhorn

K. C.

Basch

Wolf

(2009). Exploring the relationship between teacher confirmation, gender, and student effort in the college classroom. Human Communication, 12(4), 447–464.

Daniels

Arapostathis

(2005). What do they really want? Student voices and motivation research. Urban Education, 40(1), 34–59.

Ericsson

K. A

. (2006). The influence of experience and deliberate practice on the development of superior expert performance. In Ericsson

K. A.

Charness

Hoffman

R. R.

Feltovich

P. J.

(Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (pp. 683–704). Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816796.038

10.

Fredrickson

(2018). Assessing the impact of student effort and content interaction on learning for on-campus and online students. Global Journal of Business Pedagogy, 2(1), 47–64. https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bsu&AN=133806589&site=eds-live

11.

Geier

M. T

. (2020). Students’ expectations and students’ satisfaction: The mediating role of excellent teacher behaviors. Teaching of Psychology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628320959923

12.

Goodboy

A. K.

Booth-Butterfield

Bolkan

Griffin

D. J.

(2015). The role of instructor humor and students’ educational orientations in student learning, extra effort, participation, and out-of-class communication. Communication Quarterly, 63(1), 44–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463373.2014.965840

13.

Gupta

Maksy

M. M.

(2014). Factors associated with student performance in an investments course: An empirical study. Journal of Finance and Accountancy, 16, 1–31.

14.

Hayes

(2009). Beyond Baron and Kenny: Statistical mediation analysis in the new millennium. Communication Monographs, 76(4), 408–420.

15.

Hayes

(2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis (2nd ed.). Guilford Publications.

16.

Hayes

Montoya

Preacher

Selig

Page-Gould

Sharples

(2016, January). Advances in within-subject mediation analysis. Symposium conducted at the Meeting of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology , San Diego, CA.

17.

Bentler

P. M.

(1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indices in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118

18.

Jussim

Eccles

(1995). Naturalistic studies of interpersonal expectancies. Review of Personality and Social Psychology, 15, 74–108.

19.

Keeley

Furr

Buskist

(2010). Differentiating psychology students’ perceptions of teachers using the teacher behavior checklist. Teaching of Psychology, 37(1), 16–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/00986280903426282

20.

Keeley

Ismail

Buskist

(2016). Excellent teachers’ perspective on excellent teaching. Teaching of Psychology, 43(3), 175–179. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628316649307

21.

Keeley

Smith

Buskist

(2006). The teacher behaviors checklist: Factor analysis of its utility for evaluating teaching. Teaching of Psychology, 33(2), 84–91. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328023top3302_1

22.

Kuh

G. D.

Kinzie

Buckley

J. A.

Bridges

B. K.

Hayek

J. C.

(2006). What matters to student success: A review of the literature? National Postsecondary Education Cooperative.

23.

Landrum

Stowell

(2013). The reliability of student ratings of master teacher behaviors. Teaching of Psychology, 40(4), 300–303. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628313501043

24.

Lin

T.-C.

(2016). An investigation of the relationship between in-class and out-of-class efforts on student learning: Empirical evidence and strategy suggestion. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 16(4), 14–32. https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eric&AN=EJ1112483&site=eds-live

25.

Liu

Keeley

Buskist

(2015). Chinese college students’ perceptions of characteristics of excellent teachers. Teaching of Psychology, 42(1), 83–86. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628314562684

26.

Liu

Keeley

Buskist

(2016). Chinese college students’ perceptions of excellent teachers across three disciplines: Psychology, chemical engineering, and education. Teaching of Psychology, 43(1), 70–74. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628315620888

27.

Main

J. B.

Ost

(2014). The impact of letter grades on student effort, course selection, and major choice: A regression-discontinuity analysis. The Journal of Economic Education, 45(1), 1–10.

28.

Meltzer

Katzir-Cohen

Miller

Roditi

(2001). The impact of effort and strategy use on academic performance: Student and teacher perceptions. Learning Disability Quarterly, 24(2), 85–98.

29.

Miele

D. B.

Browman

A. S.

Vasilyeva

(2019). Individual differences in students’ effort source beliefs predict their judgments of ability. Motivation Science. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/mot0000124

30.

Pascarella

Terenzini

(2005). How college affects students: A third decade of research (Vol. 2). Jossey-Bass.

31.

Petrocelli

(2003). Hierarchical multiple regression: Regression in counseling research: Common problems and possible remedies. Journal of Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 36, 9–21.

32.

Preacher

Hayes

(2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 36(4), 717–731. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206553

33.

Quinn

P. D.

Duckworth

A. L.

(2007). Happiness and academic achievement: Evidence for reciprocal causality. Poster Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Psychological Society, San Francisco, CA.

34.

R Core Team (2018). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/

35.

Razali

Wah

(2011). Power comparisons of Shapiro-Wilk, Kolmogorow-Smirnov, Lilliefors and Anderson-Darling tests. Journal of Statistical Modeling and Analytics, 2(1): 21–31.

36.

Rich

S. P.

(2006). Student performance: Does effort matter? Journal of Applied Finance, 16(2), 82–87.

37.

Rosseel

(2012). Lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i02

38.

Salsman

Dulaney

Chinta

Zascavage

Joshi

(2013). Student effort in and perceived benefits from undergraduate research. College Student Journal, 47(1), 202–211.

39.

Schaeffer

Epting

Zinn

Buskist

(2003). Student and faculty perceptions of effective teaching: A successful replication. Teaching of Psychology, 30(2), 133–136.

40.

Sekaran

Bougie

. (2011). Research methods for business: A skill building approach. John Wiley and Sons.

41.

Skinner

E. A.

Belmont

M. J.

(1993). Motivation in the classroom: Reciprocal effects of teacher behavior and student engagement across the school year. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(4), 571–581. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.85.4.571

42.

Sproull

(1995). Handbook of research methods (2nd ed.). Scarecrow Press.

43.

Stigall

Blincoe

(2015). Student and instructor use of the teacher behavior checklist. Teaching of Psychology, 42(4), 299–306. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628315603061

44.

Stone-Romero

Rosopa

(2004). Inference problems with hierarchical multiple regression-based tests of mediating effects. In Martocchio

(Series Ed.), Research in personnel and human resources management (Vol. 23, pp. 249–290. Elsevier.

45.

Timmers

C. F.

Braber-van den Broek

van den Berg

S. M

. (2013). Motivational beliefs, student effort, and feedback behaviour in computer-based formative assessment. Computers & Education, 60(1), 25–31. https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eric&AN=EJ1006963&site=eds-live

46.

Vulcano

. (2007). Extending the generality of the qualities and behaviors constituting effective teaching. Teaching of Psychology, 34(2), 114–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/00986280701293198

47.

Weaver

R. L.

Cottrell

H. W.

(1988). Motivating students: Stimulating and sustaining student effort. College Student Journal, 22(1), 22–32.