In this article, I describe a recent scandal involving collusion between officials at the American Psychological Association (APA) and the U.S. Department of Defense, which appears to have enabled the torture of detainees at the Guantanamo Bay detention facility. The scandal is a relevant, complex, and engaging case that teachers can use in a variety of courses. Details of the scandal exemplify a number of psychological concepts, including obedience, groupthink, terror management theory, group influence, and motivation. The scandal can help students understand several factors that make ethical decision-making difficult, including stress, emotions, and cognitive factors such as loss aversion, anchoring, framing, and ethical fading. I conclude by exploring some parallels between the current torture scandal and the development of APA’s ethics guidelines regarding the use of deception in research.
American Psychological Association. (1973). Ethical principles in the conduct of research with human participants. American Psychologist, 28, 79–80. doi:10.1037/h0038067
4.
American Psychological Association. (2010). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct: Including 2010 and 2016 amendments. Retrieved fromhttp://www.apa.org/ethics/code/index.aspx
American Psychological Association. (2015c). Report of the independent reviewer and related materials[Explanatory preface to the Hoffman Report]. Retrieved fromhttp://www.apa.org/independent-review/index.aspx
8.
BaumrindD. (1964). Some thoughts on ethics of research: After reading Milgram’s “Behavioral study of obedience.”American Psychologist, 19, 421–423. doi:10.1037/h0040128
9.
BaumrindD. (1971). Principles of ethical conduct in the treatment of subjects: Reaction to the draft report of the committee on ethical standards in psychological research. American Psychologist, 26, 887–896. doi:10.1037/h0032145
10.
BazermanM. H.TenbrunselA. E. (2011). Blind spots: Why we fail to do what’s right and what to do about it. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
11.
BetanE. J.StantonA. L. (1999). Fostering ethical willingness: Integrating emotional and contextual awareness with rational analysis. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 30, 295–301.
12.
BurkeB. L.MartensA.FaucherE. H. (2010). Two decades of terror management theory: A meta-analysis of mortality salience research. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14, 155–195. doi:10.1177/1088868309352321
13.
DeLeonP. H.SammonsM. T.SextonJ. L. (1995). Focusing on society’s real needs: Responsibility and prescription privileges?American Psychologist, 50, 1022–1032. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.50.12.1022
GriffenE. (2014). Groupthink of Irving Janis. In GriffenE.LedbetterA.SparksG. (Eds.). A first look at communication theory (pp. 235–246). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
17.
HaidtJ. (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review, 108, 814–834. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.108.4.814
18.
HandelsmanM. M. (2006). Teaching ethics in introductory psychology. In DunnD. S.ChewS. L. (Eds.), Best practices in teaching introductory psychology (pp. 159–175). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
HoffmanD. H.CarterD. J.LopezC. R. V.BenzmillerH. L.GuoA. X.LatifiS. Y.CraigD. C. (2015, 94). Report to the special committee of the board of directors of the American Psychological Association: Independent review relating to APA Ethics Guidelines, National Security Interrogations, and Torture(revised). Chicago, IL: Sidley Austin LLP. Retrieved fromhttp://www.apa.org/independent-review/revised-report.pdf
KahnemanD. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
23.
KahnemanD.TverskyA. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263–291.
24.
KleinbergJ. (2016). How organizational hunger may have contributed to the American Psychological Association’s scandal over the ethics of torture. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 66, 475–491.
25.
KnappS. J.GottliebM. C.HandelsmanM. M. (2015). Ethical dilemmas in psychotherapy: Positive approaches to decision making. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
26.
KouchakiM.DesaiS. D. (2015). Anxious, threatened, and also unethical: How anxiety makes individuals feel threatened and commit unethical acts. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100, 360–375. doi:10.1037/a0037796
MilgramS. (1974). Obedience to authority: An experimental view. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
32.
MooreD. A.LoewensteinG. (2004). Self-interest, automaticity, and the psychology of conflict of interest. Social Justice Research, 17, 189–202. doi:10.1023/B: SORE.0000027409.88372.b4
PopeK. S. (2016). The code not taken: The path from guild ethics to torture and our continuing choices. Canadian Psychology, 57, 51–59. doi:10.1037/cap0000043
37.
PyszczynskiT.SolomonS.GreenbergJ. (2003). In the wake of 9/11: The psychology of terror. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Report of the American Psychological Association Presidential Task Force on Psychological Ethics and National Security. (2005, 6). Retrieved fromhttp://www.apa.org/pubs/info/reports/pens.pdf
40.
RisenJ. (2014). Pay any price: Greed, power, and endless war. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
StarkL. (2010). The science of ethics: Deception, the resilient self, and the APA Code of Ethics, 1966–1973. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 46, 337–370. doi:10.1002/jhbs.20468
SummergradP.SharfsteinM. D. (2015). Ethics, interrogation, and the American Psychiatric Association. American Journal of Psychiatry, 172, 706–707. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2015.15060772
45.
SummersF. (2008) Making sense of the APA: A history of the relationship between psychology and the military. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 18, 614–637. doi:10.1080/10481880802297665
46.
TenbrunselA.MessickD. M. (2004). Ethical fading: The role of self-deception in unethical behavior. Social Justice Research, 17, 223–236. doi:10.1023/B: SORE.0000027411.35832.53
47.
ThomasN. K. (2016). “We didn’t know”: Silence and silencing in organizations. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 66, 492–505. doi:10.1080/00207284.2016.1176489
