Case studies have become a popular vehicle for pre-service teachers to be introduced to the challenges of classroom teaching and participate in hypothetical classroom decision-making. Because of the similarity of case study instruction to those classroom structures proven to influence a student’s adoption of mastery-approach goals, we expected that case study learning would predict educational psychology students’ adoption of these adaptive goals. However, there is limited empirical research on the impact of case study instruction on student’s motivation, particularly for students’ adoption of achievement goals. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to examine the relationships between students’ perceived experiences in case study instruction and each of four achievement goals identified in the goal literature. Since self-efficacy may be another important influence on students’ achievement goals, we also included it as another predictor variable in our regression analyses. Both online and traditional on-campus students are included in this study. While neither performance goal was significantly related to case study instruction for either class format, perceptions of case study instruction predicted online students’ mastery-approach goals and predicted lower rates of mastery-avoidance goals in traditional students. Self-efficacy predicted greater likelihood of mastery-approach goals for traditional students and lower rates of mastery-avoidance goals in both class formats.
AmesC. (1992). Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 261–271.
2.
AmesC.ArcherJ. (1988). Achievement goals in the classroom: Students’ learning strategies and motivation processes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(3), 260–267.
3.
AndrewsL. (2002). Preparing general education pre-service teachers for inclusion: Web-enhanced case-based instruction. Journal of Special Education Technology, 17(3), 27–35.
4.
AngeliC. (2004). The effect of case-based learning on early childhood pre-service teachers’ beliefs about the pedagogical uses of ICT. Journal of Educational Media, 29(2), 139–151. https://doi.org/10.1080/1358165042000253302
5.
ArtinoA. R.VermillionJ. R. (2007, April). Using achievement goal theory to predict adaptive outcomes in university students learning online[Paper presentation]. Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association.
6.
BanduraA. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W.H. Freeman and Company.
7.
BarrettT. (2010). The problem-based learning process as finding and being in flow. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 47(2), 165–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703291003718901
8.
BruningR.SiwatuK. O.LiuX.PytlikZilligL. M.HornC.SicS.CarslonD. (2008). Introducing teaching cases with face-to-face and computer-mediated discussion: Two multi-classroom quasi-experiments. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33, 299–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2006.11.002
9.
ChingC. P. (2011). Preservice teachers’ use of educational theories in classroom and behavior management course: A case based approach. Procedia: Social and Behavioral Sciences, 29, 1209–1217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.11.355
10.
ConroyD. E.ElliotA. J. (2004). Fear of failure and achievement goals in sport: Addressing the issue of the chicken and the egg. Anxiety, Stress, and Coping, 17(3), 271–285. https://doi.org/10.1080/1061580042000191642
11.
DweckC. S.LeggettE. L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95(2), 256–273.
ElliotA. J. (2005). A conceptual history of the achievement goal construct. In ElliotA. J.Dweck’sC. S. (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 52–72). Guilford Press.
14.
ElliotA. J.McGregorH. A. (2001). A 2 x 2 achievement goal framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(3), 501–519. https://doi.org/10.1O37//OO22-3514.80.3.501
15.
EngleR. A.FauxR. B. (2006). Towards productive disciplinary engagement of prospective teachers in educational psychology: Comparing two methods of case-based instruction. Teaching Educational Psychology, 1(2), 1–22.
16.
FinneyS. J.PieperS. L.BarronK. E. (2004). Examining the psychometric properties of the achievement goal questionnaire in a general academic context. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 64(2), 365–382. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164403258465
17.
FurnerJ. M.Gonzalez-DeHassA. (2011). How do students’ mastery and performance goals relate to math anxiety?Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science, & Technology Education, 7(4), 167–182.
18.
GonidaE. N.VoulalaK.KiosseoglouG. (2009). Students’ achievement goal orientations and their behavioral and emotional engagement: Co-examining the role of perceived school goal structures and parent goals during adolescence. Learning and Individual Differences, 19, 53–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2008.04.002
19.
Gonzalez-DeHassA. R.WillemsP. P. (2015). Case study instruction in educational psychology: Implications for teacher preparation. In LiM.ZhaoY. (Eds.), Exploring learning and teaching in higher education (pp. 99–122). Springer.
20.
GourneauB. (2014). Challenges in the first year of teaching: Lessons learned in an elementary education resident teacher program. Contemporary Issues in Education Research, 7(4), 299–318.
21.
GreeneB. A.MillerR. B.CrowsonM.DukeB. L.AkeyK. L. (2004). Predicting high school students’ cognitive engagement and achievement: Contributions of classroom perceptions and motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29, 462–482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2004.01.006
22.
HeitzmannR. (2008). Case study instruction in teacher education: Opportunity to develop students’ critical thinking, school smarts and decision-making. Education, 128(4), 523–542.
23.
HowardJ. (2002). Technology-enhanced project-based learning in teacher education: Addressing the goals of transfer. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 10(3), 343–364.
KimH.HannafinM. J. (2008). Situated case-based knowledge: An emerging framework for prospective teacher learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24, 1837–1845. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2008.02.025
26.
KomarrajuM.NadlerD. (2013). Self-efficacy and academic achievement: Why do implicit beliefs, goals, and effort regulation matter?Learning and Individual Differences, 25 (67-72). http://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2013.01.005
27.
LiemA. D.LauS.NieY. (2008). The Role of self-efficacy, task value, and achievement goals in predicting learning strategies, task disengagement, peer relationship, and achievement outcome. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33, 486–512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2007.08.001
28.
MayoJ. A. (2002). Case-based instruction: A technique for increasing conceptual application in introductory psychology. Journal of Constructivist Psychology, 15, 65–74. http://doi.org/10.1080/107205302753305728
29.
MeeceJ. L. (1991). The classroom context and students’ motivational goals. In MaehrM. L.PintrichP. R. (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement (Vol. 7, pp. 261–285). JAI Press.
30.
MersethK. K. (2008). Using case discussion materials to improve mathematics teaching practice. The Mathematics Educator, 11(1), 3–20.
31.
MyersR. (1990). Classical and modern regression with applications (2nd ed.). Duxbury.
32.
PatrickH.AndermanL. H.BrueningP. S.DuffinL. C. (2011). The role of educational psychology in teacher education: Three challenges for educational psychologists. Educational Psychologist, 46(2), 71–83. http://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2011.538648
33.
PintrichP. R.SmithD. A.GarciaT.McKeachieW. J. (1991). A manual for the use of motivated strategies for learning questionnaire (MSLQ). Ann Arbor: National Center for Research to Improve Postsecondary Teaching and Learning, University of Michigan.
34.
PytlikZilligL. M.HornC. A.BruningR.BellS.LiuX.SiwatuK. O.BodvarssonM. C.DoyoungKCarlsonD. (2011). Face-to-face versus computer-mediated discussion of teaching cases: Impacts on preservice teachers’ engagement, critical analyses, and self-efficacy. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36, 302–312. https://doi.org/t0.1016/j.cedpsych2011.07.002
35.
StipekD. (1998). Motivation to learn: From theory to practice (3rd ed.). Allyn & Bacon.
36.
SudzinaM. R. (1997). Case study as a constructivist pedagogy for teaching educational psychology. Educational Psychology Review, 9(2), 199–218.
37.
UrdanT.TurnerJ. C. (2005). Competence motivation in the classroom. In ElliotA. J.Dweck’sC. S. (Eds.). Handbook of Competence and Motivation (pp. 297–317). Guilford Press.
38.
WillemsP. PGonzalez-DeHassA. R. (2006). Educational Psychology Casebook. Pearson Education.
