There are but a handful of experimental or quasi-experimental studies comparing student outcomes from flipped or inverted classrooms to more traditional lecture formats. In the current study, I present cumulative exam performance and student evaluation data from two sections of a statistics course I recently taught: one a traditional lecture (N = 19) and the other a flipped class (N = 24). Independent samples t-tests revealed students in the flipped classroom outperformed their lecture peers by more than a letter grade on the final exam. Further, these students were more satisfied with the course overall, a novel finding in this burgeoning area of research. This latter point, I argue, is likely due to the strong cohesion between the in-class and out-of-class content.
BernardR. M.BorokhovskiE.SchmidR. F.TamimR. M.AbramiP. C. (2014). A meta-analysis of blended learning and technology use in higher education: From the general to the applied. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 26, 87–122.
3.
CollinsK. M. T.OnwuegbuzieA. J. (2007). I cannot read my statistics textbook: The relationship between reading ability and statistics anxiety. Journal of Negro Education, 76, 118–129.
4.
DayJ.FoleyJ. D. (2006). Evaluating a web lecture intervention in a human ndash; Computer interaction course. IEEE Transactions on Education, 49, 420–431.
5.
GrahamC. R. (2006). Blended learning systems: Definition, current trends, and future directions. In BonkC. J.GrahamC. R. (Eds.), Handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives (pp. 3–21). San Francisco, CA: JosseyBass/Pfeiffer.
HughesG. (2007). Using blended learning to increase learner support and improve retention. Teaching in Higher Education, 12, 349–363.
8.
JohnsonD. W.JohnsonR. T. (2009). An educational psychology success story: Social interdependence theory and cooperative learning. Educational Researcher, 368, 365–379.
OcakM. A. (2011). Why are faculty members not teaching blended courses? Insights from faculty members. Computers & Education, 56, 689–699.
12.
OsgerbyJ. (2013). Students’ perceptions of the introduction of a blended learning environment: An exploratory case study. Accounting Education, 22, 85–99.
13.
RyanT. E. (2006). Motivating novice students to read their textbooks. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 33, 135–140.
14.
SnodinN. S. (2013). The effects of blended learning with a CMS on the development of autonomous learning: A case study of different degrees of autonomy achieved by individual learners. Computers & Education, 61, 209–216.
15.
StrayerJ. F. (2012). How learning in an inverted classroom influences cooperation, innovation and task orientation. Learning Environments Research, 15, 171–193.
16.
TuneJ. D.SturekM.BasileD. P. (2013). Flipped classroom model improves graduate student performance in cardiovascular, respiratory, and renal physiology. Advances in Physiology Education, 37, 316–320.
17.
VaughanN. (2007). Perspectives on blended learning in higher education. International Journal on E-Learning, 6, 81–94.
18.
WilsonS. G. (2013). The flipped class: A method to address the challenges of an undergraduate statistics course. Teaching of Psychology, 40, 193–199.
19.
YangY.-F. (2012). Blended learning for college students with English reading difficulties. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 25, 393–410.
