Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

We describe an Introduction to Psychology (IP) demonstration of water dowsing and ideomotor action designed to enhance students’ critical thinking. An instructor demonstrated that metal rods crossed over an uncovered cup containing water but not one containing sugar. Student volunteers using the rods also saw them cross over the cup containing water, even after we covered the cup and surreptitiously replaced it with the cup containing sugar (illustrating ideomotor action). Five days later, students who saw the demonstration were (a) less convinced of the validity of dowsing and facilitated communication after reading anecdotal evidence and (b) more likely to suggest ideomotor action as an explanation for several ideomotor-related phenomena compared to students in the control sections of IP.

Keywords

dowsing paranormal ideomotor critical thinking

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bates

J. A.

(1991). Teaching hypothesis testing by debunking a demonstration of telepathy. Teaching of Psychology, 18, 94–97.

Boyce

T. E.

Geller

E. S.

(2002). Using the Barnum effect to teach psychological research methods. Teaching of Psychology, 29, 316–318.

Burgess

C. A.

Kirsch

Shane

Neiderauer

K. L.

Graham

S. M.

Bacon

(1998). Facilitated communication as an ideomotor response. Psychological Science, 9, 71–74. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00013

Hyman

(2007). Ouija, dowsing, and other seductions of ideomotor action. In Della Sala

(Ed.), Tall tales about the mind & brain: Separating fact from fiction (pp. 411–424). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Lawson

T. J.

(1999). Assessing psychological critical thinking as a learning outcome for psychology majors. Teaching of Psychology, 26, 207–209. doi:10.1207/S15328023TOP260311

Lawson

T. J.

(2003). A psychic-reading demonstration designed to encourage critical thinking. Teaching of Psychology, 30, 251–253. doi:10.1207/S15328023TOP3002_04

Lawson

T. J.

(Ed.). (2007). Scientific perspectives on pseudoscience and the paranormal: Readings for general psychology. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Lilienfeld

S. O.

Lohr

J. M.

Morier

(2001). The teaching of courses in the science and pseudoscience of psychology: Useful resources. Teaching of Psychology, 28, 182–191. doi:10.1207/S15328023TOP2803_03

McBurney

D. H.

(1976). ESP in the psychology curriculum. Teaching of Psychology, 3, 66–69. doi:10.1207/s15328023top0302_5

10.

McClean

C. P.

Miller

N. A.

(2010). Changes in critical thinking skills following a course on science and pseudoscience: A quasi-experimental study. Teaching of Psychology, 37, 85–90. doi:10.1080/00986281003626714

11.

Nordland

(2009, November 4). Iraq swears by bomb detector U.S. sees as useless. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/04/world/middleeast/04sensors.html

12.

Plait

(2009, November 4). When antiscience kills: Dowsing for bombs [Swift Blog post]. Retrieved from http://www.randi.org/site/index.php/swift-blog/763-when-antiscience-kills-dowsing-for-bombs.html

13.

Randi

(1999, January). The matter of dowsing. Swift, 2, 3–6. Retrieved from http://www.randi.org/pdf/swift2-34.pdf

14.

Stanovich

K. E.

(2013). How to think straight about psychology (10th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.

15.

Wagner

(2012). All about dowsing [web article]. Retrieved from http://paranormal.about.com/od/dowsing/a/All-About-Dowsing.htm

16.

Wegner

D. M.

(2004). Précis of the illusion of conscious will. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27, 649–692. doi:10.1017/S0140525X04000159

17.

Wesp

Montgomery

(1998). Developing critical thinking through the study of paranormal phenomena. Teaching of Psychology, 25, 275–278. doi:10.1080/00986289809709714

Dowsing Rods Designed to Sharpen Critical Thinking and Understanding of Ideomotor Action

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References