This article examines the transformation of filial piety by probing disagreements between parents and children over marriage decisions. Based on field observations and in-depth interviews in Guangdong, this research shows that children’s responses to disagreements vary by gender, generation, and rural or urban background. Collective family economies and intergenerational moral imperatives create a strong patriarchal basis for filial obedience for older respondents and rural non-migrants. Rural migrants’ responses are the most diverse given the option to live separately from their parents, although they feel obligated to please their parents, who are morally and culturally constrained by their rural community. The resurgence of parental power is conflated with strong reciprocal emotional bonding in young urbanites, contributing to painful and prolonged negotiations with parents. Sons are more constrained by parental authority than daughters, given the continued importance of patrilineality. This study therefore illustrates the resilience and the multifaceted transformation of filial piety in China.
All-China Women’s Federation 全国妇联 (2012) 新生代进城务工者婚恋生活状况报告 (Pursuing marriage and love life: advocating young migrants to adapt to city life). Beijing: 社会科学文献出版社.
2.
CAIHEXIAOPINGWU (2006) “Social changes and occupational gender inequality.” Chinese Sociology & Anthropology 38, 4: 37–53.
3.
CHANKAM WING (2009) “The Chinese hukou system at 50.” Eurasian Geography and Economics 50, 2: 197–221.
4.
CHERLINANDREW (2004) “The deinstitutionalization of American marriage.” J. of Marriage and Family 66, 4: 848–61.
5.
CHOISUSANNE Y.P.LUOMING (2016) “Performative family: homosexuality, marriage and intergenerational dynamics in China.” British J. of Sociology 67, 2: 260–80.
6.
CHOWESTHER N.L.ZHAOMICHAEL S. (1996) “The one-child policy and parent-child relationships: a comparison of one-child with multiple-child families in China.” International J. of Sociology and Social Policy 16, 12: 35–62.
7.
COLLINSPATRICIA HILL (2015) “Intersectionality’s definitional dilemmas.” Annual Rev. of Sociology41: 1–20.
8.
CROLLELISABETH (1981) The Politics of Marriage in Contemporary China. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
9.
DAVISDEBORAH (1993) “Urban households: supplicants to a socialist state.” Pp. 50–76 in Davis and Harrell, 1993.
10.
DAVISDEBORAH S. (2014) “Privatization of marriage in post-socialist China.” Modern China 40, 6: 551–77.
11.
DAVISDEBORAH S. (2016) “His, her, and their marriages: (re)verticalization of family loyalties in urban China.” Public talk at Universities Service Centre for China Studies, Chinese Univ. of Hong Kong, Jan. 6.
12.
DAVISDEBORAH S.FRIEDMANSARA L. (2014) “Deinstitutionalizing marriage and sexuality.” Pp. 1–38 in DavisDeborah S.FriedmanSara L. (eds.), Wives, Husbands, and Lovers: Marriage and Sexuality in Hong Kong, Taiwan, and Urban China. Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press.
13.
DAVISDEBORAHHARRELLSTEVAN [eds.] (1993) Chinese Families in the Post-Mao Era. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press.
14.
DAVISKATHY (2008) “Intersectionality as buzzword: a sociology of science perspective on what makes a feminist theory successful.” Feminist Theory 9, 1: 67–85.
15.
EKLUNDLISA (2018) “Filial daughter? Filial son? How China’s young urban elite negotiate intergenerational obligations.” NORA-Nordic J. of Feminist and Gender Research 26, 4: 295–312.
16.
ENGEBRETSENELISABETH L. (2017) “Under pressure: lesbian-gay contract marriages and their patriarchal bargains.” Pp. 163–81 in Santos and Harrell, 2017.
17.
FANCINDY C.SUNMINGJIEZHENGSIQI (2011) “Migration and split households: a comparison of sole, couple, and family migrants in Beijing, China.” Environment and Planning A43: 2164–85.
18.
FARRERJAMES (2002) Opening Up: Youth Sex Culture and Market Reform in Shanghai. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
19.
FONGVANESSA L. (2004) Only Hope: Coming of Age under China’s One-Child Policy. Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press.
20.
FREEDMANMAURICE (2004 [1966]) Chinese Lineage and Society: Fukien and Kwangtung. London: Athlone.
21.
GREENHALGHSUSANWINCKLEREDWIN A. (2005) Governing China’s Population: From Leninist to Neoliberal Biopolitics. Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press.
22.
GULDINGREGORY ELIYU (1995) “Toward a greater Guangdong: Hong Kong’s sociocultural impact on the Pearl River delta and beyond.” Pp. 89–118 in KwokReginald Ying-WangSoAlvin Y. (eds.), Hong Kong–Guangdong Link: Partnership in Flux. Armonk, NY: ME Sharpe.
23.
HANCOCKANGE-MARIE (2007) “When multiplication doesn’t equal quick addition: examining intersectionality as a research paradigm.” Perspective on Politics 5, 1: 63–79.
24.
HANSENMETTE HALSKOVPANGCUIMING (2008) “Me and my family: perceptions of individual and collective among young rural Chinese.” European J. of East Asian Studies 7, 1: 75–99.
25.
HUYANG (2016) “Impact of rural-to-urban migration on family and gender values in China.” Asian Population Studies 12, 3: 251–72.
26.
HUYANGSCOTTJACQUELINE (2016) “Family and gender values in China: generational, geographic, and gender differences.” J. of Family Issues 37, 9: 1267–93.
27.
INGLEHARTRONALDWAYNEE. BAKER (2000) “Modernization, cultural change, and the persistence of traditional values.” American Sociological Rev. 65, 1: 19–51.
28.
JANKOWIAKWILLIAM R. (1993) Sex, Death, and Hierarchy in a Chinese City. New York: Columbia Univ. Press.
29.
JANKOWIAKWILLIAM R.LIXUAN (2017) “Emergent conjugal love: mutual affection and female marital power.” Pp. 146–62 in Santos and Harrell, 2017.
30.
JANKOWIAKWILLIAM R.MOOREROBERT L. (2017) Family Life in China. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
31.
JIYINGCHUNYEUNGWEI-JUN JEAN (2014) “Heterogeneity in contemporary Chinese marriage.” J. of Family Issues 35, 12: 1662–82.
32.
JUDDELLEN (1994) Gender and Power in Rural North China. Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press.
33.
KULPDANIEL HARRISON (1966 [1925]) Country Life in South China: The Sociology of Familism. Reprint. Taipei: Ch’eng-wen.
34.
LAIQINGTHORNTONARLAND (2015) “The making of family values: developmental idealism in Gansu, China.” Social Science Research51: 174–88.
35.
LAVELYWILLIAMRENXINHUA (1992) “Patrilocality and early marital co-residence in rural China, 1955–85.” China Q. 130: 378–91.
36.
LOGANJOHN R.BIANFUQIN (1999) “Family values and co-residence with married children in urban China.” Social Forces 77, 4: 1253–82.
37.
LUILAKE (2018) “Marital power in inter-hukou families in China: an intersectionality approach.” J. of Family Issues 39, 5: 1165–90.
38.
MANNSUSAN L. (2011) Gender and Sexuality in Modern Chinese History. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
39.
National Bureau of Statistics (2013) China Statistical Yearbook. Beijing: China Statistical Press.
40.
NOLANPETERWHITEGORDON (1981) “Distribution and development in China.” Bull. of Concerned Asian Scholars 13, 3: 2–18.
41.
OBENDIEKHELENA (2017) “Higher education, gender, and elder support in rural northwest China.” Pp. 74–90 in Santos and Harrell, 2017.
42.
OXFELDELLEN (2010) Drink Water, But Remember the Source: Moral Discourse in a Chinese Village. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press.
43.
PARISHWILLIAM L.WHYTEMARTIN KING (1978) Village and Family in Contemporary China. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
44.
ROFELLISA (2007) Desiring China: Experiments in Neoliberalism, Sexuality, and Public Culture. Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press.
45.
SANTOSGONÇALOHARRELLSTEVAN (2017) Transforming Patriarchy: Chinese Families in the Twenty-First Century. Seattle: Univ. of Washington Press.
46.
SELDENMARK (1993) “Family strategies and structures in rural north China.” Pp. 139–64 in Davis and Harrell, 1993.
47.
SHENYANG (2016) “Filial daughters? Agency and subjectivity of rural migrant women in Shanghai.” China Q. 226: 519–37.
48.
STACEYJUDITH (1983) Patriarchy and Socialist Revolution in China. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press.
49.
SUNYUEZHU (2017) “Among a hundred good virtues, filial piety is the first: contemporary moral discourses on filial piety in urban China.” Anthropological Q. 90, 3: 771–99.
50.
TAOCHUNFANG 陶春芳 and JIANGYONGPING 蒋永萍 (1993) 中国妇女社会地位概观 (An overview of the social status of Chinese women). Beijing: 中国妇女出版社.
51.
TOSANDY (2015) “My mother wants me to jiaru-haomen (marry into a rich and powerful family)!” Sage Open 5, 1: 1–11.
52.
UNGERJONATHAN (1993) “Urban families in the eighties: an analysis of Chinese surveys.” Pp. 25–49 in Davis and Harrell, 1993.
53.
VAN DER SPRENKELOTTO. B (1964) “Max Weber on China.” History and Theory 3, 3: 348–70.
54.
WALBYSYLVIAARMSTRONGJOSTRIDSOFIA (2012) “Intersectionality: multiple inequalities in social theory.” Sociology 46, 2: 224–40.
55.
WANGYUESHENG 王跃生 (2012) 城乡养老中的家庭代际关系研究 — 以2010年七省区调查数据为基础 (Research on elderly family support in the intergenerational relationship in urban and rural areas: Based on the survey of seven provinces in 2010). 开放时代 (Open times)2: 102–21.
56.
WATSONRUBIE (2004) “Families in China: ties that bind?” Paper presented at the conference “The Family Model in Chinese Art and Culture,” Princeton Univ., Nov. 6.
57.
WHYTEMARTIN KING (1990) “Changes in mate choice in Chengdu.” In DavisDeborahVogelEzra F. (eds.), Chinese Society on the Eve of Tiananmen. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press.
58.
WHYTEMARTIN KING (1997) “The fate of filial obligations in urban China.” China J. 38: 1–31.
59.
WHYTEMARTIN KING (2004) “Filial obligations in Chinese families: paradoxes of modernization.” Pp. 106–27 in IkelsCharlotte (ed.), Filial Piety: Practice and Discourse in Contemporary East Asia. Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press.
60.
XUANQIYALIXUE (2017) “Family structure.” In XuAnqiDeFrainJohnLiWenrong (eds.), The Chinese Family Today. London: Routledge.
61.
XUXIAOHEWHYTEMARTIN KING (1990) “Love matches and arranged marriages: a Chinese replication.” J. of Marriage and the Family 52, 3: 709–22.
62.
YANYUNXIANG (2003) Private Life under Socialism: Love, Intimacy, and Family Change in a Chinese Village, 1949–1999. Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press.
63.
YANYUNXIANG (2010) “The Chinese path to individualization.” British J. of Sociology 61, 3: 489–512.
64.
YANYUNXIANG (2011) “The changing moral landscape.” Pp. 36–77 in KleinmanArthurYanYunxiangJunJingLeeSingZhangEverettTianshuPanFeiWuJinhuaGuo (eds.), Deep China: The Moral Life of the Person. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press.
65.
YANYUNXIANG (2013) “Parent-driven divorce and individualisation among urban Chinese youth.” International Social Science J. 64, 213–14: 317–30.
66.
YANGC. K. (1959a) The Chinese Family in the Communist Revolution. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
67.
YANGC. K. (1959b) A Chinese Village in Early Communist Transition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
68.
YANGHAIOUCHANDLERDAVID (1992) “Intergenerational relations: grievances of the elderly in rural China.” J. of Comparative Family Studies 23, 3: 431–53.
69.
ZANGXIAOWEI (2000) Children of the Cultural Revolution: Family Life and Political Behavior in Mao’s China. Boulder, CO: Westview.
70.
ZAVORETTIROBERTA (2017) “Being the right woman for ‘Mr. Right’: marriage and household politics in present-day Nanjing.” Pp. 129–45 in Santos and Harrell, 2017.
71.
ZENGGUOHUA (2004) “Adaptation, revival, and reconstruction: clan organizations and rural power structures; two case studies from southern Jiangxi and eastern Guangdong.” Chinese Sociology & Anthropology 37, 1: 34–50.
72.
ZHANGHONG (2017) “Recalibrating filial piety: realigning the state, family, and market interests in China?” Pp. 234–50 in Santos and Harrell, 2017.
73.
ZHANGJUN (2017) “(Extended) family car, filial consumer-citizens: becoming properly middle class in post-socialist south China.” Modern China 43, 1 (Jan.): 36–65.
74.
ZHANGJUNSUNPEIDONG (2014) “When are you going to get married? Parental matchmaking and middle-class women in contemporary urban China.” Pp. 118–46 in DavisDeborah S.FriedmanSara L. (eds.), Wives, Husbands, and Lovers: Marriage and Sexuality in Hong Kong, Taiwan, and Urban China. Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press.
75.
ZHANGWEIGUO (2009) “‘A married out daughter is like spilt water’?: Women’s increasing contacts and enhanced ties with their natal families in post-reform rural north China.” Modern China 35, 3 (May): 256–83.
76.
ZHUYAPENG (2013) “Youth housing problems in China.” Pp. 142–50 in ForrestRayYipNgai ming (eds.), Young People and Housing: Transitions, Trajectories, and Generational Fractures. London: Routledge.
