This article provides a critical analysis of a distinctive psychology of Black women, discusses the relevant epistemologies and conceptual framework that can inform such a perspective, and suggests a set of guiding principles for advancing theory and research on Black women within a historically and contextually relevant framework. A discussion of who is best suited to study the lives of Black women is also provided. The article concludes with a charge for a psychology of Black women that will examine previously ignored issues, formulate and test of new (and old) hypotheses, and develop alternative theoretical paradigms that are sensitive to the realities and contextualized lives of this population.
Angelou, M. (1989). Foreword. In B. LankerI dream a world: Portraits of Black women who changed America. New York: Stewart, Tabori & Chang.
2.
Barnouw, V. (1973). Culture and personality (2nd. ed.). Belmont, CA: Dorsey.
3.
Betancourt, H.,& Lopez, S. R. (1993). The study of culture, ethnicity, and race in American psychology. American Psychologist, 48, 629-637.
4.
Bing, V., & Reid, P. T. (1996). Unknown women and unknowing research: Consequences of color and class in feminist psychology. In N. R. Goldberger & J. Tarule (Eds.), Knowledge, difference, and power: Essays inspired by women’s ways of knowing (pp. 172-202). New York: Basic Books.
5.
Brewer, R. M. (1994). Theorizing race, class and gender: The scholarship of Black feminist intellectuals and Black women’s labor. In S. M. James & A. P. Busia (Eds.), Theorizing Black feminisms: The visionary pragmatism of Black women (2nd ed., pp. 13–30). New York: Routledge.
6.
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
7.
Brown, L. S. (1990). The meaning of a multicultural perspective for theory-building in feminist therapy. Women & Therapy, 9, 1-21.
8.
Brown, L. S. (1995). Cultural diversity in feminist therapy: Theory and practice. In H. Landrine (Ed.), Bringing cultural diversity to feminist psychology: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 143-161). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
9.
Campbell, P. (1983). The impact of societal biases in research methods. In B. Richardson & J. Wirtenberg (Eds.), Sex role research: Measuring social change. New York: Praeger.
10.
Collins, P. H. (1990). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness and the politics of empowerment. New York: Routledge.
11.
Comas-Diaz, L. (1987). Feminist therapy with Hispanic/Latinawomen: Myth or reality. Women & Therapy, 6(4), 39-61.
12.
Comas-Diaz, L. (1991). Feminism and diversity in psychology: The case ofwomen of color. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 15, 597-609.
13.
Crawford, M., & Maracek, J. (1989). Psychology reconstructs the female: 1968-1988. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 13, 147-165.
14.
Dressler, W. W. (1992, March). Health in the African-American community: Accounting for inequities. Paper presented at the Social Science and health Policy: Building Bridges Between Research and Action Conference, Bethesda, MD.
15.
Graham, S. (1992). Most of the subjects were White and middle class: Trends in published research on African Americans in selected APA journals, 1970-1989. American Psychologist, 47, 629-639.
16.
Greene, B. (Ed.). (1997). Ethnic and cultural diversity among lesbian and gay men. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
17.
Greene, B., & Sanchez-Hucles, J. (1997). Diversity: Advancing an inclusive feminist psychology. In J. Worell & N. Johnson (Eds.), Feminist revisions: New directions for education and practice (pp. 173-202). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
18.
Guthrie, R. V. (1991). The psychology of African Americans: An historical perspective. In R. L. Jones (Ed.), Black psychology (3rd ed., pp. 33-45). Berkeley, CA: Cobb & Henry.
19.
hooks b. (2000). Feminist theory: From margin to center (2nd ed.). Boston: South End.
20.
Hull, G. T., Bell-Scott, P., & Smith, B. (1982). All the women are White, all the Blacks are men, but some of us are brave. Old Westbury, NY: Feminist Press.
21.
Hyde, J. S. (1991). Half the human experience: The psychology of women (4th ed.). Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath.
22.
King, D. K. (1988). Multiple jeopardy, multiple consciousness: The context of Black feminist ideology. Signs, 14(1), 42-72.
23.
Landrine, H. (1995). Introduction: Cultural diversity, contextualism, and feminist psychologist: Theory, research, and practice. In H. Landrine (Ed.), Bringing cultural diversity to feminist psychology: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 1-20). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
24.
Lewin, K. (1946). Behavior and development as a function of the total situation. In L. Carmichael (Ed.), Manual of child psychology (pp. 791-844). New York: John Wiley.
25.
Marecek, J. (1989). Introduction. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 14(4), 367-378.
26.
Marsella, A. J. (1998). Toward a global-community psychology: Meeting the needs of a changing world. American Psychologist, 53(12), 1282-1291.
27.
Mays, V., Rubin, J., Sabourin, M., & Walker, L. (1996). Moving toward a global psychology: Changing theories and practice to meet the changing needs of a changing world. American Psychologist, 51, 485-487.
28.
Mednick, M. T. (1991). Current and futures in American feminist psychology: State of the art revisited. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 15, 611-621.
29.
Miller, J. G. (1997). Theoretical issues in cultural psychology. In J. W. Berry, Y. H. Poortinga,& J. Pandey (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology: Theory and method (Vol. 1, pp. 85-128). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
30.
Payton, C. R. (1994). Who must do the hard things. American Psychologist, 39(4), 391-397.
31.
Prilletensky, I. (1997). Values, assumptions, and practices: Assessing the moral implications of psychological discourse and action. American Psychologist, 52, 517-535.
32.
Reid, P. T. (1993). Poor women in psychological research: Shut up and shut out. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 17, 133-150.
33.
Reid, P. T. (2000). Women, ethnicity, and AIDS: What’s love got to do with it?Sex Roles, 42(7-8), 709-722.
34.
Reid, P. T, & Kelly, E. (1994). Research on women of color: From ignorance to awareness. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18, 477-486.
35.
Russo, N. F.,& Vaz, K. (2001). Addressing diversity in the decade of behavior: Focus onwomen of color. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 25, 280-294.
36.
Saris, R. N., & Johnston-Robledo, I. (2000). Poor women are still shut out of mainstream psychology. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 24, 233-235.
37.
Sherif, C. W. (1979). Bias in psychology. In J. A. Sherman& E. T. Beck (Eds.), The prism of sex: Essays in the sociology of knowledge (pp. 93-133). Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
38.
Sparks, E. E.,& Parker, A. H. (2000). The integration of feminism and multiculturalism: Ethical dilemmas at the border. In M. M. Brabeck (Ed.), Practicing feminist ethics in psychology (pp. 203-224). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
39.
Sue, S. (1999). Science, ethnicity, and bias: Where have we gone wrong?American Psychologist, 54, 1070-1077.
40.
Thomas, V. G. (1997). Black women in psychology: Old issues and new challenges. Invited address presented at the 105th Annual Convention of the American psychological Association, Chicago, IL.
41.
Thomas, V. G. (2004). Building a contextually responsive evaluation framework: Lessons from working with urban school interventions. In V. G. Thomas & F. I. Stevens (Eds.), Coconstructing a contextually responsive evaluation framework: The talent development model of school reform (pp. 3-23); New Directions for Evaluation, No. 101, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
42.
Thomas, V. G., & Miles, S. E. (1995). Psychology of Black women: Past, present, and future. In H. Landrine (Ed.), Bringing cultural diversity to feminist psychology: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 303-330). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
43.
Triandis, H. C. (Ed.). (1980). Handbook of cross-cultural psychology (Vols. 1-6). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
44.
Unger, R., & Crawford, M. (1996). Women and gender: A feminist psychology (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
45.
U. S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (1979 to 2002 editions). Digest of education statistics. Washington, D. C.: author. (some editions available at http://nces.ed.gov)
46.
Weisstein, N. (1968). Kinder, kirche, kuche as scientific law: Psychology constructs the female. Boston: New England Free Press.
47.
White, J. L. (1991). Toward a Black psychology. In R. L. Jones (Ed.), Black psychology. Berkeley, CA: Cobb & Henry.
48.
Williams, W. S. (2003, March). Possessing the right perspective. Presentation delivered at the Black Studies Conference held at the University of Missouri, Columbia, MO. Retrieved from http://www.abpsy.org.premessage.htm
49.
Wyatt, G. E. (1997). Stolen women: Reclaiming our sexuality, taking back our lives. New York: John Wiley.
50.
Wyche, K. F. (1993). Psychology and African-American women: Findings from applied research. Applied & Preventive Psychology, 2, 115-121.
51.
Wyche, K. F.,& Crosby, F. J. (1996). Women’s ethnicities: Journey through psychology. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
52.
Yoder, J. D., & Kahn, A. S. (1993). Working toward an inclusive psychology of women. American Psychologist, 48, 846-850.
