Do electoral incentives shape public education spending? Although educational budgets are often portrayed as policy-driven, this study alternatively considers whether they reflect political incentives. Drawing on political budget cycle (PBC) theory and leveraging the distinctive history of educational politics and reform in the U.S., we hypothesize that local education spending follows election cycles. Focusing on California, we provide evidence that school districts spend significantly more around election years, when incumbents seek reelection, than in non-election years. Our findings support the presence of PBCs in school districts, fostering important discussion about political accountability, electoral incentives, and budgetary governance in public education.
AidtT. S.VeigaF. J.VeigaL. G. (2011). Election results and opportunistic policies: A new test of the rational political business cycle model. Public Choice, 148, 21–44.
2.
AlesinaA.ParadisiM. (2017). Political budget cycles: Evidence from Italian cities. Economics and Politics, 29(2), 157–177.
3.
AltJ. E.LassenD. D. (2006). Transparency, political polarization, and political budget cycles in OECD countries. American Journal of Political Science, 50(3), 530–550.
4.
AltJ. E.LowryR. C. (1994). Divided government, fiscal institutions, and budget deficits: Evidence from the states. American Political Science Review, 88(4), 811–828.
5.
AltJ. E.RoseS. S. (2009). Context-conditional political budget cycles. In BoixC.StokesS. C. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of comparative politics (pp. 845–867). Oxford University Press.
6.
AndonoskaL.XuH. D. (2023). Political budget cycle and unfunded pension liabilities in states in the USA. Public Money & Management, 44(6), 1–10.
7.
Anessi-PessinaE.SiciliaM.SteccoliniI. (2012). Budgeting and rebudgeting in local governments: Siamese twins?Public Administration Review, 72(6), 875–884.
BartanenB.GrissomJ. A.JoshiE.MeredithM. (2018). Mapping Inequalities in local political representation: Evidence from Ohio School Boards. AERA Open, 4(4), 1–19.
10.
BeeC. A.MoultonS. R. (2015). Political budget cycles in US municipalities. Economics of Governance, 16, 379–403.
11.
BenitoB.GuillamónM. D.RíosA. M. (2017). The electoral budget cycle on municipal waste collection expenditure. Applied Economics, 49(41), 4161–4179.
12.
BennettG.NorrisC. (2023). Why school board elections are garnering national attention. PBS New Hour.
13.
BerryC. R.HowellW. G. (2007). Accountability and local elections: Rethinking retrospective voting. Journal of Politics, 69(3), 844–858.
14.
BesleyT.CaseA. (1995). Does electoral accountability affect economic policy choices? Evidence from gubernatorial term limits. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(3), 769–798.
15.
BlaisA.NadeauR. (1992). The electoral budget cycle. Public Choice, 74(4), 389–403.
16.
BrunnerE. J.RuebenK. (2001). Financing new school construction and modernization: Evidence from California. National Tax Journal, 54(3), 527–539.
17.
BurnettC. M.KoganV. (2017). The politics of potholes: Service quality and retrospective voting in local elections. Journal of Politics, 79(1), 302–314.
California Department of Education (CDOE). (2023c). Local control funding formula. Retrieved September 5, 2023 from https://www.cde.ca.gov/fg/aa/lc/
21.
California Department of Education (CDOE). (2023d). Number of school districts in California by type. Retrieved July 20, 2023 from https://www.cde.ca.gov/re/lr/do/
California State Controller’s Office. (2023). Track Proposition 30/Proposition 55. Retrieved September 5, 2023 from https://trackprop55.sco.ca.gov/
24.
CandelariaC. A.ShoresK. A. (2019). Court-ordered finance reforms in the adequacy era: Heterogeneous causal effects and sensitivity. Education Finance and Policy, 14(1), 31–60.
25.
CardD.PayneA. A. (2002). School finance reform, the distribution of school spending, and the distribution of student test scores. Journal of Public Economics, 83(1), 49–82.
26.
ChortareasG.LogothetisV.PapandreouA. A. (2016). Political budget cycles and reelection prospects in Greece’s municipalities. European Journal of Political Economy, 43, 1–13.
27.
CrawfordE. (2018). How nonpartisan ballot design conceals partisanship: A survey experiment of school board members in two states. Political Research Quarterly, 71(1), 143–156.
28.
DavidsonA. M.McGregorR. M.SiemiatyckyM. (2020). Gender, race and political ambition: The case of Ontario school board elections. Canadian Journal of Political Science, 53(2), 461–475.
29.
DeLucaT. A. (2013). K-12 non-instructional service consolidation: Spending changes and scale economies. Journal of Education Finance, 39(2), 150–173.
30.
DoležalováJ. (2011). The political-budget cycle in countries of the European Union. Review of Economic Perspectives, 11(1), 12–36.
31.
DownsA. (1957). An economic theory of democracy. Harper and Row.
32.
DrazenA. (2001). The political business cycle after 25 years. In BernankeB. S.RogoffK. (Eds.), NBER macroeconomics annual 2000 (Vol. 15, pp. 75–138). MIT Press.
33.
DrazenA.EslavaM. (2010). Electoral manipulation via voter-friendly spending: Theory and evidence. Journal of Development Economics, 92(1), 39–52.
34.
DuncombeW.YingerJ. (2007). Does school district consolidation cut costs?Education Finance and Policy, 2(4), 341–375.
35.
DuncombeW.YingerJ. (2011). Are education cost functions ready for prime time? An examination of their validity and reliability. Peabody Journal of Education, 86(1), 28–57.
36.
EhrenbergR. G.ChaykowskiR. P.EhrenbergR. A. (1988). Are school superintendents rewarded for “performance”? In MonkD. H.UnderwoodJ. (Eds.), Microlevel school finance: Issues and implications for policy (pp. 337–364). Ballinger.
37.
ForemnyD.FreierR.MoessingerM. D.YeterM. (2018). Overlapping political budget cycles. Public Choice, 177, 1–27.
38.
GalliE.RossiS. P. S. (2002). Political budget cycles: The case of the Western German Länder. Public Choice, 110(3-4), 283–303.
39.
GarnG.CopelandG. (2014). School board elections: Theories meet reality. Journal of School Leadership, 24(1), 4–31.
40.
GerwinD. (1969). Budgeting public funds: The decision process in an urban school district. University of Wisconsin Press.
41.
HartneyM. T.HayesS. D. (2021). Off-cycle and out of sync: How election timing influences political representation. State Politics & Policy Quarterly, 21(4), 335–354.
42.
HealyA.MalhotraN. (2009). Myopic voters and natural disaster policy. American Political Science Review, 103(3), 387–406.
43.
HeinesenE. (2004). Determinants of local public school expenditure: A dynamic panel data model. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 34(4), 429–453.
HessF. M.LealD. L. (2005). School house politics: Expenditures, interests, and competition in school board elections. In HowellW. G. (Ed.), Besieged: School boards and the future of education politics (pp. 228–249). Brookings Institution Press.
46.
HymanJ. (2017). Does money matter in the long run?: Effects of school spending on educational attainment. American Economic Journal Economic Policy, 9(4), 256–280.
47.
JohnsonR. C.TannerS. (2018). Money and freedom: The impact of California’s School Finance Reform on academic achievement and the composition of district spending (Technical report). Getting Down to Facts II. Policy Analysis for California Education, PACE. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED594733
48.
JonesP. A.ReitanoV.BuergerC. (2022). Fiscal shocks, budgetary pressures, and public education expenditure stabilization. International Journal of Public Administration, 45(2), 147–156.
49.
KleinF. A.SakuraiS. N. (2015). Term limits and political budget cycles at the local level: Evidence from a young democracy. European Journal of Political Economy, 37, 21–36.
50.
KoganV.LavertuS.PeskowitzZ. (2016). Do school report cards produce accountability through the ballot box?Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 35(3), 639–661.
51.
KoganV.LavertuS.PeskowitzZ. (2018). Election timing, electorate composition, and policy outcomes: Evidence from school districts. American Journal of Political Science, 62(3), 637–651.
52.
Köppl TurynaM.KulaG.BalmasA.WaclawskaK. (2016). The effects of fiscal decentralisation on the strength of political budget cycles in local expenditure. Local Government Studies, 42(5), 785–820.
LeeT. M.PlummerE. (2007). Budget adjustments in response to spending variances: Evidence of ratcheting of local government expenditures. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 19(1), 137–167.
55.
McCafferyJ.BowmanJ. H. (1978). Participatory democracy and budgeting: The effects of Proposition 13. Public Administration Review, 38(6), 530–538.
56.
McMahonW. W. (1970). An economic analysis of major determinants of expenditures on public education. Review of Economics and Statistics, 52(3), 242–252.
57.
MoeT. M. (2005). Teacher unions and school board elections. In HowellW. G. (Ed.), Besieged: School boards and the future of education politics (pp. 254–287). Brookings Institution Press.
58.
MuellerS. (2023). School board elections are latest battleground for polarized national politics. National Public Radio.
59.
National Center for Education Statistics (NCES). (2023). The elementary/secondary information system. Retrieved July 20, 2023, from https://nces.ed.gov/ccd/elsi/
60.
NelsonA. A.BaluR. (2014). Local government responses to fiscal stress: Evidence from the public education sector. Public Administration Review, 74(5), 601–614.
61.
Nguyen-HoangP.ZhangP. (2022). Cap and gap: The fiscal effects of property tax levy limits in New York. Education Finance and Policy, 17(1), 1–26.
62.
NordhausW. D. (1975). The political business cycle. Review of Economic Studies, 42(2), 169–190.
63.
OrdineP.RoseG.GiacobbeP. (2023). The effect of female representation on political budget cycle and public expenditure: Evidence from Italian municipalities. Economics and Politics, 35(1), 97–145.
PaysonJ. A. (2017). When are local incumbents held accountable for government performance? Evidence from US school districts. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 42(3), 421–448.
66.
PerssonT.TabelliniG. (2005). The economic effects of constitutions. MIT press.
67.
PetersonE. R.Rubie-DaviesC. M.Elley-BrownM. J.WiddowsonD. A.DixonR. S.IrvingS. E. (2011). Who is to blame? Students, teachers and parents views on who is responsible for student achievement. Research in Education, 86(1), 1–12.
RakhmanF.SaudagaranS. (2023). The effect of political budget cycle on local governments’ financial statements in a young democracy. Public Money & Management, 43, 512–520.
70.
ReckhowS.HenigJ. R.JacobsenR.Alter LittJ. (2017). “Outsiders with deep pockets”: The nationalization of local school board elections. Urban Affairs Review, 53(5), 783–811.
71.
RobinsonS. E.CaverF.MeierK. J.O’TooleL. J. (2007). Explaining policy punctuations: Bureaucratization and budget change. American Journal of Political Science, 51(1), 140–150.
72.
RogoffK.SibertA. (1988). Elections and macroeconomic policy cycles. Review of Economic Studies, 55(1), 1–16.
73.
RogoffK. S. (1987). Equilibrium political budget cycles (Working Paper No. 2428). National Bureau of Economic Research.
74.
RosenbergJ. (1992). Rationality and the political business cycle: The case of local government. Public Choice, 73(1), 71–81.
75.
RoseS. (2006). Do fiscal rules dampen the political business cycle?Public Choice, 128(3–4), 407–431.
76.
RyuS.ChoI.KimJ. (2021). Does the stringency of state tax and expenditure limitations discourage political manipulation in fiscal reserves?Public Administration Review, 81(3), 375–388.
77.
SchneiderC. J. (2010). Fighting with one hand tied behind the back: political budget cycles in the West German states. Public Choice, 142, 125–150.
78.
SchwartzA. E.StiefelL. (2004). Immigrants and the distribution of resources within an urban school district. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 26(4), 303–327.
ShiM.SvenssonJ. (2006). Political budget cycles: Do they differ across countries and why?Journal of Public Economics, 90(8-9), 1367–1389.
81.
ShmuelA. (2020). The political budget cycle across varying degrees of democracy. Electoral Studies, 68, 102218.
82.
SilvaF.SonstelieJ. (1995). Did serrano cause a decline in school spending?National Tax Journal, 48(2), 199–215.
83.
SosinaV. E.WeathersE. S. (2019). Pathways to inequality: Between-district segregation and racial disparities in school district expenditures. AERA Open, 5(3), 1–15.
84.
SpicerZ.KushnerJ.LamarcheJ. F. (2023). Are municipal budget cycles political? Evidence from Ontario, CanadaState and Local Government Review, 55, 277–287.
85.
SpringJ. (2011). The politics of American education. Taylor & Francis.
86.
StrateJ.WolmanH.MelchiorA. (1993). Are there election-driven tax-and-expenditure cycles for urban governments?Urban Affairs Quarterly, 28(3), 462–479.
ThompsonP. N. (2019). Are school officials held accountable for fiscal stress? Evidence from school district financial intervention systems. Economics of Education Review, 72, 44–54.
Vasquez HeiligJ.WardD. R.WeismanE.ColeH. (2014). Community-based school finance and accountability: A new era for local control in education policy?Urban Education, 49(8), 871–894.
91.
WillumsenD. M.GoetzK. H. (2015). Staggered political institutions: Design and effects. Journal of European Public Policy, 22(7), 1040–1051.
