A Reliance Typology of Collaborative Governance Platforms: Findings From a Comparative Study

Abstract

Collaborative governance has been discussed extensively in the public administration and management literatures, but there has been limited focus on structure and on the platforms supporting ongoing efforts. This article explores thirty collaborative groups over a 12-year period, using surveys, interviews, financial reports, and other data. The study proposes a typology of platforms based on their reliance on stakeholder boards, staff, or partners. The typology reveals implications related to the context, strengths, and weaknesses of different platforms, which can assist with their design, evaluation, and administration.

Keywords

collaborative governance watershed management network governance

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Agranoff

(2006). Inside collaborative networks: Ten lessons for public managers. Public Administration Review, 66(s1), 56–65. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00666.x

Agranoff

(2007). Managing within networks: Adding value to public organizations (ocm71812680). Georgetown University Press. http://www.loc.gov/catdir/toc/ecip071/2006031171.html

Agranoff

McGuire

(2003). Collaborative public management: New strategies for local governments (ocm50561603). Georgetown University Press.

Ansell

Gash

(2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543–571. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum032

Ansell

Gash

(2018). Collaborative platforms as a governance strategy. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 28(1), 16–32. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mux030

Axinn

W. G.

Pearce

L. D.

(2006). Mixed method data collection strategies. New perspectives on anthropological and social demography. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511617898

Bell

Scott

T. A.

(2020). Common institutional design, divergent results: A comparative case study of collaborative governance platforms for regional water planning. Environmental Science & Policy, 111, 63–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2020.04.015

Bidwell

R. D.

Ryan

C. M.

(2006). Collaborative partnership design: The implications of organizational affiliation for watershed partnerships. Society & Natural Resources, 19(9), 827–843.

Blair

(2015). A reflexive exploration of two qualitative data coding techniques. Journal of Methods and Measurement in the Social Sciences, 6(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.2458/v6i1.18772

10.

Bonnell

J. E.

Koontz

T. M.

(2007). Stumbling forward: The organizational challenges of building and sustaining collaborative watershed management. Society & Natural Resources, 20(2), 153–167.

11.

Bryson

J. M.

Crosby

B. C.

Stone

M. M.

(2006). The design and implementation of cross-sector collaborations: Propositions from the literature. Public Administration Review, 66(s1), 44–55. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00665.x

12.

Bryson

J. M.

Crosby

B. C.

Stone

M. M.

(2015). Designing and implementing cross-sector collaborations: Needed and challenging. Public Administration Review, 75(5), 647–663. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12432

13.

Byron

Curtis

Lockwood

(2001). Exploring burnout in Australia’s Landcare program: A case study in the Shepparton region. Society & Natural Resources, 14(10), 901–910.

14.

Cain

B. E.

Gerber

E. R.

Hui

(2020). The challenge of externally generated collaborative governance: California’s attempt at regional water management. American Review of Public Administration, 50(4–5), 428–437.

15.

Chaffin

B. C.

Mahler

R. L.

Wulfhorst

J. D.

Shafii

(2015). The role of agency partnerships in collaborative watershed groups: Lessons from the Pacific northwest experience. Environmental Management (New York), 55(1), 56–68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-014-0367-y

16.

Cheng

A. S.

Daniels

S. E.

(2003). Examining the interaction between geographic scale and ways of knowing in ecosystem management: A case study of place-based collaborative planning. Forest Science, 49(6), 841–854.

17.

Clark

L. R.

(2001). The evolution of watershed councils and the oregon plan: Tempering the populist tradition. Journal of Sustainable Forestry, 13(1–2), 205–221. https://doi.org/10.1300/J091v13n01_02

18.

Cochran

Fields

Barthuly

Nabatchi

Mehdi

M. Q.

(2019). The Atlas of collaboration: Oregon volume: Version 1.0 (p. 256). Portland State University and Syracuse University. https://atlasofcollaboration.org/

19.

Creswell

J. W

. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed). Sage.

20.

Downey

Davis

E. J.

Margerum

(2023). Capacity matters: A 20-year review of the Oregon Watershed Enhancement Board’s operating capacity investments. Oregon Watershed Enhancement Board.

21.

Elliott

(2018). Thinking about the coding process in qualitative data analysis. Qualitative Report, 23, 2850–2861. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2018.3560

22.

Emerson

Nabatchi

(2015). Moving from genus to species: A typology of governance regimes. In Emerson

Nabatchi

(Eds.) Collaborative governance regimes (pp. 159–179). Georgetown University Press.

23.

Emerson

Nabatchi

Balogh

(2011). An integrative framework for collaborative governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mur011

24.

Floress

Prokopy

L. S.

Allred

S. B.

(2011). It’s who you know: Social capital, social networks, and watershed groups. Society & Natural Resources, 24(9), 871–886. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920903493926

25.

Floress

Prokopy

L. S.

Ayres

(2011). Who’s in charge: Role clarity in a Midwestern Watershed Group. Environmental Management, 48(4), 825. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-011-9724-2

26.

Foster-Fishman

P. G.

Berkowitz

S. L.

Lounsbury

D. W.

Jacobson

Allen

N. A.

(2001). Building collaborative capacity in community coalitions: A review and integrative framework. American Journal of Community Psychology, 29(2), 241–261. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010378613583

27.

Genskow

K. D.

(2009). Catalyzing collaboration: Wisconsin’s agency-initiated basin partnerships. Environmental Management, 43(3), 411–424. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-008-9236-x

28.

Habron

(2003). Role of adaptive management for watershed councils. Environmental Management, 31(1), 29–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-002-2763-y

29.

Huxham

Vangen

(2005). Managing to collaborate: The theory and practice of collaborative advantage. Routledge. http://www.loc.gov/catdir/toc/ecip0418/2004013650.html

30.

Imperial

M. T.

(2005). Lessons from six watershed management programs. Administration & Society, 37(3), 281–320.

31.

Innes

J. E.

Booher

D. E.

(2010). Planning with complexity: An introduction to collaborative rationality for public policy. Routledge.

32.

Kania

Kramer

(2011). Collective impact. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 9(1), 36–41.

33.

Margerum

R. D.

(2011). Beyond consensus: Improving collaborative planning and management. MIT Press.

34.

Mason

D. P.

Margerum

R. D.

Rosenberg

Ault

. (2021). The Professionalization of an evolving sector: Evidence from watershed councils. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 32(5), 979–991. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-021-00403-0

35.

Millesen

J. L.

Carman

J. G.

(2019). Building capacity in nonprofit boards: Learning from board self-assessments. Journal of Public and Nonprofit Affairs, 5(1), 74–94. https://doi.org/10.20899/jpna.5.1.74-94

36.

Moore

E. A.

Koontz

T. M.

(2003). A typology of collaborative watershed groups: Citizen-based, agency-based, and mixed partnerships. Society & Natural Resources, 16(5), 451–460.

37.

Nabatchi

Emerson

(2021). Implementation in collaboration governance. In Meek

J. W.

(Ed.), Handbook of collaborative public management (pp. 402–420). Edward Elgar Publishing.

38.

Nikolic

S. J. S.

Koontz

T. M.

(2008). Nonprofit organizations in environmental management: A comparative analysis of government impacts. Journal of Public Administration Research & Theory, 18(3), 441–463.

39.

O’Leary

Vij

(2012). Collaborative public management where have we been and where are we going? The American Review of Public Administration, 42(5), 507–522. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074012445780

40.

Oregon Watershed Enhancement Board. (2020, October 26). Oregon plan for salmon and watersheds. https://www.oregon.gov/oweb/resources/Pages/opsw.aspx

41.

Parker

K. B.

Margerum

R. D.

Dedrick

(2010). Sustaining watershed collaboratives: The issue of coordinator-board relationships. Society & Natural Resources, 23(5), 469–484.

42.

Provan

K. G.

Kenis

(2008). Modes of network governance: Structure, management, and effectiveness. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(2), 229–252. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum015

43.

Provan

K. G.

Lemaire

R. H.

(2012). Core concepts and key ideas for understanding public sector organizational networks: Using research to inform scholarship and practice. Public Administration Review, 72(5), 638–648. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2012.02595.x

44.

Provan

K. G.

Milward

H. B.

(1995). A preliminary theory of interorganizational network effectiveness: A comparative study of four community mental health systems. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40(1), 1–33. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393698

45.

Purdy

J. M.

(2016). The role of power in collaborative governance. In Margerum

R. D.

Robinson

C. J.

(Eds.), The challenges of collaboration in environmental governance: Barriers and responses (pp. 246–264). Edward Elgar Publishing.

46.

Sorensen

Torfing

(2009). Making governance networks effective and democratic through metagovernance. Public Administration, 87(2), 234–258. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2009.01753.x

47.

Stout

Keast

(2021). Collaboration: What does it really mean? In Meek

J. W.

(Ed.), Handbook of collaborative public management (pp. 17–35). Edward Elgar Publishing.

48.

Thompson

Robbins

Sohngen

Arvai

Koontz

(2006). Economy, politics and institutions: From adaptation to adaptive management in climate change. Climatic Change, 78(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-006-9095-5

49.

Thomson

A. M.

Perry

J. L.

(2006). Collaboration processes: Inside the Black box. Public Administration Review, 66(s1), 20–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00663.x

50.

Vangen

Hayes

J. P.

Cornforth

(2014). Governing cross-sector, inter-organizational collaborations. Public Management Review, 17(9), 1–24.

51.

Voluntary Local Watershed Councils, ORS 541.910, Oregon Revised Statute.

52.

Wang

Ran

(2023). Network governance and collaborative governance: A thematic analysis on their similarities, differences, and entanglements. Public Management Review, 25(6), 1187–1211. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2021.2011389

53.

Weber

E. P.

(2003). Bringing society back in: Grassroots ecosystem management, accountability, and sustainable communities. The MIT Press.

54.

Wiley

Bierley

Reeve

Smith

(2013). When local solutions aren’t enough: A strategic funding partnership to restore a large river system. The Foundation Review, 5(1), 89–104.

55.

Yoon

Fields

Cochran

Nabatchi

(2022). Collaborative Governance at Scale: Examining the regimes, platforms, and system in the state of oregon. American Review of Public Administration, 52(6), 439–456. https://doi.org/10.1177/02750740221104521