Government–business relations have been central to general discussions on policymaking in democratic states. This study analyzes government–business relations in policymaking during economic booms and crises in New Order Indonesia (March 1966–May 1998). The analysis is based on pluralist, state autonomy, and capacity theories, and critical discourse analysis is applied to textual sources to reveal the historical dimensions of policymaking during the economic booms and downturns under the New Order Indonesia. The findings show that policymaking during these periods was characterized by complex, dialectical, and dynamic relations between the government and businesses.
Abdulgani-KnappR. (2007). Soeharto: The life and legacy of Indonesia's second president: An authorised biography. Marshall Cavendish.
2.
AlkatiriZ. (2013). The words of magic used during the Soeharto’s Indonesian New Order military regime era 1980–1997. Asian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 2(1), 82–91.
3.
AmirZ. A. (2003). Peta Islam Politik Pasca Soeharto. Pustaka LP3ES. Regime Era 1980–1997. Asian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 2(1), 317–321.
4.
AtkinsonM. M.ColemanW. D. (1992). Policy networks, policy communities and the problems of governance. Governance, 5(2), 154–180.
5.
BaggottR. (1995). Pressure groups today (Vol. 1). Manchester University Press.
6.
BartlettO. (2018). Power, policy ideas and paternalism in non-communicable disease prevention. European Law Journal, 24(6), 474–489.
7.
BengstonD. N.FletcherJ. O.NelsonK. C. (2004). Public policies for managing urban growth and protecting open space: Policy instruments and lessons learned in the United States. Landscape and Urban Planning, 69(2–3), 271–286.
8.
BesleyT.PerssonT. (2009). The origins of state capacity: Property rights, taxation, and politics. American Economic Review, 99(4), 1218–1244.
9.
BinderkrantzA. S.PedersenH. H.BeyersJ. (2017). What is access? A discussion of the definition and measurement of interest group access. European Political Science, 16(3), 306–321.
10.
BoothA. (1998). The Indonesian economy in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries: A history of missed opportunities. St. Martin’s Press.
11.
BrassP. R. (Ed.) (2023). Ethnic groups and the state. Taylor & Francis.
12.
BräutigamD.RaknerL.TaylorS. (2002). Business associations and growth coalitions in Sub-Saharan Africa. Journal of Modern African Studies, 40(4), 519–547.
13.
BresnanJ. (1993). Managing Indonesia: The modern political economy. Columbia University Press.
14.
BrunilaT. (2023). The autonomy of the political and the authority of the state: Carl Schmitt and the de-politicization of the economy. Publications of the Faculty of Social Sciences.
15.
CammackP. (1990). Statism, new institutionalism, and Marxism. Socialist Register, (3–4), 26.
16.
CernyP. G. (1990). The changing architecture of politics: Structure, agency, and the future of the state. Sage Publications.
17.
ChuaC. (2007). The conglomerates in crisis: Indonesia, 1997–1998. Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy, 13(1), 107–127.
18.
ChuaC. (2008). Chinese big business in Indonesia: The state of capital (Vol. 17, 1st ed). Routledge.
19.
CiglerA. J.LoomisB. A.NownesA. J. (Eds.) (2015). Interest group politics. CQ Press.
20.
CoppelC. H. A. R. L. E. S. A. (2008). Anti-chinese violence in Indonesia after Soeharto. In SuryadinataL. E. O. (Ed.), Ethnic Chinese in Contemporary Indonesia (pp. 117–136). Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
21.
CoxallW. N. (2014). Pressure groups in British politics. Routledge.
22.
CraigG.TaylorM.ParkesT. (2004). Protest or partnership? The voluntary and community sectors in the policy process. Social Policy and Administration, 38(3), 221–239.
23.
CraigR. B. (1971). The Bracero program: Interest groups and foreign policy. University of Texas Press.
24.
CribbR. (2010). The historical roots of Indonesia’s New Order: Beyond the colonial comparison. In AspinallE.FealyG. (Eds.), Soeharto’s New Order and its legacy (Vol. 67, pp. 67–79). ANU E Press, The Australian National University, Canberra ACT 0200, Australia.
25.
CrouchH. A. (2010). Political reform in Indonesia after Soeharto. Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
26.
CummingsS.De HaanL.SeferiadisA. A. (2020). How to use critical discourse analysis for policy analysis: A guideline for policymakers and other professionals. Knowledge Management for Development Journal, 15(1), 99–108.
27.
DahlR. A. (2005). Who governs?: Democracy and power in an American city. Yale University Press.
28.
DattaA.JonesH.FebrianyV.HarrisD.DewiR. K.WildL.YoungJ. (2011). The political economy of policy-making in Indonesia. Overseas Development Institute (ODI).
29.
DomhoffG. W. (1996). State autonomy or class dominance? Case studies on policy making in America. Transaction Publishers.
30.
DomhoffG. W. (Ed.) (2017). The power elite and the state. Routledge.
31.
DürA. (2008). Measuring interest group influence in the EU: A note on methodology. European Union Politics, 9(4), 559–576.
32.
EisingR. (2007). Institutional context, organizational resources and strategic choices: Explaining interest group access in the European Union. European Union Politics, 8(3), 329–362.
33.
EklöfS. (2003). Politics, business, and democratization in Indonesia. In GomezE. (Ed.), Political business in east Asia (1st ed., pp. 232–265). Routledge.
34.
EvansP. B. (1985). Bringing the state back in. Cambridge University Press.
35.
FaircloughN. (2001). Critical discourse analysis as a method in social scientific research. Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, 5(11), 121–138.
36.
FaircloughN. (2012). Critical discourse analysis. In Paul GeeJMichaelH (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Discourse Analysis (pp. 9–21). Routledge.
37.
FaneG. (1996). Deregulation in Indonesia: Two steps forward, one step back. Agenda, 3(3), 341–350.
38.
FischerF.MillerG. J. (Eds.) (2017). Handbook of public policy analysis: Theory, politics, and methods. Routledge.
39.
FlowerdewJ.RichardsonJ. E. (Eds.) (2017). The Routledge handbook of critical discourse studies. Taylor & Francis.
40.
FukuokaY. (2012). Politics, business and the state in post-soeharto Indonesia. Contemporary Southeast Asia, 34(1), 80–100. http://www.jstor.org/stable/41446245
41.
GeddesB. (2023). Politician's dilemma: Building state capacity in Latin America (Vol. 25). Univ of California Press.
42.
GrindleM.ThomasJ. (1991). Public choices and policy change: The political economy of reform in developing countries. John Hopkins University Press.
43.
HadizV. (Ed.) (2005). The politics of economic development in Indonesia: Contending perspectives. Routledge.
44.
HadizV. R. (2004). The rise of neo-Third Worldism? The Indonesian trajectory and the consolidation of illiberal democracy. Third World Quarterly, 25(1), 55–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/0143659042000185336
45.
HadizV.RobisonR. (2004). Reorganising power in Indonesia: The politics of oligarchy in an age of markets. Routledge.
46.
HadizV. R.RobisonR. (2013). The political economy of oligarchy and the reorganization of power in Indonesia. Indonesia, 96(1), 35–57.
47.
HaleK.MontjoyR.BrownM. (2015). Pluralism, political participation, and third-party groups (pp. 97–118). How American Elections Work.
48.
HamiltonN. (2014). The limits of state autonomy: Post-revolutionary Mexico (Vol. 673). Princeton University Press.
49.
HansonJ. K.SigmanR. (2021). Leviathan’s latent dimensions: Measuring state capacity for comparative political research. Journal of Politics, 83(4), 1495–1510.
50.
HeldD. (2013). Political theory and the modern state. John Wiley & Sons.
51.
HillH. (2000). The Indonesian economy since 1966: South-east Asia’s emerging giant. Cambridge University Press.
52.
HirstP. Q. (Ed.) (2005). The pluralist theory of the state: selected writings of GDH Cole, JN Figgis and HJ Laski. Routledge.
53.
HojnackiM.KimballD. C. (1999). The who and how of organizations' lobbying strategies in committee. Journal of Politics, 61(4), 999–1024.
54.
IbenskasR.BuneaA. (2021). Legislators, organizations and ties: Understanding interest group recognition in the European Parliament. European Journal of Political Research, 60(3), 560–582.
55.
IkhsanM. F.GhaniA. B. A.IshakM. S. (2017). The dynamics of the Chinese business practice and the local elites behavior: The legacy of pseudo-capitalism in Indonesia’s local development. Journal of Governance and Development, 13(2), 155–169.
56.
IsmantoI. (2020). Business Relations in Democratizing Indonesia. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Recent Innovations (ICRI 2018), pp. 1489–1495. ISBN: 978-989-758-458-9. DOI: 10.5220/0009930614891495. Copyright c 2020 by SCITEPRESS – Science and Technology Publications, Lda.
57.
JannW.WegrichK. (2017). Theories of the policy cycle. In FischerF.MillerG. J. (Eds.), Handbook of public policy analysis (pp. 69–88). Routledge.
58.
JenkinsD. (2015). President Soeharto. In CaseyS.WrightJ. (Eds.), Mental maps in the era of détente and the end of the Cold war 1968–91 (pp. 114–136). Palgrave Macmillan UK.
59.
JessopB. (2016). State theory. In C. Ansell & J. Torfin (Eds.), Handbook on theories of governance (pp. 71–85). EE Elgar Online.
60.
JesusA. M. D. (2010). Policy-making process and interest groups: How do Local Government Associations influence policy outcome in Brazil and the Netherlands?Brazilian Political Science Review, 4(1), 69–101.
61.
JohanssonA. C. (2019). Political change and the business elite in Indonesia. In MendozaR. U.BejaE. L.Jr.TeehankeeJ. C.La ViñaA. G. M.Villamejor-MendozaM. F. (Eds.), Building Inclusive Democracies in ASEAN (pp. 143–172). World Scientific.
62.
JordanG. (1990). Sub-governments, policy communities and networks: Refilling the old bottles?Journal of Theoretical Politics, 2(3), 319–338.
63.
KadewandanaD.Endrődi-KovácsV. (2022). The relationship between business and politics: A study of rent-seeking in Indonesia. In SetiawanB.MulyanaB.WikurendraE. A. (Eds.), Economic and business trajectory: Indonesia, Asia and Europe (pp. 133–147). Delta Pijar Katulistiwa.
64.
KaseP. (2015). Business sectors and government policies: A comparison of New Zealand and Indonesia. International Journal of Business Management and Economics Research, 2(1), 11–38.
65.
KawamuraK. (2008). Indonesia's development policy in historical perspective. JICA Background Paper, (2).
66.
KimY. T. (1999). Neoliberalism and the decline of the developmental state. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 29(4), 441–461.
67.
KiranaA. D. (2019). Reproduksi Narasi Tentang Kepahlawan Soeharto: Studi Representasi di Museum Hm Soeharto. SASDAYA: Gadjah Mada Journal of Humanities, 3(2), 120–140.
68.
KuncoroA.ResosudarmoB. P. (2006). Understanding Indonesian Economic Reforms, 1983–2000. In FanelliJ. M.McMahonG. (Eds.), Understanding Market Reforms: Volume 2: Motivation, implementation and Sustainability (pp. 294–324). Palgrave Macmillan UK.
69.
KusumahB.RahajaM.ParatwidjajaD. (1998). Menghujat importir kesayangan: status import terdaftar bisa mendatangkan fee jutaan dollar. Business (Indonesian Magazine). Jakarta, 21 Agustus.
70.
KørnøvL.ThissenW. A. H. (2000). Rationality in decision- and policy-making: Implications for strategic environmental assessment. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 18(3), 191–200.
71.
LanT. J. (2018). Chinese Indonesians and China-Indonesia relations: A juxtaposition of identity and politics. Masyarakat Indonesia, 43(2), 201–210.
72.
LeftwichA. (2009). Analysing the politics of state-business relations. Institutions and Pro-Poor Growth (IPPG) Discussion Paper Series, 23.
73.
LesterJ. N.LochmillerC. R.GabrielR. (2016). Locating and applying critical discourse analysis within education policy. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 24, 102–102.
74.
LiddleR. W. (1991). The relative autonomy of the third world politician: Soeharto and Indonesian economic development in comparative perspective. International Studies Quarterly, 35(4), 403–427.
75.
LiddleR. W. (1999). The Politics of Economic Development in Indonesia: Contending Perspectives. Edited by Ian ChalmersHadizVedi R.London and New York: Routledge, 1997. xxx, 269 pp. $75.00 (cloth). Journal of Asian Studies, 58(3), 888–890.
76.
LimY.LeeY. (2023). Interest Group Politics. In HanJ.PardoR. P.ChoY. (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of South Korean Politics (Vol. 326, pp. 326–341).Oxford University Press.
77.
LindbladJ. T. (2003). Business responses to crisis in Indonesia: The 1930s and the 1990s. Australian Economic History Review, 43(2), 169–182.
78.
LloydG. J. (2001). Chinese Indonesians, unsettled past, uncertain future. In GodleyM. R.LloydG. J. (Eds.), Perspectives on the Chinese Indonesians (pp. 1–19). Crawford House Publishing.
79.
LundbergE. (2014). A pluralist state?: Civil society organizations’ access to the Swedish policy process 1964-2009 (Doctoral Dissertation, Örebro universitet).
80.
LynggaardK.TriantafillouP. (2023). Discourse analysis and strategic policy advice: Manoeuvring, navigating, and transforming policy. Journal of European Public Policy, 30(9), 1936–1959.
81.
LynnL. (2008). What is a neo-Weberian state? Reflections on a concept and its implications. NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, 1(2), 17–30.
82.
MackieJ. (2010). Patrimonialism: The new order and beyond. In AspinallE.FialyG. (Eds.), Soeharto’s new order and its legacy (pp. 81–96). ANU E Press.
83.
MahoneyC. (2007). Lobbying success in the United States and the European Union. Journal of Public Policy, 27(1), 35–56.
84.
MaJ.DeDeoS. (2018). State power and elite autonomy in a networked civil society: The board interlocking of Chinese non-profits. Social Networks, 54, 291–302.
85.
MalatestaD.SmithC. R. (2014). Lessons from resource dependence theory for contemporary public and nonprofit management. Public Administration Review, 74(1), 14–25.
86.
MaloneyW. A.JordanG.McLaughlinA. M. (1994). Interest groups and public policy: The insider/outsider model revisited. Journal of Public Policy, 14(1), 17–38.
87.
MannM. I. C. H. A. E. L. (1986). The sources of Social Sower (Vol. i). Cambridge University Press.
88.
MarchJ. G.OlsenJ. P. (1983). The new institutionalism: Organizational factors in political life. American Political Science Review, 78(3), 734–749.
89.
MaronA.ShalevM. (Eds.) (2017). Neoliberalism as a state project: Changing the political economy of Israel. Oxford University Press.
90.
MarshallD. (2015). Explaining interest group interactions with party group members in the European Parliament: Dominant party groups and coalition formation. JCMS Journal of Common Market Studies, 53(2), 311–329.
91.
MarshD.LewisC. (2014). The political power of big business: A response to Bell and Hindmoor. New Political Economy, 19(4), 628–633.
92.
MarshD.RhodesR. A. W. (2002). Policy communities and issue networks: beyond typology. Social Networks. Critical Concepts in Sociology, (35), 89–119.
93.
MaxfieldS.SchneiderB. R. (Eds.) (1997). Business and the state in developing countries. Cornell University Press.
94.
McCullochN.Peter TimmerC. (2008). Rice policy in Indonesia: A special issue. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 44(1), 33–44.
95.
McKayA. (2012). Buying policy? The effects of lobbyists’ resources on their policy success. Political Research Quarterly, 65(4), 908–923.
96.
McLeodR. H. (2000). Soeharto's Indonesia: a better class of corruption. Agenda: A Journal of Policy Analysis and Reform, (7), 99–112.
97.
MetzF.BrandenbergerL. (2023). Policy networks across political systems. American Journal of Political Science, 67(3), 569–586.
98.
MietznerM.FordM.PepinskyT. B. (2014). Oligarchs, politicians, and activists: Contesting party politics in post-suharto Indonesia (pp. 99–116). Wealth, Power and Contemporary Indonesian Politics.
99.
MitchellT. (1999). Society, economy, and the state effect. State/culture: State-formation after the cultural turn, 76, 90.
NeilsonD. (1998). State autonomy and the mode of political regulation: neo-liberal restructuring in New Zealand. Studies in Political Economy, 57(1), 45–71.
102.
NordlingerE. A.LowiT. J.FabbriniS. (1988). The return to the state: Critiques. American Political Science Review, 82(3), 875–901.
103.
OlsonM. (2022). The rise and decline of nations. Yale University Press.
104.
PetersB. G. (2018). American public policy: Promise and performance. CQ Press.
105.
PiersonC. (2012). The modern state. Routledge.
106.
PratamaP. Y.BudimanB.SarmiasihM. (2019). A comparative political analysis between the new order regime and the reformed era in Indonesia: A case study of oligarchy politics in the mining industry of East Kalimantan. Jurnal Studi Pemerintahan, 194–207.
107.
PurdeyJ. (2006). Anti-chinese violence in Indonesia, 1996–1999. University of Hawaii Press.
108.
RasmussenM. K. (2015). The battle for influence: The politics of business lobbying in the European Parliament. JCMS Journal of Common Market Studies, 53(2), 365–382.
109.
ReidA. (2001). Outsider’ status and economic success. In GodleyMichael R.LloydGrayson J. (Eds.), Perspectives on the Chinese Indonesians (pp. 67–82). Crawford House Publishing.
110.
ResosudarmoB. P.KuncoroA. (2006). The political economy of Indonesian economic reforms: 1983–2000. Oxford Development Studies, 34(3), 341–355.
111.
RhodesR. A. (2017). Network governance and the differentiated polity: Selected essays (Vol. 1). Oxford University Press.
112.
RhodesR. A. W. (2006). Policy Network. In MoranM.ReinM.GoodinR. E. (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Public Policy (Vol. 6, p. 425–447). Oxford University Press.
113.
RhodesR. A. W. (2013, February). How to manage your policy network. In: Workshop paper for the Commonwealth Secretariat, London 7th to 8th February.
114.
RichardsonJ. (2000). Government, interest groups and policy change. Political Studies, 48(5), 1006–1025.
115.
RobisonR. (1992). Indonesia: An autonomous domain of social power?Pacific Review, 5(4), 338–349.
116.
RobisonR. (2009). Indonesia: The rise of capital. Equinox Publishing.
117.
RobisonR.HadizV. R. (2005). Reorganising power in Indonesia: The politics of oligarchy in an age of markets. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 41(3), 395–396.
118.
RobisonR. J. (1982). The transformation of the state in Indonesia. Bulletin of Concerned Asian Scholars, 14(1), 48–60.
119.
RobisonR.RosserA. (1998). Contesting reform: Indonesia's new order and the IMF. World Development, 26(8), 1593–1609.
120.
RosserA. (2013). The politics of economic liberalization in Indonesia: State, market and power. Routledge.
121.
SahrasadH. (2019). Colonial structure, Chinese minority and racial violence in Indonesia: A social reflection. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute (BIRCI-Journal): Humanities and Social Sciences, 2(2), 209–221.
122.
SatoY. (2003). Post-crisis economic reform in Indonesia: Policy for intervening in ownership in historical perspective.
123.
SatoY. (2019). “Reemerging Developmental State in Democratized Indonesia,” In Developmental State Building: The Politics of Emerging Economies, edited by Y.SaviraniA. (2015). Business and politics in provincial Indonesia: The batik and construction sector in Pekalongan, Central Java (Doctoral dissertation, Universiteit van Amsterdam [Host]).
124.
SchmitterP. C. (1983). Democratic theory and neo-corporatist practice. Social Research, (50), 885–928.
125.
SchumakerP. (2021). Critical pluralism, democratic performance, and community power. University Press of Kansas.
126.
SchwarzA. (Ed.). (1995). A nation in waiting: Indonesia in the 1990s (2nd ed.). Westview Press.
127.
SchwarzA. (2018). A nation in waiting: Indonesia's search for stability. Routledge.
128.
SkocpolT. (1987). Bringing the state back in: Strategies for analysis in current research. In EvansP. B.RueschemeyerD.SkocpolT. (Eds.), Bringing the state back in. (pp. 3–37). Cambridge University Press.
129.
SmithM. J. (1990). Pluralism, reformed pluralism and neo-pluralism: The role of pressure groups in policy-making. Political Studies, 38(2), 302–322.
130.
SmithM. J. (1993). Pressure, power and policy: State autonomy and policy networks in Britain and the United States (pp. 87–87). Harvester Wheatsheaf.
131.
SoesastroH.BasriM. C. (2005). The political economy of trade policy in Indonesia. ASEAN Economic Bulletin, 22(1), 3–18.
132.
SoesastroM. H. (1989). The political economy of deregulation in Indonesia. Asian Survey, 29(9), 853–869.
133.
SoiferH. D. (2012). Measuring state capacity in contemporary Latin America. Revista de Ciencia Política, 32(3), 585–598.
134.
StevenR. (2016). Japanese investment in Thailand, Indonesia and Malaysia: A decade of JASEAN. In MooreJ. (Ed.), The other Japan (pp. 199–245). Routledge.
135.
SuryadinataL. (1999). A year of upheaval and uncertainty: The fall of Soeharto and rise of Habibie. Southeast Asian Affairs, 1999(1), 111–127.
136.
SutherlandH. (1975). The priyayi. Indonesia, 19, 57–77.
137.
SuttonR. (1999). The policy process: An overview (p. 35). Overseas Development Institute.
138.
TjosvoldD.PengA. C.ChenY. F.SuF. (2008). Business and government interdependence in China: Cooperative goals to develop industries and the marketplace. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 25(2), 225–249.
139.
Van ZandenJ. L.MarksD. (2013). An economic history of Indonesia: 1800-2010. Routledge.
140.
VowlesJ.RoperJ. (1997). Business and politics during the postwar era. The political economy of New Zealand, 100–118.
141.
WalkerR. B. J. (1991). State sovereignty and the articulation of political space/time. Millennium - Journal of International Studies, 20(3), 445–461.
142.
WangJ. C. F. (1994). Comparative Asian politics: Power, policy and change. Prentice Hall International, Inc.
143.
WardhanaA. (1998). Economic reform in Indonesia: The transition from resource dependence to industrial competitiveness. Behind East Asian growth: The political and social foundations of prosperity. Roudlege.
144.
WasinoW.HartatikE. S.ShintasiiwiF. A. (2021). Wong Cilik in Javanese history and culture, Indonesia. Kemanusiaan the Asian Journal of Humanities, 28(2), 31–51.
145.
WattsD. (2007). Pressure groups. Edinburgh University Press.
146.
WeissL. (1995). Governed interdependence: Rethinking the government-business relationship in East Asia. Pacific Review, 8(4), 589–616.
147.
WieT. K. (2006). The Indonesian government’s economic policies towards the ethnic Chinese: Beyond economic nationalism? Southeast Asia's Chinese businesses in an Era of globalization: Coping with the rise of China (pp. 76–101). Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
148.
WilliamsJ. T.CollinsB. K. (1997). The political economy of corporate taxation. American Journal of Political Science, 41(1), 208–244.
149.
WilsonG. A. (2013). Community resilience, policy corridors and the policy challenge. Land Use Policy, 31, 298–310.
150.
WinsidiW.IdiA.Rifa’IA. (2020). The dynamics of religious political assertiveness of President Soeharto. International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding, 7(4), 125–131.
151.
WintersJ. A. (2013). Oligarchy and democracy in Indonesia. Indonesia, 96(1), 11–33.
152.
WodakR. (2015). Critical discourse analysis, discourse-historical approach. In TracyK. (General Editor), IlieC.SandelT. (Associate Editors), The international encyclopedia of language and social interaction (pp. 1–14). John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
153.
WodakR.MeyerM. (Eds.) (2015). Methods of critical discourse studies. Sage.
154.
WrightM. (1988). Policy community, policy network and comparative industrial policies. Political Studies, 36(4), 593–612.
155.
YenW.LiuL.WonE.Testriono. (2022). The imperative of state capacity in public health crisis: Asia's early COVID-19 policy responses. Governance, 35(3), 777–798.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
