The Hierarchical Configurations of Policy Networks: A Study of Decision-Making Processes in Urban Transport

Abstract

This study sheds light on a commonly overlooked aspect in network literature: the potential for hierarchized behavior within networks. Providing a longitudinal case study of decision-making behavior in urban transport policy networks, the study also adds to calls for longitudinal studies in the field of public administration. By analyzing documents and interviews, the study reveals the gradual shift towards hierarchical decision-making within networked structures. Furthermore, it highlights how organizational variables shape networked behavior over time, both facilitating and constraining hierarchized behavior. Consequently, this article suggests that hierarchized and collaborative dynamics co-exist and co-evolve within policy networks.

Keywords

networks hierarchization collaboration decision-making urban transport

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ansell

(2000). The networked polity regional development in western Europe. Governance: An International Journal of Policy and Administration, 13(3), 303–333.

Ansell

Gash

(2007). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543–571. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum032

Askim

Bjurstrøm

K. H.

Kjærvik

(2019). Quasi-contractual ministerial steering of state agencies: Its intensity, modes, and how agency characteristics matter. International Public Management Journal, 22(3), 470–498. https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2018.1547339

Bali

A. S.

Howlett

Lewis

J. M.

Ramesh

(2021). Procedural policy tools in theory and practice. Policy and Society, 40(3), 295–311. doi:10.1080/14494035.2021.1965379

Bach

Wegrich

(2019). The blind spots of public bureaucracy and the politics of non-coordination (1st 2019. ed.). Palgrave Macmillan Cham.

Blom-Hansen

(2003). Avoiding the ‘joint-decision trap’: Lessons from intergovernmental relations in Scandinavia. European Journal of Political Research, 35, 35–67. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.00441

Cepiku

Mastrodascio

(2019). Leadership behaviours in local government networks: An empirical replication study. Public Management Review, 23(3), 354–375. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2019.1679233

Davidson

Coenen

Acuto

Gleeson

(2019). Reconfiguring urban governance in an age of rising city networks: A research agenda. Urban Studies, 56(16), 3540–3555. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098018816010

Egeberg

(1999). The impact of bureaucratic structure on policy making. Public Administration, 77(1), 155–170. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9299.00148

10.

Egeberg

Trondal

(2009). Political leadership and bureaucratic autonomy: Effects of agencification. Governance, 22(4), 673–688. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.2009.01458.x

11.

Egeberg

Trondal

(2018). An organizational approach to public governance: Understanding and design. Oxford University Press.

12.

Emerson

Nabatchi

(2015). Collaborative governance regimes. Georgetown University Press.

13.

Grix

Phillpots

(2010). Revisiting the ‘governance narrative’. Public Policy and Administration, 26(1), 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/0952076710365423

14.

Head

B. W.

Alford

(2015). Wicked problems. Administration & Society, 47(6), 711–739. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399713481601

15.

Hood

C. C.

(1986). The tools of government. Chatham House.

16.

Howlett

(2000). Managing the hollow state procedural policy instruments and modern governance. Canadian Public Administration, 43(4), 412–431.

17.

Hustedt

Danken

(2017). Institutional logics in inter-departmental coordination: Why actors agree on a joint policy output. Public Administration, 95(3), 730–743. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12331

18.

Isett

K. R.

Mergel

I. A.

LeRoux

Mischen

P. A.

Rethemeyer

R. K.

(2010). Networks in public administration scholarship: Understanding where we are and where we need to go. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21(1), i157–i173. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muq061

19.

Keast

(2016). Network governance. In Ansell

Torfing

(Eds.), Handbook on theories of governance (pp. 442–453). Edward Elgar.

20.

Kickert

W. J. M.

Klijn

E.-H.

Koppenjan

J. F. M.

(1997). Managing complex networks: Strategies for the public sector. Sage.

21.

Krogh

A. H.

(2020). Facilitating collaboration in publicly mandated governance networks. Public Management Review, 24(4), 631–653. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2020.1862288

22.

Lodge

Wegrich

(2014). The Problem-solving capacity of the modern state: Governance challenges and administrative capacities. Oxford University Press.

23.

McGuire

(2006). Collaborative public management assessing what we know and how we know it. Public Administration Review, 66, 33–43.

24.

Meek

J. W.

(2021). Handbook of collaborative public management. Edward Edgar Publishing.

25.

Ministry of Transport. (2012). Nasjonal transportplan 2014–2023.

26.

Ministry of Transport. (2017). Nasjonal transportplan 2018–2029.

27.

Murdoch

MacCarthaigh

Geys

(2023). It’s about time: Temporal dynamics and longiutdinal research designs in public administration. Queen’s University Belfast.

28.

O’Toole

J. L. J.

(1997). Treating networks seriously: Practical and research-based agendas in public administration. Public Administration Review, 57(1), 45–52.

29.

O’Toole

J. L. J.

Meier

K. J.

(2004). Public management in intergovernmental networks: Matching structural networks and managerial networking. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 14(4), 469–494. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muh032

30.

Page

E. C.

(1992). Political authority and bureaucratic power: A comparative analysis (2nd ed.). Harvester Wheatsheaf.

31.

Peters

B. G.

(2015). Pursuing horizontal management: The politics of public sector coordination. University Press of Kansas.

32.

Pierre

Peters

B. G.

(2017). The shirking bureaucrat: A theory in search of evidence? Policy and Politics, 45(2), 157–172. https://doi.org/10.1332/030557317X14845830916703

33.

Powell

W. W.

(1990). Netiher market nor hierarchy: Network forms of organization (Vol. 12). JAI Press.

34.

Provan

K. G.

Milward

H. B.

(1995). A preliminary theory of interorganizational network effectiveness: A comparative study of four community mental health systems. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40(1), 1–33.

35.

Purdy

J. M.

(2012). A framework for assessing power in collaborative governance processes. Public Administration Review, 72(3), 409–417. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02525.x

36.

Ran

(2018). The entangled twins: Power and trust in collaborative governance. Administration & Society, 51(4), 607–636. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399718801000

37.

Saz-Carranza

Salvador Iborra

Albareda

(2016). The power dynamics of mandated network administrative organizations. Public Administration Review, 76(3), 449–462. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12445

38.

Scharpf

F. W.

(1994). Games real actors could play. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 6(1), 27–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/0951692894006001002

39.

Simon

(1944). Decision-making and administrative organization. Public Administration Review, 4(1), 16–30.

40.

Simon

(1997). Administrative behavior: A study of decision-making processes in administrative organization (4th ed.). Simon & Schuster Free Press.

41.

Stout

Keast

(2021). Collaboration: What does it really mean? In Meek

J. W.

(Ed.), Handbook of collaborative public management (pp. 17–35). Edward Elgar Publishing.

42.

Streeck

Thelen

K. A.

(2005). Beyond continuity: Institutional change in advanced political economies. Oxford University Press.

43.

Tønnesen

Krogstad

J. R.

Christiansen

Isaksson

(2019). National goals and tools to fulfil them: A study of opportunities and pitfalls in Norwegian meta governance of urban mobility. Transport Policy, 81, 35–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2019.05.018

44.

Trein

Biesbroek

Bolognesi

Cejudo

G. M.

Duffy

Hustedt

Meyer

(2020). Policy coordination and integration: A research agenda. Public Administration Review, 81(5), 973–977. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13180

45.

Trondal

(2022). “Let’s organize”: The organizational basis for stable public governance. Public Administration, 101(1), 201–220. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12858

46.

van Duijn

Bannink

Ybema

. (2021). Working toward network governance: Local actors’ strategies for navigating tensions in localized health care governance. Administration & Society, 54(4), 660–689. https://doi.org/10.1177/00953997211033818

47.

Wegrich

Kostka

Hammerschmid

(2017). The governance of infrastructure. Oxford University Press.

48.

Wegrich

Stimac

(2014). Coordination capacity. In Lodge

Wegrich

(Eds.), The problem-solving capacity of the modern state (pp. 41–62). Oxford University Press.

49.

Westskog

Amundsen

Christiansen

Tønnesen

(2020). Urban contractual agreements as an adaptive governance strategy: Under what conditions do they work in multi-level cooperation? Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 22(4), 554–567. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908x.2020.1784115

50.

Zhou

Dai

(2023). Within the shadow of hierarchy: The role of hierarchical interventions in environmental collaborative governance. Governance, 36, 187–208. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12664