There is a voluminous literature devoted to identifying factors that affect the success of collaborative processes. Our first research goal was to develop a list of 13 elements of effective collaborative procedural design, which could then be applied to a case study of an innovative water policy collaboration. The case study indicated that the design of that collaborative process embodied significant limitations, and those imperfections provided valuable insights into how to design a successful collaboration. Our second research goal was to utilize what we learned from the case study to propose a typology for designing a successful collaborative process.
AdlerP. A.AdlerP. (1994). Observational techniques. In DenzinN.LincolnY. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 377–392). SAGE.
2.
AnsellC.GashA. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543–571. http://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum032
3.
BensonD.GainA. K.RouillardJ. J. (2015). Water governance in a comparative perspective: From IWRM to a “Nexus” approach?Water Alternatives, 8(1), 756–773.
4.
BiddleJ. C. (2017). Improving the effectiveness of collaborative governance regimes: Lessons from watershed partnerships. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 143(9), Article 04017048.
5.
CosgroveW. J. (2003). Water security and peace. In CosgroveW. J. (Ed.), Water security and peace: A synthesis of studies prepared under the PCCP-water for peace process (p. 107). UNESCO.
6.
D’EstreeT. P.ColbyB. B. (2004). Braving the currents: Evaluating environmental conflict resolution in the river basins of the American West. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
7.
DungumaroE. W.MaduluN. F. (2003). Public participation in integrated water resources management: The case of Tanzania. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C, 28(20), 1009–1014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pce.2003.08.042
8.
EmersonK.NabatchiT. (2015). Collaborative governance regimes. Georgetown University Press.
9.
EmersonK.NabatchiT.BaloghS. (2012). An integrative framework for collaborative governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mur011
FisherR.UryW. L.PattonB. (2011). Getting to Yes: Negotiating agreement without giving in. Penguin.
15.
FungA. (2006). Varieties of participation in complex governance. Public Administration Review, 66, 66–75. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4096571
16.
Gallego-AyalaJ. (2013). Trends in integrated water resources management research: A literature review. Water Policy, 15(4), 628–647. https://doi.org/10.2166/wp.2013.149
17.
GerlakA. K.HeikkilaT.LubellM. (2013). The promise and performance of collaborative governance. In KamienieckiS.KraftM. E. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of U.S. environmental policy (pp. 413–434). Oxford University Press.
18.
HeikkilaT. (2017). Evidence for tackling the complexities of water governance. Public Administration Review, 77(1), 17–20.
19.
HeikkilaT.SchlagerE. C. (2012). Addressing the issues: The choice of environmental conflict-resolution venues in the United States. American Journal of Political Science, 56(4), 774–786.
20.
HemmatiM. (2002). Multi-stakeholder processes for governance and sustainability: Beyond deadlock and conflict. Routledge.
HerbertG. (2013b, October11). [Letter to Water Strategy Advisory Team Members].
23.
HerbertG. (2016, November18). [Letter to Water Strategy Advisory Team Members].
24.
KawulichB. (2005). Participant observation as a data collection method. Forum of Qualitative Social Research, 6(2), Art. 43. https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-6.2.466
25.
KoontzT. M. (2006). Collaboration for sustainability? A framework for analyzing government impacts in collaborative-environmental management. Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy, 2(1), 15–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/15487733.2006.11907974
26.
KoontzT. M. (2016). Back to the future? Collaborative environmental governance theory and practice. In MargerumR. D.RobinsonC. J. (Eds.), The challenges of collaboration in environmental governance: Barriers and responses (pp. 54–80). Edward Elgar.
27.
KoontzT. M.JohnsonE. M. (2004). One size does not fit all: Matching breadth of stakeholder participation to watershed group accomplishments. Policy Sciences, 37(2), 185–204. https://doi.org/10.1023/b:Olic.0000048532.94150.07
28.
KoontzT. M.NewigJ. (2014). From planning to implementation: Top-down and bottom-up approaches for collaborative watershed management. Policy Studies Journal, 42(3), 416–442. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/psj.12067
29.
KoontzT. M.SteelmanT. A.CarminJ.KorfmacherK. S.MoseleyC.ThomasC. W. (2004). Collaborative Environmental Management: What Roles for Government. Resources for the Future.
30.
LentonR.MullerM. (2012). Integrated water resources management in practice: Better water management for development. Routledge.
MargerumR. D. (2008). A typology of collaboration efforts in environmental management. Environmental Management, 41(4), 487–500. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-008-9067-9
35.
MargerumR. D. (2011). Beyond consensus: Improving collaborative planning and management. MIT Press.
36.
MargerumR. D.RobinsonC. J. (2015). Collaborative partnerships and the challenges for sustainable water management. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 12, 53–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2014.09.003
37.
McDougallC.BanjadeM. R. (2015). Social capital, conflict, and adaptive collaborative governance: Exploring the dialectic. Ecology and Society, 20(1), Article 44.
38.
McKinneyM.FieldP. (2008). Evaluating community-based collaboration on federal lands and resources. Society & Natural Resources, 21(5), 419–429. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920701744215
SamuelsonC. D.VedlitzA.WhittenG. D.MatlockM.AlstonL. T.PetersonT. R.GilbertzS. J. (2005). Citizen participation and representation in collaborative engagement processes. In SabatierP. A.FochtW.LubellM.TrachtenbergZ.VedlitzA.MatlockM. (Eds.), Swimming upstream: Collaborative approaches to watershed management (pp. 137–170). MIT Press.
ScottT. (2015). Does Collaboration make any difference? Linking collaborative governance to environmental outcomes. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 34(3), 537–566. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/pam.21836
49.
ShabmanL.ScodariP. (2012). Towards integrated water resources management: A conceptual framework for U. S. Army Corps of Engineers water and related land resources implementation studies (2012-VSP-01). U. S. Army Corps of Engineers. http://www.iwr.usace.army.mil/Portals/70/docs/iwrreports/2012-VSP-01.pdf
SpradleyJ. (1980). Participant observation. Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
54.
TaylorP. L.SonnenfeldD. A. (2017). Water crises and institutions: Inventing and reinventing governance in an era of uncertainty. Society & Natural Resources, 30(4), 395–403. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2017.1274208
55.
TorfingJ.PetersB. G.PierreJ.SørensenE. (2012). Interactive governance: Advancing the paradigm. Oxford University Press.
56.
TrachtenbergZ.FochtW. (2005). A trust based guide to stakeholder participation. In SabatierP. A.FochtW.LubellM.TrachtenbergZ.VedlitzA.MatlockM. (Eds.), Swimming upstream: Collaborative approaches to watershed management (pp. 85–136). MIT Press.
57.
UlibarriN.ScottT. A. (2017). Linking network structure to collaborative governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 27(1), 163–181. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muw041
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. (2014). Building strong collaborative relationships for a sustainable water resources future: Understanding integrated water resources management.
