The field of public leadership studies has witnessed limited research on paternalistic leadership (PL) and its impact on civil servants. The present study draws upon a questionnaire survey of 2,064 Chinese civil servants to explore the impact of administrative leaders’ PL styles on civil servants’ public service motivation (PSM) and the mediating mechanism that underlies its effects. When PL is exercised in a benevolent or moral style, it intensifies subordinates’ PSM. But authoritarian behavior, whether used separately, or in combination with another style (as in benevolent-authoritarian, moral-authoritarian or benevolent-moral-authoritarian leadership), showed an insignificant effect on PSM. In addition, trust in leader mediates the relationship between benevolent, moral and AL styles and subordinates’ PSM. Our findings suggest that even in an authoritarian-oriented society such as China, the authoritarian variant of PL is increasingly losing its influence, and moral and benevolent leadership have become more important in modern organizations, and should be the primary leadership strategies employed by government leaders.
AlbrechtS.TravaglioneA. (2003). Trust in public-sector senior management. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 14(1), 76–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585190210158529
2.
AndersenL. B.BjørnholtB.BroL. L.Holm-PetersenC. (2018). Leadership and motivation: A qualitative study of transformational leadership and public service motivation. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 84(4), 675–691. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852316654747
3.
AntonakisJ.BendahanS.JacquartP.LaliveR. (2014). Causality and endogeneity: Problems and solutions. In DayD. V. (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Leadership and Organizations (pp. 93–117). Oxford University Press.
4.
AryeeS.BudhwarP. S.ChenZ. X. (2002). Trust as a mediator of the relationship between organizational justice and work outcomes: Test of a social exchange model. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23(3), 267–285. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/job.138/abstract
5.
AryeeS.ChenZ. X.SunL. Y.DebrahY. A. (2007). Antecedents and outcomes of abusive supervision: Test of a trickle-down model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(1), 191–201. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.1.191
6.
AssafA. G.TsionasM. (2020). Correcting for endogeneity in hospitality and tourism research. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 32(8), 2657–2675. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijchm-02-2020-0153
7.
AycanZ. (2006). Paternalism: Towards conceptual refinement and operationalization. In YangK. S.HwangK. K.KimU. (Eds.), Scientific advances in indigenous psychologies: empirical, philosophical, and cultural contributions (pp. 445–466). Sage Inc.
8.
BassB.AvolioB. (2000). Multifactor leadership questionnaire (2nd ed.). Mind Garden.
9.
BermanE. M. (1997). Dealing with cynical citizens. Public Administration Review, 57(2), 105–122. https://doi.org/10.2307/977058
10.
BoyceC. J.WoodA. M.BanksJ.ClarkA. E.BrownG. D. (2013). Money, well-being, and loss aversion: Does an income loss have a greater effect on well-being than an equivalent income gain?Psychological Science, 24(12), 2557–2562. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613496436
11.
BrownM. E.TreviñoL. K.HarrisonD. A. (2005). Ethical leadership: A social learning perspective for construct development and testing. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 97(2), 117–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2005.03.002
ChenC. A.HsiehC. W.ChenD. Y. (2014). Fostering public service motivation through workplace trust: Evidence from public managers in Taiwan. Public Administration, 92(4), 954–973. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12042
14.
ChenH. Y.KaoH. S. R.WuC. F. (2007). The effects of Chinese paternalistic leadership on multinational subordinates, psychological health: A study of Chinese expatiate managers. Research in Applied Psychology, 36, 223–244.
15.
ChenM. J. (2002). Paradox: The Chinese “middle way” perspective. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 19(2–3), 179–199. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016235517735
16.
ChenX. P.EberlyM. B.ChiangT. J.FarhJ. L.ChengB. S. (2014). Affective trust in Chinese leaders: Linking paternalistic leadership to employee performance. Journal of Management, 40(3), 796–819. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311410604
17.
ChenX. P.FarhJ. L. (1999, August). The effectiveness of transactional and transformational leader behaviors in Chinese organizations: Evidence from Taiwan. The Annual National Meeting of Academy of Management, Chicago.
18.
ChengB. S.ChouL. F.FarhJ. L. (2000). A triad model of paternalistic leadership: The constructs and measurement. Indigenous Psychological Research in Chinese Societies, 14, 3–64. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-839X.2004.00137.x
19.
ChengB. S.ChouL. F.WuT. Y.HuangM. P.FarhJ. L. (2004). Paternalistic leadership and subordinate responses: Establishing a leadership model in Chinese organizations. Asian Journal Of Social Psychology, 7(1), 89–117. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-839x.2004.00137.x
20.
ChoiY.Mai-DaltonR. R. (1999). The model of followers’ responses to self-sacrificial leadership: An empirical test. The Leadership Quarterly, 10(3), 397–421. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1048-9843(99)00025-9
21.
ChouW. J.SibleyC. G.LiuJ. H.LinT. T.ChengB. S. (2015). Paternalistic leadership profiles. Group & Organization Management, 40(5), 685–710. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601115573358
22.
CloughertyJ. A.DusoT.MuckJ. (2016). Correcting for self-selection based endogeneity in management research: Review, recommendations and simulations. Organizational Research Methods, 19, 286–347. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428115619013
23.
ColellaA.GarciaF.ReidelL.TrianaM. (2005). Paternalism: ‘Hidden’ discrimination [Paper presentation]. Academy of Management, Honolulu, Hawaii, CA.
DeVellisR. (2003). Scale development: Theory and applications. Sage Publication.
26.
DirksK. T.FerrinD. L. (2002). Trust in leadership: Meta-analytic findings and implications for research and practice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 611–628. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.4.611
27.
EisenbergerR.FasoloP.Davis-LaMastroV. (1990). Perceived organizational support and employee diligence, commitment and Innovation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75(1), 51–59. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.75.1.51
28.
ErbenG. S.GüneşerA. B. (2008). The relationship between paternalistic leadership and organizational commitment: Investigating the role of climate regarding ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 82(4), 955–968. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9605-z
29.
FarhJ.ChengB. (2000). A cultural analysis of paternalistic leadership in Chinese organizations: Management and organizations in the Chinese context. Palgrave Macmillan.
30.
FarhJ.ChengB.ChouL.ChuX. P. (2006). Authority and benevolence: Employees’ responses to paternalistic leadership in China. In TsuiA. S.BianY.ChengL. (Eds.), China’s domestic private firms: Multidisciplinary perspectives on management and performance (pp. 230–260). Sharpe.
31.
GraenG. B.Uhl-BienM. (1995). Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchange (LMX)theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective. The Leadership Quarterly, 6(2), 219–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/1048-9843(95)90036-5
32.
GrantA. M.SumanthJ. J. (2009). Mission Possible? The performance of prosocially motivated employees depends on manager trustworthiness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(4), 927–944. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014391
33.
GuQ.TangT. L. P.JiangW. (2015). Does moral leadership enhance employee creativity? Employee identification with leader and leader–member exchange (LMX) in the Chinese context. Journal of Business Ethics, 126(3), 513–529. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1967-9
34.
HairJ. F.BlackW. C.BalinB. J.AndersonR. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Pearson Education Limited.
35.
HayesA. F. (2009). Beyond baron and kenny: Statistical mediation analysis in the new millennium. Communication Monographs, 76(4), 408–420. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637750903310360
36.
HeG.AnR.HewlinP. F. (2019). Paternalistic leadership and employee well-being: A moderated mediation model. Chinese Management Studies, 13(3), 645–663. https://doi.org/10.1108/cms-10-2018-0724
37.
HillA. D.JohnsonS. G.GrecoL. M.O’BoyleE. H.WalterS. L. (2021). Endogeneity: A Review and agenda for the methodology-practice divide affecting micro and Macro Research. Journal of Management, 47(1), 105–143. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206320960533
38.
HombergF.VogelR. (2016). Human resource management (HRM) and public service motivation (PSM). International Journal of Manpower, 37(5), 746–763. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijm-05-2016-0120
39.
HumphreysJ. H.Randolph-SengB.Pane HadenS. S.NovicevicM. M. (2015). Integrating libertarian paternalism into paternalistic leadership: The choice architecture of H. J. Heinz. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 22(2), 187–201. https://doi.org/10.1177/1548051814564573
40.
JacobsenC. B.Bøgh AndersenL. (2015). Is leadership in the eye of the beholder? A study of intended and perceived leadership practices and organizational performance. Public Administration Review, 75(6), 829–841. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12380
41.
JensenU. T.AndersenL. B.JacobsenC. B. (2019). Only when we agree! How value congruence moderates the impact of goal-oriented leadership on public service motivation. Public Administration Review, 79(1), 12–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13008
42.
JensenU. T.BroL. L. (2018). How transformational leadership supports intrinsic motivation and public service motivation: The mediating role of basic need satisfaction. The American Review of Public Administration, 48(6), 535–549. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074017699470
43.
Karakitapoğlu-AygünZ.GumusluogluL.ScanduraT. A. (2020). How do different faces of paternalistic leaders facilitate or impair task and innovative performance? Opening the black box. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 27(2), 138–152. https://doi.org/10.1177/1548051819833380
44.
KearneyR. C.HaysS. W. (1994). Labor-management relations and participative decision making: Toward a new paradigm. Public Administration Review, 54(1), 44–51. https://doi.org/10.2307/976497
45.
KetokiviM.McIntoshC. N. (2017). Addressing the endogeneity dilemma in operations management research: Theoretical, empirical, and pragmatic considerations. Journal of Operations Management, 52(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2017.05.001
46.
KhuwajaU.AhmedK.AbidG.AdeelA. (2020). Leadership and employee attitudes: The mediating role of perception of organizational politics. Cogent Business & Management, 7(1), 1720066. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2020.1720066
47.
KimS.VandenabeeleW. (2010). A strategy for building public service motivation research internationally. Public Administration Review, 70(5), 701–709. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2010.02198.x
48.
KrauseM. S.HowardK. I. (2003). What random assignment does and does not do. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 59(7), 751–766. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.10170
49.
LeeJ. Y.JangS. H.LeeS. Y. (2018). Paternalistic leadership and knowledge sharing with outsiders in emerging economies: Based on social exchange relations within the China context. Personnel Review, 47(5), 1094–1115. https://doi.org/10.1108/pr-03-2017-0068
50.
LiuB.TangT. L. P.YangK. (2015). When does public service motivation fuel the job satisfaction fire? The joint moderation of person–organization fit and needs–supplies fit. Public Management Review, 17(6), 876–900. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2013.867068
51.
MacKinnonD. P. (2008). Introduction to statistical mediation analysis. Routledge.
52.
MansurJ.SobralF.GoldszmidtR. (2017). Shades of paternalistic leadership across cultures. Journal of World Business, 52(5), 702–713. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2017.06.003
53.
MarquesT. M. G. (2021). Research on public service motivation and leadership: A bibliometric study. International Journal of Public Administration, 44(7), 591–606. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2020.1741615
54.
MayerR. C.DavisJ. H.SchoormanF. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 709–734. https://doi.org/10.2307/258792
55.
MiaoQ.NewmanA.SchwarzG.CooperB. (2018). How leadership and public service motivation enhance innovative behavior. Public Administration Review, 78(1), 71–81. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12839
NiuC. P.WangA. C.ChengB. S. (2009). Effectiveness of a moral and benevolent leader: Probing the interactions of the dimensions of paternalistic leadership. Asian Journal Of Social Psychology, 12(1), 32–39. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-839x.2008.01267.x
58.
NyhanR. C. (2000). Changing the paradigm: Trust and its role in public sector organizations. The American Review of Public Administration, 30(1), 87–109. https://doi.org/10.1177/02750740022064560
59.
NyhanR. C.MarloweH. A. (1997). Development and psychometric properties of the organizational trust inventory. Evaluation Review, 21(5), 614–635. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193841x9702100505
60.
OberfieldZ. W. (2014). Public management in time: A longitudinal examination of the full range of leadership theory. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 24(2), 407–429. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mus060
61.
ÖtkenA. B.CenkciT. (2012). The impact of paternalistic leadership on ethical climate: The moderating role of trust in leader. Journal of Business Ethics, 108(4), 525–536. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-1108-2
62.
PaarlbergL. E.LavignaB. (2010). Transformational leadership and public service motivation: Driving individual and organizational performance. Public Administration Review, 70(5), 710–718. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2010.02199.x
63.
ParryK. W.Proctor-ThomsonS. B. (2002). Perceived integrity of transformational leaders in organizational settings. Journal of Business, 35(2), 75–96. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1013077109223
64.
PaşaS. F.KabasakalH.BodurM. (2001). Society, organisations, and leadership in Turkey. Applied Psychology, 50(4), 559–589. https://doi.org/10.1111/1464-0597.00073
65.
PellegriniE. K.ScanduraT. A. (2008). Paternalistic leadership: A review and agenda for future research. Journal of Management, 34(3), 566–593. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308316063
66.
PellegriniE. K.ScanduraT. A.JayaramanV. (2010). Cross-cultural generalizability of paternalistic leadership: An expansion of leader-member exchange theory. Group and Organization Management an International Journal, 35(4), 391–420. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601110378456
PerryJ. L.HondeghemA. (2008). Motivation in public management: The call of public service. Oxford University Press.
69.
PerryJ. L. (2000). Bringing society in: Toward a theory of public-service motivation. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10(2), 471–488. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024277
70.
PerryJ. L.WiseL. R. (1990). The motivational bases of public service: foundations for a third wave of research. Public Administration Review, 50(3), 367–373. https://doi.org/10.2307/976618
71.
QuintanaS. M.MaxwellS. E. (1999). Implications of recent developments in structural equation modeling for counseling psychology. The Counseling Psychologist, 27(4), 485–527. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000099274002
72.
RaineyH. G.SteinbauerP. (1999). Galloping elephants: Developing elements of a theory of effective government organizations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 9(1), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024401
73.
RawatP. S.LyndonS. (2016). Effect of paternalistic leadership style on subordinate’s trust: An Indian study. Journal of Indian Business Research, 8(4), 264–277. https://doi.org/10.1108/jibr-05-2016-0045
74.
ReddingS. G. (1990). The spirit of Chinese capitalism. Walter de Gruyter.
75.
RutzO. J.WatsonG. F. (2019). Endogeneity and marketing strategy research: An overview. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 47(3), 479–498. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-019-00630-4
SaygiliM.ÖzerKarakayaPÖ. (2020). Paternalistic leadership, ethical climate and performance in health staff. Hospital Topics, 98(1), 26–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/00185868.2020.1726848
78.
SchwarzG.EvaN.NewmanA. (2020). Can public leadership increase public service motivation and job performance?Public Administration Review, 80(4), 543–554. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13182
79.
SchwarzG.NewmanA.CooperB.EvaN. (2016). Servant leadership and follower job performance: The mediating effect of public service motivation. Public Administration, 94(4), 1025–1041. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12266
80.
SeidleB.FernandezS.PerryJ. L. (2016). Do leadership training and development make a difference in the public sector? A panel study. Public Administration Review, 76(4), 603–613. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12531
81.
SergiovanniT. (1982). Ten principles of quality leadership. Educational Leadership: Journal of the Department of Supervision and Curriculum Development, N.E.A, 39(5), 330–336.
82.
SilinR. (1976). Leadership and values: The organization of large-scale Taiwanese enterprises. Harvard University Press.
83.
TanH. H.TanC. S. (2000). Toward the differentiation of trust in supervisor and trust in organization. Genetic Social and General Psychology Monographs, 126(2), 241–260.
84.
TianQ.SanchezJ. I. (2017). Does paternalistic leadership promote innovative behavior? The interaction between authoritarianism and benevolence. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 47(5), 235–246. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12431
85.
TuanT. L. (2018). Behind the influence of job crafting on citizen value co-creation with the public organization: Joint effects of paternalistic leadership and public service motivation. Public Management Review, 20(10), 1533–1561. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2018.1430247
86.
UgaddanR. G.ParkS. M. (2017). Quality of leadership and public service motivation: A social exchange perspective on employee engagement. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 30(3), 270–285. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijpsm-08-2016-0133
87.
VandenabeeleW. (2014). Explaining public service motivation: The role of leadership and basic needs satisfaction. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 34(2), 153–173. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371x14521458
88.
VictorB.CullenJ. B. (1998). A theory and measure of ethical climate in organizations. In FrederickW. C.PrestonL. E. (Eds.), Business ethics: Research issues and empirical studies (pp. 77–97). JAI Press.
89.
VogelR.MasalD. (2015). Public leadership: A review of the literature and framework for future research. Public Management Review, 17(8), 1165–1189. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2014.895031
90.
WalasekL.StewartN. (2015). How to make loss aversion disappear and reverse: Tests of the decision by sampling origin of loss aversion. Journal of Experimental Psychology General, 144(1), 7–11. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000039
91.
WangA. C.ChengB. S. (2010). When does benevolent leadership lead to creativity? The moderating role of creative role identity and job autonomy. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31(1), 106–121. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.634
WartM. V. (2013). Administrative leadership theory: A reassessment after 10 years. Public Administration, 91(3), 521–543. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12017
94.
WestwoodR. (1997). Harmony and patriarchy: The cultural basis for “paternalistic headship” among the overseas Chinese. Organization Studies, 18(3), 445–480. https://doi.org/10.1177/017084069701800305
95.
WhitenerE. M.BrodtS. E.KorsgaardM. A.WernerJ. M. (1998). Managers as initiators of trust: An exchange relationship framework for understanding managerial trustworthy behavior. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 513–530. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1998.926624
96.
WooldridgeJ. M. (2010). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. MIT Press.
97.
WrightB. E.HassanS.ParkJ. (2016). Does a public service ethic encourage ethical behavior? Public service motivation, ethical leadership and the willingness to report ethical problems. Public Administration, 94(3), 647–663. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12248
98.
WrightB. E.ChristensenR. K.PandeyS. K. (2013). Measuring public service motivation: Exploring the equivalence of existing global measures. International Public Management Journal, 16(2), 197–223. https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2013.817242
99.
WrightB. E.MoynihanD. P.PandeyS. K. (2012). Pulling the levers: Transformational leadership, public service motivation, and mission valence. Public Administration Review, 72(2), 206–215. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02496.x
100.
WuM.HuangX.ChanS. C. H. (2012). The influencing mechanisms of paternalistic leadership in Mainland China. Asia Pacific Business Review, 18(4), 631–648. https://doi.org/10.1080/13602381.2012.690940
101.
WuM.HuangX.LiC.LiuW. (2012). Perceived interactional justice and trust-in-supervisor as mediators for paternalistic leadership. Management and Organization Review, 8(1), 97–121. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-8784.2011.00283.x
102.
YangJ.MossholderK. W. (2010). Examining the effects of trust in leaders: A bases-and-foci approach. The Leadership Quarterly, 21(1), 50–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2009.10.004
103.
ZhangY.HuaiM. Y.XieY. H. (2015). Paternalistic leadership and employee voice in China: A dual process model. The Leadership Quarterly, 26(1), 25–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2014.01.002
104.
ZhangY.WaldmanD. A.HanY. L.LiX. B. (2015). Paradoxical Leader Behaviors in People Management: Antecedents and Consequences. Academy of Management Journal, 58(2), 538–566. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2012.0995
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
