Private Bank Public Values and Priorities Under the Community Reinvestment Act

Abstract

The Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) requires banks to grant low-income communities access to credit. Federal agencies monitor CRA activity and rate banks on compliance. As an economic development tool, the CRA supports private investment of public outcomes. This paper uses qualitative content analysis to examine bank and nonprofit comments regarding proposed CRA rule changes and bank shareholder reports through the lens of the realized publicness framework, to explore how banks express public values. This study finds that banks espouse public values, but that the context of those values is not aligned with community nonprofit values.

Keywords

realized publicness Community Reinvestment Act public values corporate social responsibility

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alexander

J. C.

Jr. Dahl

Spivey

M. F

. (2009). The effects of bank lending practices on CRA compliance examination scheduling and non-compliant banks’ recovery 1990-1998. Quarterly Journal of Finance and Accounting, 48(1), 49–65.

Alniacik

(2011). How corporate social responsibility information influences stakeholders’ intentions. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 18(4), 234–245.

Anderson

S. C.

(2012). Public, private, neither, both? Publicness theory and the analysis of healthcare organizations. Social Science & Medicine, 74(3), 273–460.

Auerbach

C. F.

Silverstein

L. B.

(2003). Qualitative data: An introduction to coding and analysis. New York University Press.

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (FRB). (2021). Community reinvestment act (CRA). https://www.federalreserve.gov/apps/CRAPubWeb/Schedule/DistrictSchedule

Bozeman

(1987). All organizations are public. Jossey-Bass Publishers.

Branco

M. C.

Rodrigues

L. L.

(2006). Corporate social responsibility and resource-based perspectives. Journal of Business Ethics, 69, 111–132.

Butcher

K. F.

Muñoz

A. P.

(2017). Using credit reporting agency data to assess the link between the community reinvestment act and consumer credit outcomes. Cityscape, 19(2), 85–108.

Calabrese

T. D.

Ely

T. L.

(2021). How U.S. private foundations change payouts based on financial shocks: Revealed publicness or revealed privateness? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muab015

10.

Choi

Lee

K. H

Hur

(2021). Examining the impact of control and ownership on social enterprises’ public value creation using integrative publicness theory. Public Management Review, 23(5), 710–730.

11.

Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) of 1977, 12 U.S.C. § 2903 et seq. (1977).

12.

Cormier

Ledoux

M. J.

Magnan

(2011). The informational contribution of social and environmental disclosures for investors. Management Decision, 49(8), 1276–1304.

13.

Costa

Desmarais

B. A.

Hird

J. A.

(2019). Public comments’ influence on science use in U.S. rulemaking: The case of EPA’s national emission standards. American Review of Public Administration, 49(1), 36–50.

14.

Crow

D. A.

Albright

E. A.

Koebele

E. A.

(2019). Stakeholder participation and strategy in rulemaking: A comparative analysis. State Politics & Policy Quarterly, 19(2), 1–28.

15.

Dahl

Douglas

E. D.

Spivey

M. F.

(2002). Community reinvestment act enforcement and changes in targeted lending. International Regional Science Review, 25(3), 307–322.

16.

Dahl

Evanof

D. D.

Spivey

M. F.

(2003). The timing and persistence of CRA compliance ratings. Journal of Financial Services Research, 23(2), 113–132.

17.

DiPasquale

Wheaton

(1994). Housing market dynamics and the future of housing prices. Journal of Urban Economics, 35, 1–27.

18.

Feeney

M. K.

Welch

E. W.

(2012). Realized publicness at public and private research universities. Public Administration Review, 72(2), 272–284.

19.

Fordham

A. E.

Robinson

(2019). Mapping meanings of corporate social responsibility- an Australian case study. International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, 3(1), 1–20.

20.

Forrer

Kee

J. E.

Newcomer

K. E.

Boyer

(2010). Public–private partnerships and the public accountability question. Public Administration Review, 70, 475–484.

21.

Foye

Clapham

Gabrielli

(2018). Home-ownership as a social norm and positional good: Subjective wellbeing evidence from panel data. Urban Studies, 55(6), 1290–1312.

22.

Gray

Javad

Power

D. M.

Sinclair

D. A. R.

(2001). Social and environmental disclosure and corporate characteristics: A research note and extension. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 28(3–4), 327–356.

23.

Gregory

(2000). Using stakeholder values to make smarter environmental decisions. Environment, 42(5), 34–44.

24.

Hayden

Swanson

(1980). Planning through the socialization of property rights: The community reinvestment act. Journal of Economic Issues, 14(2), 351–369.

25.

Haynes-Maslow

Andress

Jilcott Pitts

Osborne

Baquero

Bailey-Davis

Byker-Shanks

Houghtaling

Kolodinsky

B. K.

Morgan

E. H.

Piltch

Prewitt

Seguin

R. A.

Ammerman

A. S.

(2017). Arguments used in public comments to support or oppose the US department of agriculture’s minimum stocking requirements: A content analysis. Academy of Nutrition and Dieticians, 118(9), 1664–1672.

26.

Hodge

G. A.

Greve

(2007). Public–private partnerships: An international performance review. Public Administration Review, 67, 545–558.

27.

Hwang

Quigley

J. M.

(2006). Economic fundamentals in local housing markets: Evidence from U.S. metropolitan regions. Journal of Regional Science, 46(3), 425–453.

28.

Johnson

R. G.

III Gooden

S. T.

Berry-James

R. M

. (2020). Symposium introduction: The pursuit of civil rights and public sector values in the 21st century: Examining Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.’s vision in the Trump era. Public Administration Review, 80, 1035–1037.

29.

Jørgensen

T. B.

Bozeman

(2007). Public values, an inventory. Administration & Society, 39(3), 354–381.

30.

Kettl

D. F.

(2015). From intergovernmental to intersectoral. In Guy

M. E.

Rubin

M. M.

(Eds.), Public administration evolving (pp. 18–36). Routledge.

31.

Kılıç Karamahmutoğlu

Kuzey

Uyar

. (2015). The impact of ownership and board structure on corporate social responsibility (CSR) reporting in Turkish banking industry. Corporate Governance International Journal of Business in Society, 15(3), 357–374.

32.

Kozlarz

(2020, January 21). The debate over how Chicago should build affordable housing, explained. Chicago Development News. https://chicago.curbed.com/2020/1/21/21075361/chicago-development-affordable-housing-requirements-aro-lightfoot

33.

Krippendorff

(2004). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (2nd ed.). Sage Publications, Inc.

34.

Leviten-Reid

Matthew

R. A.

(2018). Housing tenure and neighbourhood social capital. Housing, Theory & Society, 35(3), 300–328.

35.

Maguire

L. A.

Lind

A. E.

(2003). Public participation in environmental decisions: Stakeholders, authorities, and procedural justice. International Journal of Global Environmental Issues, 3(2), 133–48.

36.

Manturek

K. R.

(2012). Urban homeownership and mental health: Mediating effect of perceived sense of control. City & Community, 11(4), 409–430.

37.

McCulley

(2021, November 8). Paul McCulley says the infrastructure bill advances both capitalism and social justice. CNBC. https://www.cnbc.com/2021/11/08/paul-mcculley-says-the-infrastructure-bill-advances-both-capitalism-and-social-justice.html

38.

Mendelson

N. A.

(2007). Regulatory beneficiaries and informal agency policymaking. Cornell Law Review, 92(3), 397–452.

39.

Merritt

C. C.

(2019). What makes an organization public? Managers’ perceptions in the mental health and substance abuse treatment system. The American Review of Public Administration, 49(4), 411–424.

40.

Min

Lee

K. H

Yang

(2020). Multidimensional publicness and collaboration for community benefits: The case of U.S. hospitals. Public Administration Review, 80(3), 381–390.

41.

Moulton

(2009). Putting together the publicness puzzle: A framework for realized publicness. Public Administration Review, 69(5), 889–990.

42.

Moulton

(2012). The authority to do good: Publicly responsible behavior among private mortgage lenders. Public Administration Review, 72(3), 430–439.

43.

Moulton

Bozeman

(2011). The publicness of policy environments: An evaluation of subprime mortgage lending. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21(1), 87–115.

44.

Moulton

Eckerd

(2012). Preserving the publicness of the nonprofit sector. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 41(4), 656–685.

45.

Moulton

Feeney

M. K.

(2011). Public service in the private sector: Private loan originator participation in a public mortgage program. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21(3), 547–572.

46.

Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC). (2018, August 28). OCC seeks comments on modernizing community reinvestment act regulations. [Press release]. https://www.occ.gov/news-issuances/news-releases/2018/nr-occ-2018-87.html

47.

Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC). (2020, November 9). Community reinvestment act: Key provisions of the June 2020 CRA rule and frequently asked questions. [Press release]. https://www.occ.gov/news-issuances/bulletins/2020/bulletin-2020-99.html

48.

Pesmatzoglou

Nikolaou

Evangelinos

Allan

(2014). Extractive multinationals and corporate social responsibility: A commitment towards achieving the goals of sustainable development or only a management strategy? Journal of International Development, 26(2), 187–206.

49.

Provalis Research. (2021). https://provalisresearch.com

50.

Rainey

H. G.

(2009). Understanding and managing public organizations. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons.

51.

Reid

C. K.

(2012). The community reinvestment act and the authority to do good. Public Administration Review, 72(3), 439–441.

52.

Renn

Webler

Rakel

Dienel

Johnson

(1993). Public participation in decision making: A three-step procedure. Policy Sciences, 26(3), 189–214.

53.

Reynaers

A. M.

(2014). Public values in public–private partnerships. Public Administration Review, 74, 41–50.

54.

Rosenbloom

D. H.

(2015). The public context. In Guy

M. E.

Rubin

M. M.

(Eds.), Public administration evolving (pp. 1–17). Routledge.

55.

Rothstein

(2017). The color of law. W.W. Norton & Company.

56.

Salamon

L. M.

Geller

S. L.

Newhouse

C. L.

(2012, December). What do nonprofits stand for? Renewing the nonprofit value commitment. Listening Post Communique. http://ccss.jhu.edu/wp-content/uploads/downloads/2012/12/What-Do-Nonprofits-Stand-For_JHUCCSS_12.2012.pdf

57.

Scott

W. R.

(2001). Institutions and organizations (2nd ed.) Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

58.

Scott

W. R.

(2003). Institutional carriers: Reviewing modes of transporting ideas over time and space and considering their consequences. Industrial and Corporate Change, 12(4), 879–94.

59.

Sharma

(2011). Corporate social responsibility in India. Indian Journal of Industrial Relations, 46(4), 637–649.

60.

Siregar

S. V.

Bachtiar

(2010). Corporate social reporting: Empirical evidence from Indonesia stock exchange. International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, 3, 241–252.

61.

Steurer

Langer

Konrad

Martinuzzi

(2005). Corporations, stakeholders and sustainable development I: A theoretical exploration of business-society relations. Journal of Business Ethics, 61(3), 263–281.

62.

(2017). Dimensional publicness and serving the vulnerable: Analyses of specialized substance abuse treatment programs. The American Review of Public Administration, 47(8), 898–913.

63.

Taibi

A. D.

(1994). Banking, finance, and community economic empowerment: Structural economic theory, procedural civil rights, and substantive racial justice. Harvard Law Review, 107(7), 1465–1544.

64.

The White House. (2021). The child tax credit. https://www.whitehouse.gov/child-tax-credit/

65.

Trefethen

(2012). Survey: Home ownership still the American Dream. Real Estate Weekly, 13, D5. https://link.galegroup.com/apps/doc/A294901232/ITOF?u=auraria_main&sid=ITOF&xid=f535a9d9

66.

Tuazon

Corder

G. D.

Mclellan

B. C.

(2013). Sustainable development: A review of theoretical contributions. International Journal of Sustainable Future for Human Security, 1(1), 40–48.

67.

Van Rijnsoever

F. J

. (2017). (I can’t get no) saturation: A simulation and guidelines for sample sized in qualitative research. PLoS One, 12(7), 1–17.

68.

Varkey

(2022). Moving publicness forward: Merging Moulton and Merritt’s frameworks to examine managed care organizations. Perspectives on Public Management and Governance, 5(3), 255–264.

69.

West

W. F.

Raso

(2013). Who shapes the rulemaking agenda? Implications for bureaucratic responsiveness and bureaucratic control. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 23(3), 495–519.

70.

Williams

Pei

(1999). Corporate social disclosures by listed companies on their web sites: An international comparison. The International Journal of Accounting, 34(3), 389–419.

71.

Wright

(2012, January 19) Disclosure requirements for consumer and business deposit accounts, as recently republished by the consumer financial protection Bureau. Banking & Finance Law Report. https://www.bankingandfinancelawreport.com/2012/01/articles/consumer-law/disclosure-requirements-for-consumer-and-business-deposit-accounts-as-recently-republished-by-the-consumer-financial-protection-bureau/

72.

Yackee

S. W.

(2006). Sweet-talking the fourth branch: The influence of interest group comments on federal agency rulemaking. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16(1), 103–124.

73.

Yackee

J. W.

Yackee

S. W.

(2006). A bias towards business? Assessing interest group influence on the U.S. bureaucracy. The Journal of Politics, 68(1), 128–139.

74.

Zhu

Johansen

(2014). Public responsibility and inequality in health insurance coverage: An examination of american state health care systems. Public Administration, 92(2), 422–439.

75.

Zumbro

(2014). The relationship between homeownership and life satisfaction in Germany. Housing Studies, 29(3), 319–338.