Using a case study of British trade union organizer Margaret Bondfield, this article begins the task of adding a working class perspective to accounts of women’s participation in Progressive era urban reform and expansion of public policy while also showing how international networks of support among trade union women undergirded American reform efforts. The narrative expands the consideration of intersectionality and positionality in analyzing women’s role in developing public administration.
AbbottE. (1938). Letter to Margaret Bondfield, Dec. 14. Available Margaret Bondfield collection, Vassar College.
2.
AbbottG. (1932). Letter to Margaret Bondfield, May4. Available Margaret Bondfield collection, Vassar College.
3.
AbramsF. (2003). Freedom’s cause. Profile.
4.
AdamsG. (1992). Enthralled with modernity: The historical context of knowledge and theory development in public administration. Public Administration Review, 52, 363–373.
5.
AlchonG. (1992). Mary van Kleeck and scientific management In NelsonD. (Ed.), A mental revolution: Scientific management since Taylor (pp. 102–129). Ohio State University Press.
6.
BearfieldD. (2009). Equity at the intersection. Public Administration Review, 69, 583–586.
7.
BledsteinB. (1976). The culture of professionalization: The middle class and the development of higher education in America. Norton.
8.
BondfieldM. (1898). Conditions under which shop assistant work. Economic Journal, 9, 277–286.
9.
BondfieldM. (1904). The effects on health of women’s employment in shops. Perspectives in Public Health, 25, 738–745.
10.
BondfieldM. (1911). The passing away of Margaret MacDonald. Life and Labor, 5, 327–328.
11.
BondfieldM. (1912a). Evils of the living-in system. National Insurance Weekly, July6, 99. Available in the Margaret Bondfield Collection, Vassar College.
12.
BondfieldM. (1912b). Evils of the living-in system: Alternative housing schemes for shop assistants. National Insurance Weekly, August10, 260. Available in the Margaret Bondfield Collection.
13.
BondfieldM. (1914). The national care of maternity. New Statesman, 5, 5–8.
14.
BondfieldM. (1919a). Some American impressions. Woman Worker, 43, 1. Available in Margaret Bondfield Collection, Vassar College.
15.
BondfieldM. (1919b). Votes for women. Campaign poster available in Margaret Bondfield Collection, Vassar College.
16.
BondfieldM. (1926). Mary Macarthur. The Flame, April, pp. 3 and 8. Available in Margaret Bondfield Collection, Vassar College.
17.
BondfieldM. (1927). Lead paint (employment of women). Hansard Debates Commons, July19, Vol. 209.
18.
BondfieldM. (1937). Dame Adelaide Anderson. Address at Memorial Service, August1. Available Margaret Bondfield Collection, Vassar College.
19.
BondfieldM. (1948). A life’s work. Hutchinson and Co.
20.
BondfieldM. (n.d. a). Some lessons of the British Health Insurance Act. Unpublished paper available in the Margaret Bondfield Collection, Vassar College.
21.
BondfieldM. (n.d. b). The employment of children. Unpublished paper available in the Margaret Bondfield Collection, Vassar College.
22.
BreslinR.PandeyS.RiccucciN. (2017). Intersectionality in public leadership research. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 37, 160–182.
23.
BurnierD. (2022). The long road of administrative memory: Jane Addams, Frances Perkins and care-centered administration. In ShieldsP.EliasN. (Eds.), Handbook on gender and public administration (pp. 53–67). Edward Elgar.
24.
CobbleD. (2009). U. S. labor women’s internationalism in the World War I era. Revue Francaise D’etudes Americaines, 4, 44–58.
25.
CobbleD. (2014). A higher “standard of life” for the world: U. S. labor women’s reform internationalism and the legacies of 1919. Journal of American History, 100, 1052–1085.
26.
CrenshawK. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43, 1241–1299.
27.
DawleyA. (1991). Struggles for justice: Social responsibility and the liberal state. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
28.
DenisonE. (1912). Helping school children. Harper and Brothers.
29.
DenisonE. (1920). Distinguished guests speak. Bulletin of the Taylor Society, 5, 4–7.
30.
DurantR. (2010). Herbert Hoover’s revenge: Politics, policy and administrative reform movements. In DurantR. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of American bureaucracy (pp. 151–178). Oxford University Press.
31.
FelbingerC.HaynesW. (Eds.). (2004). Outstanding women in public administration. M.E. Sharpe.
32.
GerringJ. (2004). What is a case study and what is it good for?American Political Science Review, 98, 341–354.
33.
GompersS. (1920). Labor and the employer. E. P. Dutton.
34.
HamiltonM. (1925). Margaret Bondfield. Thomas Seltzer.
HounmenouC. (2012). Black settlement houses and oppositional consciousness. Journal of Black Studies, 43, 646–666.
37.
HutchingsK.OwensP. (1911). In merry mood. Life and Labor, 1, 171.
38.
HutchingsK.OwensP. (2021). Women thinkers and the canon of international thought: Recovery, rejection, and reconstitution. American Political Science Review, 115, 347–359.
39.
JonesM. (2020). Vanguard: How Black women broke barriers, won the vote, and insisted on equality for all. Basic Books.
40.
LeeE. (1995). Political science, public administration, and the rise of the American administrative state. Public Administration Review, 55, 538–546.
41.
LutonL. (2002). The tale that wagged the dog: Is the Progressive era the foundation of American public administration?Administrative Theory and Praxis, 3, 439–456.
42.
McCallL. (2005). The complexity of intersectionality. Signs, 30, 1771–1800.
43.
McGuireJ. (2011). Continuing an alternative view of public administration: Mary van Kleeck and industrial citizenship. Administration and Society, 43, 66–86.
44.
NackenoffC. (1915). Octobermeeting. Bulletin of the Taylor Society, 1, 1–2.
45.
NackenoffC. (2016). Towards a more inclusive community: The legacy of female reformers in the Progressive state. In SkowronekS.EngelS.AckermanB. (Eds.), The Progressives’ century: Political reform, constitutional government, and the modern American state (pp. 219–242). Yale University Press.
46.
OldfieldK. (2003). Social class and public administration: A closed question opens. Administration and Society, 35, 438–461.
47.
OldfieldK.ConantR. (2001). Professors, social class, and affirmative action: A pilot study. Journal of Public Administration Education, 7, 171–185.
48.
OrleckA. (2017). Common sense and a little fire (2nd ed.). University of North Carolina Press.
49.
PhillipsA. (1987). Divided loyalties: Dilemmas of sex and class. Virago.
50.
PotterD. (1911). Special committee to safeguard women’s interests under the National Insurance Bill report. Hazell, Watson and Viney.
51.
PrasadA.MirR. (2002). Digging deep for meaning: A critical hermeneutic analysis of CEO letters to shareholders in the oil industry. Journal of Business Communication, 39, 92–116.
52.
RobbinsS.JudgeT. (2018). Essentials of organizational behavior, 14th ed.Pearson.
53.
RodgersD. (1998). Atlantic crossings: Social politics in a progressive age. Harvard University Press.
54.
SchachterH. L. (2002). Women, progressive-era reform, and scientific management. Administration and Society, 34, 563–578.
55.
SchachterH. L. (2011). The New York School of Philanthropy, the Bureau of Municipal Research and the trail of the missing women: A public administration history detective story. Administration and Society, 43, 3–21.
56.
SchachterH. L. (2014). “The two faces of progressive era professions: Using an early twentieth century case to understand the place of power in constructing professions and why this matters for public administration. Administrative Theory and Praxis, 36, 489–509.
57.
SchachterH. L. (2020). Women in public administration: An integrative review. Public Administration Quarterly, 44, 515–544.
58.
ShieldsP. (2022). The origin of the settlement model of public administration: Stories of women pioneers. In ShieldsP.EliasN. (Eds.), Handbook on gender and public administration (pp. 35–52). Edward Elgar.
59.
SilverbergH. (Ed.) (1998). Gender and American social science: The formative years. Princeton University Press.
60.
SkocpolT. (1992). Protecting soldiers and mothers: The political origins of social policy in the United States. Belknap Press/ Harvard University Press.
61.
SkocpolT.HowardCLehmannS. G.Abend-WeinM. (1993). Women’s associations and the enactment of mothers’ pensions in the United States. American Political Science Review, 87, 686–701.
62.
SloaneN. (2018). The women in the room: Labour’s forgotten history. I. B. Taurus.
63.
SmithM. (2010). The fight to protect race and regional identity within the General Federation of Women’s Club, 1895-1902. Georgia Historical Quarterly, 94, 479–513.
64.
SoedrigoJ.GlasA. (2020). Toward active reflexivity: Positionality and practice in the production of knowledge. PS: Political Science and Politics, 53, 527–521.
65.
StiversC. (1995). Settlement women and bureau men: Constructing a usable past for public administration. Public Administration Review, 55, 522–529.
66.
StiversC. (2000). Bureau men, settlement women: Constructing public administration in the progressive era. University of Kansas Press.
67.
StiversC. (2002). Unfreezing the progressive era: The story of Julia Lathrop. Administrative Theory and Praxis, 24, 537–554.
68.
StoneJ. (1985). The search for social peace: Reform legislation in France, 1890-1914. State University of New York Press.
69.
WaldL. (1929). Letter to Margaret Bondfield, May7. Available in the Margaret Bondfield collection, Vassar College.
70.
WaldL. (1934). Windows on Henry street. Little, Brown.
71.
WaldoD. (1948). The administrative state. Ronald Press.
72.
WhiteL. (1926). Introduction to public administration. Macmillan.
73.
Wyatt-NicholH.BrownS.HaynesW. (2011). Social class and socioeconomic status: Relevance and inclusion in MPA-MPP programs. Journal of Public Administration Education, 17, 187–208.
