The dominant narrative about women’s progress in public administration focuses on identifying the obstacles to that progress and how to overcome them. But to make real progress toward gender equality and social justice, we must rethink our entire approach to research. Understanding the difference women make via narrative inquiry is a necessary change to the prevailing dialectic.
AguilarF. J. (1967). Scanning the business environment. New York, NY: Macmillan.
2.
AlkadryM. G.TowerL. E. (2014). Women and public service: Barriers, challenges, and opportunities. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
3.
BowlingC. J.WrightD. S. (1998). Change and continuity in state administration: Administrative leadership across four decades. Public Administration Review, 58, 429-494.
4.
BoxR. C. (1992). An examination of the debate over research in public administration. Public Administration Review, 52, 62-69.
5.
BullardA.WrightD. (1993). Circumventing the glass ceiling: Women executives in American state governments. Public Administration Review, 53, 189-202.
6.
BurnierD. (2003). Finding a voice: Gender and subjectivity in public administration research and writing. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 25, 37-60.
7.
BurnierD. (2008). Erased history: Frances Perkins and the emergence of care-centered public administration. Administration & Society, 40, 403-422.
8.
CarrollS. J. (1985). Women as candidates in American politics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
9.
CarrollS. J. (1994). The politics of difference: Women public officials as agents of change. Stanford Law and Policy Review, 5(2), 11-20.
10.
ChaseS. (2000). Narrative inquiry: Multiple lenses, approaches, voices. In DenzinN.LincolnY. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 651-679). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
11.
ConditD.HutchinsonJ. M. (1997). Women in public administration: Extending the metaphor of the emperor’s new clothes. The American Review of Public Administration, 27, 181-198.
12.
CornwellC. R.KelloughJ. E. (1994). Women and minorities in federal government agencies: Examining new evidence from panel data. Public Administration Review, 54, 265-270.
13.
D’AgostinoM. (2015). The difference that women make:government performance and women-led agencies. Administration & Society, 47(5), 532-548 DOI: 10.1177/0095399714548267
14.
DodsonD. L.CarrollS. J. (1991). Reshaping the agenda: Women in state legislatures. New Brunswick, NJ: Center for American Women and Politics.
15.
Duerst-LahtiG.JohnsonC. M. (1992). Management styles, stereotypes, and advantages. In GuyM. E. (Ed.), Women and men of the states: Public administrators at the state level (pp. 125-156). New York, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
FoxR. A.SchuhmannR. A. (1999). Gender and local government: A comparison of women and men city managers. Public Administration Review, 59, 231-242.
18.
FrankG. (2000). Venus on wheels: Two decades of dialogue on disability, biography, and being female in America. Berkeley: University of California Press.
19.
GamsonW. A. (2002). How storytelling can be empowering. In CeruloK. A. (Ed.), Culture in mind: Toward a sociology of culture and cognition (pp. 187-198). New York, NY: Routledge.
20.
GuyM. E. (Ed.). (1992). Women and men of the states: Public administrators at the state level. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
21.
GuyM. E. (1994). Organizational architecture, gender and women’s careers. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 14, 77-90.
22.
GuyM. E. (2000). The amazing Miss Burchfield. Public Administration Review, 60, 6-19.
23.
GuyM. E.McCandlessS. A. (2012). Social equity: Its legacy, its promise. Public Administration Review, 72(Suppl. 1), S5-S13.
24.
HaleM. M.KellyR. M. (Eds.). (1989). Gender, bureaucracy, and democracy. New York, NY: Greenwood Press.
25.
HoustonD. J.DelevanS. M. (1990). Public administration research: An assessment of journal publications. Public Administration Review, 50, 674-681.
26.
HsiehC. W.WinslowE. (2006). Gender representation in the federal workforce: A comparison among groups. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 26, 276-295.
27.
HummelR. P. (1991). Stories managers tell: Why they are as valid as science. Public Administration Review, 51, 31-41.
28.
KellyR. M.GuyM. E.BayesJ.Duerst-LahtiG.DukeL. L.HaleM. M.. . . StanleyJ. R. (1991). Public managers in the states: A comparison of career advancement by state. Public Administration Review, 51, 402-412.
29.
LeuenbergerD. Z. (2011). Women in public administration: Sustainable development and social justice. In D’AgostinoM. J.LevineH. (Eds.), Women in public administration: Theory and practice (pp. 141-151). Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning.
30.
Maynard-MoodyS.MushenoM.C. (2003). Cops, teachers, counselors: Stories from the fron lines of public service. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
31.
McGuireJ. T. (2011). Gender and the personal shaping of public administration in the United States: Mary Anderson and the women’s bureau, 1920–1930. Public Administration Review, 72, 265-271.
32.
McLaughlinD.TierneyW. G. (Eds.). (1993). Naming silenced lives: Personal narratives and processes of educational change. New York, NY: Routledge.
33.
MeierK. J.MastracciS. H.WilsonK. (2006). Gender and emotional labor in public organizations: An empirical examination of the link to performance. Public Administration Review, 66, 899-909.
34.
MeierK. J.O’TooleL. J.Jr.BoyneG. A.WalkerR. M. (2006). Strategic management and the performance of public organizations: Testing venerable ideas against recent theories. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 17, 357-377.
35.
MillerW.KerrB.ReidM. (1999). A national study of gender-based occupational segregation in municipal bureaucracies: Persistence of glass walls?Public Administration Review, 59, 218-230.
36.
MintzbergH. (1973). The nature of managerial work. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
37.
NaffK. C.ThomasS. (1994). The glass ceiling revisited: Determinants of federal job advancement. Review of Policy Research, 13, 249-272.
38.
NewmanM. A. (1993). Career advancement: Does gender make a difference?The American Review of Public Administration, 23, 361-384.
39.
NewmanM. A. (1994). Gender and Lowi’s thesis: Implications for career advancement. Public Administration Review, 54, 277-284.
40.
NewmanM. A. (1996). Equal employment opportunity and glass ceilings: A contradiction in terms?Public Administration Quarterly, 19, 420-434.
41.
OspinaS. M.DodgeJ. (2005a). It’s about time: Catching method up to meaning—The usefulness of narrative inquiry in public administration research. Public Administration Review, 65, 143-157.
42.
OspinaS. M.DodgeJ. (2005b). Narrative inquiry and the search for connectedness: Practitioners and academics developing public administration scholarship. Public Administration Review, 65, 410-423.
43.
Personal Narratives Group. (1989). Interpreting women’s lives: Feminist theory and personal narratives. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
PittsD. W. (2006). Modeling the impact of diversity management. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 26, 245-268.
46.
RiccucciN. M. (2009). The pursuit of social equity in the federal government: A road less traveled?Public Administration Review, 69, 373-382.
47.
RiccucciN. M.SaidelJ. (1997). The representativeness of state-level leaders: A missing piece of the representative bureaucracy puzzle. Public Administration Review, 57, 423-430.
48.
SabharwalM. (2015). From glass ceiling to glass cliff: Women in senior executive service. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25, 399-426.
49.
SaidelJ. R.LoscoccoK. (2005). Agency leaders, gendered institutions, and representative bureaucracy. Public Administration Review, 65, 158-170.
50.
Saint-GermainM. A. (1989). Does their difference make a difference?Social Science Quarterly, 70, 956-968.
51.
SchachterH. L. (2008). Lillian Borrone: Weaving a web to revitalize port commerce in New York and New Jersey. Public Administration Review, 68, 61-67.
52.
SchachterH. L. (2011). The New York School of Philanthropy, the Bureau of Municipal Research, and the trail of the missing women: A public administration history detective story. Administration & Society, 43, 3-21.
53.
ShieldsP. (2011). Jane Addams’s theory of democracy and social ethics: Incorporating a feminist perspective. In D’AgostinoM.LevineH. (Eds.), Women in public administration: Theory and practice (pp. 15-34). Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning.
54.
SilverbergH. (1998). “A government of men”: Gender, the city, and the new science of politics. In SilverbergH. (Ed.), Gender and American social science (pp. 156-184). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
55.
StallingsR. A.FerrisJ. M. (1988). Public administration research: Work in PAR, 1940–1984. Public Administration Review, 48, 580-586.
56.
StiversC. (1995). Settlement women and bureau men: Constructing a usable past for public administration. Public Administration Review, 55, 522-529.
57.
StiversC. (2000). Bureau men, settlement women: Constructing public administration in the progressive era. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
58.
SzymborskiL. (1996). Why are there so few women managers?Public Management, 78(12), 11-15.
59.
TameriusK. L. (1995). Sex, gender, and leadership in the representation of women. In Duerst-LahtiG.Mae KellyR. (Eds.), Gender power, leadership, and governance. (pp. 183-238) Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
60.
Tolleson-RinehartS. (1991). Do women leaders make a difference? Substance, style, and perception. In DodsonD. (Ed.), Gender and policymaking: Studies of women in office (pp. 93-102). New Brunswick, NJ: Eagleton Institute of Politics, Center for American Women and Politics.
61.
VoldenC.WisemanA. E.WitterD. A. (2013). When are women more effective lawmakers than men?American Journal of Political Science, 57, 326-341.
62.
WhiteJ. D. (1999). Taking language seriously: The narrative foundations of public administration research. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
63.
WiseL. R.TschirhartM. (2000). Examining empirical evidence on diversity effects: How useful is diversity research for public sector managers?Public Administration Review, 60, 386-394.
