This article theorizes and analyzes the relationship between populist leaders and government transparency. Employing a paired comparison of leaders in Brazil and the United States before and during the pandemic, it illuminates three interlocking tactics: (a) the weakening of transparency institutions, (b) erasure and suppression of transparency, and (c) corruption of transparency via misuse and misinformation. Populist efforts to subvert pandemic transparency elicited a striking response in both countries: the emergence of “compensatory transparency initiatives” (CTIs). By collating and disclosing subnational pandemic data to fill transparency gaps at the federal level, CTIs drew attention to populist failings.
Amorim NetoO.AcácioI. (2020). De Volta ao Centro da Arena: Causas e Consequências do Papel Político dos militares sob Bolsonaro. Journal of Democracy em Português, 9(2), 1–29.
BagozziB. E.BerlinerD.AlmquistZ. W. (2021). When does open government shut? Predicting government responses to citizen information requests. Regulation & Governance, 15(2), 280–297. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12282
BerlinerD. (2016). Sunlight or window dressing? Local government compliance with South Africa’s promotion of access to Information Act. Governance, 30(4), 641–661. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12246
CollierR. (2017). Massive cuts to science and medicine in Trump budget. CMAJ: Canadian Medical Association Journal, 189(23), E812–E813. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.1095437
CuillierD. (2010). Honey v. vinegar: Testing compliance-gaining theories in the context of freedom of information laws. Communication Law and Policy, 15(3), 203–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/10811680.2010.489842
17.
DeephouseD. L.HeugensP. P. M.A. R. (2009). Linking social issues to organizational impact: The role of infomediaries and the infomediary process. Journal of Business Ethics, 86(4), 541–553. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9864-3
FensterM. (2021). Populism and transparency: The political core of an administrative norm. University of Cincinnati Law Review. Retrieved February25, 2021, from https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=3780371
HaggardS.KaufmanR. (2021). Backsliding: Democratic regress in the contemporary world. Cambridge University Press.
28.
HemmiA.GrahamI. (2014). Hacker science versus closed science: Building environmental monitoring infrastructure. Information Communication & Society, 17(7), 830–842.
LagunesP.MichenerG.OdillaF.PiresB. (2021). President Bolsonaro’s promises and actions on corruption control. Revista Direito GV 17. Fundação Getulio Vargas, Escola de Direito de São Paulo. https://doi.org/10.1590/2317-6172202121
LevitskyS.ZiblattD. (2019). How democracies die (Reprint ed.). Broadway Books.
40.
LöblováO.RoneJ.BorbáthE. (2021). Covid-19 in Central and Eastern Europe: Focus on Czechia, Hungary, and Bulgaria. In GreerS. L.KingE.da FonsecaE. M.Peralta-SantosA. (Eds.), Coronavirus politics: The comparative politics and policy of COVID-19 (pp. 413–435). University of Michigan Press.
MahoneyJ.BarrenecheaR. (2019). The logic of counterfactual analysis in case-study explanation. British Journal of Sociology, 70(1), 306–338. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.12340
45.
MannaE.FranzblauJ. (2018). Closing democracy’s window. Open the Government.
46.
McIntyreL. (2018). Post-truth. The MIT Press.
47.
McKechnieD. B. (2017). @POTUS: Rethinking presidential immunity in the time of Twitter. University of Miami Law Review, 72(1), 1–33.
MooneyC. (2006). The Republican war on science. Basic Books.
50.
MoynihanD. P. (2022). Public management for populists: Trump’s schedule F executive order and the future of the civil service. Public Administration Review, 82, 174–178. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13433
PasquierM.VilleneuveJ. P. (2007). Organizational barriers to transparency: A typology and analysis of organizational behaviour tending to prevent or restrict access to information. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 73(1), 147–162.
56.
PetersB. G.PierreJ. (2019). Populism and public administration: Confronting the administrative state. Administration & Society, 51(10), 1521–1545. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399719874749
57.
PiotrowskiS. J. (2010). Governmental transparency and secrecy: Linking literature and contemporary debate. Lexington Books.
RicardJ.MedeirosJ. (2020). Using misinformation as a political weapon: COVID-19 and Bolsonaro in Brazil. The Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review. Shorenstein Center for Media, Politics, and Public Policy. https://doi.org/10.37016/mr-2020-013
62.
RobertsA. (1998, April25). Limited access: Assessing the Health of Canada’s Freedom of Information Laws (ID 2091495, SSRN Scholarly Paper). Social Science Research Network. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2091495.
63.
RobertsA. (2006). Blacked out: Government secrecy in the Information Age. Cambridge University Press.
SchnellS. (2022). Transparency in a ‘post-fact’ world. Perspectives on Public Management and Governance.
67.
SilvaM. G. D.RodriguesT. C. M. (2021). O Populismo de Direita no Brasil: Neoliberalismo e Autoritarismo no Governo Bolsonaro. Mediações - Revista de Ciências Sociais, 26(1), 86–107. https://doi.org/10.5433/2176-6665.2021v26n1p86
68.
SnellR. (2001). Administrative compliance – Evaluating the effectiveness of freedom of information. Freedom of Information Review, 93, 26–32.
TarrowS. (2010). The strategy of paired comparison: Toward a theory of practice. Comparative Political Studies, 43(2), 230–259. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414009350044
WagnerA. J. (2021). Pandering, priority or political weapon: Presidencies, political parties & the freedom of information act. Communication Law and Policy, 26(1), 53–102. https://doi.org/10.1080/10811680.2021.1856603
WeylandK. (1999). Neoliberal populism in Latin America and Eastern Europe. Comparative Politics, 31(4), 379–401. https://doi.org/10.2307/422236
82.
WeylandK. G.MadridR. L. (Eds.). (2019). When democracy Trumps populism: European and Latin American lessons for the United States. Cambridge University Press.
WoodM.MatthewsF.OvermanS.SchillemansT. (2022). Enacting accountability under populist pressures: Theorizing the relationship between anti-elite rhetoric and public accountability. Administration & Society, 54(2), 311–334. https://doi.org/10.1177/00953997211019387
85.
WorthyB. (2016). The politics of freedom of information: How and why governments pass laws that threaten their power. Manchester University Press.
86.
WorthyB.HazellR. (2014). The impact of the Freedom of Information Act in the UK. In BowlesN.HamiltonJ. T.Levy DavidA. L. (Eds.), Transparency in politics and the media (pp. 31–49). Oxford University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
