Although public employees’ innovative behavior is essential for ongoing improvement of public services and thereby development of public organizations, limited research has examined this topic—especially in transition countries. Drawing on social cognitive theory, this study theorizes that servant leadership fosters public sector employees’ innovative behavior through the sequential mediation roles of public service motivation and learning goal orientation. Results from structural equation modelling with multi-source data from Vietnam’s public sector employee and manager surveys support the hypothesized model. Our study sheds light on the drivers of public employees’ innovative behavior in a less researched context.
AllenS.WinstonB. E.TatoneG. R.CrowsonH. M. (2018). Exploring a model of servant leadership, empowerment, and commitment in nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 29(1), 123–140. https://doi.org/10.1002/nml.21311
AntonakisJ.BendahanS.JacquartP.LaliveR. (2010). On making causal claims: A review and recommendations. Leadership Quarterly, 21(6), 1086–1120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.10.010
4.
AntonakisJ.HouseR. J. (2014). Instrumental leadership: Measurement and extension of transformational-transactional leadership theory. Leadership Quarterly, 25(4), 746–771. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2014.04.005
5.
BanduraA. (1977). Social learning theory. Prentice-Hall.
6.
BanduraA. (1986). Social foundations of though and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs.
BernierL.HafsiT.DeschampsC. (2015). Environmental determinants of public sector innovation: A study of innovation awards in Canada. Public Management Review, 17(6), 834–856. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2013.867066
9.
BharanitharanD. K.LoweK. B.BahmanniaS.ChenZ. X.CuiL. (2021). Seeing is not believing: Leader humility, hypocrisy, and their impact on followers’ behaviors. Leadership Quarterly, 32(2), 101440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2020.101440
10.
BorinsS. (2000a). Loose cannons and rule breakers, or enterprising leaders? Some evidence about innovative public managers. Public Administration Review, 60(6), 498–507. https://doi.org/10.1111/0033-3352.00113
11.
BorinsS. (2000b). What border? Public management innovation in the United States and Canada. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 19(1), 46–74.
12.
BreaughJ.RitzA.AlfesK. (2018). Work motivation and public service motivation: Disentangling varieties of motivation and job satisfaction. Public Management Review, 20(10), 1423–1443. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2017.1400580
13.
BrièreM.Le RoyJ.MeierO. (2021). Linking servant leadership to positive deviant behavior: The mediating role of self-determination theory. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 51(2), 65–78. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12716
14.
ButtonS.MathieuJ. E.ZajacD. (1996). Goal orientation in organizational research: A conceptual and empirical foundation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 67(1), 26–48.
15.
BystedR.HansenJ. R. (2015). Comparing public and private sector employees’ innovative behaviour: Understanding the role of job and organizational characteristics, job types, and subsectors. Public Management Review, 17(5), 698–717. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2013.841977
16.
ChoY. J.SongH. J. (2021). How to facilitate innovative behavior and organizational citizenship behavior: Evidence from public employees in Korea. Public Personnel Management, 50(4), 509–537. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0091026020977571
17.
CaiW.LysovaE. I.KhapovaS. N.BossinkB. A. G. (2018). Servant leadership and innovative work behavior in Chinese high-tech firms: A moderated mediation model of meaningful work and job autonomy. Frontiers in Psychology, 9(OCT), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01767
18.
CerasoliC. P.FordM. T. (2014). Intrinsic motivation, performance, and the mediating role of mastery goal orientation: A test of self-determination theory. Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 148(3), 267–286. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.2013.783778
19.
ChenZ.ZhuJ.ZhouM. (2015). How does a servant leader fuel the service fire? A multilevel model of servant leadership, individual self identity, group competition climate, and customer service performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(2), 511–521. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038036.supp
20.
ComreyA. L.LeeH. B. (1992). A first course in factor analysis (2nd ed.). Hillsdale.
21.
de CremerD.van DijkeM.BosA. E. R. (2007). When leaders are seen as transformational: The effects of organizational justice. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 37(8), 1797–1816. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2007.00238.x
22.
DeShonR. P.GillespieJ. Z. (2005). A motivated action theory account of goal orientation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(6), 1096–1127. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.90.6.1096
23.
de SpiegelaereS.van GyesG.van HootegemG. (2014). Labour flexibility and innovation, complementary or concurrent strategies? A review of the literature. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 35(4), 653–666. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143831X13492831
24.
de VriesH.BekkersV.TummersL. (2016). Innovation in the public sector: A systematic review and future research agenda. Public Administration, 94(1), 146–166. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12209
DoniaM. B. L.RajaU.PanaccioA.WangZ. (2016). Servant leadership and employee outcomes: The moderating role of subordinates’ motives. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 25(5), 722–734. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2016.1149471
27.
EhrhartM. G. (2004). Leadership and procedural justice climate as antecedents of unit-level organizational citizenship behavior. Personnel Psychology, 57(1), 61–94. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2004.tb02484.x
EvaN.RobinM.SendjayaS.van DierendonckD.LidenR. C. (2019). Servant Leadership: A systematic review and call for future research. Leadership Quarterly, 30(1), 111–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2018.07.004
30.
FaveroN.BullockJ. B. (2015). How (not) to solve the problem: An evaluation of scholarly responses to common source bias. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25(1), 285–308. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muu020
31.
FornellC.LarckerD. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50.
32.
García-JuanB.Escrig-TenaA. B.Roca-PuigV. (2020). Psychological empowerment: Antecedents from goal orientation and consequences in public sector employees. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 40(2), 297–326. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X18814590
33.
GaskinJ.LimJ. (2017). CFA tool. Amos Plugin.
34.
GasparinM.QuinnM. (2021). Designing regional innovation systems in transitional economies: A creative ecosystem approach. A Journal of Urban and Regional Policy, 52(2), 621–640. https://doi.org/10.1111/grow.12441
35.
Gould-WilliamsJ. S.MostafaA. M. S.BottomleyP. (2015). Public service motivation and employee outcomes in the Egyptian public sector: Testing the mediating effect of person-organization fit. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25(2), 597–622. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mut053
36.
GuiC.ZhangP.ZouR.OuyangX. (2021). Servant leadership in hospitality: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Hospitality Marketing and Management, 30(4), 438–458. https://doi.org/10.1080/19368623.2021.1852641
Günzel-JensenF.HansenJ. R.JakobsenM. L. F.WulffJ. (2018). A two-pronged approach? Combined leadership styles and innovative behavior. International Journal of Public Administration, 41(12), 957–970. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2017.1303711
39.
HairJ. F.BlackW. C.BalinB. J.AndersonR. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed). Pearson Education Limited.
40.
HaleJ. R.FieldsD. L. (2007). Exploring servant leadership across cultures: A study of followers in Ghana and the USA. Leadership, 3(4), 397–417. https://doi.org/10.1177/1742715007082964
41.
HammondM. M.NeffN. L.FarrJ. L.SchwallA. R.ZhaoX. (2011). Predictors of individual-level innovation at work: A meta-analysis. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 5(1), 90–105. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018556
42.
HansenJ. A.Pihl-ThingvadS. (2019). Managing employee innovative behaviour through transformational and transactional leadership styles. Public Management Review, 21(6), 918–944. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2018.1544272
43.
HayesA. F. (2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Guilford Press.
44.
HeJ.van de VijverF. (2012). Bias and equivalence in cross-cultural research. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(2), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1111
45.
HochJ. E.BommerW. H.DulebohnJ. H.WuD. (2018). Do ethical, authentic, and servant leadership explain variance above and beyond transformational leadership? A meta-analysis. Journal of Management, 44(2), 501–529. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316665461
46.
HolmanD.TotterdellP.AxtellC.StrideC.PortR.SvenssonR.ZibarrasL. (2012). Job design and the employee innovation process: the mediating role of learning strategies. Journal of Business and Psychology, 27(2), 177–191. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-011-9242-5
47.
JanssenO.van YperenN. W. (2004). Employees’ goal orientations, the quality of leader-member exchange, and the outcomes of job performance and job satisfaction. Academy of Management Journal, 47(3), 368–384. https://doi.org/10.2307/20159587
48.
JinM. H.McDonaldB.ParkJ. (2018). Does public service motivation matter in public higher education? Testing the theories of person–organization fit and organizational commitment through a serial multiple mediation model. American Review of Public Administration, 48(1), 82–97. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074016652243
49.
JungH. S.YoonH. H. (2018). Improving frontline service employees’ innovative behavior using conflict management in the hospitality industry: The mediating role of engagement. Tourism Management, 69(September2017), 498–507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2018.06.035
50.
KanterR. M. (1996). When a thousand flowers bloom: Structural, collective, and social conditions for innovation in organization. In MyersP. S. (Ed.), Knowledge Management and Organizational Design (pp. 93-131). Butterworth-Heinemann.
51.
KiN. (2020). Public service motivation and government officials’ willingness to learn in public sector benchmarking process. Public Management Review, 23(4), 610–632https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2019.1708437
KonovskyM. A. (2000). Understanding procedural justice and its impact on business organizations. Journal of Management, 26(3), 489–511. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920630002600306
54.
LeeA.LyubovnikovaJ.TianA. W.KnightC. (2020). Servant leadership: A meta-analytic examination of incremental contribution, moderation, and mediation. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 93(1), 1–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12265
55.
LemonM.SahotaP. S. (2004). Organizational culture as a knowledge repository for increased innovative capacity. Technovation, 24(6), 483–498. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4972(02)00102-5
56.
LidenR. C.WayneS. J.MeuserJ. D.HuJ.WuJ.LiaoC. (2015). Servant leadership: Validation of a short form of the SL-28. Leadership Quarterly, 26(2), 254–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2014.12.002
57.
LidenR. C.WayneS. J.ZhaoH.HendersonD. (2008). Servant leadership: Development of a multidimensional measure and multi-level assessment. Leadership Quarterly, 19(2), 161–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2008.01.006
58.
LoiR.LamL. W.ChanK. W. (2012). Coping with job insecurity: The role of procedural justice, ethical leadership and power distance orientation. Journal of Business Ethics, 108(3), 361–372. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-1095-3
59.
LuuT. T. (2016). How servant leadership nurtures knowledge sharing: The mediating role of public service motivation. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 29(1), 91–108. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-06-2015-0112
60.
MarkeyR.PatmoreG. (2009). The role of the state in the diffusion of industrial democracy: South Australia, 1972g-9. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 30(1), 37–66. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143831X08099433
61.
MarshH. W.HauK.-T.BallaJ. R.GraysonD. (1998). Is more ever too much? The number of indicators per factor in confirmatory factor analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 33(2), 181–220. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr3302_1
62.
MatzlerK.MuellerJ. (2011). Antecedents of knowledge sharing—Examining the influence of learning and performance orientation. Journal of Economic Psychology, 32(3), 317–329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2010.12.006
63.
McCune SteinA.BellC. M.Ai MinY. (2020). Does “the servant as leader” translate into Chinese? A cross-cultural meta-analysis of servant leadership. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 29(3), 315–329. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2019.1703681
64.
McFarlinD. B.SweeneyP. D. (1992). Distributive and procedural justice as predictors of satisfaction with personal and organizational outcomes in Hong Kong. Journal of Organizational Behavior21(5), 547–562.
65.
MiaoQ.NewmanA.SchwarzG.CooperB. (2018). How leadership and public service motivation enhance innovative behavior. Public Administration Review, 78(1), 71–81. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12839
66.
MiaoQ.NewmanA.SchwarzG.XuL. (2014). Servant leadership, trust, and the organizational commitment of public sector employees in China. Public Administration, 92(3), 727–743. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12091
67.
MostafaA. M. S.El-MotalibE. A. A. (2019). Servant leadership, leader–member exchange and proactive behavior in the public health sector. Public Personnel Management, 48(3), 309–324. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091026018816340
MutonyiB. R.SlåttenT.LienG. (2020). Empowering leadership, work group cohesiveness, individual learning orientation and individual innovative behaviour in the public sector: empirical evidence from Norway. International Journal of Public Leadership, 16(2), 175–197. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijpl-07-2019-0045
70.
NeubertM. J.HunterE. M.TolentinoR. C. (2016). A servant leader and their stakeholders: When does organizational structure enhance a leader’s influence?The Leadership Quarterly, 27(6), 896–910. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2016.05.005
71.
NorthcottD.TaulapapaT. M. (2012). Using the balanced scorecard to manage performance in public sector organizations: Issues and challenges. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 25(3), 166–191. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513551211224234
72.
OsborneS. P.BrownL. (2011). Innovation, public policy and public services delivery in the UK. The word that would be king?Public Administration, 89(4), 1335–1350. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2011.01932.x
73.
PanaccioA.HendersonD. J.LidenR. C.WayneS. J.CaoX. (2015). Toward an understanding of when and why servant leadership accounts for employee extra-role behaviors. Journal of Business and Psychology, 30(4), 657–675. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-014-9388-z
74.
PandeyS. K.WrightB. E.MoynihanD. P. (2008). Public service motivation and interpersonal citizenship behavior in public organizations: Testing a preliminary model. International Public Management Journal, 11(1), 89–108. https://doi.org/10.1080/10967490801887947
75.
PerryJ. L. (1996). Measuring public service motivation: An assessment of construct reliability and validity. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 6(1), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024303
76.
PerryJ. L.HondeghemA. (2008). Building theory and empirical evidence about public service motivation. International Public Management Journal. https://doi.org/10.1080/10967490801887673
77.
PerryJ. L.HondeghemA.WiseL. R. (2010). Revisiting the motivational bases of public service: Twenty years of research and an Agenda for the future. Public Administration Review, 70(5), 681–690. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2010.02196.x
78.
PodsakoffP. M.MacKenzieS. B.PodsakoffN. P. (2012). Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 539–569. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100452
79.
PoortvlietP. M.GiebelsE. (2012). Self-improvement and cooperation: How exchange relationships promote mastery-approach driven individuals’ job outcomes. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 21(3), 392–425. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2011.555080
80.
RafiqueM.A.HouY.ChudheryM.A.Z.GullN.AhmedS.J. (2021), “The dimensional linkage between public service motivation and innovative behavior in public sector institutions; the mediating role of psychological empowerment”, European Journal of Innovation Management, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-02-2021-0098
81.
RaineyH. G. (1999). Using comparisons of public and private organizations to assess innovative attitudes among members of organizations. Public Productivity & Management Review, 23(2), 130. https://doi.org/10.2307/3380775
82.
RitzA.BrewerG. A.NeumannO. (2016). Public service motivation: A systematic literature review and outlook. Public Administration Review, 76(3), 414–426. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12505
83.
RyuG. (2022). Why does organizational culture matter for public employees’ innovative behavior?International Review of Public Administration, 27(1), 15–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/12294659.2022.2044106
SchafferB. S.RiordanC. M. (2003). A Review of cross-cultural methodologies for organizational research: A best-practices approach. Organizational Research Methods, 6(2), 169–215. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428103251542
86.
SchneiderS. K.GeorgeW. M. (2011). Servant leadership versus transformational leadership in voluntary service organizations. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 32(1), 60–77. https://doi.org/10.1108/01437731111099283
87.
SchwarzG.EvaN.NewmanA. (2020). Can public leadership increase public service motivation and job performance?Public Administration Review, 80(4), 543–554. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13182
88.
SchwarzG.NewmanA.CooperB.EvaN. (2016). Servant leadership and follower job performance: The mediating effect of public service motivation. Public Administration, 94(4), 1025–1041. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12266
89.
ScottS. G.BruceR. A. (1994). Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), 580–607. https://doi.org/10.5465/256701
90.
ShimD. C.ParkH. H. (2019). Public service motivation in a work group: Role of ethical climate and servant leadership. Public Personnel Management, 48(2), 203–225. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091026018806013
91.
ShimD. C.ParkH. H.EomT. H. (2016). Public servant leadership: Myth or powerful reality?International Review of Public Administration, 21(1), 3–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/12294659.2016.1147753
92.
SlackN. J.SinghG.NarayanJ.SharmaS. (2020). Servant leadership in the public sector: Employee perspective. Public Organization Review, 20(4), 631–646. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-019-00459-z
93.
SousaM.van DierendonckD. (2021). Serving the need of people: The case for servant leadership against populism. Journal of Change Management, 21(2), 222–241. https://doi.org/10.1080/14697017.2021.1917494
94.
StockJ.YogoM. (2005). Asymptotic Distributions of Instrumental Variables Statistics with Many Instruments. In AndrewsD.StockJ. (Eds.), Identification and Inference for Econometric Models: Essays in Honor of Thomas Rothenberg (pp. 109–120). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511614491.007
95.
StroudD.FairbrotherP.EvansC.BlakeJ. (2018). Governments matter for capitalist economies: Regeneration and transition to green and decent jobs. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 39(1), 87–108. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143831X15601731
96.
TuanL. T. (2017). Knowledge sharing in public organizations: The roles of servant leadership and organizational citizenship behavior. International Journal of Public Administration, 40(4), 361–373. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2015.1113550
97.
TuckeyM.BrewerN.WilliamsonP. (2002). The influence of motives and goal orientation on feedback seeking. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 75(2), 195–216. https://doi.org/10.1348/09631790260098677
98.
VandenabeeleW. (2007). Toward a public administration theory of public service motivation: An institutional approach. Public Management Review, 9(4), 545–556. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719030701726697
99.
VandewalleD. (1997). Development and validation of a work domain goal orientation instrument. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 57(6), 995–1015.
100.
VandewalleD.NerstadC. G. L.DysvikA. (2019). Goal orientation: A review of the miles traveled and the miles to go. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 6, 115–144. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-041015-062547
101.
van DierendonckD.SousaM. (2016). Finding meaning in highly uncertain situations: Servant leadership during change. In C. Peus, S. Braun & B. Schyns (Eds.), Leadership lessons from compelling contexts (Vol. 8, pp. 403–424). Emerald Group Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1479-357120160000008015
102.
van LoonN. M.VandenabeeleW.LeisinkP. (2017). Clarifying the relationship between public service motivation and in-role and extra-role behaviors: The relative contributions of person-job and person-organization fit. American Review of Public Administration, 47(6), 699–713. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074015617547
103.
Van VoD.AkbarY. H.TruongL. D. (2021). The moderating role of subsidiary size on the association between institutional distance and subsidiary’s access to complementary local assets: Evidence from Vietnam. Journal of Asia Business Studies, ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print). https://doi.org/10.1108/JABS-10-2020-0409
104.
WangZ.MengL.CaiS. (2019). Servant leadership and innovative behavior: A moderated mediation. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 34(8), 505–518. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMP-11-2018-0499
105.
WrightB. E.HassanS.ParkJ. (2016). Does a public service ethic encourage ethical behaviour? Public service motivation, ethical leadership and the willingness to report ethical problems. Public Administration, 94(3), 647–663. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12248
106.
YoshidaD. T.SendjayaS.HirstG.CooperB. (2014). Does servant leadership foster creativity and innovation? A multi-level mediation study of identification and prototypicality. Journal of Business Research, 67(7), 1395–1404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.08.013
107.
YuanF.WoodmanR. W. (2010). Innovative behavior in the workplace: The role of performance and image outcome expectations. Academy of Management Journal, 53(2), 323–342. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.49388995
108.
ZhangY.ZhengY.ZhangL.XuS.LiuX.ChenW. (2021). A meta-analytic review of the consequences of servant leadership: The moderating roles of cultural factors. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 38(1), 371–400. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-018-9639-z
