Presidents are increasingly relying on a mode of governing—presidentialism—that produces radical shifts in public policy through the administrative state, rather than through Congress. Most recently, using the tools of the administrative state rather than legislative action, the Trump Administration has reinterpreted the laws governing asylum, especially as to citizens from Central America seeking refuge from violence and dire poverty. Through a legal analysis of the judiciary’s response to these reforms, this article examines the limits and constraints of presidential administrative power.
AberbachJ. D.RockmanB. A. (2000). In the web of politics: Three decades of the U.S. federal executive. Brookings Institution Press.
2.
Administrative Procedure Act of1946, Pub. L. 79-404 79–404, 60 Stat. 237, Codified as Amended at 5 U.S.C. Sec. 500 et. seq.
3.
Aliens Subject to a Bar on Entry Under Certain Presidential Proclamations; Procedures for Protection, 8 C.F.R. Sec. 208.30 (2018).
4.
Asylum Eligibility and Procedural Modifications, 8 C.F.R. Sec. 208.13 (c) (2019).
5.
BohmerC.ShumanA. (2018). Political asylum deceptions: The culture of suspicion. Palgrave Macmillan.
6.
BoltonA.FigueiredoJ.LewisD. (2019). Elections, ideology, and turnover in the U.S. federal government (NBER Working Paper No. 22932). www.nber.org/papers/w22932
7.
BressmanL. S. (2003). Beyond accountability: Arbitrariness and legitimacy in the administrative state. New York University Law Review, 78, 461–556.
8.
BrodkinE. (1987). The false promise of administrative reform: Implementing quality control in welfare. Temple University Press.
9.
BrodkinE. (2011). Policy work: Street-level organizations under new managerialism. Journal of Public Administration and Theory, 21, i253–i277. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muq093
DohertyK. M.LewisD.LimbockerS. (2019). Presidential control and turnover in regulatory personnel. Administration & Society, 51(10), 1606–1630. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0095399719875458
16.
GoldenM. (2000). What motivates bureaucrats? Politics and administration during the Reagan years. Columbia University Press.
17.
HamlinR. (2014). Let me be a refugee: Administrative justice and the politics of asylum in the United States, Canada, and Australia. Oxford University Press.
18.
HickmanK.PierceR. (2014). Federal administrative law: Cases and materials (2nd ed.). Foundation Press.
19.
Illegal Immigration Reform and Responsibility Act of1996, Pub. L. No. 104-208, 110 Stat. 3009-546, codified at 8 U.S.C. § 1158 et. seq. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Parole of Arriving Aliens Found to Have a Credible Fear of Persecution or Torture, ICE Directive 11002.1 (2009).
20.
Immigration and Nationality Act (1990). Pub. L. 101-649, 104 Stat. 4978, codified at 8. U.S.C. 1101. et. seq. INS v. Cardoza Fonseca, 480 U.S. 421 (1987).
21.
Immigration and Nationality Act of1965, Pub. L. 89-236, codified as amended at 8 U.S.C. 1101 et. seq.
KellerA.JoscelyneA.GranskiM.RosenfeldB.Correa-VelezI. (2017). Pre-migration trauma exposure and mental health functioning among Central American migrants arriving at the US border. Plos One, 12(1), Article e0168692. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0168692
26.
KerwinD. (2018). From IIRIRA to Trump: Connecting the dots to the current US immigration policy crisis. Journal on Migration and Human Security, 6(3), 192–204. https://doi.org/10.1177/2331502418786718
27.
LawA. O. (2010). The immigration battle in American courts. Cambridge University Press.
28.
LegomskyS. (2007). The new path of immigration law: Asymmetric incorporation of criminal justice norms. Washington and Lee Law Review, 64, 469–529.
29.
LensV. (2019). The travel ban cases: A tale of two government. Boston University Public Interest Law Journal, 29(1), 67–109.
30.
LeutertS.EzzellE.ArveyS.SanchezG.YatesC.KuhneP. (2018). Asylum processing and waitlists at the U.S.-Mexico border [Special report]. Robert Strauss Center for International Security and Law at the University of Texas at Austin.
31.
LipskyM. (1984). Bureaucratic disentitlement in social welfare programs. Social Service Review, 58(1), 3–27.
32.
LipskyM. (2010). Street level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public services. Russell Sage Foundation. (Original work published 1980)
MashawJ.BerkeD. (2018). Presidential administration in a regime of separated powers: An analysis of recent American experience. Yale Journal on Regulation, 35, 549–615. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3018618
35.
Matter A-B, 27 I&N Dec. 316, A.G. (2018).
36.
Matter of L-E-A, 27 I&N Dec. 581, A.G. (2019).
37.
Maynard-MoodyS.MushenoM. (2003). Cops, teachers, counselors: Stories from the front lines of public service. University of Michigan Press.
38.
MendelsonN. (2007). Regulatory beneficiaries and informal agency policymaking. Cornell Law Review, 92, 397–452. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.881137
39.
MetzgerG. (2017). The Supreme Court, 2016 term forward: 1930s redux: The administrative state under siege. Harvard Law Review, 131, 1–95.
40.
MillerB.KeithL. C.HolmesJ. (2014). Immigration judges and U.S. asylum policy. University of Pennsylvania Press.
41.
Office of Immigration Statistics & Office of Strategy, Policy, and Plans. (2019). Annual flow report: Refugees and Asylees: 2017. Department of Homeland Security.
42.
PffifnerJ. (2010). Presidential transitions. In EdwardsG. C.HowellW. G. (Eds.), Oxford handbook of the American presidency (pp. 85–107). Oxford University Press.
43.
Ramji-NogalesJ.SchoenholtzA. I.SchragP. G. (2009). Refugee roulette: Disparities in asylum adjudication and proposals for reform. New York University Press.
44.
Refugee Act of1980, Pub. L. No. 96-212, 94 Stat. 102, codified at 8. U.S.C. 1181 et. seq.
45.
RosenbergG. (1991). The hollow hope: Can courts bring about social change?University of Chicago Press.
United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. (2018). Global trends: Forced displacement in 2018 [The UN Refugee Agency year in review]. https://www.unhcr.org/5d08d7ee7.pdf
Watkins-HayesC. (2009). The new welfare bureaucrats: Entanglements of race, class, and policy reform. University of Chicago Press.
58.
ZechmeisterE. J. (2014). The political culture of democracy in the Americas, 2014: Democratic governance across 10 years of the Americas barometer. The United States Agency for International Development, Vanderbilt University.
