The use of lethal technologies by global terror networks has elevated domestic security policy to a central concern of 21st-century public administration. Twentieth-century public administration scholars, influenced by Progressivism, Pluralism, and Public Choice, led the field to believe that it could both develop and administer domestic security policy without a coherent state theory to guide this policy. This scission between security policy and state theory must be repaired. The relevance of the field to pressing 21st-century security questions as well as the security of the public depends on renewing this linkage.
BeckerC. (1932). The heavenly city of the eighteenth century philosophers. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
2.
BentleyA. (1967). The process of government. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Original work published 1908)
3.
BoxR. (2009). Public administration and society: Critical issues in American governance (2nd ed.). Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
4.
BreisachE. (1993). American progressive history: An experiment in modernization. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
5.
BrownlowL. (1937). Administrative management in the government of the United States: The president’s committee on administrative management. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
6.
CarrE. H. (1939). The twenty years’ crisis, 1919-1939: An introduction to the study of international relations. London, UK: Macmillan.
7.
CooperR. (2003). The breaking of nations: Order and chaos in the twenty-first century. New York, NY: Grove.
8.
CrolyH. (1914). Progressive democracy. New York, NY: Macmillan.
9.
DeweyJ. (1915). German philosophy and politics. New York, NY: Henry Holt.
10.
DeweyJ. (1927). The public and its problems. Denver, CO: Alan Swallow.
11.
DeweyJ.BentleyA. (1949). Knowing and the known. Boston, MA: Beacon.
12.
GoodnowF. (1900). Politics and administration: A study in government. New York, NY: Macmillan.
13.
GulickL.UrwickL. (1937). Papers on the science of administration. New York, NY: Institute of Public Administration.
14.
HerzJ. (1976). The nation state and the crisis of world politics. New York, NY: David McKay.
15.
HofstadterR. (1955). The age of reform. New York, NY: Vintage.
16.
HuntingtonS. (1957). The soldier and the state: The theory and politics of civil-military relations. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
17.
JamesW. (1912). Essays in radical empiricism. New York, NY: Longmans, Green.
18.
KieferJ.MontjoyR. (2006). Incrementalism before the storm: Network performance for the evacuation of New Orleans. Public Administration Review, 66(Suppl. 1), 122-130.
19.
MearsheimerJ. (2001). The tragedy of great power politics. New York, NY: Norton.
20.
MorgenthauH. (1948). Politics among nations: The struggle for power and peace. New York, NY: Knopf.
21.
Morstein-MarxF. (1957). The administrative state. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
22.
MosherF. (1968). Democracy and the public service. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
23.
National Academy of Public Administration. (1993). Coping with catastrophe: Building an emergency management system to meet people’s needs in natural and manmade disasters. Washington, DC: Author.
24.
NiskanenW. (1996). Bureaucracy: Servant or master? Lessons from America. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
25.
OlsonM. (1965). The logic of collective action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
26.
OstromV. (1973). The intellectual crisis in American public administration. Tuscaloosa, AL: University of Alabama Press.
27.
OstromV.TieboutC.WarrenR. (1961). The organization of government in metropolitan areas: A theoretical inquiry. American Political Science Review, 55, 831-842.
28.
O’TooleL.HanfK. (2002). American public administration and the impacts of international governance. Public Administration Review, 62, 158-167.
29.
PiersonC. (1996). The modern state. New York, NY: Routledge.
30.
PoggiG. (1990). The state: Its nature, development and prospects. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
31.
ResekC. (1999). War and the intellectuals: Randolph S. Bourne, collected essays: 1915-1919. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett. (Original work published 1964)
32.
RohrJ. (1986). To run a constitution: The legitimacy of the administrative state. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
RobertsP. (2006). FEMA and the prospects for reputation-based autonomy. Studies in American Political Development, 20, 57-87.
35.
RosenbergH. (1958). Bureaucracy aristocracy & autocracy. The Prussian experience. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
36.
RosenbloomD. (2000). Building a legislative-centered public administration: Congress and the administrative state, 1946-1999. Tuscaloosa, AL: University of Alabama Press.
37.
SimonH. (1946). The proverbs of administration. Public Administration Review, 6, 53-67.
38.
SmallA. (1909). The Cameralists, the pioneers of German social polity. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
39.
SteverJ. (1988a). The progressive image of public administration. Dialogue, 10, 1-24.
40.
SteverJ. (1988b). The end of public administration: Problems of the profession in post-progressive era. Dobbs Ferry, New York: Transnational Publishers.
41.
SteverJ. (1990). The dual image of the administrator in progressive administrative theory. Administration & Society, 22, 39-57.
42.
StillmanR. (1991). Preface to public administration: A search for themes and direction. New York, NY: St. Martin’s.
43.
StiversC. (2000). Bureau men and settlement women: Constructing public administration in the progressive era. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
44.
TrumanD. (1967). The governmental process: Political interests and public opinion. New York, NY: Knopf. (Original work published 1951)
45.
U.S. Government. (1992). Federal response plan. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
46.
U.S. Government. (2004a). National response plan. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
47.
U.S. Government. (2004b). National incident management system. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
48.
U.S. Government. (2006). National infrastructure protection plan. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
49.
U.S. Government. (2008). National response framework. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
50.
VaughanL. (1997). Randolph Bourne and the politics of cultural radicalism. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
51.
von HayekF. A. (1944). The road to serfdom. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
52.
von MisesL. (1944). Bureaucracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
53.
WaldoD. (1948). The administrative state. New York, NY: Ronald Press.
54.
WalkerD. (2002). 9/11: The implications for public sector management. Public Administration Review, 62, 94-97.
55.
WalkerM. (1978). Rights and functions: The social categories of eighteenth century German jurists and Cameralists. Journal of Modern History, 50, 234-251.
56.
WaughW. (2000). Living with hazards, dealing with disasters. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
57.
WaughW.StreibG. (2006). Collaboration and leadership for effective emergency management. Public Administration Review, 66(Suppl.), 131-140.
58.
WeylW. (1912). The new democracy: An essay on certain political and economic tendencies in the United States. New York, NY: Macmillan.
59.
WhiteL. D. (1958). The Republican era: 1869-1901; A study in administrative history. New York, NY: Macmillan.
60.
WilsonW. (1887). The study of administration. Political Science Quarterly, 2, 197-222.
61.
WilsonW. (1913). Congressional government: A study in American politics. New York, NY: Houghton Mifflin.
62.
WilsonW. (1981). Congressional government: A study in American politics. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press. (Original work published 1885)
63.
WiseC. (2006). Organizing for homeland security after Katrina: Is adaptive management what’s missing?Public Administration Review, 66, 302-318.
