The article analyzes contested reasoning and public values conflict in the state takeover of municipalities via emergency managers (EM) to address fiscal crisis. We investigate the following questions: (1) which public values are associated with the EM intervention strategies?; (2) is there a competition among those values? A content analysis of nearly 500 official documents in four Michigan municipalities reveals that EM interventions reflect a strive for fiscal accountability and legality at the expense of democratic values. This study contributes to the growing body of research on public values, and it advances our understanding of decision-making processes under stress.
AndersonM. W. (2012). Democratic dissolution: Radical experimentation in state takeovers of local governments. The Fordham Urban Law Journal, 39(3), 577–624.
2.
BeeriI. (2013). Direct administration of failing local authorities: Democratic deficit or effective bureaucracy?Public Money & Management, 33(2), 137–144.
3.
BehnR. D. (2001). Rethinking democratic accountability. Brookings Institution Press.
4.
BouckaertG.van de WalleS. (2003). Comparing measures of citizen trust and user satisfaction as indicators of ‘good governance’: Difficulties in linking trust and satisfaction indicators. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 69(3), 329–343.
5.
BozemanB. (2007). Public values and public interest: Counterbalancing economic individualism. Georgetown University Press.
6.
BrysonJ. M.CrosbyB. C.BloombergL. (2014). Public value governance: Moving beyond traditional public administration and the new public management. Public Administration Review, 74(4), 445–456.
7.
BuchananB.MillstoneJ. (1979). Public organizations: A value-conflict view. International Journal of Public Administration, 1(3), 261–305.
8.
BuckwalterN. D.BalfourD. L. (2020). Democratic legitimacy in bureaucratic structures: A precarious balance. In PaanakkerH.MastersA.HubertsL. (Eds.), Quality of governance: Values and violations (pp. 27–43). Palgrave Macmillan.
de GraafG. (2015). The bright future of value pluralism in public administration. Administration & Society, 47(9), 1094–1102.
12.
de GraafG.HubertsL.SmuldersR. (2016). Coping with public value conflicts. Administration & Society, 48(9), 1101–1127.
13.
de GraafG.MeijerA. (2019). Social media and value conflicts: An explorative study of the Dutch police. Public Administration Review, 79(1), 82–92.
14.
de GraafG.PaanakkerH. L. (2015). Good governance: Performance values and procedural values in conflict. The American Review of Public Administration, 45(6), 635–652.
15.
de GraafG.van der WalZ. (2017). Without blinders: Public values scholarship in political science, economics, and law: Content and contribution to public administration. Public Integrity, 19(3), 196–218.
DonaldB.GlasmeierA.GrayM.LobaoL. (2014). Austerity in the city: Economic crisis and urban service decline?Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 7(1), 3–15.
18.
FasenfestD. (2018). Fiscal emergency management in Michigan: A misguided policy initiative. In NickelsA. E.RiveraJ. D. (Eds.), Community development and public administration theory: Promoting democratic principles to improve communities (pp. 66–84). Routledge.
19.
FasenfestD. (2019). A neoliberal response to an urban crisis: Emergency management in Flint, MI. Critical Sociology, 45(1), 33–47.
20.
FasenfestD. (2021). Neoliberalism, urban policy and environmental degradation. In BenzT. A.CassanoG. (Eds.), Urban emergency (mis)management and the crisis of neoliberalism: Flint, MI in context (pp. 21–52). Brill.
21.
FasenfestD.PrideT. (2016). Emergency management in Michigan: Race, class and the limits of liberal democracy. Critical Sociology, 42(3), 331–334.
22.
FerryL.MurphyP. (2018). What about financial sustainability of local Government!: A critical review of accountability, transparency, and public assurance arrangements in England during austerity. International Journal of Public Administration, 41(8), 619–629.
23.
FuchsE. R. (1992). Mayors and money: Fiscal policy in New York and Chicago. University of Chicago Press.
24.
GallagherJ.MontemurriP.ReindlJ. C. (2014, February23). Monumental effort to tear down blight would improve neighborhoods and Detroit’s image. Detroit Free Press. http://www.freep.com/article/20140223/NEWS01/302230057
25.
GilletteC. P. (2014). Dictatorships for democracy: Takeovers of financially failed cities. Columbia Law Review, 114(6), 1373–1462.
26.
GoodsellC. T. (1989). Balancing competing values. In PerryJ. A. (Ed.), Handbook of public administration (pp. 575–584). Jossey-Bass.
27.
GrønC. H.SalomonsenH. H. (2019). In the mayor we trust? Trust as the micro-foundation of complementary politico-administrative relations in local governments. Administration & Society, 51(4), 581–606.
28.
HartleyJ.ParkerS.BeashelJ. (2019). Leading and recognizing public value. Public Administration, 97(2), 264–278.
29.
HonadleB. W. (2003). The states’ role in U.S. Local government fiscal crises: A theoretical model and results of a national survey. International Journal of Public Administration, 26(13), 1431–1472.
30.
HsiehH.-F.ShannonS. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288.
31.
HughesS.DickA.KopecA. (2021). Municipal takeovers: Examining state discretion and local impacts in michigan. State and Local Government Review, 53(3), 223–247.
32.
JørgensenT. B.BozemanB. (2007). Public values: An inventory. Administration & Society, 39(3), 354–381.
33.
KasdanD. O. (2015). Emergency management 2.0 this time, it’s financial. Urban Affairs Review, 52(5), 864–882.
34.
KaufmanH. (1956). Emerging conflicts in the doctrines of public administration. American Political Science Review, 50(4), 1057–1073.
35.
KernaghanK. (2003). Integrating values into public service: The values statement as centerpiece. Public Administration Review, 63(6), 711–719.
36.
KirkpatrickL. O. (2015). Ritual and redistribution in dedemocratized Detroit. In SmithM. P.KirkpatrickL. O. (Eds.), Reinventing Detroit: The politics of possibility (pp. 123–143). Transaction Publishers.
37.
KirkpatrickL. O.BreznauN. (2016). The (non)politics of emergency political intervention: The racial geography of urban crisis management in Michigan. http://ssrn.com/abstract=2754128
38.
KlingnerD. E.NalbandianJ. (1983). Human resource administration and cutback management: A symposium. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 4(1), 1–11.
39.
KossisL. (2012). Examining the conflict between municipal receivership and local autonomy. Virginia Law Review, 98(5), 1109–1148.
40.
KuipersB. S.HiggsM.KickertW.TummersL.GrandiaJ.Van der VoetJ. (2014). The management of change in public organizations: A literature review. Public Administration, 92(1), 1–20.
41.
KwakS. (2014). The dynamics of state fiscal behavior over the business cycle: Are state fiscal policies procyclical?The American Review of Public Administration, 44(5), 550–574.
42.
LevineC. H. (1978). Organizational decline and cutback management. Public Administration Review, 38(4), 316–325.
43.
LevineC. H. (1979). More on cutback management: Hard questions for hard times. Public Administration Review, 39(2), 179–183.
44.
LevineC. H.RubinI. S.WolohojianG. G. (1981a). Resource scarcity and the reform model: The management of retrenchment in Cincinnati and Oakland. Public Administration Review, 41(6), 619–628.
45.
LevineC. H.RubinI. S.WolohojianG. G. (1981b). The politics of retrenchment: How local governments manage fiscal stress. SAGE Publications.
46.
MartinsenD. S.JørgensenT. B. (2010). Accountability as a differentiated value in supranational governance. The American Review of Public Administration, 40(6), 742–760.
47.
MeijerA.De JongJ. (2020). Managing value conflicts in public innovation: Ostrich, chameleon, and dolphin strategies. International Journal of Public Administration, 43(11), 977–988.
48.
Michel-ClupotM.RouotS. (2015). Public values and function creep of the financial rating by local authorities. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 81(2), 303–325.
MoldavanovaA. (2016). Two narratives of intergenerational sustainability: A framework for sustainable thinking. The American Review of Public Administration, 46(5), 526–545.
52.
MooreM. H. (1995). Creating public value: Strategic management in government. Harvard University Press.
NickelsA. E. (2019). Power, participation, and protest in Flint, Michigan: Unpacking the policy paradox of municipal takeovers. Temple University Press.
55.
NickelsA. E.ClarkA. D.WoodZ. D. (2020). How municipal takeovers reshape urban democracy: Comparing the experiences of Camden, New Jersey and Flint, Michigan. Urban Affairs Review, 56(3), 790–822.
OvereemP.VerhoefJ. (2014). Moral dilemmas, theoretical confusion: Value pluralism and its supposed implications for public administration. Administration & Society, 46(8), 986–1009.
60.
PaanakkerH. L. (2019). Values of public craftsmanship: The mismatch between street-level ideals and institutional facilitation in the prison sector. The American Review of Public Administration, 49(8), 884–896.
PaanakkerH. L. (2021). Perceptions of the frontline craft: Assessing value convergence between policy makers, managers, and street-level professionals in the prison sector. Administration & Society, 53(2), 222–247.
63.
PeckJ. (2014). Pushing austerity: State failure, municipal bankruptcy and the crises of fiscal federalism in the USA. Cambridge Journal of Regions Economy and Society, 7(1), 17–44.
64.
PlantJ. F.WhiteL. G. (1982). The politics of cutback budgeting: An alliance building perspective. Public Budgeting & Finance, 2(1), 65–71.
65.
RaudlaR.DouglasJ. W.Randma-LiivT.SaviR. (2015). The impact of fiscal crisis on decision-making processes in european governments: Dynamics of a centralization cascade. Public Administration Review, 75(6), 842–852.
66.
RourkeF. E. (1992). Responsiveness and neutral competence in American bureaucracy. Public Administration Review, 52, 539–546.
67.
RubinI. (1982). Running in the red: The political dynamics of urban fiscal stress. Suny Press.
68.
RutgersM. R. (2015). As good as it gets? On the meaning of public value in the study of policy and management. The American Review of Public Administration, 45(1), 29–45.
69.
SchmidtE. (2019). How top civil servants decide on cutbacks: A qualitative study into the role of values. Public Money & Management, 41(5), 359–367.
70.
ScorsoneE. A.PlerhoplesC. (2010). Fiscal stress and cutback management amongst state and local governments: What have we learned and what remains to be learned?State and Local Government Review, 42(2), 176–187.
71.
SeamsterL. (2018). When democracy disappears: Emergency management in Benton Harbor. Du Bois Review Social Science Research on Race, 15(2), 295–322.
72.
SpicerM. W. (2001). Value pluralism and its implications for American public administration. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 23(4), 507–528.
73.
SpicerM. W. (2014). In defense of value pluralism in public administration. Administration & Society, 46(8), 1010–1019.
StewartJ.KringasP. (2003). Change management-strategy and values in six agencies from the Australian public service. Public Administration Review, 63(6), 675–688.
77.
SugrueT. J. (2005). The origins of the urban crisis: Race and inequality in postwar Detroit. Princeton University Press.
TalisseR. B. (2015). Value pluralism. Administration & Society, 47(9), 1064–1076.
80.
TangS. Y.CallahanR. F.PisanoM. (2014). Using common-pool resource principles to design local government fiscal sustainability. Public Administration Review, 74(6), 791–803.
81.
ThacherD.ReinM. (2004). Managing value conflict in public policy. Governance, 17(4), 457–486.
TrochimW. M. K.DonnellyJ. P. (2008). The research method knowledge base. Cengage Learning.
84.
van der WalZ. (2016). Public values research in the 21st century: Where we are, where we haven’t been, and where we should go. International Journal of Public Administration, 39(1), 1–5.
85.
van der WalZ.de GraafG.LasthuizenK. (2008). What’s valued most? Similarities and differences between the organizational values of the public and private sector. Public Administration, 86(2), 465–482.
86.
WagenaarH. (2014). The necessity of value pluralism in administrative practice. Administration & Society, 46(8), 1020–1028.
87.
WangS.CrosbyA. (2019). Politics or professionalism to the rescue? The Friedrich-Finer debate in the context of state intervention on Michigan. Public Administration Quarterly, 43(4), 555–583.
88.
WestJ. P.DavisC. (1988). Administrative values and cutback politics in American local government. Public Personnel Management, 17(2), 207–222.
89.
WilliamsI.ShearerH. (2011). Appraising public value: Past, present and futures. Public Administration, 89(4), 1367–1384.
90.
WitesmanE. M.WaltersL. C. (2015). Modeling public decision preferences using context-specific value hierarchies. The American Review of Public Administration, 45(1), 86–105.
91.
WrightB. E. (2010). Public administration in 2020: Balancing values as a journey, not a destination. Public Administration Review, 70(s1), s312–s313.
92.
WynenJ.VerhoestK.KleizenB. (2019). Are public organizations suffering from repetitive change injury? A panel study of the damaging effect of intense reform sequences. Governance, 32(4), 695–713.
93.
ZavattaroS. M.EntressR.TylerJ.SadiqA.-A. (2021). When deaths are dehumanized: Deathcare during COVID-19 as a public value failure. Administration & Society, 53(9), 1443–1462.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
