In their critique of Spicer’s and Wagenaar’s account of value pluralism (VP), Talisse, Overeem, and Verhoef seem to suggest either that VP does not exist or that it is irrelevant for public administration (PA). My argument is that in public governance, there are many conflicting intrinsic values. This means we can speak of incommensurability, the key feature of VP, and there is much potential for PA in this realization. I propose additional research questions on the nature of value conflict in late modern governance: which intrinsic values conflict in public governance, how often do they conflict, and how is this dealt with by both individuals and institutions? Answers to these questions will have a great deal of practical relevance and might possibly lead to what Beck Jørgensen and Rutgers call a new “Public Values Perspective (PVP)” in PA.
Beck JørgensenT.BozemanB. (2002). Public values lost? Comparing cases on contracting out from Denmark and the United States. Public Management Review, 4, 63-81.
2.
Beck JørgensenT.BozemanB. (2007). Public values: An inventory. Administration & Society, 39, 354-381.
3.
Beck JørgensenT.RutgersM. (2014). Public values: Core or confusion? Introduction to the centrality and puzzlement of public values research. American review of Public Administration, 45, 3-12.
4.
Beck JørgensenT.SørensenD. (2013). Codes of good governance: National or global values?Public Integrity, 15, 71-96.
5.
BerlinI. (1982). Against the current: Essays in the history of ideas. London, UK: Hogarth Press.
6.
BevirM. (2010). Democratic governance. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
7.
de GraafG.HubertsL.& SmuldersR. (2014). Coping with public value conflicts. Administration & Society. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0095399714532273
8.
de GraafG.& PaanakkerH. (2014). Good governance: Performance values and procedural values in conflict. American Review of Public Adminisration. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0275074014529361
9.
de GraafG.van der WalZ. (2010). Managing conflicting public values: Governing with integrity and effectiveness. American Review of Public Administration, 40, 623-630.
10.
HampshireS. (Ed.). (1978). Public and private morality. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
11.
HampshireS. (1983). Morality and conflict. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
12.
LukesS. (1989). Making sense of moral conflict. In RosenblumN. L. (Ed.), Liberalism and the moral life (pp. 127-142). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
13.
Maynard-MoodyS.& MushenoM. (2003). Cops, teachers, counselors: Stories from the front lines of public service. Ann-Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
14.
NieuwenburgP. (2004). The agony of choice: Isaiah Berlin and the phenomenology of conflict. Administration & Society, 35, 683-700.
15.
NieuwenburgP. (2012, April). Conflicts of values: Three paradoxes. Paper presented at the IRSPM, Rome, Italy.
16.
RothsteinB.TeorellJ. (2008). What is the quality of government? A theory of impartial government institutions. Governance, 21, 165-190.
17.
RutgersM.van der MeerH. (2010). The origins and restriction of efficiency in public administration: Regaining efficiency as the core value of public administration. Administration & Society, 42, 755-779.
18.
SkolnickJ. H. (1967). Justice without trial. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
19.
SørensenE. (2002). Democratic theory and network governance. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 24, 693-720.
20.
SørensenE.TorfingJ. (2005). The democratic anchorage of government networks. Scandinavian Political Studies, 28, 195-218.
21.
SpicerM. W. (2001). Value pluralism and its implications for American public administration. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 23, 507-528.
22.
StewartJ. (2006). Value conflict and policy change. Review of Policy Research, 23, 183-195.
23.
TalisseR. (2015). Value pluralism: A philisophical clarification. Administration & Society. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0095399715593315
24.
ThacherD.ReinR. (2004). Managing value conflict in public policy. Governance, 17, 457-486.
25.
TummersL.BekkersV.VinkE.MushenoM. (2013, April). Handling stress during policy implementation: Developing a classification of “coping” by frontline workers based on a systematic overview. Paper presented at the 2013 IRSPM Conference, Prague, Czech Republic.
26.
van der WalZ.de GraafG.LawtonA. (2011). Competing values in public management. Public Management Review, 13, 331-341. doi:10.1080/14719037.2011.554098
27.
WalzerM. (1973). Political action: The problem of dirty hands. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 2, 160-180.
