Calorie labeling on menus became a federal law in 2010 but was not implemented until 2018, 8 years after adoption. This study reconstructs the history of the federal menu-labeling mandate using a process-tracing approach and finds that the delays in implementation resulted not from direct agency capture by the regulated industry, but rather from a system of indirect influence whereby lawmakers continue to influence policy-making even after adoption. Excessive legislative control can contribute to substantial implementation delays that undermine legislative intent. However, administrative agencies can serve as trustees to hold elected officials accountable to their own policy commitments.
BankerM. I. (2010). I saw the sign: The new federal menu-labeling law and lessons from local experience. Food and Drug Law Journal, 65(4), 901–928, iv.
4.
BennettA.CheckelJ. T. (2014). Process tracing: From metaphor to analytic tool. Cambridge University Press.
BrodkinE. (1990). Implementation as policy politics. In Dennis J. Palumbo and Donald J. Calista (Eds.), Implementation and the policy process: Opening up the black box (pp. 107–118). Praeger.
7.
CarpenterD. (2001). The forging of bureaucratic autonomy: Reputations, networks, and policy innovation in executive agencies, 1862-1928. Princeton University Press.
8.
CarpenterD. (2010). Reputation and power: Organizational image and pharmaceutical regulation at the FDA (1st ed.). Princeton University Press.
9.
CarpenterD.MossD. A. (Eds.). (2013). Preventing regulatory capture: Special interest influence and how to limit it. Cambridge University Press.
McCubbinsM. D.NollR. G.WeingastB. R. (1987). Administrative procedures as instruments of political control. Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization, 3(2), 243–277.
29.
MeierK. J. (1997). Bureaucracy and democracy: The case for more bureaucracy and less democracy. Public Administration Review, 57(3), 193–199. https://doi.org/10.2307/976648
NixonL.MejiaP.CheyneA.WilkingC.DorfmanL.DaynardR. (2015). “We’re part of the solution”: Evolution of the food and beverage industry’s framing of obesity concerns between 2000 and 2012. American Journal of Public Health, 105(11), 2228–2236. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2015.302819
35.
NorthD. C.WeingastB. R. (1989). Constitutions and commitment: The evolution of institutions governing public choice in seventeenth-century England. The Journal of Economic History, 49(4), 803–832.
Office of the Commissioner. (2017, August25). Statement from FDA Commissioner Scott Gottlieb, M.D., on the FDA’s role in ensuring Americans have access to clear and consistent calorie and nutrition information; Forthcoming guidance will provide greater clarity and certainty [Web content]. https://www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/Newsroom/PressAnnouncements/ucm573277.htm
38.
PasachoffE. (2016). The president’s budget as a source of agency policy control. The Yale Law Journal, 125(8), 2182–2555.
39.
PotterR. A. (2019). Bending the rules: Procedural politicking in the bureaucracy (1st ed.). University of Chicago Press.
40.
StiglerG. J. (1971). The theory of economic regulation. The Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science, 2(1), 3–21. https://doi.org/10.2307/3003160
41.
ThalerR. H.SunsteinC. R. (2008). Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. Yale University Press.
U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (2017b, May1). Food labeling; Nutrition labeling of standard menu items in restaurants and similar retail food establishments; Extension of compliance date; Request for comments. https://www.regulations.gov/document?D=FDA-2011-F-0172-0621
WagnerW. (2010). Administrative law, filter failure, and information capture. Duke Law Journal, 59(7), 1321–1432.
46.
WaldoD. (2007). The administrative state: A study of the political theory of American public administration (Dewey Library JF 1351 W3 2007). Transaction Publishers.
