This study examines the relationship between community ethnic-racial diversity and contributions to donor-advised funds (DAFs) held by community foundations. Unlike general contributions, DAFs allow donors to retain advisory control over their fund distribution based on individual preferences. In contrast to prior research that generally finds that diversity dampens private provision of public goods, we show that greater ethnic-racial diversity is significantly associated with higher levels of contributions to DAFs at community foundations but not with general contributions. The findings contribute to the literature on diversity and public goods provision and have practical implications for the policy role of private philanthropy.
AlesinaA.BaqirR.EasterlyW. (1999). Public goods and ethnic divisions. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 11(4), 1243–1284.
2.
AlesinaA.DevleeschauwerA.EasterlyW.KurlatS.WacziargR. (2003). Fractionalization. Journal of Economic Growth, 8, 155–194.
3.
AlesinaA.La FerraraE. (2000). Participation in heterogeneous communities. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115(3), 847–904.
4.
AlesinaA.La FerraraE. (2005). Ethnic diversity and economic performance. Journal of Economic Literature, 43(3), 762–800.
5.
AndreoniJ. (2018). The benefits and costs of donor-advised funds. Tax Policy and the Economy, 32(1), 1–44.
6.
AndreoniJ.PayneA.SmithJ.KarpD. (2016). Diversity and donations: The effect of religious and ethnic diversity on charitable giving. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 128, 47–58.
7.
AshleyS. R. (2014). Is the inequality equitable? An examination of the distributive equity of philanthropic grants to rural communities. Administration & Society, 46(6), 684–706.
8.
BarmanE. (2008). With strings attached: Nonprofits and the adoption of donor choice. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 37(1), 39–56.
9.
BekkersR.WiepkingP. (2011). A literature review of empirical studies of philanthropy: Eight mechanisms that drive charitable giving. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 40(5), 924–973.
10.
Ben-NerA. (2018). Is altruism (always) good for society? The problem of particularistic giving in a diverse society. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2018(1), Article 11625.
BrooksA. C. (2005). Does social capital make you generous?Social Science Quarterly, 86(1), 1–15.
13.
BrownE.FerrisJ. M. (2007). Social capital and philanthropy: An analysis of the impact of social capital on individual giving and volunteering. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 36(1), 85–99.
14.
CarmanJ. G. (2001). Community foundations: A growing resource for community development. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 12(1), 7–24.
15.
CarsonE. D. (2014). The future of community foundations. In MazanyT.PerryD. C. (Eds.). Here for good: Community foundations and the challenges of the 21st century (pp. 43–58). New York, NY: M.E. Sharpe, Inc.
16.
ColinvauxR. (2017). Donor advised funds: Charitable spending vehicles for 21st century philanthropy. Washington Law Review, 92, 39–86.
17.
ColinvauxR. (2018). Defending place-based philanthropy by defining the community foundation. Brigham Young University Law Review, 2018(1), 1–56.
CutlerD. M.ElmendorfD. W.ZeckhauserR. J. (1993). Demographic characteristics and the public bundle (NBER Working Paper w4283). National Bureau of Economic Research.
20.
DahlbergM.EdmarkK.LundqvistH. (2012). Ethnic diversity and preferences for redistribution. Journal of Political Economy, 120(1), 41–76.
21.
DalyS. (2008). Institutional innovation in philanthropy: Community foundations in the UK. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 19(3), 219–241.
Dimitrova-GrajzlV.GrajzlP.GuseA. J.SmithJ. T. (2016). Racial group affinity and religious giving: Evidence from congregation-level panel data. The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, 16(2), 689–725.
24.
FongC. M.LuttmerE. F. P. (2009). What determines giving to Hurricane Katrina victims? Experimental evidence on racial group loyalty. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 1(2), 64–87.
25.
FrumkinP.KimM. T. (2001). Strategic positioning and the financing of nonprofit organizations: Is efficiency rewarded in the contributions marketplace?Public Administration Review, 61(3), 266–275.
26.
FukuyamaF. (1995, September/October). Social capital and the global economy. Foreign Affairs, 74, 89–103.
27.
GiridharadasA. (2019). Winners take all: The elite charade of changing the world. Knopf Doubleday.
28.
GoldinC.KatzL. F. (1999). Human capital and social capital: The rise of secondary schooling in America, 1910–1940. Journal of Interdisciplinary History, 29(4), 683–723.
29.
GraddyE. A.MorganD. L. (2006). Community foundations, organizational strategy, and public policy. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 35(4), 605–630.
30.
GraddyE. A.WangL. (2009). Community foundation development and social capital. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 38(3), 392–412.
31.
GreenleeJ. S.BrownK. L. (1999). The impact of accounting information on contributions to charitable organizations. Research in Accounting Regulation, 13, 111–125.
32.
GrønbjergK. A.PaarlbergL. (2001). Community variations in the size and scope of the nonprofit sector: Theory and preliminary findings. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 30(4), 684–706.
33.
HabyarimanaJ.HumphreysM.PosnerD. N.WeinsteinJ. M. (2007). Why does ethnic diversity undermine public goods provision?The American Political Science Review, 101(4), 709–725.
34.
HammackD. C. (1989). Community foundations: The delicate question of purpose. In MagatR. (Ed.), An agile servant (pp. 23–50). Foundation Center.
35.
HarrisE. E.NeelyD. G. (2016). Multiple information signals in the market for charitable donations. Contemporary Accounting Research, 33(3), 989–1012.
36.
HeistH. D.Vance-McMullenD. (2019). Understanding donor-advised funds: How grants flow during recessions. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 48(5), 1066–1093.
37.
HerzogP. S.YangS. (2018). Social networks and charitable giving: Trusting, doing, asking, and alter primacy. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 47(2), 376–394.
38.
HungermanD. M. (2008). Race and charitable church activity. Economic Inquiry, 46(3), 380–400.
39.
LonghoferW.NegroG.RobertsP. W. (2019). The changing effectiveness of local civic action: The critical Nexus of community and organization. Administrative Science Quarterly, 64(1), 203–229.
40.
MadoffR. D. (2016, November). Charities and taxpayers deserve more from donor-advised funds. The Chronicle of Philanthropy, p. 53.
41.
MiguelE.GugertyM. K. (2005). Ethnic diversity, social sanctions, and public goods in Kenya. Journal of Public Economics, 89(11–12), 2325–2368.
42.
MontalvoJ. G.Reynal-QuerolM. (2002). Why ethnic fractionalization? Polarization, ethnic conflict and growth (Economics Working Papers No. 660). Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra. https://ideas.repec.org/p/upf/upfgen/660.html
OktenC.OsiliU. O. (2004). Contributions in heterogeneous communities: Evidence from Indonesia. Journal of Population Economics, 17(4), 603–626.
45.
OktenC.WeisbrodB. A. (2000). Determinants of donations in private nonprofit markets. Journal of Public Economics, 75(2), 255–272.
46.
OstranderS. A. (2007). The growth of donor control: Revisiting the social relations of philanthropy. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 36(2), 356–372.
47.
PaarlbergL. E.JohnsonJ. M.HannibalB. (2020). Race and the public foundation grants marketplace: The differential effect of network status in communities of colour. Public Management Review, 22, 1443–1463.
48.
PaarlbergL. E.ZuhlkeS. (2019). Revisiting the theory of government failure in the face of heterogeneous demands. Perspectives on Public Management and Governance, 2(2), 103–124.
49.
PerryD. C.MazanyT. (2014). Community foundations as foundations of community. In MazanyT.PerryD. C. (Eds.). Here for good: Community foundations and the challenges of the 21st century (pp. 2–25). New York, NY: M.E. Sharpe, Inc.
PhillipsS. D.JungT. (2016). Concluding thoughts: The “Ubers,” of philanthropy and future disruptions. In JungT.PhillipsS. D.HarrowJ. (Eds.). The Routledge companion to philanthropy (pp. 530–539). Routledge.
52.
PosnettJ.SandlerT. (1989). Demand for charity donations in private non-profit markets: The case of the U.K. Journal of Public Economics, 40, 187–200.
53.
PoteeteA. R.OstromE. (2004). Heterogeneity, group size and collective action: The role of institutions in forest management. Development and Change, 35(3), 435–461.
54.
PoterbaJ. M. (1997). Demographic structure and the political economy of public education. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 16(1), 48–66.
55.
PutnamR. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. Simon & Schuster.
56.
PutnamR. D. (2007). E Pluribus Unum: Diversity and community in the twenty-first century the 2006 Johan Skytte prize lecture. Scandinavian Political Studies, 30(2), 137–174.
57.
QuHOsiliU.Beyond Grantmaking: An Investigation of Program-Related Investments by U.S. Foundations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly. 2017;46(2):305–329.
58.
ReichR. (2018). Just giving: Why philanthropy is failing democracy and how it can do better. Princeton University Press.
59.
ReichR.BernholzL.CordelliC. (2016). Philanthropy in democratic societies: History, institutions, values. University of Chicago Press.
60.
RotoloT.WilsonJ. (2012). State-level differences in volunteerism in the United States: Research based on demographic, institutional, and cultural macrolevel theories. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 41(3), 452–473.
61.
RupasinghaA.GoetzS. J.FreshwaterD. (2006). The production of social capital in US counties. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 35(1), 83–101.
62.
SampsonR. J.GraifC. (2009). Neighborhood social capital as differential social organization: Resident and leadership dimensions. American Behavioral Scientist, 52(11), 1579–1605.
63.
SchneiderJ. C. (1996). Philanthropic styles in the United States: Toward a theory of regional differences. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 25(2), 190–210.
StichnothH.Van der StraetenK. (2013). Ethnic diversity, public spending, and individual support for the welfare state: A review of the empirical literature. Journal of Economic Surveys, 27(2), 364–389.
66.
TajfelH.BilligM.BundyR.FlamentC. (1971). Social categorization and intergroup behavior. European Journal of Social Psychology, 1, 149–178.
67.
TinkelmanD. (1999). Factors affecting the relation between donations to not-for-profit organizations and an efficiency ratio. Government and Nonprofit Accounting, 10(1), 135–161.
68.
TinkelmanD.MankaneyK. (2007). When is administrative efficiency associated with charitable donations?Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 36(1), 41–64.
69.
TrusselJ. M.ParsonsL. M. (2007). Financial reporting factors affecting donations to charitable organizations. Advances in Accounting, 23, 263–285.
70.
TrounstineJ. (2016). Segregation and inequality in public goods. American Journal of Political Science, 60(3), 709–725.
71.
VigdorJ. L. (2004). Community composition and collective action: Analyzing initial mail response to the 2000 census. Review of Economics and Statistics, 86(1), 303–312.
72.
WeisbrodB. A. (1988). The nonprofit economy. Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.
73.
WeisbrodB. A.DominguezN. D. (1986). Demand for collective goods in private nonprofit markets: Can fundraising expenditures help overcome free-rider behavior?Journal of Public Economics, 30(1), 83–96.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
