Participatory budgeting is fast becoming a popular form of public participation. Public managers play an important role in organizing and implementing participatory budgeting. Their role perceptions affect whether they use their discretion to limit or increase residents’ say in participatory processes. However, we know little about public managers’ role perceptions in participatory budgeting. In this study, we develop a typology of public managers’ role perceptions in participatory budgeting using a Q-methodological analysis of public managers in seven municipal participatory budgeting projects in Belgium. We find evidence for four distinct perspectives: a managerial, citizen-centered, technocratic, and skeptical perspective.
AbelsonJ.ForestP.-G.EylesJ.SmithP.MartinE.GauvinF.-P. (2002). Obtaining public input for health-systems decision-making: Past experiences and future prospects. Canadian Public Administration/administration Publique Du Canada, 45(1), 70–97. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1754-7121.2002.tb01074.x
2.
AberbachJ. D.PutnamR. D.RockmanB. A. (1981). Bureaucrats & politicians in western democracies. Harvard University Press.
3.
AbramS.CowellR. (2004). Dilemmas of implementation: “integration” and “participation” in Norwegian and Scottish local government. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 22(5), 701–719. https://doi.org/10.1068/c0350
4.
AlkadryM. G. (2003). Deliberative discourse between citizens and administrators. If citizens talk, will administrators listen?Administration & Society, 35(2), 184–209. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399703035002004
5.
BarberaC.SiciliaM.SteccoliniI. (2016). What Mr. Rossi wants in participatory budgeting: Two R’s (responsiveness and representation) and two I’s (inclusiveness and interaction). International Journal of Public Administration, 39(13), 1088–1100. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2016.1177839
6.
BartocciL.GrossiG.MauroS. G. (2019). Towards a hybrid logic of participatory budgeting. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 32(1), 65–79. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-06-2017-0169
7.
BiddleB. J. (1986). Recent developments in role theory. Annual Review of Sociology, 12(1986), 67–92.
8.
BrownS. R. (1980). Political subjectivity. Applications of Q methodology in political science. Yale University Press.
BrownS. R.DurningD. W.SeldonS. C. (2008). Q methodology. In MillerG. J.YangK. (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in public administration (pp. 721–763). CRC Press.
11.
BryerT. A. (2009). Explaining responsiveness in collaboration: Administrator and citizen role perceptions. Public Administration Review, 69(2), 271–283. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2008.01973.x
12.
CanalR. (2017). ¿Queremos decir lo mismo cuando hablamos de participación? Perspectivas de activistas, técnicos y políticos locales reveladas con metodología Q [Do we all mean the same when we talk about participation? perspectives of local officials, politicians and so]. Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas, 158, 23–40. https://doi.org/10.5477/cis/reis.158.23
13.
De GraafG. (2011). The loyalties of top public administrators. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21(2), 285–306. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muq028
14.
DenhardtJ. V.DenhardtR. B. (2015). The new public service revisited. Public Administration Review, 75(5), 664–672. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12347
DudleyL.Webb FarleyK. E.Gniady BanfordN. (2018). Looking back to look forward: Federal officials’ perceptions of public engagement. Administration and Society, 50(5), 679–698. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399718763162
EckerdA.HeidelbergR. L. (2019). Administering public participation. The American Review of Public Administration, 50(2), 133–147. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074019871368
20.
FaehnleM.BäcklundP.TyrväinenL.NiemeläJ.Yli-PelkonenV. (2014). How can residents’ experiences inform planning of urban green infrastructure? Case Finland. Landscape and Urban Planning, 130(1), 171–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.07.012
21.
FranklinA. L.EbdonC. (2005). Are we all touching the same camel?The American Review of Public Administration, 35(2), 168–185. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074005275621
22.
FrenkielE.Lama-RewalS. T. (2019). The redistribution of representation through participation: Participatory budgeting in Chengdu and Delhi. Politics and Governance, 7(3), 112–123. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v7i3.2139
23.
GuoH. (David)NeshkovaM. I. (2013). Citizen input in the budget process. The American Review of Public Administration, 43(3), 331–346. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074012443588
24.
HummelR. (1994). The bureaucratic experience: A critique of life in the modern organization. St. Martin’s Press.
KimS.SchachterH. L. (2013). Citizen participation in the budget process and local government accountability. Public Performance & Management Review, 36(3), 456–471. https://doi.org/10.2753/PMR1530-9576360304
27.
KingC. S.FelteyK. M.SuselB. O. (1998). The question of participation: Toward authentic public participation in public administration. Public Administration Review, 58(4), 317. https://doi.org/10.2307/977561
28.
LeeY.SchachterH. L. (2019). Exploring the relationship between trust in government and citizen participation. International Journal of Public Administration, 42(5), 405–416. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2018.1465956
29.
LiaoY. (2018a). How to make using two-way mechanisms routine: Testing a preliminary model. Public Performance and Management Review, 41(3), 519–543. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2018.1444645
30.
LiaoY. (2018b). Toward a pragmatic model of public responsiveness: Implications for enhancing public administrators’ responsiveness to citizen demands. International Journal of Public Administration, 41(2), 159–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2016.1256305
31.
LiaoY.MaL. (2019). Do professional associations make a difference? Linking municipal managers’ association participation and attitudes toward citizen participation. Public Management Review, 21(12), 1824–1847. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2019.1577907
32.
LiaoY.SchachterH. L. (2018). Exploring the antecedents of municipal managers’ attitudes towards citizen participation. Public Management Review, 20(9), 1287–1308. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2017.1363903
33.
LiaoY.ZhangY. (2012). Citizen participation in local budgeting: Mechanisms, political support, and city manager’s moderating role. International Review of Public Administration, 17(2), 19–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/12294659.2012.10805226
34.
LutfallahS.BuchananL. (2019). Quantifying subjective data using online Q-methodology software. The Mental Lexicon, 14(3), 415–423. https://doi.org/10.1075/ml.20002.lut
MarloweJ.PortilloS. (2006). Citizen engagement in local budgeting: Does diversity pay dividends?Public Performance & Management Review, 30(2), 179–202. https://doi.org/10.2753/PMR1530-9576300203
37.
McKeownB.ThomasD. B. (2013). Q methodology. SAGE.
38.
MigchelbrinkK.Van de WalleS. (2020). When will public officials listen? A vignette experiment on the effects of input legitimacy on public officials’ willingness to use public participation. Public Administration Review, 80(2), 271–280. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13138
39.
MigchelbrinkK.Van de WalleS. (2021). A systematic review of the literature on determinants of public managers’ attitudes toward public participation. Local Government Studies. Advance online publication. http://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2021.1885379
40.
MillerS. A.HildrethR. W.StewartL. M. (2019). The modes of participation: A revised frame for identifying and analyzing participatory budgeting practices. Administration & Society, 51(8), 1254–1281. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399717718325
MoynihanD. P. (2003). Normative and instrumental perspectives on public participation: Citizens summits in Washington D.C. The American Review of Public Administration, 40(2), 164–188. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074003251379
43.
NalbandianJ. (1999). Facilitating community, enabling democracy: New roles for local government managers. Public Administration Review, 59(3), 187. https://doi.org/10.2307/3109948
44.
NederhandJ.KlijnE.-H.van der SteenM.van TwistM. (2019). The governance of self-organization: Which governance strategy do policy officials and citizens prefer?Policy Sciences, 52(2), 233–253. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-018-9342-4
45.
PageE. C. (2012). Policies without politicians: Bureaucratic influence in comparative perspective. Oxford University Press.
46.
R Core Team. (2017). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.r-project.org/
47.
RobbinsS. P.JudgeT. A. (2018). Essentials of Organizational Behavior (14th ed.). Pearson Education Limited.
48.
RobertsN. (2004). Public deliberation in an age of direct citizen participation. American Review of Public Administration, 34(4), 315–353. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074004269288
49.
RossmannD.ShanahanE. A. (2012). Defining and achieving normative democratic values in participatory budgeting processes. Public Administration Review, 72(1), 56–66. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02480.x
50.
RourkeF. E. (1996). Bureaucracy, Politics, and Public Policy. Little Brown.
SchooleyS. E. (2012). Using appreciative inquiry to engage the citizenry: Four potential challenges for public administrators. International Journal of Public Administration, 35(5), 340–351. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2012.655465
53.
SintomerY.HerzbergC.RöckeA. (2008). Participatory budgeting in Europe: Potentials and challenges. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 32(1), 164–178. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2008.00777.x
54.
SintomerY.RöckeA.HerzbergC. (2016). Participatory budgeting in Europe: Democracy and public governance. Routledge.
55.
StephensonW. (1953). The study of behavior: Q-technique and its methodology. University of Chicago Press.
56.
StiversC. (1994). The listening bureaucrat: Responsiveness in public administration. Public Administration Review, 54(4), 364–369. https://doi.org/10.2307/977384
57.
StiversC. (2001). Citizenship ethics in public administration. In CooperT. L. (Ed.), Handbook of administrative ethics. Second edition revised and expanded (2nd ed., pp. 583–602). Marcel Dekker. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781482290042
58.
SvaraJ. H. (1999). Politics-administration/officials-citizens: Exploring linkages in community governance. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 21(3), 309–324.
59.
ThomasJ. C. (2013). Citizen, customer, partner: What should be the role of the public in public management. Public Administration Review, 73(6), 786–796. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12109
60.
Van DorpE. J.‘t HartP. (2019). Navigating the dichotomy: The top public servant’s craft. Public Administration, 97(4), 877–891. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12600
61.
Van EijkC. J. A.SteenT. P. S. (2014). Why people co-produce: Analysing citizens’ perceptions on co-planning engagement in health care services. Public Management Review, 16(3), 358–382. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2013.841458
WangX.Van WartM. (2007). When public participation in administration leads to trust: An empirical assessment of managers’ perceptions. Public Administration Review, 67(2), 265–278. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00712.x
WeblerT.TulerS.ShockeyI. I.SternP.BeattieR. (2003). Participation by local governmental officials in watershed management planning. Society & Natural Resources, 16(2), 105–121. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920309196
YangK. (2005). Public administrators’ trust in citizens: A missing link in citizen involvement efforts. Public Administration Review, 65(3), 273–285. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2005.00453.x
70.
YangK.CallahanK. (2007). Citizen involvement efforts and bureaucratic responsiveness: Participatory values, stakeholder pressures, and administrative practicality. Public Administration Review, 67(2), 249–264. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00711.x
71.
YangK.PandeyS. K. (2011). Further dissecting the black box of citizen participation: When does citizen involvement lead to good outcomes?Public Administration Review, 71(6), 880–892. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02417.x
72.
ZabalaA. (2014). qmethod: A package to explore human perspectives using Q methodology. The R Journal, 6(2), 163. https://doi.org/10.32614/RJ-2014-032
ZhangY.YangK. (2009). Citizen participation in the budget process: The effect of city managers. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, 21(2), 289–317. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBAFM-21-02-2009-B006
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
