Nonprofits compete with collaborators and collaborate with competitors regularly. Collaboration, a long-standing normatively preferred strategy for nonprofits, is utilized as modus operandi without thought to the potential unintended consequences. While competition is a dirty word for nonprofits, it is a necessary but undesirable reality and should not be avoided without consideration to the potential benefits. Nonprofit leaders may not be willing to explicitly acknowledge the use of competition as an operational strategy, which makes room for cognitive dissonance to impact the study of nonprofits. This piece identifies impacts of cognitive dissonance offering direction for future research exploring the interactive nature of competing with collaborators.
AbouAssiK. (2013). Hands in the pockets of mercurial donors: NGO response to shifting funding priorities. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 42(3), 584–602.
2.
AshleyS.FaulkL. (2010). Nonprofit competition in the grants marketplace: Exploring the relationship between nonprofit financial ratios and grant amount. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 21(1), 43–57.
3.
AustinJ. E. (2010). The collaboration challenge: How nonprofits and businesses succeed through strategic alliances (Vol. 109). John Wiley.
4.
BaileyD.KoneyK. M. (1996). Interorganizational community-based collaboratives: A strategic response to shape the social work agenda. Social Work, 41(6), 602–611.
5.
BarmanE. A. (2002). Asserting difference: The strategic response of nonprofit organizations to competition. Social Forces, 80(4), 1191–1222.
BenjaminL. M.CampbellD. C. (2015). Nonprofit performance: Accounting for the agency of clients. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 44(5), 988–1006.
9.
BennettR.SavaniS. (2011). Surviving mission drift: How charities can turn dependence on government contract funding to their own advantage. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 22(2), 217–231.
BrazilM.TeramE. (2009). Collaboration gone awry: A struggle for power and control over service delivery in the non-profit sector. The Maxwell School, Syracuse University, Program for the Advancement of Research on Conflict and Collaboration E-PARCC.
12.
BriggsE.PetersonM.GregoryG. (2010). Toward a better understanding of volunteering for nonprofit organizations: Explaining volunteers’ pro-social attitudes. Journal of Macromarketing, 30(1), 61–76.
13.
BrilliantE.YoungD. R. (2004). The Changing Identity of Federated Community Service Organizations. Administration in Social Work, 28(3–4), 23–46.
14.
BrownJ. A.GianiodisP.SantoroM. D. (2017). Managing co-opetition for shared stakeholder utility in dynamic environments. California Management Review, 59(4), 114–139.
15.
BungerA. C. (2013). Administrative coordination in nonprofit human service delivery networks: The role of competition and trust. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 42(6), 1155–1175.
16.
BungerA. C.Collins-CamargoC.McBeathB.ChuangE.Pérez-JollesM.WellsR. (2014). Collaboration, competition, and co-opetition: Interorganizational dynamics between private child welfare agencies and child serving sectors. Children and Youth Services Review, 38, 113–122.
17.
BungerA. C.GillespieD. F. (2014). Coordinating non-profit children’s behavioral health services: Clique composition and relationships. Health Care Management Review, 39(2), 102–110.
18.
CagiltayN. E.OzcelikE.OzcelikN. S. (2015). The effect of competition on learning in games. Computers & Education, 87, 35–41.
19.
CanavanB. (2017). Tourism stakeholder exclusion and conflict in a small island. Leisure Studies, 36(3), 409–422.
20.
ChetkovichC.FrumkinP. (2003). Balancing margin and mission: Nonprofit competition in charitable versus fee-based programs. Administration & Society, 35(5), 564–596.
21.
DuffyJ.KornienkoT. (2010). Does competition affect giving?Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 74(1–2), 82–103.
22.
FestingerL. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance (Vol. 2). Stanford University Press.
23.
GazleyB. (2010). Why not partner with local government? Nonprofit managerial perceptions of collaborative disadvantage. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 39(1), 51–76.
24.
GazleyB.BrudneyJ. L. (2007). The purpose (and perils) of government-nonprofit partnership. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 36(3), 389–415.
25.
GazleyB.ChengY. (2020). Integrating coproduction theory into voluntary sector theories: Approaches and implications for Chinese governance. Journal of Chinese Governance, 5(1), 28–47.
26.
GazleyB.GuoC. (2015). What do we know about nonprofit collaboration? A comprehensive systematic review of the literature. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2015, Article 115409.
27.
GnyawaliD. R.ParkB. J. R. (2011). Co-opetition between giants: Collaboration with competitors for technological innovation. Research Policy, 40(5), 650–663.
28.
GoddardM. (2015). Competition in healthcare: Good, bad or ugly?International Journal of Health Policy and Management, 4(9), 567–569.
GuoC.AcarM. (2005). Understanding collaboration among nonprofit organizations: Combining resource dependency, institutional, and network perspectives. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 34(3), 340–361.
31.
HardyC. L.Van VugtM. (2006). Nice guys finish first: The competitive altruism hypothesis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32(10), 1402–1413.
32.
Harmon-JonesE.MillsJ. (2019). An introduction to cognitive dissonance theory and an overview of current perspectives on the theory. In Harmon-JonesE. (Ed.), Cognitive dissonance: Reexamining a pivotal theory in psychology (pp. 3–24). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000135-001
33.
HillR.MyattA. (2007). Overemphasis on perfectly competitive markets in microeconomics principles textbooks. The Journal of Economic Education, 38(1), 58–76.
34.
HuckS.LünserG. K.TyranJ. R. (2012). Competition fosters trust. Games and Economic Behavior, 76(1), 195–209.
35.
IrvinR. A. (2010). Collaboration versus competition in the third sector. In Bruce A. Seaman & Dennis R. Young (Eds.), Handbook of research on nonprofit economics and management (pp. 83–95). Edward Elgar.
36.
JonesE. E. (1985). Major developments in social psychology during the past five decades. In LindzeyG.AronsonE. (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (3rd ed., pp. 47–108). Random House.
37.
JonesM. B. (2007). The multiple sources of mission drift. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 36(2), 299–307.
38.
KingmaB. R. (2003). Public good theories of the nonprofit sector. In AnheierH. K.Ben-NerA. (Eds.), The study of the nonprofit enterprise (pp. 53–65). Springer.
39.
KirchnerT. A.FordJ. B. (2017). Coopetition among nonprofit organizations: Strategic and synergistic implications of competition and cooperation: An abstract. In RossiP.KreyN. (Eds.), Academy of marketing science world marketing congress (pp. 169–170). Springer.
40.
KwongC.TasavoriM.Wun-mei CheungC. (2017). Bricolage, collaboration and mission drift in social enterprises. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 29(7–8), 609–638.
LeeteL. (2000). Wage equity and employee motivation in nonprofit and for-profit organizations. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 43(4), 423–446.
43.
Levine DanielJ.EckerdA. (2019). Organizational sensegiving: Indicators and nonprofit signaling. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 30(2), 213–231.
44.
McCarthyC.Ford CarletonP.KrumpholzE.ChowM. P. (2018). Accelerating Innovation Through Coopetition. Nursing Administration Quarterly, 42(1), 26–34.
45.
McGinnisJ. A. (2012). Participatory philanthropy: An analysis of community inputs impact on grantee selection [PhD dissertation]. Georgia Institute of Technology.
46.
McGuireM.SilviaC. (2015). Managing effective collaborations. In PerryJ. L.ChristensenR. K. (Eds.), Handbook of public administration (pp. 293–311). John Wiley.
47.
MottnerS.FordJ. B. (2008). Internal competition in a nonprofit museum context: Development of a scale. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 13(2), 177–190.
48.
NaidooS.SutherlandM. (2016). A management dilemma: Positioning employees for internal competition versus internal collaboration. Is coopetition possible?South African Journal of Business Management, 47(1), 75–87.
49.
NguyenT. A.KodinskyD.SkeltonW.KaurP.YinY.MathewA.BasapurS. (2012, June). Interactive philanthropy: An interactive public installation to explore the use of gaming for charity. In Proceedings of the designing interactive systems conference (pp. 482–485). https://doi.org/10.1145/2317956.2318027
RitchieR. J.WeinbergC. B. (2000). A typology of nonprofit competition: Insights for social marketers. Social Marketing Quarterly, 6(3), 63–71.
52.
SchmidtS. M.KochanT. A. (1977). Interorganizational relationships: Patterns and motivations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 22, 220–234.
53.
SharpZ. (2018). Existential angst and identity rethink: The complexities of competition for the nonprofit. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 47(4), 767–788.
TjosvoldD.JohnsonD. W.JohnsonR. T.SunH. (2006). Competitive motives and strategies: Understanding constructive competition. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research and Practice, 10, 87–99.
56.
TuckmanH. P. (1998). Competition, commercialization, and the evolution of nonprofit organizational structures. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 17(2), 175–194.
57.
WalleyK. (2007). Coopetition: An introduction to the subject and an agenda for research. International Studies of Management & Organization, 37(2), 11–31.
58.
WilburnK.WilburnR. (2014). The double bottom line: Profit and social benefit. Business Horizons, 57(1), 11–20.
59.
WolffT.MinklerM.WolfeS. M.BerkowitzB.BowenL.ButterfossF. D.LeeK. S. (2017). Collaborating for equity and justice: Moving beyond collective impact. Nonprofit Quarterly, 9, 42–53.
