Does nonprofit leadership have an impact on the performance of collaborative networks? This article examines the degree to which nonprofit-led networks and other governance characteristics matter in explaining the performance of network achieving federal funding. Specifically, we hypothesize that networks led by nonprofit organizations may achieve more funding and project awards than those led by government organizations. Using data from a national survey of local homeless service networks, we find that contrary to the hypothesized expectations, networks led by nonprofits are less successful in federal funding and project award than networks led by government organizations.
AgranoffR.McGuireM. (2001). Big questions in public network management research. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 11(3), 295–326.
2.
AgranoffR.McGuireM. (2003). Collaborative public management: New strategies for local governments. Georgetown University Press.
3.
AnsellC.GashA. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543–571.
4.
BermanE. M.WestJ. P. (1995). Public-private leadership and the role of nonprofit organizations in local government: The case of social services. Review of Policy Research, 14(1–2), 235–251.
5.
BrysonJ. M.CrosbyB. C.StoneM. M. (2006). The design and implementation of cross-sector collaborations: Propositions from the literature. Public Administration Review, 66(6), 44–55.
6.
BrysonJ. M.CrosbyB. C.StoneM. M. (2015). The design and implementation of cross-sector collaborations: Needed and challenging. Public Administration Review, 75(5), 647–663.
7.
ByrneT.MunleyE. A.FargoJ. D.MontgomeryA. E.CulhaneD. P. (2013). New p;erspectives on c;ommunity-level d;eterminants of h;omelessness. Journal of Urban Affairs, 33(5), 607–625.
8.
ChenB.GraddyE. A. (2010). The effectiveness of nonprofit lead-organization networks for social service delivery. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 20(4), 405–422.
EmersonK.NabatchiT.BaloghS. (2012). An integrative framework for collaborative governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22(1), 1–29.
11.
EngT.-Y.LiuC.-Y. G.SekhonY. K. (2012). The role of relationally embedded network ties in resource acquisition of British nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 41(6), 1092–1115.
12.
FargoJ. D.MunleyE. A.ByrneT. H.MontgomeryA. E.CulhaneD. P. (2013). Community-level characteristics associated with variation in rates of homelessness among families and single adults. American Journal of Public Health, 103(S2), S340–S347.
13.
FeiockR. C.JangH. S. (2009). Nonprofits as local government service contractors. Public Administration Review, 69(4), 668–680.
14.
Foster-FishmanP. G.BerkowitzS. L.LounsburyD. W.JacobsonS.AllenN. A. (2001). Building collaborative capacity in community coalitions: A review and integrative framework. American Journal of Community Psychology, 29(2), 241–261.
15.
FountainJ. (2013). Implementing cross-agency collaboration: A guide for federal managers. IBM Center for the Business Government.
16.
FaulkL.WillemJ.JohnsonJ. M.StewartA. J. (2016). Network connections and competitively awarded funding: The impacts of board network structures and status interlocks on nonprofit organizations foundation grant acquisition. Public Management Review, 18(10), 1425–1455.
17.
GazleyB. (2008). Beyond the contract: The scope and nature of informal government–nonprofit partnerships. Public Administration Review, 68(1), 141–154.
18.
GazleyB. (2010). Linking collaborative capacity to performance measurement in government–nonprofit partnerships. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 39(4), 653–673.
19.
HansmannH. B. (1980). The role of nonprofit enterprise. The Yale Law Journal, 89(5), 835–901.
20.
Homeless Emergency Assistance and Rapid Transition to Housing Act, 896 Stat. 1-72 (2009).
21.
Homeless Emergency Assistance and Rapid Transition to Housing: Continuum of Care Program; Interim Final Rule, 2506-AC29 C.F.R. (2012).
22.
InnesJ. E.BooherD. E. (1999). Consensus building as role playing and bricolage: Toward a theory of collaborative planning. Journal of the American Planning Association, 65(1), 9–26.
JangH. S.ValeroJ. N.JungK. (2016). Effective leadership in networkcollaboration: Lessons learned from continuum of care homeless programs. IBM Center for the Business Government.
25.
KeastR.MandellM. P.BrownK.WoolcockG. (2004). Network structures: Working differently and changing expectations. Public Administration Review, 64(3), 363–371.
26.
KlijnE. H.SteijnB.EdelenbosJ. (2010). The impact of network management on outcomes in governance networks. Public Administration, 88(4), 1063–1082.
27.
LeeB. A.Price-SpartlenT.KanaJ. W. (2003). Determinants of homelessness in metropolitan area. Journal of Urban Affairs, 25(3), 335–356.
28.
LeRouxK.BrandenburgerP. W.PandeyS. K. (2010). Interlocal service cooperation in U.S. cities: A social network explanation. Public Administration Review, 70(2), 268–278.
29.
MacciòL.CristofoliD. (2017). How to support the endurance of long-term networks: The pivotal role of the network manager. Public Administration, 95(4), 1060–1076.
30.
MacIndoeH. (2013). Reinforcing the safety net: Explaining the propensity for and intensity of nonprofit-local government collaboration. State and Local Government Review, 45(4), 283–295.
31.
McGuireM. (2002). Managing networks: Propositions on what managers do and why they do it. Public Administration Review, 62(5), 599–609.
32.
McGuireM.SilviaC. (2009). Does leadership in networks matter? Examining the effect of leadership behaviors on managers’ perceptions of network effectiveness. Public Performance and Management Review, 33(1), 34–62.
33.
MilwardH. B.ProvanK. G. (2006). A manager’s guide to choosing and using collaborative networks. IBM Center for the Business of Government.
34.
OttJ. S.DickeL. A. (2012). The nature of the nonprofit sector (2nd ed.). Westview Press.
35.
ProvanK. G.KenisP. (2008). Modes of network governance: Structure, management, and effectiveness. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(2), 229–252.
36.
RichM. J. (1989). Distributive politics and the allocation of federal grants. American Political Science Review, 83(1), 193–213.
37.
RomzekB. S.LeRouxK.BlackmarJ. M. (2012). A preliminary theory of informal accountability among network organizational actors. Public Administration Review, 72(3), 442–453.
38.
RomzekB. S.LeRouxK.JohnstonJ.KempfR. J.PiatakJ. C. (2014). Informal accountability in multisector service delivery collaborations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 24(4), 813–842.
39.
SalamonL. M. (1987). Of market failure, voluntary failure, and third-party government: Toward a theory of government-nonprofit relations in the modern welfare state. Journal of Voluntary Action Research, 16(1–2), 29–49.
40.
SchneiderJ. A. (2009). Organizational social capital and nonprofits. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 38(4), 643–662.
41.
SilviaC.McGuireM. (2010). Leading public sector networks: An empirical examination of integrative leadership behaviors. The Leadership Quarterly, 21(2), 264–277.
42.
SpanK. C. L.KatrienG. L.ScholsJ. M. G. A.SchalkR. (2012). The relationship between governance roles and performance in local public interorganizational networks: A conceptual analysis. The American Review of Public Administration, 42(2), 186–201.
43.
U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). (2009). HUD’s homelessness assistance programs: Continuum of care 101. U. S. Office of Community Planning and Development.
44.
U. S. Interagency Council on Homelessness (USICH). (2012). Opening doors: Federal strategic plan to prevent and end homelessness update 2012. U. S. Government Printing Office.
45.
ValeroJ. N. (2016). Effective public service collaboration: The role of leadership and nonprofit organizations in homeless services [PhD dissertation]. University of North Texas.
46.
ValeroJ. N.JangH. S. (2016). The role of nonprofit organizations in homeless policy networks: A research note. Cityscape: A Journal of Policy Development and Research, 18(2), 151–162.
47.
Van SlykeD. M. (2006). Agents or stewards: Using theory to understand the government-nonprofit social service contracting relationship. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 17(2), 157–187.
48.
WeisbrodB. A. (1988). The nonprofit economy. Harvard University Press.
49.
WolfT. (1999). Managing a nonprofit organization in the twenty-first century. Simon and Schuster.
50.
WooldridgeJ. M. (2015). Introductory econometrics: A modern approach (5th ed.). South-Western.
51.
YiH. (2018). Network structure and governance performance: What makes a difference?Public Administration Review, 78(2), 195–205.
52.
YoungD. R. (1998). Commercialism in nonprofit social service associations: Its character, significance, and rationale. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 17(2), 278–297.
53.
YoungD. R. (2000). Alternative models of government-nonprofit sector relations: Theoretical and international perspectives. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 29(1), 149–172.
