The public service mission of public administration programs invites rethinking the exclusive focus on federal court decisions in administrative law courses. In spring 2015, we worked together in a course on the legal environment for public administration. The course included elements of the standard administrative law syllabus as well as a service component. The class worked with a city on a project that required the class to gather information about civil liability, policing, and racial inequality. A service project allows deeper learning while upending expectations of education as absorbing material presented to students. We argue service projects can be part of administrative law courses.
BokD. (2008). Our underachieving colleges: A candid look at how much students learn and why they should be learning more. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
DelgadoR.StefancicJ. (2013). Critical race theory: The cutting edge (3rd ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
9.
DeresiewiczW. (2014). The miseducation of the American elite and the way to a meaningful life. New York, NY: The Free Press.
10.
DeresiewiczW. (2015, September). The neoliberal arts: How college sold its soul to the market. Harper’s Magazine, pp. 25-32.
11.
EckerdA. (2014). Citizen language and administrative response participation in environmental impact assessment. Administration & Society.
12.
EppC. R.Maynard-MoodyS.Haider-MarkelD. P. (2014). Pulled over: How police stops define race and citizenship. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
13.
EwickP.SilbeyS. (1998). The common place of law: Stories from everyday life. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
14.
FischerF. (2003). Reframing public policy: Discursive politics and deliberative practices. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
15.
Goldberg v. Kelly 397 U.S. 254 (1970)
16.
GoodenS. T. (2014). Race and social equity: A nervous area of government. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
17.
HarkavyI.PuckettJ. (1994). Lessons from Hull House for the contemporary urban university. Social Science Review, 68, 299-321.
18.
HillM. J.HupeP. L. (2002). Implementing public policy: Governance in theory and practice (No. 04; H97, H5). London, England: SAGE.
19.
HunterS.BrisbinR. A. (2000). The impact of service learning on democratic and civic values. PS: Political Science & Politics, 33, 623-626.
20.
KenneyS. J. (2013). Gender and justice: Why women in the judiciary really matter. Routledge.
21.
KimballB. (2009). The inception of modern professional education: Christopher Columbus Langdell, 1826-1906. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
22.
KritzerH. M. (1999). The professions are dead, long live the professions: Legal practice in a post-professional world. Law & Society Review, 33, 713-759.
23.
KronmanA. T. (2004). The history of Yale law school. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
24.
Lochner v. New York (1905) 198 U.S. 45.
25.
Marbury v. Madison. (1803). 5. U.S. 137.
26.
MarshallA.BarclayS. (2003). In their own words: How ordinary people construct the legal world. Law & Social Inquiry, 28, 617-628.
27.
Mathews v. Eldridge 424 U.S. 319 (1976)
28.
MenandL. (2010). The marketplace of ideas: Reform and resistance in the American University. New York, NY: W. W. Norton.
29.
MoranL. J. (2012). Legal studies after the cultural turn: A case study of judicial research. In RoseneilS.FroshS. (Eds.), Social research after the cultural turn (pp. 124-143). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
30.
NussbaumM. (2012). Not for profit: Why democracy needs the humanities. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
31.
President’s Task Force on 21st Century Policing. (2015). Final report of the President’s Task Force on 21st century policing. Washington, DC: Office of Community Oriented Policing Services.
32.
RochaC. J. (2000). Evaluating experiential teaching methods in a policy practice course: The case for service learning to increase political participation. Journal of Social Work Education, 36, 53-63.
33.
SabatierP. A.WeibleC. M. (2014). Theories of the policy process. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
34.
SchwartzJ. (2010). Myths and mechanics of deterrence: The role of lawsuits in law enforcement decisionmaking. UCLA Law Review, 57, 1023-1094.
35.
SchwartzJ. (2012). What police learn from lawsuits. Cardozo Law Review, 33, 841-894.
36.
Schwartz-SheaP.YanowD. (2012). Interpretive research design. New York, NY: Routledge.
37.
SeronC.MungerF. (1996). Law and inequality: Race, gender, and of course, class. Annual Review of Sociology, 22, 187-212.
SilbeyS. S. (2005). After legal consciousness. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 1, 323-368.
40.
SterettS. M. (1994). “Entitled to have a hearing”: Due process in the 1890s. Social & Legal Studies, 3, 47-70.
41.
SterettS. M. (2003). Public pensions: Gender and civic service in the states, 1850-1937. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
42.
StiversC. (2000). Bureau men, settlement women: Constructing public administration in the progressive era. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
43.
TelesS. M. (2008). The rise of the conservative legal movement: The battle for control of the law. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
44.
WamsleyG. L. (1990). Refounding public administration. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
45.
Watkins-HayesC. (2009). The new welfare bureaucrats: Entanglements of race, class, and policy reform. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
46.
Watkins-HayesC. (2011). Race, respect, and red tape: Inside the black box of racially representative bureaucracies. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21, i233-i251.
47.
WhitakerG. E. (2004). Learning through action: How MPA public service team projects help students learn research and management skills. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 10, 279-294.
48.
WilliamsP. (1992). The alchemy of race and rights: Diary of a law professor. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
49.
WingA. K. (1997). Introduction. In WingA. K. (Ed.), Critical race feminism: A reader [pp. 10-22]. New York: New York Univers0ity Press.
50.
ZimmermanJ. G. (1991). The jurisprudence of equality: The women’s minimum wage, the first equal rights amendment, andAdkins v. children’s hospital, 1905-1923. The Journal of American History, 78, 188-225.
