Existing conceptualizations and measures of transformational and transactional leadership have unclear theoretical bases, confound leadership and its effects, and are not necessarily suitable for public organizations. Overcoming these problems is necessary to test how leadership affects performance. Many public administration scholars apply the concepts, emphasizing the need to ensure that the concepts are applicable in both public and private organizations. The article reconceptualizes transformational and transactional leadership and develops and tests revised measures that can be employed on employees and leaders, are robust in terms of repeated use by the same respondents, and are applicable to public and private organizations alike.
AndersenL. B.PallesenT. (2008). “Not just for the money?” How financial incentives affect the number of publications at Danish research institutions. International Public Management Journal, 11, 28-47.
4.
AndersonJ. C.GerbingD. W. (1984). The effect of sampling error on convergence, improper solutions, and goodness-of-fit indices for maximum likelihood confirmatory factor analysis. Psychometrika, 49, 155-173.
5.
AngristJ. D.PischkeJ.-S. (2009). Mostly harmless econometrics: An empiricist’s companion. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
6.
AntonakisJ. (2012). Transformational and charismatic leadership. In DayD. V.AntonakisJ. (Eds.), The nature of leadership (2nd ed., pp. 256-288). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
7.
AntonakisJ.AvolioB. J.SivasubramaniamN. (2003). Context and leadership: An examination of the nine-factor full-range leadership theory using the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire. The Leadership Quarterly, 14, 261-295.
8.
AntonakisJ.HouseR. J. (2014). Instrumental leadership: Measurement and extension of transformational–transactional leadership theory. The Leadership Quarterly, 25, 746-771.
9.
BassB. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. New York, NY: Free Press.
10.
BassB. M. (1990). From transactional to transformational leadership: Learning to share the vision. Organizational Dynamics, 18, 19-31.
11.
BassB. M.AvolioB. J.JungD. I.BersonY. (2003). Predicting unit performance by assessing transformational and transactional leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 207-218.
12.
BassB. M.RiggioR. E. (2006). Transformational leadership (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
13.
BelléN. (2014). Leading to make a difference: A field experiment on the performance effects of transformational leadership, perceived social impact, and public service motivation. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 24, 109-136.
BoyneG. A. (2002). Public and private management: What’s the difference?Journal of Management Studies, 39, 97-122.
17.
BoyneG. A. (2003). Sources of public service improvement: A critical review and research agenda. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 13, 367-394.
18.
BozemanB. (1987). All organizations are public. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
19.
BurnsJ. M. (1978). Leadership. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
20.
CarlessS.WearingA.MannL. (2000). A short measure of transformational leadership. Journal of Business and Psychology, 14, 389-405.
21.
CartonA. M.MurphyC.ClarkJ. R. (2014). A (blurry) vision of the future: How leader rhetoric about ultimate goals influences performance. Academy of Management Journal, 57, 1544-1570.
22.
ChenF. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14, 464-504.
23.
CheungG. W.RensvoldR. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 9, 233-255.
24.
CongerJ. A.KanungoR. N. (1987). Toward a behavioral theory of charismatic leadership in organizational settings. Academy of Management Review, 12, 637-647.
25.
DeciE. L.KoestnerR.RyanR. M. (1999). A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 627-668.
26.
FarrellA. M.RuddJ. M. (January, 2009). Factor analysis and discriminant validity: A brief review of some practical issues. Presented at the Australia and New Zealand Marketing Academy Conference (ANZMAC), Melbourne.
27.
FernandezS. (2005). Developing and testing an integrative framework of public sector leadership: Evidence from the public education arena. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 15, 197-217.
28.
FornellC.LarckerD. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39.
29.
FreyB. S. (1997). Not just for the money: An economic theory of personal motivation. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
30.
HargisM. B.WattJ. D.PiotrowskiC. (2011). Developing leaders: Examining the role of transactional and transformational leadership across business contexts. Organization Development Journal, 29, 51-66.
31.
HassanS.HatmakerD. M. (2015). Leadership and performance of public employees: Effects of the quality and characteristics of manager-employee relationships. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25, 1127-1155.
32.
HoltenA.-L.BøllingtoftA.WilmsI. (2015). Leadership in a changing world: Developing managers through a teaching and learning programme. Management Decision, 53, 1107-1124.
33.
HornJ. L.McArdleJ. J. (1992). A practical and theoretical guide to measurement invariance in aging research. Experimental Aging Research, 18, 117-144.
34.
HouseR. J. (1998). Appendix: Measures and assessments for the charismatic leadership approach: Scales, latent constructs, loadings, Cronbach alphas, interclass correlations. In DansereauF.YammarinoF. J. (Eds.), Leadership: The multiple-level approaches: Contemporary and alternative (pp. 23-30). London, England: JAI Press.
35.
JacobsenC. B.BøllingtoftA.AndersenL. B. (2015, November). Can leadership training teach leaders to LEAP? Experimenting with leadership training and leadership strategies. Presented at the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management Conference, Miami, FL.
36.
JarvisC. B.MacKenzieS. B.PodsakoffP. M. (2003). A critical review of construct indicators and measurement model misspecification in marketing and consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 30, 199-218.
37.
JudgeT. A.PiccoloR. F. (2004). Transformational and transactional leadership: A meta-analytic test of their relative validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 755-768.
38.
JungD. I.AvolioB. J. (2000). Opening the black box: An experimental investigation of the mediating effects of trust and value congruence on transformational and transactional leadership. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21, 949-964.
39.
LathamG. P.YuklG. (1975). A review of research on the application of goal setting in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 18, 824-845.
40.
LockeE. A.LathamG. P. (2002). Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: A 35-year odyssey. American Psychologist, 57, 705-717.
41.
LoweK. B.KroeckK. G.SivasubramaniamN. (1996). Effectiveness correlates of transformational and transactional leadership: A meta-analytic review of the MLQ literature. The Leadership Quarterly, 7, 385-425.
42.
MacKenzieS. B.PodsakoffP. M.RichG. A. (2001). Transformational and transactional leadership and salesperson performance. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 29, 115-134.
43.
MoynihanD. P.IngrahamP. W. (2004). Integrative leadership in the public sector: A model of performance-information use. Administration & Society, 36, 427-453.
44.
MoynihanD. P.PandeyS. K.WrightB. E. (2012). Setting the table: How transformational leadership fosters performance information use. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22, 143-164.
45.
O’SheaP. G.FotiR. J.HauensteinN. M. A.BycioP. (2009). Are the best leaders both transformational and transactional? A pattern-oriented analysis. Leadership, 5, 237-259.
46.
PaarlbergL. E.LavignaB. (2010). Transformational leadership and public service motivation: Driving individual and organizational performance. Public Administration Review, 70, 710-718.
47.
PaarlbergL. E.PerryJ. L. (2007). Values management: Aligning employee values and organization goals. The American Review of Public Administration, 37, 387-408.
48.
ParryK. W.SinhaP. N. (2005). Researching the trainability of transformational organizational leadership. Human Resource Development International, 8, 165-183.
49.
PerryJ. L.EngbersT. A.JunS. Y. (2009). Back to the future? Performance-related pay, empirical research, and the perils of persistence. Public Administration Review, 69, 39-51.
50.
PodsakoffP. M.BommerW. H.PodsakoffN. P.MacKenzieS. B. (2006). Relationships between leader reward and punishment behavior and subordinate attitudes, perceptions, and behaviors: A meta-analytic review of existing and new research. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 99, 113-142.
51.
PodsakoffP. M.MacKenzieS. B.MoormanR. H.FetterR. (1990). Transformational leader behaviors and their effects on followers’ trust in leader, satisfaction, and organizational citizenship behaviors. The Leadership Quarterly, 1, 107-142.
52.
RaffertyA. E.GriffinM. A. (2004). Dimensions of transformational leadership: Conceptual and empirical extensions. The Leadership Quarterly, 15, 329-354.
53.
RaineyH. G. (2014). Understanding and managing public organizations (5th ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass & Pfeiffer Imprints.
54.
RaineyH. G.BozemanB. (2000). Comparing public and private organizations: Empirical research and the power of the a priori. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10, 447-470.
55.
RowoldJ. (2011). Relationship between leadership behaviors and performance: The moderating role of a work team’s level of age, gender, and cultural heterogeneity. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 32, 628-647.
56.
ShamirB.HouseR. J.ArthurM. B. (1993). The motivational effects of charismatic leadership: A self-concept based theory. Organization Science, 4, 577-594.
57.
TrottierT.Van WartM.WangX. (2008). Examining the nature and significance of leadership in government organizations. Public Administration Review, 68, 319-333.
58.
VandenbergR. J.LanceC. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3, 4-70.
59.
Van KnippenbergD.SitkinS. B. (2013). A critical assessment of charismatic—Transformational leadership research: Back to the drawing board?The Academy of Management Annals, 7(1), 1-60.
60.
Van WartM. (2013). Administrative leadership theory: A reassessment after 10 years. Public Administration, 91, 521-543.
61.
VogelR.MasalD. (2015). Public leadership: A review of the literature and framework for future research. Public Management Review, 17, 1165-1189.
62.
WeibelA.RostK.OsterlohM. (2010). Pay for performance in the public sector: Benefits and (hidden) costs. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 20, 387-412.
63.
WeickK. E.SutcliffeK. M.ObstfeldD. (2005). Organizing and the process of sensemaking. Organization Science, 16, 409-421.
64.
WilliamsL. J.VandenbergR. J.EdwardsJ. R. (2009). 12 structural equation modeling in management research: A guide for improved analysis. The Academy of Management Annals, 3(1), 543-604.
65.
WrightB. E. (2007). Public service and motivation: Does mission matter?Public Administration Review, 67, 54-64.
66.
WrightB. E.MoynihanD. P.PandeyS. K. (2012). Pulling the levers: Transformational leadership, public service motivation, and mission valence. Public Administration Review, 72, 206-215.
67.
WrightB. E.PandeyS. K. (2010). Transformational leadership in the public sector: Does structure matter?Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 20, 75-89.
68.
YuklG. (1999). An evaluation of conceptual weaknesses in transformational and charismatic leadership theories. The Leadership Quarterly, 10, 285-305.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
