Employee motivation is important for public organizations. However, it might not be the same kind of leadership that motivates Susan and Steve. This article examines whether the association between transformational (visionary leadership) and transactional leadership (verbal and pecuniary rewards) and employee motivation depends on the employee’s gender and gender-based traits. Based on gender differences in communal and agentic traits, pecuniary rewards are argued to motivate male/agentic employees more than female/communal employees. The opposite is argued regarding visionary leadership and verbal rewards. Analysis of 1,294 Danish high school teachers shows female teachers on average are more communal and less agentic than their male colleagues. Furthermore, female teachers, unlike male teachers, are less motivated the more pecuniary rewards they perceive. However, no other gender differences are significant, lending only partial support for gender-based differences in the leadership‒motivation relationship.
AndersenL. B.HeinesenE.PedersenL. H. (2014). How does public service motivation among teachers affect student performance in schools?Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 24(3), 651–671.
3.
AndersenL. B.KjeldsenA. M. (2013). Public service motivation, user orientation, and job satisfaction: A question of employment sector?International Public Management Journal, 16(2), 252–274.
4.
AndersenL. B.PallesenT. (2008). “Not just for the money?” How financial incentives affect the number of publications at Danish research institutions. International Public Management Journal, 11(1), 28–47.
5.
AvolioB. J.ReichardR. J.HannahS. T.WalumbwaF. O.ChanA. (2009). A meta-analytic review of leadership impact research: Experimental and quasi-experimental studies. The Leadership Quarterly, 20(5), 764–784.
6.
BakanD. (1966). The duality of human existence: An essay on psychology and religion. Rand McNally.
7.
BassB. M. (1999). Two decades of research and development in transformational leadership. European Journal of Work & Organizational Psychology, 8(1), 9–32.
8.
BassB. M.AvolioB. J.AtwaterL. (1996). The transformational and transactional leadership of men and women. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 45(1), 5–34.
9.
BelléN. (2013). Experimental evidence on the relationship between public service motivation and job performance. Public Administration Review, 73(1), 143–153.
10.
BelléN. (2014). Leading to make a difference: A field experiment on the performance effects of transformational leadership, perceived social impact, and public service motivation. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 24(1), 109–136.
11.
BelléN. (2015). Performance-related pay and the crowding out of motivation in the public sector: A randomized field experiment. Public Administration Review, 75(2), 230–241.
12.
BigonessW. J. (1988). Sex differences in job attribute preferences. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 9(2), 139–147.
13.
BrightL. (2008). Does public service motivation really make a difference on the job satisfaction and turnover intentions of public employees?The American Review of Public Administration, 38(2), 149–166.
14.
CableD. M.EdwardsJ. R. (2004). Complementary and supplementary fit: A theoretical and empirical integration. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(5), 822–834.
15.
CarlessS. A. (1998). Gender differences in transformational leadership: An examination of superior, leader, and subordinate perspectives. Sex Roles, 39(11–12), 887–902.
16.
CarliL. L. (1997). Biology does not create gender differences in personality. In WalshM. R. (Eds.), Women, men, & gender: Ongoing debates (pp. 44–53). Yale University Press.
17.
DalalD. K.ZickarM. J. (2012). Some common myths about centering predictor variables in moderated multiple regression and polynomial regression. Organizational Research Methods, 15(3), 339–362.
18.
DeHart-DavisL.MarloweJ.PandeyS. K. (2006). Gender dimensions of public service motivation. Public Administration Review, 66(6), 873–887.
19.
EaglyA. H.Johannesen-SchmidtM. C. (2001). The leadership styles of women and men. Journal of Social Issues, 57(4), 781–797.
20.
EaglyA. H.Johannesen-SchmidtM. C.van EngenM. L. (2003). Transformational, transactional, and laissez-faire leadership styles: A meta-analysis comparing women and men. Psychological Bulletin, 129(4), 569–591.
21.
EaglyA. H.WoodW. (2011). Feminism and the evolution of sex differences and similarities. A Journal of Research, 64(9), 758–767.
22.
EaglyA. H.WoodW.DiekmanA. B. (2000). Social role theory of sex differences and similarities: A current appraisal. In EckesT.TrautnerH. M. (Eds.), The developmental social psychology of gender (pp. 123–174). Lawrence Erlbaum.
23.
FaveroN.AndersenS. C.MeierK. J.O’TooleL. J.Jr.WinterS. C. (2018). How should we estimate the performance effect of management? Comparing impacts of public managers’ and frontline employees’ perceptions of management. International Public Management Journal, 21, 105–130.
24.
FeatherN. T. (1984). Masculinity, femininity, psychological androgyny, and the structure of values. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47(3), 604–620.
25.
GneezyU.NiederleM.RustichiniA. (2003). Performance in competitive environments: Gender differences. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(3), 1049–1074.
26.
GooderhamP.NordhaugO.RingdalK.BirkelundG. E. (2004). Job values among future business leaders: The impact of gender and social background. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 20(3), 277–295.
27.
GrissomJ. A.Nicholson-CrottyJ.KeiserL. (2012). Does my boss’s gender matter? Explaining job satisfaction and employee turnover in the public sector. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22(4), 649–673.
28.
GuyM. E.NewmanM. A. (2004). Women’s jobs, men’s jobs: Sex segregation and emotional labor. Public Administration Review, 64(3), 289–298.
29.
Gymnasieskolernes Lærerforening. (2019a). Gymnasielærere i tal 2019 [Union of Upper Secondary School Teachers].
JacobsenC. B.AndersenL. B. (2015). Is leadership in the eye of the beholder? A study of intended and perceived leadership practices and organizational performance. Public Administration Review, 75(6), 829–841. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12380
JacobsenC. B.NielsenT. S.HansenJ. R. (2014). Det ledelsesmæssige fundament: Ledelsesstruktur, ledelsestrategi og strategisk ledelse. In AndersenL. B.BogetoftP.ChristensenJ. G.TranæsT. (Eds.), Styring, ledelse og resultater på ungdomsuddannelserne (pp. 93–110). Rockwool Foundation Research Unit and University Press of Southern Denmark.
36.
JakobsenM.JensenR. (2015). Common method bias in public management studies. International Public Management Journal, 18(1), 3–30.
37.
JensenU. T.AndersenL. B.BroL. L.BøllingtoftA.EriksenT. L. M.HoltenA.-L.JacobsenC. B.LadenburgJ.NielsenP. A.SalomonsenH. H.Westergård-NielsenN.WürtzA. (2019). Conceptualizing and measuring transformational and transactional leadership. Administration & Society, 51(1), 3–33.
38.
JensenU. T.AndersenL. B.JacobsenC. B. (2019). Only when we agree! How value congruence moderates the impact of goal-oriented leadership on public service motivation. Public Administration Review, 79(1), 12–24.
39.
JensenU. T.BroL. L. (2018). How transformational leadership supports intrinsic motivation and public service motivation: The mediating role of basic need satisfaction. The American Review of Public Administration, 48(6), 535–549.
40.
JungD. I.AvolioB. J. (2000). Opening the black box: An experimental investigation of the mediating effects of trust and value congruence on transformational and transactional leadership. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21(8), 949–964.
41.
KjeldsenA. M.AndersenL. B. (2013). How pro-social motivation affects job satisfaction: An international analysis of countries with different welfare state regimes. Scandinavian Political Studies, 36(2), 153–176.
42.
KnippenbergD.van SitkinS. B. (2013). A critical assessment of charismatic—Transformational leadership research: Back to the drawing board?The Academy of Management Annals, 7(1), 1–60.
43.
KonradA. M.RitchieJ. E.LiebP.CorrigallE. (2000). Sex differences and similarities in job attribute preferences: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 126(4), 593–641.
44.
Kristof-BrownA. L.ZimmermanR. D.JohnsonE. C. (2005). Consequences of individuals’ fit at work: A meta-analysis of person–job, person–organization, person–group, and person–supervisor fit. Personnel Psychology, 58(2), 281–342.
45.
KrogsgaardJ. A.ThomsenP.AndersenL. B. (2014). Only if we agree? How value conflicts moderate the relationship between transformational leadership and public service motivation. International Journal of Public Administration, 37(12), 895–907.
46.
MeierK. J.MastracciS. H.WilsonK. (2006). Gender and emotional labor in public organizations: An empirical examination of the link to performance. Public Administration Review, 66(6), 899–909.
NielsenP. A.BoyeS.HoltenA.-L.JacobsenC. B.AndersenL. B. (2019). Are transformational and transactional types of leadership compatible? A two-wave study of employee motivation. Public Administration, 97(2), 413–428.
49.
NielsenV. L. (2014). Differences in male and female employees’ personal attributes? Myth or a reasonable assumption: Even within professions?Gender Issues, 31(3–4), 163–184.
50.
OberfieldZ. W. (2012). Public management in time: A longitudinal examination of the full range of leadership theory. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 24(2), 407–429.
51.
OrsE.PalominoF.PeyracheE. (2013). Performance gender gap: Does competition matter?Journal of Labor Economics, 31(3), 443–499.
52.
PaulhusD. (1991). Measurement and control of response bias. In RobinsonJ. P.ShaverP. R.WrightsmanL. S. (Eds.), Measures of Social Psychological Attitudes: Vol. 1. Measures of personality and social psychological attitudes (pp. 17–59). Academic Press.
53.
PedersenM. J. (2018). More similar than different: Experimental evidence on the (in) significance of gender for the effect of different incentives on compliance behavior. Administration & Society, 50(2), 217–239.
54.
PinkerS. (2008). The sexual paradox: Troubled boys, gifted girls and the real difference between the sexes. Scribner.
55.
SpenceJ. T.HelmreichR.StappJ. (1975). Ratings of self and peers on sex role attributes and their relation to self-esteem and conceptions of masculinity and femininity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32(1), 29–39.
56.
SteersR. M.MowdayR. T.ShapiroD. L. (2004). Introduction to special topic forum: The future of work motivation theory. The Academy of Management Review, 29(3), 379–387.
VandenabeeleW. (2009). The mediating effect of job satisfaction and organizational commitment on self-reported performance: More robust evidence of the PSM–performance relationship. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 75(1), 11–34.
59.
WardL. C.ThornB. E.ClementsK. L.DixonK. E.SanfordS. D. (2006). Measurement of agency, communion, and emotional vulnerability with the personal attributes questionnaire. Journal of Personality Assessment, 86(2), 206–216.
60.
WrightB. E.MoynihanD. P.PandeyS. K. (2012). Pulling the levers: Transformational leadership, public service motivation, and mission valence. Public Administration Review, 72(2), 206–215.
61.
YuklG. (1999). An evaluation of conceptual weaknesses in transformational and charismatic leadership theories. Leadership Quarterly, 10(2), 285–305.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
