Scholars maintain that higher wages for public servants would make the public sector more efficient and reduce the abuse of power. This article challenges this idea and suggests that higher wages may actually increase public corruption. We argue that increasing pecuniary incentives for public service might lead public employees to advance their own self-interests and encourage justifications for accepting bribes. We test our theory empirically using 18,800 observations from 58 countries taken from the sixth wave of the World Values Survey. The findings confirm our theory and suggest a positive association between public servants’ wages and the toleration of corruption.
AdesA.Di TellaR. (1997). The new economics of corruption: A survey and some new results. Political Studies, 45, 496-515.
2.
AnderssonS.HeywoodP. M. (2009). The Politics of perception: Use and abuse of transparency international’s approach to measuring corruption. Political Studies, 57(4), 746-767.
3.
Aristotle. (1996). The politics and the constitutions of Athens. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
4.
AshforthB. E.GioiaD. A.RobinsonS. L.TreviñoL. K. (2008). Re-viewing organizational corruption. The Academy of Management Review, 33, 670-684.
5.
BanfieldE. C. (1975). Corruption as a feature of governmental organization. Journal of Law & Economics, 18, 587-605.
6.
BeckerG. S.StiglerG. J. (1974). Law enforcement, malfeasance, and compensation of enforcers. The Journal of Legal Studies, 3, 1-18.
7.
BicchieriC.XiaoE. (2008). Do the right thing: But only if others do so. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 22, 191-208.
8.
BowlesS.GintisH. (2000). Reciprocity, self-interest, and the welfare state. Nordic Journal of Political Economy, 26, 33-53.
9.
BowlesS.Polanía-ReyesS. (2012). economic incentives and social preferences: Substitutes or complements?Journal of Economic Literature, 50, 368-425.
10.
BraibantiR. (1962). Reflections on bureaucratic corruption. Public Administration, 40, 357-372.
11.
CohenN. (2012). Informal payments for healthcare—The phenomenon and its context. Health Economics, Policy and Law, 7, 285-308.
12.
CohenN.GershgorenS. (2013). The incentives of street-level bureaucrats and inequality in tax assessments. Administration & Society. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0095399712473984
13.
CowlyE.SmithS. (2014). Motivation and mission in the public sector: Evidence from the World Values Survey. Theory and Decision, 76, 241-263.
14.
DahlströmC.LapuenteV.TeorellJ. (2012). The merit of meritocratization: Politics, bureaucracy, and the institutional deterrents of corruption. Political Research Quarterly, 65, 656-668.
15.
Della PortaD.VannucciA. (2012). The hidden order of corruption: An institutional approach. Farnham, UK: Ashgate Publishing Company.
16.
Di TellaR.SchargrodskyE. (2003). The role of wages and auditing during a crackdown on corruption in the City of Buenos Aires. Journal of Law & Economics, XLVI, 269-292.
17.
DobelJ. P. (1999). Public integrity. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
18.
DonaldsonL. (1990). The ethereal hand: Organizational economics and management theory. The Academy of Management Review, 15, 369-381.
GeorgellisY.IossaE.TabvumaV. (2011). Crowding out intrinsic motivation in the public sector. Journal of Public Administration and Research, 21, 473-493.
24.
HallR. E. (1973). Wages, income and hours of work in the U.S. Labor Force. In CainG.WattsH. (Eds.), Labor supply and income maintenance (pp. 102-162). Chicago, IL: Markham.
25.
HenrichJ.BoydR.BowlesS.CamererC.FehrE.GintisH.McElreathR. (2001). In search of homo economicus: Behavioral experiments in 15 small-scale societies. The American Economic Review, 91, 73-78.
26.
HeywoodP. (2015). Introduction: Scale and focus in the study of corruption. In HeywoodP. (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of political corruption (pp. 1-14). New York, NY: Routledge.
27.
HortonS. (2008). History and persistence of an idea and an ideal. In PerryJ.HondeghemA. (Eds.), Motivation in public management: The call of public service (pp. 17-32). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
28.
JohnstonM. (2014). Corruption, contention, and reform. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
29.
KwonI. (2014). Motivation, discretion, and corruption. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 24, 765-794.
30.
LambsdorffJ. G. (2007). The institutional economics of corruption and reform. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
31.
LarkinI.PierceL.GinoF. (2012). The psychological costs of pay-for-performance: Implications for the strategic compensation of employees. Strategic Management Journal, 33, 1194-1214.
32.
LeightonW. A.LópezE. J. (2013). Madmen, intellectuals, and academic scribblers. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
33.
MarquetteH.PeifferC. (2015). Corruption and collective action (Developmental Leadership Program, Research paper no. 32). Retrieved from http://www.u4.no/publications/?start=20
34.
MoynihanD. P. (2010). A workforce of cynics? The effects of contemporary reforms on public service motivation. International Public Management Journal, 13, 24-34.
35.
NavotD.CohenN. (2015). How policy entrepreneurs reduce corruption in Israel. Governance, 28, 61-76.
36.
NiskanenW. A. (1971). Bureaucracy and representative government. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
37.
OstromE. (2005). Policies that crowd out reciprocity and collective action. In GintisH.BowlesS.BoydR.FehrE. (Eds.), Moral sentiments and material interests: The foundations of cooperation in economic life (pp. 253-276). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
38.
PerryJ. L.HondeghemA. (Eds.). (2008). Motivation in public management: The call of public service. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
39.
PerryJ. L.HondeghemA.WiseL. R. (2010). Revisiting the motivational bases of public service: Twenty years of research and an agenda for the future. Public Administration Review, 70, 681-690.
40.
PerryJ. L.WiseL. R. (1990). The motivational bases of public service. Public Administration Review, 50, 367-373.
41.
PerssonA.RothsteinB.TeorellJ. (2013). Why anticorruption reforms fail—Systemic corruption as a collective actions problem. Governance, 26, 449-471.
42.
PhilpM. (2007). Political conduct. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
43.
RaynerJ.WilliamsH. M.LawtonA.AllinsonC. W. (2011). Public service ethos: Developing a generic measure. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21, 27-51.
44.
Rose-AckermanS. (1975). The economics of corruption. Journal of Public Economics, 4, 187-203.
45.
RothsteinB. (2011). The quality of government. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
46.
SagerF.RosserC. (2009). Weber, Wilson, and Hegel: Theories of modern bureaucracy. Public Administration Review, 69, 1136-1147.
47.
SegalL. (2012). Instilling stewardship to address the integrity/efficiency dilemma. Administration & Society, 44, 825-852.
48.
SegalL.LehrerM. (2012). The institutionalization of stewardship: Theory, propositions, and insights from change in the Edmonton Public Schools. Organization Studies, 33, 169-201.
49.
SmithA. (2008). An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. (Original work published 1776)
50.
TreismanD. (2007). What we have learned about the causes of corruption from ten tears of cross-national empirical research?Annual Review of Political Science, 10, 211-244.
51.
Van RijckeghemC.WederB. (2001). Bureaucratic corruption and the rate of temptation: Do wages in the civil service affect corruption, and by how much?Journal of Development Economics, 65, 307-331.
52.
van VeldhuizenR. (2013). The influence of wages on public officials’ corruptibility: A laboratory investigation. Journal of Economic Psychology, 39, 341-356.
53.
VianT. (2008). Review of corruption in the health sector: Theory, methods and interventions. Health Policy and Planning, 23, 83-94.
54.
WilsonJ. Q. (1989). Bureaucracy: What government agencies do and why they do it. New York, NY: Basic Books.
55.
WilsonW. (1887). The study of administration. Political Science Quarterly, 2, 197-222.
