Despite normative claims that elite foundation boards select elite nonprofits, foundations increasingly use community volunteers to allocate grants. There is an assumption that community involvement in grant making leads to better grant decisions. However, no one has tested this assumption and explored whether community members are even making different grant decisions than traditional boards. Drawing on a sample of six funders who use a community and traditional board, their 616 grantees, and 955 nongrantees, this paper empirically tests anecdotes replete in literature, identifying the organizational and financial determinants that influence community boards grant decisions versus those that influence traditional board decisions.
AbelsonJ.GauvinF. P. (2006). Assessing the impacts of public participation: Concepts, evidence and policy implications (Research report P| 06 public involvement network). Ottoway, ON: Canadian Policy Research Networks.
2.
AlieR.SeitaJ. (1997). Who’s using evaluation and how? New study gives insight. Nonprofit World, 15(5), 40-49.
3.
ArnoveR. F. (1980). Philanthropy and cultural imperialism: The foundations at home and abroad. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
4.
ArnsteinS. R. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Planning Association, 35, 216-224.
5.
AshleyS.FaulkL. (2010). Nonprofit competition in the grants marketplace. Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 21, 43-57.
6.
AshleyS. R. (2012). Is the inequality equitable? An examination of the distributive equity of philanthropic grants to rural communities. Administration & Society. Advance online publication.
7.
BaumJ. (1996). Organizational ecology. In CleggS. R.HardyC.NordW. (Eds.), Handbook of organization studies (pp. 77-114). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
8.
BernholzL.SklootE.VarelaB. (2010). Disrupting philanthropy: Technology and the future of the social sector. Durham, NC: Center for Strategic Philanthropy and Civil Society, Sanford School of Public Policy, Duke University.
9.
BournsJ. C. (2010). Do nothing about me without me: An action guide for engaging stakeholders. Washington, DC: Grantmakers for Effective Organizations.
10.
BradshawP.MurrayV.WolpinJ. (1996). Women on boards of nonprofits: What difference do they make?Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 6, 241-254.
11.
BrownW. (2002). Racial diversity and performance of nonprofit boards of directors. Journal of Applied Management and Entrepreneurship, 7(4), 43-57.
12.
BuchheitS.ParsonsL. M. (2006). An experimental investigation of accounting information’s influence on the individual giving process. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 25, 666-686.
13.
BurbridgeL.DiazW.OdendahlT.ShawA. (2002). The meaning and impact of board and staff diversity in the philanthropic field. San Francisco, CA: Joint Affinity Groups.
14.
CabannesY. (2004). Participatory budgeting: A Significant contribution to participatory democracy. Environment & Urbanization, 16(1), 27-46.
15.
CalabreseT. (2011). Do donors penalize nonprofit organizations with accumulated wealth. Public Administration Review, 71, 859-869.
16.
CampbellK. B. (2005). Theorizing the authentic: Identity, engagement and public space. Administration & Society, 36, 688-705.
ChurchB. K.ParsonsL. M. (2008). Performance information and charitable giving: An experimental work. Davis: University of California, Davis, Graduate School of Management.
19.
CobbN. K. (2002). The new philanthropy: Its impact on funding arts and culture. Journal of Arts Management, Law, and Society, 32, 125-143.
20.
DelfinF. G.TangS. (2007). Elitism, pluralism, or resource dependency: Patterns of environmental philanthropy among private foundations in California. Environment and Planning, 39, 2167-2186.
21.
EbdonC.FranklinA. L. (2006). Citizen participation in budgeting theory. Public Administration Review, 66, 437-447.
EikenberryA. (2009). Giving circles: Philanthropy, voluntary association and democracy. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
24.
EisenbergP. (2007). The politics of foundations, a comparative analysis, edited by Helmut K. Anheier and Siobhan Daly. Reviewed by Pablo Eisenberg. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 37, 376-379
25.
EnrightK. P.BournsC. (2010). The case for stakeholder engagement. Stanford, CA: Stanford Social Innovation Review.
26.
The Foundation Center. (2009). Foundation staff positions by asset range, 2009 (*New Criteria). New York, NY: Author.
27.
The Foundation Center. (2011). Top 50 recipient organizations by grant dollars received, circal 2009. New York, NY: Author.
28.
FranklinA. L.EbdonC. (2005). Are we all touching the same camel?The American Review of Public Administration, 35, 168-185.
29.
FungA. (2003). Recipes for public spheres: Eight institutional design choices and their consequences. Journal of Political Philosophy, 11, 338-367.
30.
GalaskiewiczJ. (1985). Social organization of an urban grants economy: A study of business philanthropy and nonprofit organizations. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
31.
GalaskiewiczJ. (1997). An urban grants economy revisited: Corporate charitable contributions in the twin cities, 1979-81, 1987-89. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, 445-471.
32.
GarrowE. E. (2011). Receipt of government revenue among nonprofit human service organizations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21, 445-471.
33.
GersickK. E. (2004). Generations of giving: Leadership and continuity in family foundations. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
34.
GibelmanM.GelmanS. R.PollackD. (1997). The credibility of nonprofit boards: A view from the 1990s and beyond. Administration in Social Work, 21(2), 21-40.
35.
González-RiveraC. (2009). Diversity on foundation boards of directors. Berkeley, CA: Greenlining Institute.
36.
GordonT. P.KnockC. L.NeelyD. G. (2009). The role of rating agencies in the market for charitable contributions: An Empirical Test. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 28, 469-484.
37.
GranovetterM. (1983). The strength of weak ties: A network theory revisited. Sociological Theory, 1, 201-233.
38.
GreenleeJ. S.BrownK. L. (1999). The impact of accounting information on contributions to charitable organizations. In ChanderN.PrevitsG.RobinsonA. (Eds.), Research in accounting regulation (Vol. 13. pp. 111-126). Stamford, CT: JAI Press.
39.
GreenleeJ. S.TrusselJ. M. (2000). Predicting the financial vulnerability of charitable organizations. Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 11, 199-210.
40.
GrønbjergK.MartellL.PaarlbergL. (2000). Philanthropic funding of human services: Solving ambiguity through the two-stage competitive process. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 29(suppl. 1), 9-40.
41.
GrønbjergK.PaarlbergL. (2002). Extent and nature of overlap between listings of IRS tax-exempt registration and nonprofit incorporation—The case of Indiana. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 31, 565-594.
42.
GrønbjergKLiuH.PollakT. (2010) Incorporated but Not IRS-Registered: Exploring the (Dark) Grey Fringes of the Nonprofit Universe. Nonprofit and Voluntary Setor Quarterly, 39, 925-945.
43.
GuoC.BrownW. (2006). Community foundation performance: Bridging community resources and needs. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 35, 267-287.
44.
JacobsF. A.MarudasN. P. (2009). The combined effect of donation price and administrative inefficiency on donations to US nonprofit organizations. Financial Accountability & Management, 25, 33-53.
45.
JenkinsJ. C. (1998). Channeling social protest: Foundation patronage of contemporary social movements. In PowellW.ClemensE. (Eds.), Private action and the public good (pp. 206-216). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
46.
JunK. N.MussoJ. (2013). Participatory governance and the spatial representation of neighborhood issues. Urban Affairs Review, 49, 71-110.
47.
KarlB. D.KatzS. N. (1987). Foundations and ruling class elites. Daedalus, 116(1), 1-40.
LenkowskyL. (2002). Foundations and corporate philanthropy. In SalamonL. (Ed.), The state of nonprofit America (pp. 355-386). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
50.
LenkowskyL. (2012). Foundations and corporate philanthropy. In SalamonL. (Ed.), The state of nonprofit America (pp. 459-494). Washington, D.C: Brookings Institution Press.
51.
LindemanE. (1988). Wealth & culture: A study of one hundred foundations and community trusts and their operations during the decade 1921-1930. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
52.
MarudasN. P. (2004). Effects of nonprofit organization wealth and efficiency on private donations to large nonprofit organizations. In CopleyP. (Ed.), Research in governmental and nonprofit accounting (Vol. 11, pp. 71-92). Oxford, UK: Elsevier Ltd.
53.
MarudasN. P.HahnT.JacobsF. A. (2012). An improved model of donations to nonprofit organizations. Proceedings of AASBBS, 19, 545-559.
54.
McGinnisJ. (2013, June). Public power in philanthropy. Public Management Research Conference Paper. Madison, Wisconsin.
55.
McGinnisJ.AshleyS. (2011). The family difference? Exploring the congruence in grant distribution patterns between family and independent foundations. The Foundation Review, 3(4), 74-81.
56.
MiddletonM. (1987). Nonprofit boards of directors: Beyond the governance function. In PowellW. (Ed.), The nonprofit sector: A research handbook (pp. 141-153). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
57.
MillsC. (1956). The power elite. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
58.
NabatchiT. (2012). Putting the “public” back in public values research: Designing participation to identify and respond to values. Public Administration Review, 72, 699-708.
59.
NielsenW. A. (1972). The big foundations. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
60.
OdendahlT. (1990). Charity begins at home: Generosity and self-interest among the philanthropic elite. New York, NY: Basic Books.
61.
OktenC.WeisbrodB. (2000). Determinants of donations in private nonprofit markets. Journal of Public Economics, 75, 255-272.
62.
OstranderS. (1999). When grantees become grantors: Accountability, democracy, and social movement philanthropy. In LagemannE. C. (Ed.), Philanthropic foundations: New scholarship, new possibilities (pp. 257-270). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
63.
OstrowerF.StoneM. M. (2006). Governance: Research trends, gaps, and future prospects. In PowellW.SteinbergR. (Eds.), The nonprofit sector: A research handbook (pp. 612-628). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
64.
ParsonsL. M. (2007). The impact of financial information and voluntary disclosures on contributions to not for profit organizations. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 19(1), 179-196.
65.
PutnamR. (2001). The collapse and revival of American community. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster Paperbacks.
66.
RooneyP. (2007). Individual giving. In YoungD. (Ed.), Financing nonprofits: Putting theory into practice (pp. 23-44). Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press.
67.
SaxtonG. D.GuoC. (2011). Accountability online: Understanding the web-based accountability practices of nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 40, 270-295.
68.
SilverI. (2007). Disentangling class from philanthropy: The double-edged sword of alternative giving. Critical Sociology, 33, 537-549.
69.
SmithD. H. (2000). Grassroots associations. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
70.
SuárezD. F. (2011). Collaboration and professionalization: The contours of public sector funding for nonprofit organizations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21, 307-326.
71.
SzperR.PrakashA. (2011). Charity watchdogs and the limits of information-based regulation. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 22, 112-141.
72.
ThomasJ. C. (1995). Public participation in public decisions: New skills and strategies. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons.
73.
ThomasJ. C. (2012). Citizen, customer, partner: Engaging the public in public management. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
74.
TinkelmanD. (1998). Differences in sensitivity of financial statement users to joint cost allocations: The case of nonprofit organizations. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 13, 377-394.
75.
TinkelmanD.MankaneyK. (2007). When is administrative efficiency associated with charitable donations?Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 36, 41-64.
76.
TinkelmanD.NeelyD. G. (2011). Some econometric issues in studying nonprofit revenue interactions using NCCS data. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 40, 751-761.
77.
TrusselJ. M.ParsonsL. M. (2003, December18). Financial reporting factors affecting donations to charitable not-for-profit organizations. Social Science Research Network, pp. 1-16.
78.
TuckmanH. P.ChangC. F. (1991). A methodology for measuring the financial vulnerability of charitable nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 20, 445-460.
79.
VerbaS.SchlozmanK. L.BradyH. E. (1995). Voice and equality: Civic voluntarism in American politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
80.
WangJ.CoffeyB. S. (1992). Board composition and corporate philanthropy. Journal of Business Ethics, 11, 771-778.
81.
WeisbrodB. A.DominguezN. D. (1986). Demand for collective goods in private nonprofit markets: Can fundraising expenditures help overcome free-rider behavior?Journal of Public Economics, 30, 83-96.
82.
WerbelJ. D.CarterS. M. (2002). The CEO’s influence on corporate foundation giving. Journal of Business Ethics, 40, 47-60.
83.
WolpertJ. (1993).Patterns of generosity in America. New York, NY: The Twentieth Century Fund. Washington, DC: The Aspen Institute.
84.
ZaldM. N. (1967). Urban differentiation, characteristics of boards of directors, and organizational effectiveness. American Journal of Sociology, 73, 261-272.
85.
ZaldM. N. (1969). The power and functions of boards of directors: A Theoretical synthesis. American Journal of Sociology, 75, 97-111.
