As the founding president of a new republic, which he called an “experiment” in government, George Washington was keenly aware of the importance of “precedents” in shaping “institutions.” Following the recommendation of Herbert Simon (1947) who believed that administrative theory should be based on identifying decision premises, this study identifies premises, stated as propositions, which guided Washington in what he called his “public administration” for a new nation. These propositions comprise a coherent theoretical framework, based on Enlightenment thinking and values, for studying and practicing public administration.
AdamsJ. Q. (1788, February16). In KaminskiJohn P.SaladinoGaspare J. (Eds.), The Massachusetts volumes of the documentary history of the ratification of the constitution (Vol. 4, To William Cranch). Wisconsin Historical Society. Retrieved from http://www.wisconsinhistory.org/ratification/digital/tocvii.asp
3.
AllenW. B. (1988). George Washington. Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund.
4.
BarkerW. H. (1900). Eulogy to Dorman Eaton. The Postal Record, 13, 64.
5.
CaldwellL. K. (1944). The administrative theories of Hamilton and Jefferson. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
6.
CaldwellL. K. (1976). Novus Ordo Seclorum: The heritage of American public administration. Public Administration Review, 36, 476-488.
7.
CaresseP. O. (2003). Liberty, constitutionalism, and moderation: The political thought of George Washington. In FrostB.-P.SikkengaJ. (Eds.), History of American political thought (pp. 95-113). Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
NewboldS. P. (2010). All but forgotten: Thomas Jefferson and the development of public administration. Albany: State University of New York Press.
24.
NortonD. F. (1976). Francis Hutcheson in America. Studies on Voltaire and the Eighteenth Century, 154, 1547-1569.
25.
PalmerD. R. (1994). 1794: America, its army and the birth of the nation. Novato, CA: Presidio Press.
26.
PeabodyB. G. (2001). George Washington, presidential term limits, and the problem of reluctant political leadership. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 31, 439-453.
27.
RaadscheldersJ. C. N. (2010). Is American public administration detached from historical context? On the nature of time and the need to understand it in government and its study. The American Review of Public Administration, 40, 235-260.
28.
RandallW. S. (1997). George Washington: A life. New York, NY: Henry Holt.
29.
RawlsJ. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
30.
RhodehamelJ. (1998). The great experiment: George Washington and the American republic. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
31.
SchönD. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner. London, England: Temple Smith.
32.
SelznickP. (1996). Institutionalism “old” and “new.”Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, 270-277.
33.
SimonH. A. (1947). Administrative behavior. New York, NY: Macmillan.
34.
SmithR. N. (1993). Patriarch: George Washington and the new American nation. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
35.
StillmanR. J. (1998). Creating the American state. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
36.
TerryL. D. (2002). Leadership of public bureaucracies (2nd ed.). Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
37.
United States Army. (2005). The army (Field Manual No. 1). Washington, DC: Department of the Army.
38.
United States Civil Service Commission. (1899). Report of the United States Civil-Service Commission (Vol. 15). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
