Challenges have been made to validate “classical” forms of management. This study facilitates suggestions to view organizational theory from a design perspective. Affirming how Luther Gulick explored design, tests of a construct were used to substantiate POSDCORB as a framework. Integrated within are elements of linguistics and Alexandrian patterns. An instrument development model was used to approximate POSDCORB as it demonstrated acceptable content validity, as well as construct validity and reliability. Having explored a proxy, models were established using multivariate data. The study provides framework-theory-model scenarios, evidence to indicate the adoption of institutions, and element support.
AgranoffR. (2007). Managing within networks: Adding value to public organizations. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
2.
AgranoffR.McGuireM. (2001). Big questions in public network management research. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 11, 295-326.
3.
AlexanderC. (1964). Notes on the synthesis of form. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
4.
AlexanderC. (1979). Timeless way of building. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
5.
AlexanderC.IshikawaS.SilversteinM. (1977). A pattern language: Towns, buildings, construction. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
6.
BlumbergS. (1981). Seven decades of public administration: A tribute to Luther Gulick. Public Administration Review, 41, 245-248.
7.
BolmanL.DealT. (2008). Reframing organizations (4th ed.). San Francisco, CA: John Wiley.
8.
BoochG. (1994). Object-oriented analysis and design (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Addison-Wesley.
9.
BoochG. (1996). Object solutions: Managing the object-oriented project. New York, NY: Addison-Wesley.
10.
CaudleS. (1990). Managing information resources in state government. Public Administration Review, 50, 515-524.
11.
ChomskyN. (1996). The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
12.
ChurchillG. (1979). A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs. Journal of Marketing Research, 16, 64-73.
13.
Commission of Inquiry on Public Service Personnel. (1935). Better government personnel. New York, NY: Whittlesey.
14.
Council of State Governments. (1996). Book of the states. Lexington, KY: Author.
15.
CrawfordS.OstromE. (2000). A grammar of institutions. In McginnisM. (Ed.), Polycentric games and institutions (pp. 114-155). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
DeSanctisG.FulkJ. (1999). Conclusion: Research issues and directions. In DeSanctisG.FulkJ. (Eds.), Shaping organizational form: Communication, connection and community (pp. 497-502). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
18.
DiMaggioP.PowellW. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and the collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48, 147-160.
19.
EvaristoJ. R.DeSouzaK. C.HollisterK. (2005). Centralization momentum: The pendulum swings back again. Communications of the ACM, 48(2), 67-71.
20.
FairholmM. R. (2004). Different perspectives on the practice of leadership. Public Administration Review, 64, 577-590.
21.
FayadM. E.SchmidtD. C.JohnsonR. E. (1999). Implementing application frameworks: Object-oriented frameworks at work. New York, NY: John Wiley.
22.
FayolH. (1937). Administrative theory in the state. In GulickL.UrwickL. (Eds.), Papers on the science of administration (pp. 99-114). New York, NY: Institute of Public Administration.
23.
FissP. C. (2007). A set-theoretic approach to organizational configurations. Academy of Management Review, 32, 1180-1198.
24.
FitchL. C. (1996). Making democracy work. Berkeley, CA: Institute of Governmental Studies Press.
25.
GammaE.HelmR.JohnsonR.VlissidesJ. (1995). Design patterns. New York, NY: Addison-Wesley.
26.
GoldbergA.RubinK. S. (1995). Succeeding with objects: Decision frameworks for project management. New York, NY: Addison-Wesley.
27.
GrahamC.HaysS. W. (1986). Managing the public organization. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly.
28.
GresovC. (1989). Exploring fit and misfit with multiple contingencies. Administrative Science Quarterly, 34, 431-453.
29.
GulickL. (1935, June22–24). Saturday afternoon session. In BrownlowLouis (Director), Minutes of the proceedings of the conference on training for the public service (pp. 25-38). Princeton, NJ: Public Administration Clearing House.
30.
GulickL. (1937a). Foreword. In GulickL.UrwickL. (Eds.), Papers on the science of administration. New York, NY: Institute of Public Administration.
31.
GulickL. (1937b). Notes on the theory of organization. In GulickL.UrwickL. (Eds.), Papers on the science of administration (pp. 1-46). New York, NY: Institute of Public Administration.
32.
GulickL. (1937c). Science, values and public administration. In GulickL.UrwickL. (Eds.), Papers on the science of administration (pp. 189-195). New York, NY: Institute of Public Administration.
33.
HammondT. (1990). In defence of Luther Gulick’s “notes on the theory of organization.”Public Administration, 68, 143-173.
34.
HortonF. (1985). Information resources management. Englewood Cliffs, CA: Prentice Hall.
35.
JohnsonE.HicksD. (2004). Speaking in teams: Motivating a pattern language for collaboration. Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems, 2, 136-143.
36.
KatzD.KahnR. L. (1966). The social psychology of organizations. New York, NY: John Wiley.
37.
KerievskyJ. (2005). Refactoring to patterns. New York, NY: Addison-Wesley.
38.
LewisB. R.SnyderC. A.RainerR. K. (1995). An empirical assessment of the information resource management construct. Journal of Management Information Systems, 12, 100-224.
39.
MartinD. W. (1987). Deja vu: French antecedents of American public administration. Public Administration Review, 47, 297-303.
40.
McGinnisM. (2000). Introduction to part 1. In McGinnisM. (Ed.), Polycentric games and institutions (pp. 25-33). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
41.
MeierK. J. (2010). Governance, structure, and democracy: Luther Gulick and the future of public administration [Special issue]. Public Administration Review, 70(Suppl. 1), S284-S291.
42.
MeierK. J.BohteJ. (2000). Ode to Luther Gulick: Span of control and organizational performance. Administration & Society, 32, 115-137.
43.
MeierK. J.BohteJ. (2003). Span of control and public organizations: Implementing Luther Gulick’s research design. Public Administration Review, 63, 61-70.
44.
MillerG. M. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capability for processing information. Psychological Review, 63, 81-97.
45.
MintzbergH. (1979). The structuring of organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
46.
National Association of State Information Systems. (1987). Information systems technology in state government. Lexington, KY: Author.
47.
National Association of State Information Systems. (1988). Information systems technology in state government. Lexington, KY: Author.
48.
National Association of State Information Resource Executives. (1991). State information resource management, structure and activities. Lexington, KY: Author.
49.
OstromE. (1999). Institutional rational choice: An assessment of the institutional analysis and development framework. In SabatierP. (Ed.), Theories of the policy process (pp. 35-71). Boulder, CO: Westview.
50.
OstromE. (2005). Understanding institutional diversity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
51.
OstromE.GardnerR.WalkerJ. (1994). Rules, games, & common-pool resources. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
52.
OstromV. (1989). The intellectual crisis in American public administration (2nd ed.). Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
53.
Paperwork Reduction Reauthorization Act. (1986). United States statutes at large. Vol. 100, secs. 3341-336.
54.
PenningsJ. M. (1992). Structural contingency theory: A reappraisal. Research in Organizational Behavior, 14, 267-309.
55.
PlocherD. (1996). The paperwork reduction act of 1995: A second chance for information resources management. Government Information Quarterly, 13, 35-50.
56.
Public Administration Service. (1965). Automated data processing in state government: Status, problems, and prospects. Chicago, IL: Author.
57.
RaadscheldersJ. (2011). Public administration: The interdisciplinary study of government. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
58.
RaadscheldersJ.LeeK. (2011). Trends in the study of public administration: Empirical and qualitative observations from public administration review, 2000-2009. Public Administration Review, 71, 19-33.
59.
RichardsonI. L.BaldwinS. (1976). Public administration: Government in action. Columbus, OH: Merrill.
60.
SabatierP. A. (1977). Regulatory policy-making: Toward a framework of analysis. Natural Resources Journal, 17, 415-460.
61.
SabatierP. A. (1999). The need for better theories. In SabatierP. (Ed.), Theories of the policy process (pp. 3-17). Boulder, CO: Westview.
62.
SabatierP. A.MazmanianD. (1980). The implementation of public policy: A framework of analysis. Policy Studies Journal, 8, 538-560.
63.
ScottW. R. (2003). Organizations: Rational, natural, and open systems (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
64.
ShafritzJ. M.OttJ. S. (2001). Classics of organization theory (5th ed.). New York, NY: Harcourt.
65.
SherwoodF. P. (1990). The half-century’s “Great Books” in public administration. Public Administration Review, 50, 249-264.
66.
SimonH. A. (1947). Administrative behavior: A study of decision-making process in administrative organization. New York, NY: Free Press.
67.
SimonH. A. (1973). Applying information technology to organization design. Public Administration Review, 33, 268-278.
68.
SimonH. A. (1981). The sciences of the artificial. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
69.
SimonH. A. (1997). Administrative behavior: A study of decision-making process in administrative organization. (4th ed.). New York, NY: Free Press.
70.
StillmanR. J. (1991). Preface to public administration. New York, NY: St. Martin’s.
71.
StillmanR. J. (2005). Public administration: Concepts and cases (8th ed.). Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
72.
TaylorF. W. (1903). Shop management (No. 1003). Philadelphia, PA: American Society of Mechanical Engineers.
73.
ThompsonJ. D. (2003). Organizations in action: Social science bases of administrative theory. New York: McGraw-Hill. (Original work published 1967)
74.
United States Commission on Federal Paperwork. (1977). Information resource management: A report on the commission on federal paperwork. Washington, DC: U.S.GPO.
75.
UrwickL. (1937). The function of administration: With special reference to the work of Henri Fayol. In GulickL.UrwickL. (Eds.), Papers on the science of administration (pp. 116-130). New York, NY: Institute of Public Administration.
76.
UsherJ. (1999). Specialists, generalists, and polymorphs: Spatial advantages in multiunit organization in a single industry. Academy of Management Review, 24, 143-150.
77.
van der LindenP. (2002). Just java (5th ed.). Palo Alto, CA: Prentice Hall.
78.
Van MeterD. S.Van HornC. E. (1975). The implementation process: A conceptual framework. Administration & Society, 6, 445-488.
79.
Van RiperP. P. (1990). The literary Gulick: A bibliographical appreciation. Public Administration Review, 50, 609-614.
80.
WamsleyG.DudleyL. (1998). From reorganizing to reinventing: Sixty years and “we still don’t get it.”International Journal of Public Administration, 21, 323-374.
81.
WamsleyG.ZaldM. (1973). The political economy of public organizations: A critique and approach to the study of public administration. Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath.
82.
WeberM. (1946). Bureaucracy. GerthH. H.MillsC. W. (Eds. & Trans.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. (Original work published 1922)
83.
WilliamsonO. E. (1975). Markets and hierarchies. New York, NY: Free Press.
