Situations of extreme information deficit regarding administrative behavior are rare, but such conditions persist for the most enigmatic and troubling nations, such as North Korea. How might the behavior of public administrators be explained when systematic observation of individual administrators or institutions’ parties is not feasible?
Aim
Finding a way to estimate administrative behavior based upon the information available is an important task in understanding the complexities of closed states’ behavior in the international arena.
Method
We use constitutional analysis to explain public administration in North Korea, arguing that this is the best available method to explain administrative norms and behavior in this and other closed nations.
Results
We find that while administrative theorists predict that administrative norms can be predicted using constitutional analysis, administrative behavior in closed nations cannot be efficiently predicted using only a reconstructed set of norms as we do not have evidence to confirm that the suppositions of normative theorists hold in these conditions.
Conclusions
While we can better understand the values of administrators in North Korea through constitutional analysis, without harder evidence we can only speculate on the true values of administrators in North Korea.
Points for practitioners
Administrators working on cross-national issues with closed states like North Korea should familiarize themselves with the values of the states’ constitution, as this may be a stable source of preliminary norms for predicting administrators’ behavior.
Amnesty International (2010) The Crumbling State of Healthcare in North Korea, London: Amnesty International Publications.
2.
ArmstrongCK (2001) The nature, origins, and development of the North Korean State. In: KimSS (eds) The North Korean System in Post-Cold War Era, New York: Palgrave, pp. 39–64.
3.
Armstrong CK (2007) Beyond the DMZ: The possibility of civil society in North Korea. In: Armstrong CK (ed.) Korean Society: Civil Society, Democracy and the State. New York: Routledge, pp. 187–209.
4.
BabsonBB (2001) North Korea economy today. In: YoonCHLauLJ (eds) North Korea in Transition: Prospects for Economic and Social Reform, Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar, pp. 19–29.
BeckerJ (2005) Rogue Regime: Kim Jong Il and the Looming Threat of North Korea, New York: Oxford University Press.
7.
BertelliAMLynnLE Jr (2006) Madison’s Managers: Public Administration and the Constitution, Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
8.
CarlinRLWitJS (2006) North Korean Reform: Politics, Economics and Security, London: Routledge.
9.
Chaffin G (2011a) ‘Great Successor’ Kim Jong Un needs unalloyed support of military. In: Foreign Policy in Focus, Focal Points Blog. 20 December. Available at: http://www.fpif.org/blog?q=Tag%3Akim+Jong Un (accessed 10 January 2012).
10.
Chaffin G (2011b) North Korea More Dependent on China than Ever. In: Foreign Policy in Focus, Focal Points Blog. 31 December. Available at: http://www.fpif.org/blog?q=Tag%3Akim+Jong Un (accessed 10 January 2012).
11.
CheongSC (2000) Stalinism and Kimilsungism: A comparative analysis of ideology and power. Asian Perspective24(1): 133–161.
Chon HJ (1994) North Korea s political system. In: Ok TH and Hong YL (eds) Prospects for Change in North Korea. Berkeley: University of California, 45–101.
14.
CIA (2012a) The World Factbook: Country Comparison GDP Per Capita. Available at: <https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/rankorder/2004rank.html>.
HoareJEParesS (2005) North Korea in the 21st Century: An Interpretive Guide, Folkestone, Kent: Global Oriental.
22.
JieGJ (2000) North Korean leadership: Kim Jong Il’s balancing act in the ruling circle. Third World Quarterly21(5): 761–779.
23.
KangDC (1995) Rethinking North Korea. Asian Survey35(3): 253–267.
24.
KihlYW (2006) Staying power of the socialist ‘Hermit Kingdom’. In: KihlYWKimHN (eds) North Korea: The Politics of Regime Survival, New York: M.E. Sharpe, pp. 3–34.
25.
Kim HJ (2006) North and South Korea: Internal Politics and External Relations since 1988. Mississauga, Ont: Society for Korean and Related Studies.
26.
KimIJ (2006) Kim Jong Il’s military first politics. In: KihlYWKimHN (eds) North Korea: The Politics of Regime Survival, Amonk: M.E. Sharpe, pp. 59–74.
27.
KimSC (2006) North Korea under Kim Jong Il: From Consolidation to Systemic Dissonance, Albany: SUNY Press.
MansourovAY (2006) Emergence of the Second Republic. In: KihlYWKimHN (eds) North Korea: The Politics of Regime Survival, Armonk: M.E. Sharpe, pp. 37–58.
NewboldSP (2010) Toward a constitutional school for American public administration. Public Administration Review70: 538–546.
40.
OhKHassigRC (2000) North Korea through the Looking Glass, Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
41.
OhKHassigRC (2003) North Korea: The hardest nut. Foreign Policy139: 44–47.
42.
O’HanlonMMochizukiM (2003) Crisis on the Korean Peninsula: How to Deal with a Nuclear North Korea, New York: McGraw-Hill.
43.
PaikH (2006) North Korea: Politics overloaded and secularized. In: YunPWShinGW (eds) North Korea: 2005 and Beyond, Stanford, CA: The Walter H. Shorenstein Asia-Pacific Research Center, pp. 27–54.
44.
ParkHS (2002) North Korea: The Politics of Unconventional Wisdom, Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
45.
Pinkston DA (2003) Domestic politics and stakeholders in the North Korean missile development program. The Nonproliferation Review Summer: 1–15.
46.
RohJH (2001) Making sense of the DPRK legal system. In: KimSS (eds) The North Korean System in Post-Cold War Era, New York: Palgrave, pp. 139–156.
47.
RohrJA (1986) To Run a Constitution: The Legitimacy of the Administrative State, Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
48.
RohrJA (1988) Ethics for Bureaucrats, New York: M. Dekker.
49.
RohrJA (1998) Public Service, Ethics and Constitutional Practice, Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
50.
RohrJA (2002) Civil Servants and their Constitutions, Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
51.
RosenbloomDH (1971) Federal Service and the Constitution: The Development of the Public Employment Relationship, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
52.
RosenbloomDH (2000) Building a Legislative Centered Public Administration, Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
53.
RosenbloomDHCarrollJDCarrollJD (2000) Constitutional Competence for Public Managers: Cases and Commentary, Itasca, IL: Peacock Publishers.
54.
ScobellA (2006) Kim Jong Il and North Korea: The Leader and the System, Carlisle, PA: Strategic Studies Institute.
55.
SpicerMTerryL (1993) Legitimacy, history and logic: Public administration and the constitution. Public Administration Review53: 239–246.
56.
StoringHJBessetteJM (1995a) Toward a More Perfect Union: Writings of Herbert Storing, Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute.
57.
StoringHJ (1995b) American statesmanship: Old and new. In: BessetteJM (eds) Toward a More Perfect Union: Writings of Herbert Storing, Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute, pp. 403–430.
58.
SuhJJ (1994) Ideology. In: OkTHLeeHY (eds) Prospects for Change in North Korea, Berkeley: University of California, pp. 11–44.
59.
SungCY (2001) Understanding North Korea’s political framework. In: KilSHMoonCI (eds) Understanding Korean Politics, Albany: SUNY Press, pp. 269–308.
Wise CR (2001) The Supreme Court’s new constitutional federalism: Implications for public administration. Public Administration Review 61: 343–358.
62.
YoonDK (1997) The law and legal system of North Korea. In: TanPL (eds) Asian Legal Systems, Sydney: Butterworths.
63.
ZhangYZLiDQ (2008) Understanding North Korea, Hong Kong: City University of Hong Kong Press.
64.
ZinkeRC (1992) American constitutionalism in the interconnected world: Administrative responsibilities in a rhetorical republic. In: BaileyMTMayerRT (eds) Public Management in an Interconnected World: Essays in the Minnowbrook Tradition, New York: Greenwood Press, pp. 145–158.
