This article identifies and examines various types of the ombudsman institution that have evolved over the years, provides a clear and systematic classification of these models, and compares and contrasts them. Relatively recent developments can be better understood if they are also discussed in the light of the past. For this reason at the beginning of this article, the origin, development, and salient features of the original/classical model of the ombudsman institution are briefly discussed. Against this backdrop, the emerging pattern and the salient features of other types or deviant/distorted models of ombudsman offices are examined.
AbedinN. (1974). Local administration and politics in modernizing societies: Bangladesh and Pakistan. Dacca, Bangladesh: National Institute of Public Administration (Original work published 1973).
2.
AbedinN. (1986). Transplantation of the ombudsman institution in developed and developing countries. Round Table: Commonwealth Journal of International Affairs, 300, 333-353.
3.
AbedinN. (1995). The ombudsman in a micro state: Barbados. Legal Studies Forum, 19, 381-394.
4.
AbedinN. (2001). Government’s response to juvenile complaints and grievances: The ombudsman for juveniles in Tennessee. Children’s Legal Rights Journal, 21, 2-10.
5.
AbedinN. (2009). The ombudsman in a small developing nation: St. Lucia—Issues, concerns and suggestions. Caribbean Journal of Public Sector Management, 10, 5-27.
6.
AbedinN. (2010). The ombudsman in developing democracies: The commonwealth Caribbean experience. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 23, 221-253.
7.
AdamolekunL. (1984). The Nigerian ombudsman experience. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 50, 227-229.
8.
AndersonS. V. (1980). Ombudsman readings. Edmonton, AB, Canada: International Ombudsman Institute.
9.
AyeniV. O. (2001). The changing nature and contemporary role of national ombudsman institutions in the commonwealth and elsewhere. In ReifL. C. (Ed.), The international ombudsman yearbook (Vol. 4, pp. 91-108). The Hague, Netherlands: Kluwer Law International.
10.
BaderH.BromptonH. (1968). Remedies against Administrative Abuse in Central Europe, the Soviet Union, and Communist East Europe. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 377, 73-86.
11.
BizjackI. (1998). The role and experience of an ombudsman in a new democracy. In ReifL. C. (Ed.), The international ombudsman yearbook (formerly ombudsman journal) (pp. 57-62). The Hague, Netherlands: Kluwer Law International.
12.
CaidenG. (Ed.). (1983a). International handbook of the ombudsman: Evolution and present function (Vol. 1). Westport, CT: Greenwood.
13.
CaidenG. (Ed.). (1983b). International handbook of the ombudsman: Country surveys (Vol. 2). Westport, CT: Greenwood.
14.
CaidenG. (Ed.). (1984). Ombudsman in developing democracies: Comment. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 50, 221-226.
15.
CaidenN. (1967). Ombudsmen for underdeveloped countries. Public Administration in Israel and Abroad, 8, 107-121.
16.
ChengH. Y. (1968). The emergence and spread of the ombudsman institution. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 377, 21-27.
17.
ClarkC. C. (Ombudsman of Barbados). (2006). Annual report. Barbados: Ombudsman Office.
18.
DolanP. (1983). The Ombudsman in the United States: The states. In CaidenG. (Ed.), International handbook of the ombudsman: Country surveys (Vol. 2, pp. 217-221). Westport, CT: Greenwood.
19.
FrankB. (1975a). The ombudsman: Revisited. International Bar Journal, May, 48-60.
20.
FrankB. (1975b). State ombudsman legislation in the United State. University of Miami Law Review, 29, 379-445.
21.
GellhornW. (1966). Ombudsman and others: Citizen’s protectors in nine countries. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
22.
GellhornW. (1968). Annotated model ombudsman statute. In AndersonS. V. (Ed.), Ombudsman for American government. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
23.
GiddingsP.SladecekV.BuesoL. D. (2000). The ombudsman and human rights. In GregoryR.GiddingsP. (Eds.), Righting wrongs (pp. 443-448). Amsterdam, Netherlands: IOS Press.
24.
GordilloA. (1984). An ombudsman for Argentina: Yes, but. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 50, 230-234.
25.
GormleyW. T. (1996). Counter bureaucracies in theory and practice. Administration & Society, 28, 275-298.
26.
GottehrerD. M.HostinaM. (2000). The classical ombudsman model. In GregoryR.GiddingsP. (Eds.), Righting wrongs (pp. 403-414). Amsterdam, Netherlands: IOS Press.
27.
GottehrerD. M.FergusonM. D.AufrechtS. E. (2000). Ombudsman offices in the United States. In GregoryR.GiddingsP. (Eds.), Righting wrongs (pp. 355-372). Amsterdam, Netherlands: IOS Press.
28.
GregoryR. (1982). The select committee on the parliamentary commissioner for administration, 1967-1980. Public Law, Spring, 49-88.
29.
GregoryR. (2000). The European Union ombudsman. In GregoryR.GiddingsP. (Eds.), Righting wrongs (pp. 155-174). Amsterdam, Netherlands: IOS Press.
30.
GregoryR.GiddingsP.(2000a). The ombudsman institution: Growth and development. In GregoryR.GiddingsP. (Eds.), Righting wrongs (pp. 1-20). Amsterdam, Netherlands: IOS Press.
31.
GregoryR.GiddingsP. (2000b). The United Kingdom parliamentary ombudsman scheme. In GregoryR.GiddingsP. (Eds.), Righting wrongs (pp. 21-46). Amsterdam, Netherlands: IOS Press.
32.
GregoryR.HutchessonP. (1975). The parliamentary ombudsman: A study in the control of administrative action. London, England: George Allen & Unwin.
33.
Harvard Student Legislative Reference Bureau. (1965). A state statute to create the office of ombudsman. Harvard Journal of Legislation, 2, 213-238.
34.
HeadyF. (2001). Public Administration: A Comparative Perspective. New York: Marcel Dekker.
35.
HillL. B. (1972). International transfer of the ombudsman. In MerrittR. L. (Ed.), Communication in international politics (pp. 295-317). Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
36.
HillL. B. (1974). Institutionalization, the Ombudsman and Bureaucracy. The American Political Science Review, LXVIII, 1075-1085.
37.
HillL. B. (2000). Institutionalizing a bureaucratic monitoring mechanism: The first thirty years of Hawaii’s ombudsman. In ReifL. C. (Ed.), The international ombudsman yearbook (Vol. 4, pp. 3-58). The Hague, Netherlands: Kluwer Law International.
38.
HillL. B. (2002). The ombudsman revisited: Thirty years of Hawaii’s ombudsman. Public Administration Review, 62, 24-41.
39.
HolmgrenK. (1968). The need for an ombudsman too. In RowatD. C. (Ed.), The ombudsman: Citizen’s defender (pp. 225-230). London, England: George Allen & Unwin.
40.
HysonS. (Ed.). (2009). Provincial and territorial ombudsman offices in Canada. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
41.
International Bar Association/International Ombudsman Institute. (1983). Ombudsman and other complaint-handling systems survey, 11 (July1982-June1983). Edmonton, AB, Canada: Author.
42.
International Ombudsman Institute. (2009). Annual publication (Directory 2009). Edmonton, AB, Canada: Author.
KastariP. (1968). The chancellor of justice and the ombudsman. In RowatD. C. (Ed.), The ombudsman: Citizen’s defender (pp. 58-74). London, England: George Allen & Unwin.
45.
KempfU. (2000). Complaint-handling systems in Germany. In GregoryR.GiddingsP. (Eds.), Righting wrongs (pp. 89-206). Amsterdam, Netherlands: IOS Press.
46.
The Law Commission of Trinidad and Tobago. (1998). The Ombudsman: Improving His Effectiveness (a working paper) Government of the Republic of Trinidad and Tobago, Trinidad and Tobago.
47.
LundvikU. (1983). New Zealand. In CaidenG. (Ed.), International handbook of the ombudsman: Country surveys (Vol. 2, pp. 135-146). Westport, CT: Greenwood.
48.
MarshallG. (1968). The British parliamentary commissioner. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 277(May), 87-96.
49.
MarxF. M. (1968). The importation of foreign institutions. In RowatD. C. (Ed.), The ombudsman: Citizen’s defender (pp. 255-263). London, England: George Allen & Unwin.
50.
MillsJ. (1983). The ombudsman in the American constitutional, legal, and political structure. In CaidenG. E. (Ed.), International handbook of the ombudsman: Country surveys (Vol. 2, pp. 209-215). Westport, CT: Greenwood.
51.
Ombudsman Committee. (1974). International Bar Association [IBA] resolution. Vancouver, BC, Canada: IBA.
Parliamentary Commissioner (Ombudsman) of St. Lucia. (1998, 2005, 2006). Annual report.St. Lucia: Author.
55.
PautiM. (2000). The ombudsman in France. In GregoryR.GiddingsP. (Eds.), Righting wrongs (pp. 175-188). Amsterdam, Netherlands: IOS Press.
56.
PearceD. (1993). The ombudsman: Review and preview the importance of being different. International Ombudsman Journal, 11, 13-36.
57.
PearceD. (2000). Ombudsman in Australia. In GregoryR.GiddingsP. (Eds.), Righting wrongs (pp. 93-106). Amsterdam, Netherlands: IOS Press.
58.
PooleK. P. (1983). United Kingdom. In CaidenG. E. (Ed.), International handbook of the ombudsman: Country surveys (Vol. 2, pp. 187-208). Westport, CT: Greenwood.
59.
ReifL. C. (1993). The promotion of International Human Rights Law by the Office of the ombudsman. In ReifL. C.MarshallM. A.FerrisC. (Eds.), The ombudsman: Diversity and development (pp. 87-122). Edmonton, AB, Canada: International Ombudsman Institute.
60.
ReifL. C. (2004). The ombudsman, good governance and the International Human Rights system. Leiden, Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff.
61.
ReifL. C. (2009). Foreword. In ReifL. C. (Ed.), The international ombudsman yearbook (formerly International Ombudsman Journal, Vol. 10, pp. xiii-xiv). Leiden, Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff.
62.
RowatD. C. (1964). Ombudsman for North America. Public Administration Review, 24, 230-233.
63.
RowatD. C. (1968a). Preface. In RowatD. C. (Ed.), The ombudsman: Citizen’s defender (pp. v-xxiv). London, England: George Allen & Unwin.
64.
RowatD. C. (1968b). Conclusion. In RowatD. C. (Ed.), The ombudsman: Citizen’s defender (pp. 288-292). London, England: George Allen & Unwin.
65.
RowatD. C. (1982). [Review of the book Implementation of ombudsman plan in India]. Indian Journal of Public Administration, 28, 927-929.
66.
RowatD. C. (1983). The need for an ombudsman in developing democracies. Indian Journal of Public Administration, 29, 660-668.
67.
RowatD. C. (1984a). The state ombudsman in India. Indian Journal of Public Administration, 30, 665-672.
68.
RowatD. C. (1984b). The suitability of the ombudsman plan for developing countries. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 50, 207-211.
69.
RowatD. C. (1985). The ombudsman plan: The worldwide spread of an idea. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
70.
RowatD. C. (2007). The American distortion of the ombudsman concept and its influence on Canada. Canadian Public Administration, 50, 42-52.
71.
RudholmS. (1968). The chancellor of justice. In RowatD. C. (Ed.), The ombudsman: Citizen’s defender (pp. 17-21). London, England: George Allen & Unwin.
72.
SawerG. (1968). The ombudsman and related institutions in Australia and New Zealand. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 377(May), 62-72.
73.
ScottI. (1984). The functions of the ombudsman in underdeveloped countries. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 50, 212-220.
74.
SladecekV. (2000). Parliamentary commissioners for civil rights in the Republic of Hungary. In GregoryR.GiddingsP. (Eds.), Righting wrongs (pp. 175-188). Amsterdam, Netherlands: IOS Press.
SudamaT. (1983). The ombudsman’s office in Trinidad and Tobago: A preliminary view (Three occasional papers, General No. 5). St. Augustin, Trinidad and Tobago, Southern Caribbean: Institute of Social and Economic Research, The University of the West Indies.
77.
Tennessee Commission on Children. (1998). The advocate. Nashville, TN: Author.
78.
TigerstromB. V. (1999). The Role of the Ombudsman in Protecting Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. In ReifL. C. (Ed.), International Ombudsman Journal (pp. 3-36). The Hague/Boston/London: Kluwer Law International.
79.
TorresF. A.deM. (1999). Human Rights and the Institutional Strengthening of the Ombudsman. In ReifL. C. (Ed.), International Ombudsman journal (pp.147-158). The Hague/Boston/London: Kluwer Law International.
80.
Trinidad Guardian. (May6, 1986). Daily Newspaper in Trinidad-Tobago.
Ombudsman of Trinidad and Tobago. (1980). Third Annual Report. Trinidad and Tobago: Ombudsman Office.
83.
U.S. Ombudsman Association USOA. (1995). Public sector ombudsman. Dayton, OH: Author.
84.
U.S. Ombudsman Association USOA. (1997). Model ombudsman act for state governments. Dayton, OH: Author.
85.
U.S. Ombudsman Association USOA. (1998-present). Computed data/information from this source during the above period. Retrieved from www.usombudsman.org
86.
WennergrenB. (1968). The rise and growth of Swedish institutions for defending the citizen against official wrong. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 377(May), 1-9.
87.
WynerA. J. (1973). Executive ombudsmen and criticism of contemporary American public bureaucracy. In WynerA. J. (Ed.), Executive ombudsman in the United States (pp. 1-16). Berkeley: Institute of Governmental Studies, University of California.
