A recent Indiana Court of Appeals ruling raises significant concerns about the continuing erosion of the line between public and private, and the proliferation of the “unintended consequences” that flow from sectoral blurring. The authors use that case to introduce a broader discussion of the merits and drawbacks of public–private contracting, and the challenges in distinguishing among organizational types in an era that has seen considerable overlap in organizational characteristics. The authors survey the literature on these subjects and conclude with a discussion of the underappreciated financial, ethical, and constitutional implications of the erosion of clear sectoral distinctions.
AverchH. (1990). Private markets and public intervention. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
2.
BackxM.CarneyM.GedajlovicE. (2002). Public, private and mixed ownership and the performance of international airlines. Journal of Air Transport Management, 8, 213-220.
FeiserC. D. (2000). Protecting the public’s right to know: The debate over privatization and access to government information under state law. Florida Sate University Law Review, 27(825), 836-853.
FredericksonH. (1996). Comparing the reinventing government movement with the new public administration. Public Administration Review, 56, 263-270.
16.
GranovetterM. (1985). Economic action and social structure—The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91, 481-510.
17.
GreeneJ. (2002). Cities and privatization: Prospects for the new century. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
18.
GuttmanD.WillnerB. (1976). The shadow government: The government’s multi-billion-dollar giveaway of its decision-making powers to private management consultants, “experts,” and think tanks. New York, NY: Random House.
19.
HallT. E.O’TooleL. J. (2000). Structures for policy implementation—An analysis of national legislation, 1965-1966 and 1993-1994. Administration & Society, 31, 667-686.
20.
HartO.HolmströmB. (1987). The theory of contracts. In BewleyT. R. (Ed.), Advances in economic theory: Fifth world congress (pp. 369-398). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
21.
The Hatch Act, 5 U.S.C. 7321-7326.
22.
Hatch Political Activity Act of 1939, Ch. 40, 53 Stat. 1147; Act of July 19, 1940, Ch. 640, 54 Stat. 767.
23.
HillC. J.LynnL. E. (2005). Is hierarchical governance in decline? Evidence from empirical research. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 15, 173-195.
24.
Jackson v. Metropolitan Edison Co., 419 U.S. 345 (1974).
25.
JensenL.KennedyS. (2005). Government ethics and constitutional accountability. In FredericksonG. G.GhereR. K. (Eds.), Ethics in public management (pp. 220-242). New York, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
26.
JensenM. C.MecklingW. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 305-360.
27.
KamermanS.KahnA. J. (Eds.). (1989). Privatization and the welfare state. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
28.
KettlD. F. (1993). Sharing power: Public governance and private markets. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
29.
KettlD. F. (2000). The global public management revolution: A report on the transformation of governance. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
30.
LightP. C. (1999). The true size of government. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
31.
Little Hatch Act, 5 U.S.C. § 1501 et seq.
32.
MachiavelliN. (1985). The prince (MansfieldH. C.Jr., Trans). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
33.
MilwardH.ProvanK. (2000). Governing the hollow state. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10, 359-380.
34.
MitnickB. M. (1980). The political economy of regulation: Creating, designing, and removing regulatory forms. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
35.
NiskanenW. A. (1971). Bureaucracy and representative government. Chicago, IL: Aldine, Atherton.
36.
Norwood v. Harrison, 413 U.S. 455 (1973).
37.
OsborneD.GaeblerT. (1992). Reinventing government: How the entrepreneurial spirit is transforming the public sector. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
38.
O’TooleL.Jr. (1986). Policy recommendations for multi-actor implementation: An assessment of the field. Journal of Public Policy, 6, 181-210.
39.
PackJ. R. (1989). Privatization and cost reduction. Policy Sciences, 22, 1-25.
40.
RaineyH. G. (2003). Understanding and managing public organizations (3rd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
41.
RohrJ. A. (1990). To run a constitution: The legitimacy of the administrative state. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
RosenbloomD. H. (1992). The constitution as a basis for public administrative ethics. Essentials of government ethics. New York, NY: Viking Penguin.
44.
RosenbloomD. H. (2002). Public administration and civil liberties. Public Administration Review, 62, 58-60.
45.
RosenbloomD. H.CarrollJ.CarrollJ. (2000). Toward constitutional competence for public managers: Cases and commentary. Itasca, IL: Peacock.
46.
RosenbloomD. H.PiotrowskiS. J. (2005). Outsourcing the constitution and administrative law norms. American Review of Public Administration, 35, 103-121.
47.
SalamonL. M.LundM. S. (1989). Beyond privatization: The tools of government action. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
48.
SavasE. S. (2000). Privatization and public-private partnerships. New York, NY: Chatham House.
49.
SclarE. D. (2001). You don’t always get what you pay for: The economics of privatization. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
50.
SingerP. (2002). Corporate warriors: The rise of the privatized military industry and its ramifications for international security. International Security, 26, 186-220.
51.
SmithS.LipskyM. (1993). Nonprofits for hire: The welfare state in the age of contracting. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
52.
SpicerM. (1995). The founders, the constitution, and public administration: A conflict in worldviews. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
53.
Van SlykeD. (2003). The mythology of privatization in contracting for social services. Public Administration Review, 63, 296-315.
54.
WamsleyG. L.ZaldM. N. (1973). The political economy of public organizations: A critique and approach to the study of public administration. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
55.
WeimerD.ViningA. (1999). Policy analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
56.
WeisbrodB. (1998). To profit or not to profit: The commercial transformation of the nonprofit sector. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
57.
WilliamsonO. E. (1985). The economic institutions of capitalism. New York, NY: Free Press.
