After 9/11, a bitter national debate emerged pitting privacy against security. No theory of privacy or domestic security and no compromise blend of institutional insights and technological advances have been proposed to meet this dilemma. This work fills that gap by offering a middle ground proposing a knowledge‐based systems focus that parses privacy into two separable concepts: behavior and identity in the behavior–identity–knowledge (BIK) model. The authors outline a plan for a BIK‐sensible world involving initial steps to simulate behavior choices, streamlined social identity masking, and the institutional adaptations required for a practical compromise between security and privacy.
AldermanE.KennedyC. (1995). The right to privacy. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
2.
BonabeauE. (2002). Agent‐based modeling: Methods and techniques for simulating human systems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 99: 7280‐7287.
3.
de TocquevilleA. (1863). Democracy in America (3rd ed., ReevesH., Trans.). Cambridge, UK: Sever and Francis.
4.
DemchakC.FenstermacherK. D. (2004). Balancing security and privacy in the 21st century. Paper presented at Intelligence and Security Informatics at Tucson, Arizona.
5.
DobbinB. (2004, April1). Businessman gets mistaken at airports for Guantanamo Bay detainee. The Associated Press State & Local Wire.
6.
DunleavyP.MargettsH.BastowS.TinklerJ. (2006). New public management is dead ‐ long live digital‐era governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16(3):467‐494.
7.
DysonE. (2008). How loss of privacy may mean loss of security. Scientific American. [online]
8.
Electronic Privacy Information Center. (2004). EPIC Alert 10.07 [WWW]. Electronic Privacy Information Center, April 9, 2003. Retrieved February 29, 2004, from http://www.epic.org/alert/EPIC_Alert_10.07.html
9.
FountainJ. E. (2001). Building the virtual state: Information technology and institutional change. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
10.
Frias‐MartinezE.MagoulasG.ChenS.MacredieR. (2005). Modeling human behavior in user‐adaptive systems: Recent advances using soft computing techniques. Expert Systems With Applications, 29, 320‐329.
GreenemeierL. (2008). International report: What impact is technology having on privacy around the world?Scientific American. [online]
13.
GuilmartinJ. F.Jr.HowardM. (1994). Two historians in technology and war. Carlisle Barracks, PA: Strategic Studies Institute, Army War College.
14.
HeintzeT.BretschneiderS. (2000). Information technology and restructuring in public organizations: Does adoption of information technology affect organizational structures, communications, and decision making?Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10, 801‐830.
15.
KettlD. F. (2000). Public administration at the millennium: The state of the field. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10, 7‐34.
16.
LahlouS.JegouF. (2004). European Disappearing Computer Privacy Design Guidelines v1.1 (EDC‐PG 2003; Ambient Agoras report no. IST‐2000‐25134). Brussels: European Union.
17.
LangheinrichM. (2001). Privacy by design—Principles of privacy‐aware ubiquitous systems. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2201, 273‐291.
18.
LaPorteT. (ed.). (1975). Organized social complexity: Challenge to politics and policy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
19.
LichtblauE. (2004, October9). Papers show confusion as watch list grew quickly. The New York Times, p. 9.
20.
LynnL. E.Jr.HeinrichC. J.HillC. J. (2000). Studying governance and public management: Challenges and prospects. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10, 233‐261.
21.
KlambergM.NilssonM.PeterssonA.SeipelP.FlyghedJ.SjöbergC. M.. (2008, September3). FRA‐lagen möjliggör massiv kartläggning av oskyldiga (FRA‐law allows for massive mapping of the innocent). Pressmeddelande. [online].
22.
MarkoffJ. (2002, November9). Threats and responses: Intelligence; Pentagon plans a computer system that would peek at personal data of Americans. The New York Times.
23.
NamatameA.TeranoT.KurumataniK. (2002). Agent‐based approaches in economic and social complex systems. Amsterdam: IOS Press.
24.
NewellA.SimonH. A. (1963). GPS, A program that simulates human thought. In FeigenbaumE.FeldmanJ. (Eds.), Computers and thought (pp. 279‐296). Menlo Park, CA: AAAI Press.
25.
RochlinG. I. (1991). Iran Air flight 655 and the USS Vincennes: Complex, large‐scale military systems and the failure of control. In LaporteT. R. (Ed.), Social responses to large technical systems (pp. 99‐125). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
26.
SchwartzJ. (2005, July23). Cameras in Britain record the criminal and the banal. The New York Times, p. 7.
27.
SharkeyJ. (2003, March11). Business travel: On the road; A safer sky or welcome to flight 1984?The New York Times, p. 9.
28.
StoneD. (2001). Policy paradox: The art of political decision making (Rev. ed.). New York: Norton.
29.
ThompsonJ. D. (1967). Organizations in action: Social science bases of administrative theory. New York: McGraw‐Hill.
30.
van de Garde‐PerikE.MarkopoulosP.de RuyterB. (2006). On the relative importance of privacy guidelines for ambient health care. In Proceedings of the 4th Nordic Conference on Human Computer Interaction: Changing Roles. Oslo, Norway: ACM Press.
31.
Van NattaD.Jr.SciolinoE.CowellA.GreyS.FouquetH.MekhennetS.. (2005). Bombings in London: Terror threat; Subway suspect is shot to death by London police. The New York Times, p. 1.
32.
WamsleyG. L.BacherR. N.GoodsellC. T.KronebergP. S.RohrJ. A.StiversC. M.. (1990). Refounding public administration. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
33.
WilsonJ. Q. (1989). Bureaucracy: What government agencies do and why they do it. New York: Basic Books.
