Lately, disciplinary vocabulary seems to be outpacing disciplinary transformation. Disciplinary turns of phrase are intensified in public administration not only because it is literally a governing vocabulary but also because the discipline has never been an easily definable area of scholarship or practice. Although public administration research thus far has been focused on transformations within the discipline, my focus here is outward, toward sociology as a “contributing discipline.” I explore through the lens of the disciplinary convergence of public administration and public sociology the disciplinary dispersion of a public sentimentality that hopes to diverge with the world as it is.
Abrams, P. (1988). Notes on the difficulty of studying the state . Journal of Historical Sociology, 1, 58-89.
2.
Adams, C.J. (1991). The sexual politics of meat: A feminist-vegetarian critical theory. New York: Continuum .
3.
Adams, G.B. (1992). Enthralled with modernity: The historical context of knowledge and theory development in public administration. Public Administration Review, 52, 363-373.
4.
Agger, B. (1989a). Fast capitalism. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
5.
Agger, B. (1989b). Socio(onto)logy: A disciplinary reading. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
6.
Agger, B. (1990). The decline of discourse: Reading, writing and resistance in postmodern capitalism. New York: Falmer Press.
7.
Agger, B. (1991). A Critical Theory of Public Life: Knowledge, Discourse, and Politics in an Age of Decline. New York: RoutledgeFalmer.
8.
Agger, B. (2000). Public sociology: From social facts to literary acts. New York: Rowman & Littlefield .
9.
Agger, B., & Luke, T. (2002). Politics in postmodernity: The diaspora of politics and the homelessness of political and social theory. Theoretical Directions in Political Sociology for the 21st Century, 11, 159-195.
10.
American University. (2007). MA concentration in public sociology Retrieved 22 November, 2007, from http://www.american.edu/cas/sociology/maps/
11.
Aronowitz, S., & Bratsis, P. (Eds.). (2002). Paradigm lost: State theory reconsidered. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
12.
Auden, W.H. (2007, December). De Droite et de Gauche. Harpers, 19.
13.
Barrow, C.W. (1990). Universities and the capitalist state: Corporate liberalism and the reconstruction of American higher education, 1894-1928 . Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
14.
Barrow, C.W. (1993). Critical theories of the state: Marxist, neo-Marxist, post-Marxist. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
15.
Boltanski, L., & Chiapello, E. (2005). The new spirit of capitalism. New York: Verso.
16.
Box, R.C. (2004). Public administration and society: Critical issues in American governance. New York: M.E. Sharp.
17.
Box, R.C. (2005). Critical social theories in public administration . Armonk, NY: ME Sharpe.
18.
Bryson, J.M. (1996). Strategic planning for public and nonprofit organizations . San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
19.
Burawoy, M. (2004a). Introduction, public sociologies: A symposium from Boston College. Social Problems, 51, 103-106.
20.
Burawoy, M. (2004b). Manifesto for public sociologies. Social Problems, 51, 124-130.
21.
Burawoy, M. (2004c). Public sociologies: Contradictions, dilemmas, and possibilities. Social Forces, 82, 1-16.
22.
Burawoy, M. (2004d). The world needs public sociology. Sosiologisk Tidsskrift, 12, 255-272.
23.
Burawoy, M. (2005a). 2004 American Sociological Association presidential address: For public sociology. American Sociological Review , 70(1), 4-28.
24.
Burawoy, M. (2005b). Public sociology: Populist fad or path to renewal ? British Journal of Sociology, 56, 417-432.
25.
Burawoy, M. (2005c). The critical turn to public sociology. Critical Sociology, 31, 313-326.
26.
Burawoy, M. (2006). Introduction: A public sociology for human rights . In J. Blau & K. I. Smith (Eds.), Public sociologies reader (pp. 1-18). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
27.
Burawoy, M. (2007a). For public sociology. In D. Clawson, R. Zussman, J. Misra, N. Gerstel , R. Stokes, D. L. Anderton, et al. (Eds.) Public sociology: Fifteen eminent sociologists debate politics and the profession in the twenty-first century (pp. 1-18). Berkeley: University of California Press.
28.
Burawoy, M. (2007b). Public sociology vs. the market. Socio-Economic Review, 5, 356-67.
29.
Burawoy, M. (2008). What is to be done? Theses on the degradation of social existence in a globalizing world. Current Sociology , 56, 351-359.
30.
Calhoun, C. (2005). The Promise of public sociology. British Journal of Sociology, 56, 355-363.
31.
Catlaw, T.J. (2005, September). Constitution as executive order: The administrative state and the political ontology of "We the People." Administration & Society, 37, 445-482.
32.
Catlaw, T.J. (2006). The death of the practitioner. Administrative Theory and Praxis, 28, 190-207.
33.
Cunliffe, A.L. & Jun, J.S. (2005, May). The need for reflexivity in public administration . Administration & Society, 37, 225-242.
34.
DeLeon, L. & Denhardt, R.B. (2000, March/April). The political theory of reinvention. Public Administration Review, 60, 89-97.
35.
Denhardt, R. (1982). Public administration: Sub-field? Profession? Discipline?The American Review of Public Administration, 16, 15-21.
36.
Denhardt, R.B. (1981). In the shadow of organization. Lawrence: University of Kansas Press.
37.
Denhardt, J.V. & Denhardt, R.B. (2003). The new public service: Serving, not steering. New York: M.E. Sharpe.
38.
Eikenberry, A.M. (2007). Philanthropy, voluntary association and governance beyond the state: Giving circles and challenges for democracy. Administration & Society, 39, 857-882.
39.
Eikenberry, A.M. & Kluver, J.D. (2004, March). The marketization of the nonprofit sector: Civil society at risk? Public Administration Review, 64, 132-140.
40.
Ericson, R. (2005). Publicizing sociology. British Journal of Sociology, 56, 365-372.
41.
Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison . London: Allen Lane.
42.
Foucault, M. (1978). Governmentality, in Burchell, Graham, Colin Gordon, and Peter Miller. The Foucault effect. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Frederickson, G.H. (1980). New public administration. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
45.
Gantman, E.R. (2005). Capitalism, social privilege and managerial ideologies . Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
46.
Goodnow, F.J. (1900). Politics and administration: A study in government . New York: Russell & Russell .
47.
Gouldner, A.W. (1968). The Sociologist as Partisan: Sociology and the Welfare State. The American Sociologist, 3, 103-116.
48.
Gouldner, A.W. (1970) The coming crisis of western sociology. New York: Basic Books.
49.
Harmon, M.M. (1981). Action theory for public administration. New York: Longman.
50.
Harmon, M.M. (1995). Responsibility as paradox: A critique of rational discourse on government. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
51.
Harney, S. (2002). State work: Public administration and mass intellectuality . Durham NC: Duke University Press .
52.
Hirst, P. (2000). Democracy and governance. In J. Pierre, (Ed.), Debating governance: Authority, steering, and democracy (pp. 13-35). New York: Oxford University Press.
53.
Jessop, B. (1982). The capitalist state: Marxist theories and methods . New York: New York University Press.
54.
Katz, D., & Kahn R.L. (1966). The social psychology of organizations. New York: Wiley.
55.
Kettl, D.F. (2002). The transformation of governance: Public administration for twenty-first century America. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
56.
King, C.S. & Zanetti, L. (2005). Transformational public service: Portraits of theory in practice. New York: ME Sharpe.
57.
MacIntyre, A. (1981). After virtue. Notre Dame, IN : University of Notre Dame Press.
58.
Mandel, E. (1975). Late capitalism. (J. De Bres, Trans.). London: NLB Humanities Press.
59.
Maslow, A.H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50, 370-96.
60.
McSwite, O.C. (1997). Legitimacy in public administration: A discourse analysis. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
61.
Merton, R. (1940). Bureaucratic structure and personality. Social Forces, 18, 560-568.
62.
Merton, R.K. (1957). Social theory and social structure. New York: Free Press.
63.
Miliband, R. (1969). The state in capitalist society. New York: Basic Books.
64.
Mitchell, T. (1991). The limits of the state: Beyond statist approaches and their critics. The American Political Science Review, 85, 77-96.
65.
National Association of Schools of Public Affairs and Administration (2008). Standards for professional masters degree programs in public affairs, policy, administration. Retrieved January 5, 2008, from http://www.naspaa.org/accreditation/seeking/reference/standards.asp
66.
Nickel, P.M. (2007). Network governance and the new constitutionalism . Administrative Theory & Praxis, 29, 198-224.
67.
Nickel, P.M., & Eikenberry, A.M. (2006). Beyond public vs. private management: The transformative potential of democratic feminist management . Administrative Theory & Praxis, 28, 359-380.
68.
Nickel, P.M. and Eikenberry, A.M. (2009). The discourse of marketized philanthropy: A critique of consumption, profit, and media celebration as the basis for benevolence. American Behavioral Scientist, 52(7).
69.
Pierre, J. (Ed.). (2000). Debating governance: Authority, steering, and democracy. New York : Oxford University Press.
70.
Poulantzas, N. (1969). The problem of the capitalist state. New Left Review, 58, 67-78.
71.
Raadschelders, J.C.N. (2005). Government and public administration: Challenges to and need for connecting knowledge, Administrative Theory and Praxis, 27, 602-627
72.
Rhodes, R.A.W. (1996). The new governance: Governing without government . Political Studies, 44, 652-667.
73.
Rothschild, J. (1979). The collectivist organization: An alternative to rational-bureaucratic models. American Sociological Review , 44, 509-527.
74.
Rothschild, J. (2000). Creating a just and democratic workplace: More engagement, less hierarchy. Contemporary Sociology, 29, 195-213.
75.
Ryan, M. (1982). Marxism and deconstruction: A critical articulation . Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
76.
Salamon, L.M., & Elliott, O.V. (2002). Tools of government: A guide to the new governance . Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
77.
Sorensen, E. (2002). Democratic Theory and Network Governance. Administrative Theory and Praxis, 24, 693-720.
78.
Sorensen, E., & Torfing, J. (2005). Network governance and post liberal democracy . Administrative Theory and Praxis, 27, 197-237.
79.
Stivers, C. (2000). Bureau men settlement women: Constructing public administration in the progressive era. Lawrence: University of Kansas Press.
80.
Touraine, A. (1988). The return of the actor: Social theory in postindustrial society. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
81.
Waldo, D. (1948). The administrative state: A study of the political theory of American public administration. New York: Ronald Press.
82.
Wamsley, G.L. & Wolf, J.F. (1990). Refounding Public Administration. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
83.
Weber, M. (1946). Bureaucracy. In H. H. Gerth & C. W. Mills (Eds.), From Max Weber: Essays in sociology (pp. 196-244). New York: Oxford University Press.
84.
Weber, M. (1947). The Fundamental Concept of Sociology. In T. Parsons, (Ed.), The theory of social and economic organization (pp. 88-112) New York: Free Press.
85.
White, J.D. (1986, January-February). On the growth of knowledge in public administration, Public Administration Review, 46, 15-24.
86.
Wilson, W. (1887). The study of administration. In J. M. Shafritz & A. C. Hyde (Eds.), Classics of public administration (pp. 14-26). New York: Harcourt Brace.
87.
Yanow, D. (1996). American ethnogenesis and public administration , Administration and Society, 27, 483-509.
88.
Yanow, D. (2004). Translating local knowledge at organizational peripheries. British Journal of Management, 15, S9-S25.
