The objective of this article is to determine the relationships between board members' involvement in prescribed activities of boards of directors and the performance of public transit systems. It analyzes the degree to which board members are involved in prescribed activities of boards of directors as an indication of their effectiveness using self-rated survey responses. Then, it identifies public transit organizational performance measures from Section 15 sources and determines their relationships with board performance. One significant finding is that involvement in board educational activities may enable the board to pressure the transit systems they oversee to operate their existing fleets more efficiently to reduce cost per vehicle hour. Similarly, involvement in strategic activities could make boards put pressure on transit systems to be cost effective.
Axelrod, N. (1994). Board leadership and board development. In Herman R. D. & Associates (Ed.), The Jossey-Bass handbook of nonprofit leadership and management (pp. 119-136). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
2.
Bart, C.K. (2001). Measuring the mission effect in human intellectual capital. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 2, 320-330.
3.
Bart, C.K., & Bontis, N. (2003). Distinguishing between the board and management in company mission: Implication for corporate governance. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 4, 361-381.
4.
Belkhir, M. (2004). Board of directors size and performance in banking . Social Science Research Network. Retrieved November 7, 2007, from http://ssrn.com/absract=604505
5.
Bradshaw, P., Murray, V., & Wolpin, J. (1992). Do nonprofit boards make a difference? An exploration of the relationships among board structure, process, and effectiveness. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 21, 227-249.
6.
Busco, C., Giovannoni, E., Riccabini, A., Franceschi, D., & Frigo, M.L. (2007). Linking governance to strategy: The role of the finance organization. Strategic Finance, 89(3), 22-28.
7.
Chu, X., Fielding, G.J., & Lamar, B.W. (1992). Measuring transit performance using data envelopment analysis. Transportation Research, 26A(3), 223-230.
Daft, R.L. (1998). Organization theory and design, 6th. ed. Cincinnati, OH: Southwest Publishing Co.
10.
Dees, J.G. (1998). Enterprising nonprofits. Harvard Business Review, 76, 55-67.
11.
Demb, A., & Neubauer, F.F. (1992). The corporate board: Confronting the paradoxes. New York: Oxford University Press.
12.
Drucker, P. (1954). The practice of management. New York: Harper & Row.
13.
Forbes, D.P., & Milliken, F.J. (1999). Cognition and corporate governance: Understanding boards of directors as strategic decision-making groups, Academy of Management Review, 24, 489-505.
14.
Golden, B.R., & Zajac, E.J. (201). When will boards influence strategy? Inclination × Power = Strategy change. Strategic Management Journal, 22, 1087-1111.
15.
Gompers, P.A., Ishii, J.L., & Mtrick, A. (2003). Corporate governance and equity prices. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118, 107-155.
16.
Green, J.C., & Griesinger, D.W. (1996). Board performance and organizational effectiveness in non-profit social service organizations. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 6, 381-402.
17.
Green, W.H. (2007). Econometric Modeling Guide, LIMDEP, Econometric Software (Version 9.0, Vol. 1) [Computer software]. New York: Econometric Software, Inc.
18.
Herman, R.D., & Heimovics, R.D. (1991). Executive leadership in nonprofit organizations: New strategies for shaping executive-board dynamics . San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
19.
Herman, R.D., & Renz, D.O. (1997). Multiple constituencies and the social construction of nonprofit organization effectiveness. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 26, 185-206.
20.
Herman, R.D., & Renz, D.O. (2000). Board practices of especially effective and less effective local nonprofit organizations. American Review of Public Administration, 30, 146-160.
21.
Hilman, A.J., Canella, A.A., Jr., & Paetzold, R.L. (2000). The resource dependence role of corporate directors: Strategic adaptation of board composition in response to environmental change. Journal of Management Studies , 37, 235-255.
22.
Ingley, C.B., & van der Walt, N.T. (2003). Board configuration: Building better boards. Corporate Governance, 3(4), 5-17.
23.
Jackson, D., & Holland, T. (1998). Measuring the effectiveness of nonprofit boards . Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 27, 159-182.
24.
Klein, A. (1998). Firm performance and board committee structure . Journal of Law and Economics, 33, 275-303.
25.
Klein, A. (2002). Audit committee, board of director characteristics, and earnings management. Journal of Accounting and Economics , 33, 375-400.
26.
Larcker, D.F., Richardson, S.A., & Tuna, I. (2007). Corporate governance, accounting outcomes, and organizational performance. Accounting Review, 82(4), 963-1008.
27.
Lawler, E.E., III, Finegold, D., Benson, G., & Conger, J. (2002a). Adding value in the boardroom. MIT Sloan Management Review. Winter, pp. 92-93.
28.
Lawler, E.E., III, Finegold, D., Benson, G., & Conger, J. (2002b). Corporate boards: Keys to effectiveness. Organizational Dynamics, 30, 310-324.
Letts, C.W., Ryan, W.P., & Grossman, A. (1999). High performance nonprofit organizations: Managing upstream for greater impact. New York: John Wiley.
31.
McDonagh, K.J., & Umbdenstock, R.J. (2006). Hospital governing boards: A study of their effectiveness in relation to organizational performance. Journal of Healthcare Management, 51(6), 377-391.
32.
Millstein, I.M., & MacAvoy, P.W. (1998). The active board of directors and performance of large publicly traded corporations. Columbia Law Review , 98(5), 1283-1322.
33.
Nelson, J. (2005). Corporate practices, CEO characteristics and firm performance. Journal of Corporate Finance, 11(1-2), 197-228.
34.
Obeng, K., & Azam, G. (1995). The intended relationship between federal operating subsidy and cost. Public Finance Quarterly, 23(1), 72-94.
35.
Obeng, K., & Ugboro, I. (2005). A study of the activities and roles of public transit boards. Transportation Journal, 44(3), 51-76.
36.
Preisser, J.S., & Qaqish, B.F. (1999). Robust regression for clustered data with application to binary responses. Biometrics, 55, 574-570.
37.
Quinn, R.E., & Rohrbaugh, J. (1981). A competing values approach to organizational effectiveness, Public Productivity Review, 5, 122-140.
38.
Taylor, B.E., Chait, R.P., & Holland, T.P. (1996). The new work of the nonprofit board. Harvard Business Review, 74, 36-47.
39.
Walton, E.L. & Dawson, S. (2001). Managers' perceptions of criteria of organizational effectiveness, Journal of Management Studies, 38, 173-199.
40.
Williams, R.L. (2000). A note on robust estimation for cluster-correlated data. Biometrics, 56, 645-646.
41.
Williamson, O.E. (2002). The theory of the firm as governance structure: From choice to contract. Journal of Economics Perspectives , 16(3), 171-195.
42.
Yates, B.T. (1996). Analyzing costs, procedures, processes, and outcomes in human services. Applied Social Research Methods Services Vol. 42. Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage.
43.
Yuchtman, E., & Seashore, S.E. (1967). A systems resource approach to organizational effectiveness. American Sociology Review , 32, 891-903.
