We live in a world of numbers, but numbers have become so dominant that we consider nothing to be real unless it can be measured and mathematized. How did we come to live by the numbers? An answer is offered by Edmund Husserl. By constructing a history of mathematics rooted in the geometry of land surveying, it is possible to point to breaking points showing how it came to be that man is no longer the measure of all things. This provides indicators of typical misuses of measurement to be avoided in management.
Carnevale, D. (2003). Organization development in the public sector. Boulder, CO: Westview.
2.
Derrida, J. (1989). Edmund Husserl's origin of geometry: An introduction(J. P. Leavey, Jr., Trans.). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press—Bison Books. (Originalwork published 1962)
3.
Follett, M. P. (1977). The giving of orders. In E. M. Fox& L. Urwick (Eds.), Dynamic administration: The collected papers of Mary Parker Follett(pp. 21-41). New York: Hippocrene. (Original work published 1925)
4.
Husserl, E. (1970). The crisis of the European science and transcendental phenomenology: An introduction to phenomenological philosophy(D. Carr, Trans.). Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press. (Original work published 1936)
5.
Kant, I. (1965). Critique of pure reason(2nd ed., N. K. Smith, Trans.). New York: St. Martin's. (Original work published 1787)
6.
Presidential Commission on the Space Shuttle ChallengerAccident. (1986). Report to the President(Vol. 4). Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
7.
Rai, S. (2004, June 13). Short on priests, U.S. Catholics outsource prayers to Indian clergy. The New York Times, p. 13-13.
8.
Stivers, C. (2003). Administration versus management: A reading from beyond the boundaries. Administration & Society, 35, 210-230.
9.
Subramani, M., Nerur, S. P., & Mahapatra, R. (n.d.). Examining the intellectual structure of knowledge management, 1990-2002—An author co-citation analysis(Working Paper 03-23). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Management Information Systems Research Center.
10.
Thayer, F. (1980). Organization theory as an epistemology: Transcending hierarchy and objectivity. In C. J. Bellone (Ed.), Organization theory and the new public administration (pp. 113-139). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
11.
Weber, M. (1924). Zur psychophysik der industriellen arbeit (1908-1909) [On the psychophysiology of industrial labor]. In M. Weber (Ed.), Gesammelte aufsaetze zur soziologie und sozialpolitik. Tuebingen, Germany: J.C.B. Mohr.
12.
White, J. D. (1999). Taking language seriously: The narrative foundations of public administration research. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
13.
White, J. D., & Adams, G. B. (Eds.). (1994). Research in public administration: Reflections on theory and practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
14.
Winerip, M. (2003, April 16). On education: Testing fad achieves new levels with the disabled. The New York Times, p. A16-A16.
