The article discusses two vital aspects of the current debate about the societal importance and future role of data, information, and knowledge in the context of social organization, administration, and government. First, it is argued that the debate concerning Big Data suffers from faulty assumptions regarding the societal significance and power of information which needs to be extended to a more comprehensive investigation about the social role of knowledge. Second, the theoretical positions brought forward are illustrated by revisiting an episode from the early history of the social sciences, arguing that misguided ideas about the possibility of “Social Physics” have failed before and are likely to fail again, due to the complexity of social behavior.
BeirneP. (1987). Adolphe Quetelet and the origins of positivist criminology. American Journal of Sociology, 92, 1140-1169.
6.
BellD. (1979). The social framework of the information society. In DertouzosM. L.MosesJ. (Eds.), The computer age: A twenty-year view (pp. 163-211). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
7.
CameronW. B. (1963). Informal sociology: A casual introduction to sociological thinking. New York, NY: Random House.
8.
CortadaJ. W. (2018). Exploring how ICTs and administration are entwined: The promise of information ecosystems. Administration & Society, 50, 1213-1237.
9.
DesouzaK. C.JacobB. (2017). Big Data in the public sector: Lessons for practitioners and scholars. Administration & Society, 49, 1043-1064.
10.
FloridiL. (2014). The 4th revolution: How the infosphere is reshaping human reality. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
11.
JanssenM.van den HovenJ. (2015). Big and Open Linked Data (BOLD) in government: A challenge to transparency and privacy?Government Information Quarterly, 32, 363-368.
12.
LakeR. W. (2017). Big Data, urban governance, and the ontological politics of hyperindividualism. Big Data & Society, 4, 1-10
13.
LazarsfeldP. F. (1961). Notes on the history of quantification in sociology: Trends, sources and problems. Isis, 52, 277-333.
14.
MaciejewskiM. (2017). To do more, better, faster and more cheaply: Using big data in public administration. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 83(Suppl. 1), 120-135.
15.
MergelI.RethemeyerR. K.IsettK. (2016). Big data in public affairs. Public Administration Review, 76, 928-937.
16.
MertonR. K. (1957). Social theory and social structure. New York, NY: Free Press.
17.
MertonR. K. (1948). The self-fulfilling prophecy. Antioch Review, 8, 193-210.
18.
MorozovE. (2014). To save everything, click here: The folly of technological solutionism. New York, NY: PublicAffairs.
19.
NassehiA. (2014, April25). Wer hat die privaten Daten verraten? [Who gave away the private data?] Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung.
20.
PentlandA. (2014). Social Physics: How good ideas spread–the lessons from a new science. New York, NY: Penguin.
21.
PopitzH. (1968). Über die Präventivwirkung des Nichtwissens [About the preventive effect of ignorance]. Tübingen, Germany: Mohr.
22.
QueteletA. (1831). Research on the propensity for crime at different ages (Translated and introduced by SylvesterSawyer F.). Cincinnati, OH: Anderson. (Original work published 1984)
23.
QueteletA. (1842). A treatise on man and the development of his faculties. Edinburgh: W. and R. Chambers. (Original work published 1835)
24.
QueteletA. (1846). Lettres a S.A.R., le Duc Regnant de Saxe-Coburg et Gotha, sur la theorie des probabilites [Letters on the theory of probabilities]. Brussels, Belgium: M. Hayez.
25.
QueteletA. (1848). Du systeme social et des lois qui le regissent [The social system and the laws that govern it]. Paris, France: Guillaumin.
26.
SeemannM. (2015). Digital tailspin: Ten rules for the internet after Snowden (Network Notebooks 09). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Institute of Network Cultures.
27.
StalderF. (2012). Between democracy and spectacle: The front-end and the back-end of the social web. In MandibergM. (Ed.), The social media reader (pp. 242-256). New York, NY: New University Press.
