The study of networks is a growth area in public management. This article argues that small studies of networks need to be supplemented with large n studies that permit one to include more theoretically relevant control variables and to deal with issues of causality. Using survey data from several hundred agency heads, this article presents a reliable measure of management network activities that has demonstrated substantial empirical import. If the right network nodes are selected, contact information on only a limited number of nodes is needed. Who initiates contacts within the network is also shown to be important.
Agranoff, R.,& McGuire, M. (2003). Collaborative public management: New strategies for local governments. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
2.
Bogason, P.,& Toonen, T. (1998). Comparing networks. Public Administration, 6, 205-407.
3.
Bressers, H., O’Toole, L. J., Jr.,& Richardson, J. (Eds.). (1995). Networks for water policy: A comparative perspective. London: Frank Cass.
4.
Gulati, R. (1995). Does familiarity breed trust? The implications of repeated ties for contractual choice in alliances. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 85-112.
5.
Hall, T. E.,& O’Toole, L. J., Jr. (2000). Structures for policy implementation: An analysis of national legislation, 1965-66 and 1993-94. Administration & Society, 31, 667-686.
6.
Hall, T. E.,& O’Toole, L. J., Jr. (2004). Shaping formal networks through the regulatory process. Administration & Society, 36 (2), 1-22.
7.
Juenke, E. G. (2005). Management tenure and network time: How experience weights network activity. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 15 (1), 113-131.
8.
Klijn, E. (1996). Analyzing and managing policy processes in complex networks: Atheoretical examination of the concept policy network and its problems. Administration& Society, 28, 90-119.
9.
Mandell, M. (Ed.). (2001). Getting results through collaboration: Networks and network structures for public policy and management. Westport, CT: Quorum.
10.
McGuire, M. (2002). Managing networks: Propositions on what managers do and why they do it. Public Administration Review, 62, 599-609.
11.
Meier, K. J., & O’Toole, L. J., Jr. (2001). Managerial strategies and behavior in networks: A model with evidence from U.S. public education. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 11, 271-295.
12.
Meier, K. J., & O’Toole, L. J., Jr. (2002). Public management and organizational performance: The impact of managerial quality. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 21, 629-643.
13.
Meier, K. J., & O’Toole, L. J., Jr. (2003). Public management and educational performance: The impact of managerial networking. Public Administration Review, 63, 689-699.
14.
Meier, K. J.,& O’Toole, L. J., Jr. (2004). Conceptual issues in modeling and measuring management and its impacts on performance. In L. E. Lynn, Jr., & P. W. Ingraham (Eds.), Effective government: How organization and management affect performance (pp. 195-223). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
15.
Milward, H. B., & Provan, K. G. (2000). Governing the hollow state. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10, 359-379.
16.
Moore, W. H. (1998). Repression and dissent: Substitution, context and timing. American Journal of Political Science, 42, 851-873.
17.
O’Toole, L. J., Jr. (1996). Rational choice and the public management of interorganizational networks. In D. F. Kettl & H. B. Milward (Eds.), The state of public management (pp. 241-263). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
18.
O’Toole, L. J., Jr. (1997). Treating networks seriously: Practical and research-based agendas in public administration. Public Administration Review, 57, 45-52.
19.
O’Toole, L. J., Jr., & Meier, K. J. (1999). Modeling the impact of public management: The implications of structural context. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 9, 505-526.
20.
O’Toole, L. J., Jr.,& Meier, K. J. (2003). Plus ça change: Public management, personnel stability, and organizational performance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 13, 43-64.
21.
O’Toole, L. J., Jr.,& Meier, K. J. (2004a). Desperately seeking Selznick: Cooptation and the dark side of managing networks. Public Administration Review, 64 (6), 681-693.
22.
O’Toole, L. J., Jr., & Meier, K. J. (2004b). Public management in intergovernmental networks: Matching structural and behavioral networks. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 14 (4), 469-494.
23.
O’Toole, L. J., Jr., Meier, K. J.,& Nicholson-Crotty, S. (2005). Managingupward, downward and outward: Networks, hierarchical relationships and performance. Public Management Review, 7 (1), 45-68.
24.
Overman, E. S., & Boyd, K. J. (1994). Best practice research and postbureaucratic reform. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 4, 67-83.
25.
Peterson, J.,& O’Toole, L. J., Jr. (2001). Federal governance in the US and the EU: A policy network perspective. InK. Nicolaidis& R. Howse (Eds.), The federal vision: Legitimacy and levels of governance in the US and the EU (pp. 300-334). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
26.
Provan, K. G., & Milward, H. B. (1991). Institutional-level norms and organizational involvement in a service-implementation network. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 1, 391-417.
27.
Provan, K. G.,& Milward, H. B. (1995). Apreliminary theory of interorganizational network effectiveness: A comparative study of four community mental health systems. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 1-33.
28.
Provan, K. G., & Milward, H. B. (2000). Governing the hollow state. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10, 359-380.
29.
Raab, J. (2002). Where do policy networks come from?Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 12, 581-622.
30.
Rainey, H. G. (2003). Understanding and managing public organizations (3rd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
31.
Rhodes, R. A. W. (1997). Understanding governance: Policy networks, reflexivity, and accountability. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
32.
Salminen, A. (2003). Governing networks. Volume 22, International Institute of Administrative Sciences Monographs. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: IOS Press.
33.
Scharpf, F. W. (Ed.). (1993). Games in hierarchies and networks: Analytical and empirical approaches to the study of governmental institutions. Boulder, CO: Westview.
34.
Scharpf, F. W. (1997). Games real actors play: Actor-centered institutionalism in policy research. Boulder, CO: Westview.
35.
van Bueren, E. V., Klijn, E., & Koopenjan, J. (2003). Dealing with wicked problems in networks: Analyzing an environmental debate from a network perspective. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 13 (2), 193-212.
