Why do Americans consider joining the military? Americans’s values, their perceptions of military benefits, their confidence in meeting military entrance requirements, and their family connections to the military may affect their likelihood of considering military service. This article tests these hypotheses with the results from a novel survey fielded to a large nationally representative sample of American nonveteran adults within military age guidelines. The results suggest that, for the average American 18- to 41-year-old nonveteran, four factors are associated with an increased likelihood of having considered military service: having a first-order family connection to the military, having favorable views of military salary or nonsalary benefits, being confident about eligibility for military service, and viewing patriotism as an important value.
AgrestiA. (2015). Foundations of linear and generalized linear models. Wiley.
2.
AnsolabehereS.SchaffnerB. F. (2014). Does survey mode still matter? Findings from a 2010 multi-mode comparison. Political Analysis, 22(3), 285–303. https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpt025
3.
BachmanJ. G.SegalD. R.Freedman-DoanP.O’MalleyP. M. (2000). Who chooses military service? Correlates of propensity and enlistment in the U.S. Armed Forces. Military Psychology, 12(1), 1–30.
BowenG. L. (1986). Intergenerational occupational inheritance in the military: A reexamination. Adolescence, 21(83), 623–629.
6.
CoppockA.McClellanO. (2019). Validating the demographic, political, psychological, and experimental results obtained from a new source of online survey respondents. Research and Politics, 6(1), 1–14.
7.
CornesseC.BlomA. G.DutwinD.KrosnickJ. A.De LeeuwE. D.LegleyeS.PasekJ.PennayD.PhillipsB.SakshaugJ. W.StruminskayaB.WenzA. (2020). A review of conceptual approaches and empirical evidence on probability and nonprobability sample survey research. Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology, 8(1), 4–36.
FarisJ. H. (1981). The all-volunteer force: Recruitment from military families. Armed Forces & Society, 7(4), 545–559.
12.
FeaverP. D. (2003). Armed servants: Agency oversight, and civil-military relations. Harvard University Press.
13.
FeaverP. D.KohnR. H.CohnL. P. (2001). The gap between military and civilian in the United States in perspective. In FeaverP. D.KohnR. H. (Eds.), Soldiers and civilians: The civil-military gap and American National Security (pp. 1–12). MIT Press.
14.
FinerS. E. (1962). The man on horseback: The role of the military in politics. Praeger.
GibsonJ. L.GriepentrogB. K.MarshS. M. (2007). Parental influence on youth propensity to join the military. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 70(3), 525–541.
HuddyL. (2023). National identity, patriotism, and nationalism. In HuddyL.SearsD. O.LevyJ. S.JeritJ. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of political psychology (pp. 733–768). Oxford University Press.
19.
HuddyL.KhatibN. (2007). American patriotism, national identity, and political involvement. American Journal of Political Science, 51(1), 63–77.
20.
HuntingtonS. P. (1957). The soldier and the state: The theory and politics of civil-military relations. Harvard University Press.
21.
JanowitzM.MoskosC. C. (1974). Racial composition in the all-volunteer force. Armed Forces & Society, 1(1), 109–123.
22.
JanowitzM.MoskosC. C. (1979). Five years of the all-volunteer force. Armed Forces & Society, 5(2), 171–218.
23.
JohnsonT.DawesC. T.McGueM.IaconoW. G. (2018). Numbers assigned in the Vietnam-era selective service lotteries influence the military service decisions for children born to draft-eligible men. Armed Forces & Society, 44(2), 347–367.
SegalD. R. (1986). Measuring the institutional/occupational change thesis. Armed Forces & Society, 12(3), 35–375.
42.
SegalD. R.BachmanG. G.Freedman-DoanPeterO’MalleyP. M. (1999). Propensity to serve in the U.S. Military: Temporal trends and subgroup differences. Armed Forces & Society, 25(3), 407–427.
43.
SegalD. R.De AngelisK. (2009). Changing conceptions of the military as a profession. In NielsenS. C.SniderD. M. (Eds.), American civil-military relations: The soldier and the state in the new era (pp. 194–212). Johns Hopkins University Press.
StetsJ. E.Burke PeterJ. (2000). Identity theory and social identity theory. Social Psychology Quarterly, 63(3), 224–237.
47.
StopherP. (2012). Data expansion and weighting. In StopherP. (Ed.), Collecting, managing, and assessing data using sample surveys (pp. 418–430). Cambridge University Press.
48.
TaylorJ. K.ClerkinR. M.NgaruiyaK. M.VelezA.-L. K. (2015). An exploratory study of public service motivation and the institutional–occupational model of the military. Armed Forces & Society, 41(1), 142–162.
49.
TaylorW. A. (2016). Military service and American democracy: From World War II to the Iraq and Afghanistan wars. University Press of Kansas.
50.
ThomasG. W. (1984). Military parental effects and career orientation under the AVF: Enlisted personnel. Armed Forces & Society, 10(2), 293–231.
51.
U.S. Census Bureau. (n.d.-a). Sex by age by veteran status for the civilian population 18 years and over, American community survey 2023 1-year estimates table B21001. U.S. Department of Commerce. https://data.census.gov/table/ACSDT1Y2023.B21001?q=veteran
WoodruffT.KeltyR.SegalD. R. (2006). Propensity to serve and motivation to enlist among American Combat Soldiers. Armed Forces & Society, 32(3), 353–366.
54.
WoodruffT.KeltyR.SegalD. R. (2025). Revisiting propensity to serve and motivations to enlist: Insights and implications for contemporary military recruitment challenges and research. Armed Forces & Society, 51(2), 482–491.
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
