Can nonstate militants professionalize? That is the core question of this piece. Discussions of professionalism have spread to the state military from civilian professions such as education, medicine, and law. This piece examines whether nonstate actors exhibit the same fundamental processes found within these state-based organizations. These fundamentals are the creation of a recognized internal ethos, which acts as a collective standard for those involved. A commitment to expertise and the punishment of those who do not reach these collective expectations reinforce this ethos. To answer this question, this piece examines the development of the Provisional Irish Republican Army (PIRA) during the Troubles. It highlights consistencies and inconsistencies with traditional forces and argues that groups like the PIRA can professionalize and increase their effectiveness in doing so. This widens the field of professionalism studies and provides an additional lens through which to examine nonstate groups.
BloomM. (2016). Constructing expertise: Terrorist recruitment and “talent spotting” in the PIRA, Al Qaeda, and ISIS. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 40, 1–21.
5.
BourkeR. (2003). Peace in Ireland: The war of ideas. London, England: Vintage.
BrooksD. (1999). The business end of military intelligence: Private military companies. Military Intelligence Professional Bulletin, 25, 42–47.
8.
BrundageJ. A. (2008). The medieval origins of the legal profession: Canonists, civilians, and courts. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
9.
BuryP.KingA. (2015). A profession of love. In KingA. (Ed.), Frontline: Combat and cohesion in the Twenty-First Century (p. 200). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
10.
ButtonM.JohnT.BrearleyN. (2002). New challenges in public order policing: The professionalisation of environmental protest and the emergence of the militant environmental activist. International Journal of the Sociology of Law, 30, 17–32.
11.
Chief of the General Staff. (2006). An analysis of military operations in Northern Ireland. Ministry of Defence.
CormanS. R. (2006). Using activity focus networks to pressure terrorist organizations. Computational & Mathematical Organization Theory, 12, 35–49.
14.
CroninA. K. (2015). ISIS is not a terrorist group: Why counterterrorism won’t stop the latest jihadist threat. Foreign Affairs, 94, 87.
15.
DillonM. (1994). The enemy within: The IRA’s war against the British. Auckland, New Zealand: Doubleday.
16.
DurkheimE. (2013). Professional ethics and civic morals. Chicago, IL: Routledge.
17.
EnglishR. (2009). Terrorism: How to respond. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
18.
FarrellT. (2001). Transnational norms and military development: Constructing Ireland’s professional army. European Journal of International Relations, 7, 63–102.
19.
FarrellT. (2005). World culture and military power. Security Studies, 14, 448–488.
20.
ForestJ. J. (2006). The making of a terrorist: Recruitment, training, and root causes. Westport, CT: Praeger Security International.
21.
HarkinG.IngramM. (2004). Stakeknife: Britain’s secret agents in Ireland. Dublin, Republic of Ireland: The O’Brien Press.
22.
HenriksenR.VinciA. (2007). Combat motivation in non-state armed groups. Terrorism and Political Violence, 20, 87–109.
23.
HigateP. (2011). ‘Cowboys and professionals’: The politics of identity work in the private and military security company. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 40, 321–341. doi:10.1177/0305829811425752.
24.
HorganJ.TaylorM. (1997). The provisional Irish Republican Army: Command and functional structure. Terrorism and Political Violence, 9, 1–32.
25.
HorganJ.TaylorM. (1999). Playing the ‘Green Card’-financing the provisional IRA: Part 1. Terrorism and Political Violence, 11, 1–38.
26.
HuntingtonS. P. (1957). The soldier and the state: The theory and politics of civil–military relationsLondon, England: Harvard University Press
27.
JanowitzM. (1961). The professional soldier: A social and political portrait. New York, NY: Free Press of Glencoe.
28.
JenkinsJ. C.EckertC. M. (1986). Channeling black insurgency: Elite patronage and professional social movement organizations in the development of the black movement. American Sociological Review, 51, 812–829.
29.
KingA. (2013). The combat soldier: Infantry tactics and cohesion in the Twentieth and Twenty-first Centuries. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
30.
McKittrickD. (2001). Lost Lives: The stories of the men, women and children who died as a result of the Northern Ireland troubles. New York, NY: Random House.
31.
MoloneyE. (2007). A secret history of the IRA. London, England: Penguin.
32.
O’DohertyS. P. (2011). The volunteer: A former IRA man’s true story. New York, NY: Strategic Book.
33.
OppenheimerA. (2009). IRA, the bombs and the bullets: A history of deadly ingenuity. Dublin, Republic of Ireland: Irish Academic Press.
34.
OrtizR. D. (2002). Insurgent strategies in the post–Cold War: The case of the revolutionary armed forces of Colombia. Studies in Conflict and Terrorism, 25, 127–143.
35.
Provisional Irish Republican Army (PIRA) ceasefires: Measures to be made in response; correspondence with Headquarters Northern Ireland; Christmas ceasefire, 1974; extension and breakdown (CJ 4/1225). (1976). Retrieved fromhttp://discovery.nationalarchives.gov.uk/details/r/C11300364
36.
QuandtW. B. (1972). Algerian military development: The PROFESSIONALIZATION of a Guerrilla Army. Retrieved from Santa Monica.
37.
SandersA. (2013). Operation Motorman (1972) and the search for a coherent British counterinsurgency strategy in Northern Ireland. Small Wars & Insurgencies, 24, 465–492.
38.
SarmaK. (2007). Defensive propaganda and IRA political control in Republican communities. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 30, 1073–1094.
39.
SmithM. L. R. (1995). Fighting for Ireland? The military strategy of the Irish Republican movement. New York, NY: Routledge.
40.
SpencerG. (2015). From armed struggle to political struggle: Republican tradition and transformation in Northern Ireland. New York, NY: Bloomsbury.
41.
StaggenborgS. (1988). The consequences of professionalization and formalization in the pro-choice movement. American Sociological Review, 53, 585–605.
