Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Military veterans serving in the U.S. House of Representatives during the 113th–115th Congresses (2013–2019) exhibited distinct legislative behavior on selected defense-related topics compared with their nonveteran colleagues. Examining 208 House roll call votes on issues salient to military veterans in which more than 90,000 individual Representative votes were cast as well as by categorizing more than 19,000 bills sponsored, this study finds that there was a small but distinct veteran voting trend that opposed Global War on Terrorism (GWOT) troop reductions. In addition, younger members exhibited a trend that suggests future Congresses may be more willing to approve use of military force than in previous decades. Finally, this study empirically demonstrates the tension in conservative fiscal policy preferences between increasing defense spending versus restraining total government expenditure.

Keywords

civil–military relations U.S. House of Representatives defense spending military effectiveness defense policy veterans

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Best

Vonnahme

(2021). Military service and legislative agendas: A study of legislators in four states. Armed Forces & Society, 47(2), 367–385. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095327X19848009

Betts

(1991). Soldier, statesmen, and cold war crises. Columbia University Press.

Bianco

(2005). Last post for “the greatest generation”: The policy implications of the decline of military experience in the US congress. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 30(1), 85–102.

Bianco

Markham

(2001). Vanishing veterans: The decline of military experience in the U.S. congress. In Feaver

Kohn

(Eds.), Soldiers and civilians: The civil-military gap and American National Security (pp. 275–288). MIT Press.

Boles

Scheurer

(2007). Beyond women, children, and families: Gender, representation, and public funding for the arts. Social Science Quarterly, 88(1), 39–50.

Burden

(2007). Personal roots of representation. Princeton University Press.

Dolan

(1998). Support for women’s interests in the 103rd congress. Women & Politics, 18(4), 81–94.

Feaver

Gelpi

(2004). Choosing your battles: American civil-military relations and the use of force. Princeton University Press.

Gelpi

Feaver

(2002). Speak softly and carry a big stick? Veterans in the political elite and the American use of force. The American Political Science Review, 96(4), 779–793.

10.

Gronke

Feaver

(2001). Uncertain confidence civilian and military attitudes about civil military relations. In Feaver

Kohn

(Eds.), Soldiers and civilians: The civil-military gap and American National Security (pp. 129–161). MIT Press.

11.

Hlavac

(2018). Stargazer: Well-formatted regression and summary statistics tables (R package version 5.2.1). CRAN.R-project.org/package=stargazer

12.

Kalb

(2013). It’s called the Vietnam Syndrome, and it’s back. Brookings Institute. brookings.edu/blog/up-front/2013/01/22/its-called-the-vietnam-syndrome-and-its-back/

13.

Lupton

(2017). Out of service, into the house: Military experience and congressional war oversight. Political Research Quarterly, 70(2), 327–339.

14.

Newport

(Ed.). (2012). The Gallup poll: Public opinion 2011. Rowman & Littlefield.

15.

Rocca

Sanchez

Nikora

(2009). The role of personal attributes in African American roll-call voting behavior in congress. Political Research Quarterly, 62(2), 408–414.

16.

RStudio. (2012). RStudio software package (Version 1.2.1335) [Computer software]. RStudio: Integrated Development Environment for R.

17.

Schiller

(1995). Senators as political entrepreneurs: Using bill sponsorship to shape legislative agendas. American Journal of Political Science, 39(1), 186–203.

18.

Swers

(1998). Are women more likely to vote for women’s issue bills than their male colleagues? Legislative Studies Quarterly, 23(3), 435–448.

19.

Washington

(2008). Female socialization: How daughters affect their legislator fathers’ voting on women’s issues. American Economic Review, 98(1), 311–332.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

2.06 MB

The Relationship Between Military Service and Legislative Behavior for U.S. Representatives in Recent Congresses

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material