Research suggests that marginalized groups can use military service to win greater governmental and social acceptance by using civic republican rhetoric, however, conditions in which claims-making rhetoric is coercive are underspecified. Because rhetorical effectiveness requires sympathetic ears, we examine the influence of (1) expectations and political efforts of marginalized group members seeking greater acceptance, (2) whether majority group economic status is outpacing marginalized groups seeking improved treatment, and (3) whether marginalized groups have influential military veterans from majority groups as allies. We apply these factors to explain the claims-making failure of German Jews following the First World War and the success of African Americans after the Second World War. From the African American case, we also conclude that military service led to greater socio-political inclusion and rights based on development of future political actors through leadership development processes and inter-group contact, especially regarding Presidents Truman and Eisenhower.
AngressW. (1976). Prussia’s army and the Jewish reserve officer controversy before World War I. Militargeschichte Mitteilungen.
2.
AppelbaumP. (2014). Loyal sons: Jews in the German army in the great war. Vallentine Mitchell.
3.
BarberJ. (2016). The presidential character: Predicting performance in the white house (4th edition). Routledge.
4.
BesselR. (1995). Germany after the first world war. Clarendon.
5.
BestR. H. (2019). [Re]Negotiating citizenship through Military service. In ThomasK. H.HunterK. (Eds.), Invisible veterans: What happens when military women become civilians again. ABC-CLIO.
6.
BondB. (1986). War and society in Europe, 1870-1970. Oxford University Press.
7.
BrehmJ.RahnW. (1997). Individual-level evidence for the causes and consequences of social capital. American Journal of Political Science, 41(3), 999–1023. https://doi.org/10.2307/2111684.
8.
CentenoM. (2010). Concluding reflection: What wars do. In KierE.KrebsR. R. (Eds), In war’s wake: International Conflict and the fate of liberal democracy. Cambridge University Press.
9.
CrimB. (2014). Anti-semitism in the German military community and the Jewish response, 1914-1938. Lexington Books.
10.
DallekR. (2004). Lyndon B. Johnson: Portrait of a president. Oxford University Press.
11.
DaviesJ. C. (1962). Toward a theory of revolution. American Sociological Review, 27(1), 5–19. https://doi.org/10.2307/2089714.
12.
DiehlJ. M. (1975). Germany: Veteran’s politics under three flags. In WardS. (Ed.), The war generation: Veterans of the first world war. Kennikat Press.
13.
DiehlJ. M. (1993). The thanks of the fatherland: German veterans after the second world war. University of North Carolina Press.
14.
EisenhowerD. (1952). Address to the American Legion. https://archive.legion.org/handle/20.500.12203/6797.Summary of Proceedings, 34th Annual National Convention of The American Legion, Milwaukee, WI, 25–28 August, 1952.
15.
FairlieR. W.SundstromW. A. (1999). The emergence, persistence, and recent widening of the racial unemployment gap. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 52(2), 252–270. https://doi.org/10.2307/2525165.
16.
FreidelF.BrinkleyA. (1982). America in the Twentieth century (5th edition). Knopf.
17.
FrevertUte. (2004). A nation in barracks: Modern Germany, military conscription, and civil society. Berg.
18.
GardnerM. (2002). Harry Truman and civil rights. Southern Illinois University Press.
19.
GayR. (1992). The Jews of Germany: A historical portrait. Yale University Press.
20.
GellerR. S. (2017). Minorities in the Israeli military, 1948–58. Lexington Books.
21.
GradyT. (2011). The German-Jewish soldiers of the first world war in history and memory. Liverpool University Press.
HuntingtonS.P. (1985). The soldier and the state. Harvard University Press.
25.
KaneR.B. (2002). Disobedience and conspiracy in the German army, 1918-1945. McFarland & Company.
26.
KierE.KrebsR. (2010). Introduction: War and democracy in comparative perspective. In KierE.KrebsR. (Eds.), War’s wake: International conflict and the fate of liberal democracy. Cambridge University Press.
27.
KlinknerP.A.SmithR. M. (1999). The unsteady march: The rise and decline of racial equality in America. University of Chicago Press.
KrebsR. R. (2004). A school for the nation? How military service does not build nations, and how it might. International Security, 28(4), 85–124. https://doi.org/10.1162/0162288041588278.
30.
KrebsR. (2006). Fighting for rights: Military service and the politics of citizenship. Cornell University Press.
31.
KrebsR. R.JacksonP. T. (2007). Twisting tongues and twisting arms: The power of political rhetoric. European Journal of International Relations, 13(1), 35–66. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066107074284.
32.
KroschA. R.TylerT. R.AmodioD. M. (2017). Race and recession: Effects of economic scarcity on racial discrimination. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113(6), 892–909. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000112.
33.
LealD. L.TeigenJ. M. (2018). Military service and political participation in the United States: Institutional experience and the vote. Electoral Studies, 53, 99–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2017.09.004.
34.
LeShanL. (2002). The Psychology of war: Comprehending its Mystique and it’s Madness. Helios Press.
MacGregorM.J. (1981). Integration of the armed forces, 1940-1965. U.S. Government Printing Office.
37.
MacMillanM. (2003). Paris 1919: Six months that changed the world. Random House.
38.
MaleyA. J.HawkinsD. N. (2018). The southern military tradition: Socio demographic factors, cultural legacy, and U.S. Army enlistments. Armed Forces & Society, 44(2), 195–218. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095327x17700851.
39.
McAdamD.TarrowS.TillyC. (2001). Dynamics of contention. Cambridge University Press.
40.
McCulloughD. (1992). Truman. Simon & Schuster Paperbacks.
41.
MesserschmidtM. (1995). The military elites in Germany since 1870: comparisons and contrasts with the French officer corps. Chapter 3. In MüllerK. (Ed.), The military in politics and society in France and Germany in the twentieth century. Berg.
MorrisA. (1986). The origins of the civil rights movement: Black communities organizing for change. Free Press.
44.
MüllerK. (1995). The military, politics and society in France and Germany. Chapter 1. In MüllerK. (Ed.), The military in politics and society in France and Germany in the twentieth century. Berg.
45.
NadelsonT. (2005). Trained to kill: Soldiers at war. The Johns Hopkins University Press.
46.
NicholsD. A. (2007). A matter of justice: Eisenhower and the beginning of the civil rights revolution. Simon and Schuster.
47.
O'DonnellH.O'DonnellK. (2015). The Irish brotherhood: John F. Kennedy, his inner circle, and the improbable rise to the presidency. Counterpoint.
48.
O'ReillyK. (1995). Nixon’s piano: Presidents and racial politics from Washington to Clinton. Free Press.
49.
OberschallA. (1973). Social conflict and social movements. Prentice-Hall.
50.
OliverP.MarwellG.TeixeiraR. (1985). A theory of the critical mass. I. Interdependence, group heterogeneity, and the production of collective action. American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), 522–556. https://doi.org/10.1086/228313.
51.
OlzakS. (1990). The political context of competition: Lynching and urban racial violence, 1882–1914. Social Forces, 69(2), 395–421. https://doi.org/10.2307/2579665.
52.
ParkerC. (2009). Fighting for democracy: Black veterans and the struggle against white supremacy in the postwar south. Princeton University Press.
PettigrewT. F.TroppL. R. (2006). A meta-analytic test of inter-group contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(5), 751–783. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.90.5.751.
55.
PfiffnerJ. P. (2010). US blunders in Iraq: De-Baathification and disbanding the army. Intelligence and National Security, 25(1), 76–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/02684521003588120.
56.
Public Papers of the Presidents of the United States (1966). Public papers of the presidents of the United States: Lyndon B. Johnson, 1965 (Volume I). Government Printing Office. entry 107.
57.
RedikerM. (2004). Villains of all nations: Atlantic pirates in the golden age. Beacon Press.
SaxeR. F. (2004). Citizens first, veterans second’: The American veterans committee and the challenge of postwar ‘Independent progressives. War & Society, 22(2), 75–94. https://doi.org/10.1179/072924704791198839.
60.
SciolinoE. (2000). Carl Rowan, writer and crusader, dies at 75. The New York Times, Sept. 24.
61.
SchorschI. (1972). Jewish Reactions to German Anti-Semitism, 1870–1914. New York: Columbia University Press.
62.
ShilsE. A.JanowitzM. (1948). Cohesion and disintegration in the Wehrmacht in world war II. Public Opinion Quarterly, 12(2), 280–315. https://doi.org/10.1086/265951.
63.
SmithHJPettigrewTFPippinGMBialosiewiczS (2012). Relative deprivation: A theoretical and meta-analytic review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 16(3), 203–232. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868311430825.
64.
SmithJ.WelchF. (1989). Black economic progress after myrdal. Journal of Economic Literature, 27(2), 519–564.
65.
SparrowB. H. (2008). American political development, state-building, and the “Security State”: Reviving a research agenda. Polity, 40(3), 355–367. https://doi.org/10.1057/pol.2008.8.
SternM. (1992). Calculating visions: Kennedy, Johnson, and civil rights. Rutgers University Press.
68.
StoneD. (2015). The Kaiser’s army: The German army in world war I. Conway Bloomsbury Publishing PLC.
69.
StoufferS.SuchmanE.DeVinneyL.StarrS.WilliamsR.Jr (1965). The American soldier. Volumes I & II. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Princeton University Press.
70.
StrohnM. (2011). The German army and the defence of the Reich: Military doctrine and the conduct of the defensive battle 1918-1939. Cambridge University Press.
71.
SullivanM. J. (2019). Earned citizenship. Oxford University Press.
72.
TillyC. (1985). War making and state making as organized crime. Chapter 5. In SkocpolT.EvansP.RueschemeyerD. (Eds.), Bringing the State back in. Cambridge University Press.
73.
TillyC. (2017). From mobilization to revolution. In CastañedaE.SchneiderC. (Eds.), Collective violence, contentious politics, and social change: A Charles tilly reader. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315205021-5.
74.
TurnerJ. (1996). Henri Tajfel: an introduction. In RobinsonW. (Ed.), Social groups and Identities: Developing the Legacy of Henri Tajfel. Butterworth and Heineman.
75.
TurnerS.BoundJ. (2003). Closing the gap or widening the divide: the effects of the G.I. Bill and world war II on the educational outcomes of black Americans. The Journal of Economic History, 63(1), 145–177. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022050703001761.
76.
WalkerI.SmithH. (2002). Fifty years of relative deprivation research. In WalkerI.SmithH. (Eds.), Relative Deprivation: Specification, development, and integration. Cambridge University Press.
77.
WeberT. (2010). Hitler’s first war: Adolf Hitler, the men of the list regiment, and the First World War. Oxford University Press.
78.
WeissJ. (1996). Ideology of death: Why the holocaust happened in Germany. IR Dee.
79.
WeitzE. (2007). Weimar Germany: Promise and tragedy. Princeton University Press.
80.
WilsonC. (1947). To secure these rights: The report of the president's committee on civil rights. Simon and Schuster.
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
