U.S. forces abroad have often faced complaints about crimes committed by troops, yet we lack systematic quantitative information on such crimes. Based on newly discovered data compiled by the Army, this article presents a comprehensive and detailed picture of American troops’ criminal activity worldwide during the Cold War (1954–1970). The data show that troops engaged in significant criminality, with a particularly high rate of violent crime—homicide, rape, and robbery—and a relatively low rate of property crime. Host countries treated offending troops leniently: Prison sentences were rare, and they averaged less than 2 years in duration. The data presented here hold far-reaching implications for our understanding of the relations between U.S. forces and host countries and the legacy of U.S. military deployments.
AlbrechtH. (1995). Sentencing in the Federal Republic of Germany. Federal Sentencing Report, 7(6), 305–307.
2.
AllenM. A.FlynnM. E. (2013). Putting our best boots forward: U.S. Military deployments and host-country crime. Conflict Management and Peace Science, 30(3), 263–285.
3.
AngstL. I. (2001). The sacrifice of a schoolgirl: The 1995 rape case, discourses of power, and women’s lives in Okinawa. Critical Asian Studies, 33(2), 243–266.
4.
BakerA. P. (2004). American soldiers overseas: The global military presence. Praeger.
5.
BergM. T.BaumerE.RosenfeldR.LoeberR. (2016). Dissecting the incidence and prevalence of offending during the crime drop of the 1990s. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 32, 377–396.
6.
BiglaiserG.DeRouenK.Jr (2009). The interdependence of U.S. troop deployments and trade in the developing world. Foreign Policy Analysis, 5(3), 247–263.
7.
BraithwaiteA.KucikJ. (2018). Does the presence of foreign troops affect stability in the host country?Foreign Policy Analysis, 14(4), 536–560.
8.
CalderK. E. (2007). Embattled garrisons: Comparative base politics and American Globalism. Princeton University Press.
9.
CochranC.ChiuH. (Eds.). (1979). U.S. status of force agreements with Asian Countries: Selected countries[Occasional papers/reprints series in Contemporary Asian Studies 7]. University of Maryland School of Law.
10.
CooleyA. (2008). Base politics: Democratic change and the U.S. Military overseas. Cornell University Press.
11.
CurtinN. (2012). “We might as well write Japan off”: The state department deals with the Girard crisis of 1957. Journal of American-East Asian Relations, 19, 109–131.
FürmetzG. (2013). Insolent occupiers, aggressive protectors: Policing GI delinquency in early 1950s West Germany. In MaulucciT. W.JrJunkerD. (Eds.), GIs in Germany: The social, economic, cultural, and political history of the American Military Presence (pp. 189–211). Cambridge University Press.
18.
HeoU.YeM. (2019). U.S. Military deployment and host-nation economic growth. Armed Forces & Society, 45(2), 234–267.
19.
IkenberryG. J. (2011). Liberal Leviathan: The origins, crisis, and transformation of the American World Order. Princeton University Press.
KaneT. (2004). Global U.S. troop deployment, 1950-2003. Heritage Foundation.
22.
KawanaS.TakahashiM. (Eds.). (2021). Exploring base politics: How host countries shape the network of U.S. Overseas Bases. Routledge.
23.
KawatoY. (2015). Protests against U.S. Military base policy in Asia: Persuasion and its limits. Stanford University Press.
24.
KehoeT. J.KehoeE. J. (2016). Crimes committed by U.S. Soldiers in Europe, 1945–1946. Journal of Interdisciplinary History, 47(1), 53–84.
25.
LakeD. A. (2009). Hierarchy in international relations. Cornell University Press.
26.
LillyJ. R. (2007). Taken by force: Rape and American GIs in Europe during World War II. Palgrave Macmillan.
27.
Martinez MachainC.MorganT. C. (2013). The effect of US troop deployment on host states’ foreign policy. Armed Forces & Society, 39(1), 102–123.
28.
MoonS. (2010). Camptown prostitution and the imperial SOFA: Abuse and violence against transnational camptown women in South Korea. In HöhnM.MoonS. (Eds.), Over there: Living with the U.S. Military empire from World War II to the present (pp. 337–365). Duke University Press.
29.
NelsonD. J. (1987). Defenders or intruders? The dilemmas of U.S. Forces in Germany. Westview Press.
PackardG. R. (1966). Protest in Tokyo: The security treaty crisis of 1960. Princeton University Press.
32.
RobertsM. L. (2013). What soldiers do: Sex and the American GI in World War II France. University of Chicago Press.
33.
RossmoD. K.RoutledgeR. (1990). Estimating the size of criminal populations. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 6, 293–314.
34.
SiderH.ColeC. (1984). The changing composition of the military and the effect on labor force data. Monthly Labor Review, 107(7), 10–13.
35.
SkoganW. G. (1977). Dimensions of the dark figure of unreported crime. Crime & Delinquency, 23, 41–44.
36.
UlmerJ. T.SteffensmeierD. J. (2014). The age and crime relationship: Social variation, social explanations. In BeaverK.BarnesJ. C.BoutwellB. (Eds.), The nurture versus biosocial debate in criminology: On the origins of criminal behavior and criminality (pp. 377–396). Sage.
37.
U.S. Senate. (1953a, April7–8). Agreements relating to the status of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, armed forces, and military headquarters: Hearings before the Committee on Foreign Relations, 83rd Cong.
38.
U.S. Senate. (1953b, April28). Agreements relating to the status of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, armed forces, and military headquarters, 83rd Cong[Executive report no. 1].
39.
U.S. Senate. (1953c, June24). Agreement regarding status of forces of parties of the North Atlantic Treaty: Supplementary hearing before the Committee on Foreign Relations, 83rd Cong.
40.
U.S. Senate. (1955, July29). Operation of article VII, NATO status of forces treaty: Report of the Committee on Armed Services, 84th Cong[Senate report no. 1268].
41.
U.S. Senate. (1959, August18). Operation of article VII, NATO status of forces treaty: Hearing before a subcommittee of the Committee on Armed Services, 86th Cong.
42.
U.S. Senate. (1961, July19). Operation of article VII NATO status of forces treaty: Hearing before a subcommittee of the Committee on Armed Services, 87th Cong.
43.
U.S. Senate. (1964a, July8). Operation of article VII, NATO status of forces treaty: Report of the Committee on Armed Services, 88th Cong[Report no. 1171].
44.
U.S. Senate. (1964b, August7). Annual NATO status of forces treaty report: Hearing held before status of forces subcommittee of the Committee on Armed Services[Executive session].
45.
U.S. Senate. (1966, August26). Operation of article VII, NATO status of forces treaty: Hearing before a subcommittee of the Committee on Armed Services, 89th Cong.
46.
U.S. Senate. (1967, August15). Operation of article VII, NATO status of forces treaty: Hearing before a subcommittee of the Committee on Armed Services, 90th Cong.
47.
YeoA. I. (2011). Activists, alliances, and anti-U.S. base protests. Cambridge University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
